zoyathedestroya wrote:We replaced Gallo, Smart, and Grant with Porzingis, Banton, and Walsh and we'll win 10 more games in the RS.
Zinger has top 20 BPM.
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
zoyathedestroya wrote:We replaced Gallo, Smart, and Grant with Porzingis, Banton, and Walsh and we'll win 10 more games in the RS.
zoyathedestroya wrote:We replaced Gallo, Smart, and Grant with Porzingis, Banton, and Walsh and we'll win 10 more games in the RS.
djFan71 wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:djFan71 wrote:Cap is limited to 10% growth, contract will be 8%. So, it’s going to be less of a % of cap by the end, but not as staggeringly less as one would hope.
Isn't there supposed to be a big cap jump in 2025-2026 due to a new tv deal or is this no longer happening?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryantoporek/2022/08/05/why-nba-teams-should-already-be-planning-for-the-2025-offseason/?sh=71b0736627c4
I think the new CBA added the 10% thing. Will see if I can find a link later

ajones9219 wrote:djFan71 wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Isn't there supposed to be a big cap jump in 2025-2026 due to a new tv deal or is this no longer happening?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryantoporek/2022/08/05/why-nba-teams-should-already-be-planning-for-the-2025-offseason/?sh=71b0736627c4
I think the new CBA added the 10% thing. Will see if I can find a link later
You're right that there is a smoothing of 10% but a 10% increase of the cap is significantly higher year over year compared to the 8% increase of the 49 million starting salary Jaylen will make. So if we assume a the 295 contract and 10% yearly increases, by the fifth year, Jaylen will be at 66ish million on a cap of 202 million, or 32.6% of the total. It's really not as damaging as people think.
Curmudgeon wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:We replaced Gallo, Smart, and Grant with Porzingis, Banton, and Walsh and we'll win 10 more games in the RS.
I wouldn't count on that.
djFan71 wrote:ajones9219 wrote:djFan71 wrote:I think the new CBA added the 10% thing. Will see if I can find a link later
You're right that there is a smoothing of 10% but a 10% increase of the cap is significantly higher year over year compared to the 8% increase of the 49 million starting salary Jaylen will make. So if we assume a the 295 contract and 10% yearly increases, by the fifth year, Jaylen will be at 66ish million on a cap of 202 million, or 32.6% of the total. It's really not as damaging as people think.
Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. The % of cap lowers but it’s still pretty significant imo. 33% is still going to be 3% more than most players are eligible for. He’ll be higher than any new MAX contract still in the 5th year. Only new supermax contracts could be higher.
Hal14 wrote:fallguy wrote:Hal14 wrote:hmmm....
Why for Boston:
-You avoid having to pay JB (66th in the league last season in BPM) that insane contract which would make him the highest paid player in the league..
-You get a player (OG) who is comparable in talent, comparable in age. OG is a much better defender, has more size/length while being less of a ball stopper, less ball dominant on offense. OG had higher EPM and higher TS% last season than JB..and he comes at a fraction of the cost
-You have more clearly defined pecking order. Tatum is THE 1, Porzingis is THE 2, and OG is THE 3
-Add front court depth with Boucher, who gives us a legit 4th big to back up KP, Rob, Al since all 3 of those guys are old or injury prone. That 4 headed monster up front (with Kornet as 5th big) allows us to load manage and keep everyone fresh/healthy come playoff time
If you're trading JB it's for optimal value. This is not close to it.
JB has 1 year left on his contract, was 66th in the league in BPM and gets injured pretty often..this is good value imo. And I outlined why in my post..
ajones9219 wrote:djFan71 wrote:ajones9219 wrote:
You're right that there is a smoothing of 10% but a 10% increase of the cap is significantly higher year over year compared to the 8% increase of the 49 million starting salary Jaylen will make. So if we assume a the 295 contract and 10% yearly increases, by the fifth year, Jaylen will be at 66ish million on a cap of 202 million, or 32.6% of the total. It's really not as damaging as people think.
Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. The % of cap lowers but it’s still pretty significant imo. 33% is still going to be 3% more than most players are eligible for. He’ll be higher than any new MAX contract still in the 5th year. Only new supermax contracts could be higher.
Oh he will be making a ton no doubt but he won't be near the highest paid player in the league like he starts and having him and Tatum won't be the back breaker like I feel like people think. Zinger taking that team friendly extension was huge for us as long as he stays healthy.
Patsfan1081 wrote:ajones9219 wrote:djFan71 wrote:Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. The % of cap lowers but it’s still pretty significant imo. 33% is still going to be 3% more than most players are eligible for. He’ll be higher than any new MAX contract still in the 5th year. Only new supermax contracts could be higher.
Oh he will be making a ton no doubt but he won't be near the highest paid player in the league like he starts and having him and Tatum won't be the back breaker like I feel like people think. Zinger taking that team friendly extension was huge for us as long as he stays healthy.
It wont be but you def wont be able to have two pg making 20 mill a season and Brad will need to start using first rounders again to cheap contributing talent. I have a inkling Brad wanted to move both Brogdan and Smart so he could have resigned Grant to balance out the roster. This team just wasn’t balanced financially.
chrisab123 wrote:For some reason Grant didn't fit Joe's very basic middle school scheme. Which if you look at the player makes no frigging sense. Not surprising. The names they got aren't sexy but they might develop into something during the year. This team is still good enough for a 1 seed but I feel like they'll finish behind Miami and Milwaukee in the regular season. Miami is going to be crazy good with Dame next year. You have to hope for an injury or regression there.
CelticFaninLBC wrote:Hal14 wrote:fallguy wrote:
If you're trading JB it's for optimal value. This is not close to it.
JB has 1 year left on his contract, was 66th in the league in BPM and gets injured pretty often..this is good value imo. And I outlined why in my post..
OG can opt out of his deal next year, so basically swapping a top 25 guy for top 50 guy, who could leave next year...
Also, Porzingis was Luka's #2 guy in Dallas and they never got out of the first round...
ajones9219 wrote:djFan71 wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Isn't there supposed to be a big cap jump in 2025-2026 due to a new tv deal or is this no longer happening?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryantoporek/2022/08/05/why-nba-teams-should-already-be-planning-for-the-2025-offseason/?sh=71b0736627c4
I think the new CBA added the 10% thing. Will see if I can find a link later
You're right that there is a smoothing of 10% but a 10% increase of the cap is significantly higher year over year compared to the 8% increase of the 49 million starting salary Jaylen will make. So if we assume a the 295 contract and 10% yearly increases, by the fifth year, Jaylen will be at 66ish million on a cap of 202 million, or 32.6% of the total. It's really not as damaging as people think.
Larry_Russell wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:Hal14 wrote:JB has 1 year left on his contract, was 66th in the league in BPM and gets injured pretty often..this is good value imo. And I outlined why in my post..
OG can opt out of his deal next year, so basically swapping a top 25 guy for top 50 guy, who could leave next year...
Also, Porzingis was Luka's #2 guy in Dallas and they never got out of the first round...
You cant look at that Dallas team as a comparison to this one. This team has far superior talent
“I can’t really talk about it but it’s been all good discussion,” Stevens said. “We want Jaylen to be here for a long, long time, and we’ve made that clear. We’re looking forward to all sitting down and we have time here. I probably shouldn’t say anything else, but I feel optimistic.”

Larry_Russell wrote:ajones9219 wrote:djFan71 wrote:I think the new CBA added the 10% thing. Will see if I can find a link later
You're right that there is a smoothing of 10% but a 10% increase of the cap is significantly higher year over year compared to the 8% increase of the 49 million starting salary Jaylen will make. So if we assume a the 295 contract and 10% yearly increases, by the fifth year, Jaylen will be at 66ish million on a cap of 202 million, or 32.6% of the total. It's really not as damaging as people think.
It is.
The difference is a million or 2. Still against apron.
zoyathedestroya wrote:When you want to protect the Genius Brad's vision but then you hear him say things like this:“I can’t really talk about it but it’s been all good discussion,” Stevens said. “We want Jaylen to be here for a long, long time, and we’ve made that clear. We’re looking forward to all sitting down and we have time here. I probably shouldn’t say anything else, but I feel optimistic.”
[/quoteajones9219 wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:When you want to protect the Genius Brad's vision but then you hear him say things like this:“I can’t really talk about it but it’s been all good discussion,” Stevens said. “We want Jaylen to be here for a long, long time, and we’ve made that clear. We’re looking forward to all sitting down and we have time here. I probably shouldn’t say anything else, but I feel optimistic.”
Because Brad knows ball. Jaylen is a top 20 player in the league, why would you not want him for a long time? The jaylen hate on this board gets incredibly silly at times[/quoteSpoiler:
zoyathedestroya wrote:ajones9219 wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:When you want to protect the Genius Brad's vision but then you hear him say things like this:
Because Brad knows ball. Jaylen is a top 20 player in the league, why would you not want him for a long time? The jaylen hate on this board gets incredibly silly at times[/quote
I don't mind having a player like JB. But not at that money. Not at the BBIQ. And not at that role.