I think 2009 and 2010 (pre the elbow / Celtics series meltdown) was the most impressive basketball of James’ career) - with 2012 and 13 not too far away, and of-course flanked by many great seasons. I certainly do tax a little for how 2010 ended, and decently more for 2011 - a campaign I’m not high on as a whole. In the grand scheme of things, it may be an underrated campaign, but without hesitation I’d take 2009-17 sans 2015 (and perhaps 2018/20) James over 11. No, I don’t think it’s a black mark that eats at a GOAT case, but it’s a dent at what I would think would surely be the GOAT 5 year span ever played without what transpired that year.
Sansterre’s analysis of the 11 Heat on greatest teams, some granular YoY breakdowns of James’ game by SideShowBob, and some film study from Dr. Spaceman (unsure if any of them still use the PC board) are all great sources of what I see as explaining factors. For me, it boils down to:
1. Hubris before the season, as seen by the “not 1..2..3..” remarks and willingness to embrace the villain role all year in response to scrutiny & a sense of disdain from the basketball world (my 5th grade self included) at the time.
2. Poor roster construction and offensive infrastructure. As I mentioned earlier, the "not 1/2/3" sentiment makes/made all the less sense considering the Heatles' abysmal spacing, pretty mediocre depth and skill-set versatility, and "mindset to let James and Wade figure it out on O" - them being the two best perimeter players [if not players, I would take Dirk > Wade myself] at the time - was a bottleneck from a team success standpoint. Found a good thread from 2015 brushing on this subject (emphasis on PaulieWal's first comment too - as it pertains to this particular subject).
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=13771893. New context / situation.
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2015946&p=86156169#p86156169I linked Sansterre's T-100 project here as good food for thought. While I don't agree with some points for certain, I think it's an intriguing read as a whole from one who enjoys learning about the potential effects of "nurture" as it pertains to sport. I think a multitude of factors did create a sense of internal conflict for James (eg. having to floor raise to an unparalleled degree, the elbow injury, how 2010 ended, the desire to go down as the greatest and shatter expectations) where joining the Heat did provide some pros but at the trade-off of playing with another star (whom had won before) and under an ATG executive / GM in the Godfather himself. On top of that, iirc James was heavier then and trying to replicate a similar play-style as 2009/10 (harder to do without as much zap - let alone sharing touches with a very functionally similar player).
4. Murphy's Law. Sometimes, everything that could go wrong.. does go wrong. And was this the case with the '11 Finals. A sense of deferring to Wade and "not getting in the way", a poor offensive process as a team, the "monkey off the back" in powering through two slugfests with Boston and Chicago (two statistically better defenses) perhaps creating too much ease/confidence going in, internal conflict & self-consciousness while activating "fear" instead of "fight" led to a performance that essentially speaks for itself.
Yes that all happened. But I think it is the best thing to have happened to James' career in the grand scheme of things. Despite consistent scrutiny and banter (still seen to this day), I don't think James could have done a better job tuning his self-consciousness towards improvement [from an individual and team standpoint], not second guessing it and trusting a hunch to figure out opponents / get better as a series goes on, and never looking back amidst a real slap in the face.