ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,849
And1: 2,679
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#381 » by younggunsmn » Sat Jul 22, 2023 1:32 am

TimberKat wrote:A lot of interesting points. Let's tackle a few here:
2. Notice Suns are dropping their mid salary guys. They trade and drop everyone except max salary Ayton, supermax Booker, and KD. Then turns around and trade a 30M contract (Chris Paul) for a supermax Beal. Heat let go Strus (16M per year) and Vicent (10M per year) who aren't exactly stars; only to get ready to add supermax Dame. So if we learn anything from the new CBA, it's how best to add supermax contract to the roster and not trade away your supermax guys (if you feel they help you win).

3. We lockup Towns for 5 years could be great news. By year 4, his supermax contract will look like a regular max contract because the cap increase 10% annually and his contract increase 8% annually.

4. If KAT is over the hill at age 27, then why do we think Ant's timeline is when he is 27? Let's assume Towns doesn't get any better, his plateau stats would look like 2021-2022: 24.6pt, 9.8RB. If he keeps it up until 32, that is HOF material for a poor defender. Chris Webber, Chris Bosh or Kevin McHale aren't able to carry a team but are great HOF supporting casts.

5. Chris Bosh avg 22 to 24 pts per game in TOR. He never avg more than 21 in MAI. So do we say LBJ eats into his game and must trade him to get draft picks so Heats could be good after LBJ and DWade's timeline are done?

7. It's not about replacing Towns. It's what can you add to make a deep playoff run now. So go get AD, SGA, or other stars. If those aren't available, Towns is by far the better options. You need at least 2 players that demand double team to win a NBA championship.


2. The suns can't give Ayton away for free. The Wizards didn't get a single 1st round pick or rotation player on a decent contract back for their supermaxed star player. Teams with spending space under the tax are going to have a big advantage when it comes to adding middle tier players to their supporting cast. Teams with tax problems are going to be letting go/salary dumping some of those same guys for nothing. That is my takeaway from the new CBA.

4. KAT is going to make 35% of the cap starting in 2024. The difference between his 8% raise and the 10% raise in the cap is miniscule, and that's assuming the cap keeps going up and we don't have another financial crisis or WWIII.

5. My point was that when you add too many star players together, particularly 2 big men like KAT and Rudy, they will eat into each other's value.
Trade value and on court production. You hope that sacrifice raises the value of the whole enough to put you over the top.
It's very hard to make the whole greater than the sum of its parts the more valuable parts you keep adding.
Sometimes that has worked, Garnett/Allen Celtics are an example.
Usually works best with veterans on the downslope of their career who are more willing to sacrifice to win.

But to borrow a metaphor from one of my favorite shows, Legion, you can't unmake soup once you've made it.
Miami gave up pretty much nothing for LBJ and Bosh, they were free agents.
We tossed a whole bunch of ingredients into the soup when we traded for Gobert that are never coming back.
Gobert and Towns, 2 guys best suited for the same position, aren't going to have the same trade value after playing 2 years next to one another. It's going to be very painful if we have to try to unmake the soup.
That's why best case scenario is that the soup that we made works out.

7. Agree any KAT trade would need to help us win now, but also must help us win in the post-Gobert window.
Disagree on caliber of player that requires.
2 younger Mike Conley-level players who fit really well and make ~20 mil or less might be even better long term for us if they fit around Ant and Jaden better. We particularly could use a young point guard.
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,422
And1: 17,379
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#382 » by Calinks » Sat Jul 22, 2023 1:49 am

I still don't think its out of the question we could trade Rudy instead of KAT mid-season. If Rudy had a really good year a team may become interested and feel they need a defensive center to get them over the edge. Rudy is also cheaper, we wont get what we paid but we still may get something we value and the team may want to move forward with KAT and Ant still.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,849
And1: 2,679
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#383 » by younggunsmn » Sat Jul 22, 2023 2:16 am

TimberKat wrote:
shrink wrote:One issue that an owner of any sports team in Minnesota faces is the competition for fan attention.

The Twin Cities have all four pro sports, and hockey is bigger here than most cities. We have soccer. We have a highly successful WNBA team. We have a Big Ten university right next to downtown, which has every sport as well.

The bottom line here is that each sport is an entertainment opportunity, and a team needs to be successful and exciting to capture the attention of the casual sports fan. Most casual fans don’t take much interest if a team is .500 or worse. We’re the weirdos here, the people that are such big Timberwolves fans that we are posting about it, months before they play their next game. We aren’t the target audience - the large mass of casual fans are. Minnesota teams can gain the interest of casual fans by winning. Even guys like Scoot of Jalen Williams aren’t names casual sports fans really know, or will convince them to drop $200 on a Friday night at Target Center vs a Wild game at Excel, or tomorrow’s Gopher football game.

I think the casual fans are ready to trade Towns, but if the team is winning, they won’t want to risk it for owner savings and delayed gratification of future picks and young players.

Do they really have that much competition? Twins are cost cutting year in year out. What is Arraez's betting avg now? How many playoff games they lose in a row? Wilds haven't been able to get pass 1st round for a while now. Vikings was interesting but limited success. When will I see Gophers beat OSU, Michigan, and Wisconsin all in the same year? I am not sold on Scoot or Williams. Still feel Towns have a lot more valuable than those two.


I think there are a few things to consider:

1. Working class people's disposable income has been drastically shrinking.
Every business, not just sports, is chasing fewer customers.
Local sports income has become more and more about chasing the whales for sponsorships and suites.
The difference in income between 10,000 and 20,000 fans is small relative to the entire pie in a market like this.

2. Sports fans attention spans are not what they used to be.
There are so many more things competing for your time than there were 30 years ago with the advent of the internet and social media.
It's much easier for the NFL to keep fans engaged with one game a week than to get them to watch 3 or 4 a week in the NBA.

3. Cable/Satellite models are dying, Bally Sports is a disaster, and trying to figure out how to stream games is not worth the effort for the casual fan. I really liked the 20$/month BSN standalone app once I got used to it.
That's probably too much for someone who isn't a dedicated fan though.

4. There are a lot of people in Minnesota with Nordic/Northern European Heritage.
And we are kind of a stoic bunch. We don't get too high or too low.
The long winters endow a kind of survivalist mentality.
So when I read comments about Minnesota sports crowds being too quiet or lackluster, I take it a bit as a cultural critique.
It's not that we aren't excited for what's going on, I think it's just more internalized than most other places.
Are we supposed to be crazy and scream at players and throw beer cans like Philly and Boston?
Be careful what you wish for.
Fans in this market are incredibly easy on the players in all sports compared to most places.

I also think that plays a bit into how we appreciate players here.
Is a guy like KAT who seems to be really into his national social media presence going to play as well with the fans here as in NY or LA?
Humility and hard work have been 2 big things that have always endeared athletes to fans here.
When those have been visibly lacking, and I'm not saying that is the case with KAT, fans turn on them pretty quick.
Smile. Work hard. Thank the fans and take the blame when things don't go well. It's not that hard.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,849
And1: 2,679
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#384 » by younggunsmn » Sat Jul 22, 2023 2:24 am

Calinks wrote:I still don't think its out of the question we could trade Rudy instead of KAT mid-season. If Rudy had a really good year a team may become interested and feel they need a defensive center to get them over the edge. Rudy is also cheaper, we wont get what we paid but we still may get something we value and the team may want to move forward with KAT and Ant still.


I hope you are right, I just think the contract is going to be a non-starter for most teams.
But if a team really surprises and want to jump start their way into contention, there could be a chance.

Say Charlotte sends us Hayward and Mark Williams. or Cleveland decides he's an upgrade for Jared Allen or NY for Mitchell Robinson.
I just have a really hard time seeing it.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#385 » by Nick K » Sat Jul 22, 2023 3:28 am

younggunsmn wrote:
TimberKat wrote:A lot of interesting points. Let's tackle a few here:
2. Notice Suns are dropping their mid salary guys. They trade and drop everyone except max salary Ayton, supermax Booker, and KD. Then turns around and trade a 30M contract (Chris Paul) for a supermax Beal. Heat let go Strus (16M per year) and Vicent (10M per year) who aren't exactly stars; only to get ready to add supermax Dame. So if we learn anything from the new CBA, it's how best to add supermax contract to the roster and not trade away your supermax guys (if you feel they help you win).

3. We lockup Towns for 5 years could be great news. By year 4, his supermax contract will look like a regular max contract because the cap increase 10% annually and his contract increase 8% annually.

4. If KAT is over the hill at age 27, then why do we think Ant's timeline is when he is 27? Let's assume Towns doesn't get any better, his plateau stats would look like 2021-2022: 24.6pt, 9.8RB. If he keeps it up until 32, that is HOF material for a poor defender. Chris Webber, Chris Bosh or Kevin McHale aren't able to carry a team but are great HOF supporting casts.

5. Chris Bosh avg 22 to 24 pts per game in TOR. He never avg more than 21 in MAI. So do we say LBJ eats into his game and must trade him to get draft picks so Heats could be good after LBJ and DWade's timeline are done?

7. It's not about replacing Towns. It's what can you add to make a deep playoff run now. So go get AD, SGA, or other stars. If those aren't available, Towns is by far the better options. You need at least 2 players that demand double team to win a NBA championship.


2. The suns can't give Ayton away for free. The Wizards didn't get a single 1st round pick or rotation player on a decent contract back for their supermaxed star player. Teams with spending space under the tax are going to have a big advantage when it comes to adding middle tier players to their supporting cast. Teams with tax problems are going to be letting go/salary dumping some of those same guys for nothing. That is my takeaway from the new CBA.

4. KAT is going to make 35% of the cap starting in 2024. The difference between his 8% raise and the 10% raise in the cap is miniscule, and that's assuming the cap keeps going up and we don't have another financial crisis or WWIII.

5. My point was that when you add too many star players together, particularly 2 big men like KAT and Rudy, they will eat into each other's value.
Trade value and on court production. You hope that sacrifice raises the value of the whole enough to put you over the top.
It's very hard to make the whole greater than the sum of its parts the more valuable parts you keep adding.
Sometimes that has worked, Garnett/Allen Celtics are an example.
Usually works best with veterans on the downslope of their career who are more willing to sacrifice to win.

But to borrow a metaphor from one of my favorite shows, Legion, you can't unmake soup once you've made it.
Miami gave up pretty much nothing for LBJ and Bosh, they were free agents.
We tossed a whole bunch of ingredients into the soup when we traded for Gobert that are never coming back.
Gobert and Towns, 2 guys best suited for the same position, aren't going to have the same trade value after playing 2 years next to one another. It's going to be very painful if we have to try to unmake the soup.
That's why best case scenario is that the soup that we made works out.

7. Agree any KAT trade would need to help us win now, but also must help us win in the post-Gobert window.
Disagree on caliber of player that requires.
2 younger Mike Conley-level players who fit really well and make ~20 mil or less might be even better long term for us if they fit around Ant and Jaden better. We particularly could use a young point guard.


You're splitting hairs on the Kat-Rudy pairing. We'll see after next season. If anybody gets traded it's Rudy all day.

Totally disagree on the young PG. Conley is perfect for this group. Perfect!

We've got a 2-3 year window with this group and we need to squeeze it for all it's worth and take our chances.

Look at all we've sacrificed over the last 20 years to get to where we are now. No big trades unless what we get back is overwhelming. On second thought, no trades period unless it's J Mac or similar.

Now I hear we're going to trade Conley for some second rate guy!? When will it end?
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,849
And1: 2,679
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#386 » by younggunsmn » Sat Jul 22, 2023 5:54 am

Where do you get trade Conley out of that?

He's perfect for this year, he's one of my fav PG's that we've had here.
He's also 36 in October.
How much longer will he play and if so can we afford to keep him and get him to re-sign here after this season?

I'm talking about eventually adding a PG that fits with Ant and Jaden's longer timeline, if we eventually explore a KAT trade.

Who are you getting to take Rudy's salary of 41, 44, and 47 million the next 3 years?
When Chicago is paying Vucevic 60 million TOTAL over those 3 years?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,758
And1: 23,086
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#387 » by Klomp » Sat Jul 22, 2023 6:18 am

younggunsmn wrote:He's perfect for this year, he's one of my fav PG's that we've had here.
He's also 36 in October.
How much longer will he play and if so can we afford to keep him and get him to re-sign here after this season?

I keep looking at him in the mold of Derek Fisher. He started until the Lakers traded him at the deadline in his age 37 season, and played another two years beyond that.

Conley is old and isn't the high usage guy he once was, but his FG%, 3FG% and FT% from after we traded for him would all rank as the best of his career. He doesn't seem to be slowing down, and like Fisher his game is perfect as a complementary piece next to a superstar SG.

I'm not worried about the ability to re-sign him. I think he'll get more opportunity here than he would elsewhere on the market. I wouldn't be surprised if he was willing to sign his next deal for around $5 million, which would be pretty good value.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,660
And1: 19,757
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edit 

Post#388 » by shrink » Sat Jul 22, 2023 4:57 pm

Klomp wrote:I'm not worried about the ability to re-sign him. I think he'll get more opportunity here than he would elsewhere on the market. I wouldn't be surprised if he was willing to sign his next deal for around $5 million, which would be pretty good value.

This is an interesting point. I agree he is a perfect fit for the Wolves this season, not just on the court, but off-court, teaching Ant and others how to feed Rudy, and acting as a model of professionalism whispering in Ant’s ear.

The following year he probably has more internal value to whatever team has Gobert. I assume that’s us, and if we can get him for $5 mil, he’d easily be worth that for us, even as a back up. As the middle class gets squeezed under the new CBA (Malik Beasley on a vet min), it’s possible $5 mil is the better than offers from other teams. He also sticks with Gobert, and the hopefully improving and successful Timberwolves, so he might take $5 mil.

Getting him for $5 would be so valuable to MIN, because it’s likely we won’t be able to afford bringing back Kyle Anderson, the other great Rudy feeder, and cog in the entire Timberwolves offense. With SloMo gone, the Wolves would need Conley more than ever. And at this price, maybe ownership bites the bullet and pays to keep Anderson.

Lastly, I will say that the financials make this a critical season for Minnesota. We may not be able to afford a team with this much talent, so we need to win now. If we falter and a money-saving trade is needed, we always think it’s a Towns trade, but it could be Gobert by the deadline. I think there’s more value trading Gobert plus Mike Conley to a contender trying to win a ring this year, rather than either Gobert or Conley separately.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#389 » by Nick K » Sat Jul 22, 2023 5:08 pm

younggunsmn wrote:Where do you get trade Conley out of that?

He's perfect for this year, he's one of my fav PG's that we've had here.
He's also 36 in October.
How much longer will he play and if so can we afford to keep him and get him to re-sign here after this season?

I'm talking about eventually adding a PG that fits with Ant and Jaden's longer timeline, if we eventually explore a KAT trade.

Who are you getting to take Rudy's salary of 41, 44, and 47 million the next 3 years?
When Chicago is paying Vucevic 60 million TOTAL over those 3 years?


Eventually adding a PG is fine with me. The new talk is about trading Conley not anything you said. How much longer can Conley play at a high level? My guess is 2 or 3 more years.

Plenty of teams would take on Rudy's salary. They would see him as their savior like we did. Teams do stupid things all the time.

Lastly, it's entirely possible that we have one hell of a year and nobody talks about trading any of our stars.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#390 » by Nick K » Sat Jul 22, 2023 5:14 pm

Klomp wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:He's perfect for this year, he's one of my fav PG's that we've had here.
He's also 36 in October.
How much longer will he play and if so can we afford to keep him and get him to re-sign here after this season?

I keep looking at him in the mold of Derek Fisher. He started until the Lakers traded him at the deadline in his age 37 season, and played another two years beyond that.

Conley is old and isn't the high usage guy he once was, but his FG%, 3FG% and FT% from after we traded for him would all rank as the best of his career. He doesn't seem to be slowing down, and like Fisher his game is perfect as a complementary piece next to a superstar SG.

I'm not worried about the ability to re-sign him. I think he'll get more opportunity here than he would elsewhere on the market. I wouldn't be surprised if he was willing to sign his next deal for around $5 million, which would be pretty good value.


I don't know about 5 million but he would sign for less I'm thinking. I couldn't agree more with your take overall. Fisher is a good comp and CP3 too.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,849
And1: 2,679
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edit 

Post#391 » by younggunsmn » Sat Jul 22, 2023 6:28 pm

shrink wrote:
Klomp wrote:I'm not worried about the ability to re-sign him. I think he'll get more opportunity here than he would elsewhere on the market. I wouldn't be surprised if he was willing to sign his next deal for around $5 million, which would be pretty good value.

This is an interesting point. I agree he is a perfect fit for the Wolves this season, not just on the court, but off-court, teaching Ant and others how to feed Rudy, and acting as a model of professionalism whispering in Ant’s ear.

The following year he probably has more internal value to whatever team has Gobert. I assume that’s us, and if we can get him for $5 mil, he’d easily be worth that for us, even as a back up. As the middle class gets squeezed under the new CBA (Malik Beasley on a vet min), it’s possible $5 mil is the better than offers from other teams. He also sticks with Gobert, and the hopefully improving and successful Timberwolves, so he might take $5 mil.

Getting him for $5 would be so valuable to MIN, because it’s likely we won’t be able to afford bringing back Kyle Anderson, the other great Rudy feeder, and cog in the entire Timberwolves offense. With SloMo gone, the Wolves would need Conley more than ever. And at this price, maybe ownership bites the bullet and pays to keep Anderson.

Lastly, I will say that the financials make this a critical season for Minnesota. We may not be able to afford a team with this much talent, so we need to win now. If we falter and a money-saving trade is needed, we always think it’s a Towns trade, but it could be Gobert by the deadline. I think there’s more value trading Gobert plus Mike Conley to a contender trying to win a ring this year, rather than either Gobert or Conley separately.


Thought experiment: Conley hits unrestricted free agency next summer.
How many teams are interested in him and what are they willing and able to spend?
I think he has a huge market. For the same reasons we love him, many teams both contending and rebuilding would absolutely love to sign him. Perfect veteran mentor to Victor and Tre in San Antonion for example or OKC/Portland for their young guards.
All teams who will have plenty of money to spend.
Miami, New Orleans, Chicago, Clippers, Toronto, Memphis, possibly Philly, Utah.
Some teams would be limited to the 5 mil taxpayer MLE, but others would have raw cap room.
I think his market in that scenario is easily the non-taxpayer MLE, so 13 million or so, unless he misses most of the season to injury or his play falls off a cliff. I think almost every team in the league would be thrilled to give him the 5 mil taxpayer MLE.
His play was absolutely stellar at the end of last season and in the playoffs, and not just for a player of his age.

2nd thought experiment: Do you offer him an extension and if so what does that offer look like.
Keep in mind our current starting point for salary next summer is right up against the 2nd taxpayer apron, already almost 20 million into the luxury tax.
At that point, we can't offer the BAE or even the taxpayer MLE, and would have to take back equal or less salary in any trade.
The options to replace Mike would have to be vet minimums, draft picks, trade, or already in house.
We could however extend Mike for whatever we wanted to, it would just cost a LOT of money.

I hope TC is having these discussions with ownership to find out where his limits are.
Offering 5 million a year is a slap in the face. His agent would make the same argument I am about his potential market next summer. I think an extension offer starts at the non-taxpayer MLE, 13 mil or so. Maybe 2 years with a player option.
And I would be very comfortable with that. But it's not my money.

Fisher is kind of a relatable comp, but outside of winning titles, Conley is a much better and more accomplished player than Fisher.
And Fisher made MLE or a good chunk of the MLE until his last couple years chasing a ring with OKC.

I agree with the sentiment generally about middle class players getting squeezed, but Malik Beasley is a poor example.
His play was awful last year with 2 teams, he's a very limited player, couldn't get run in the playoffs, and I think his career is on a Bryn Forbes trajectory and if he has another year like last year he will be fighting to stay in the league next summer.

I think that squeeze is going to mean a lot of players unfortunately get attached to the 5 mil and 13 mil taxpayer and non taxpayer MLE, even though they may deserve more (or less). Even at 36, right now I think Mike is clearly at least in that 13 mil player category.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,821
And1: 5,302
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#392 » by minimus » Sat Jul 22, 2023 8:02 pm

In the world where CP3 and Lowry get 20+ deals, I don't see us resigning Conley at 5 mil, unless he wins championship with MIN.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#393 » by Nick K » Sat Jul 22, 2023 8:16 pm

minimus wrote:In the world where CP3 and Lowry get 20+ deals, I don't see us resigning Conley at 5 mil, unless he wins championship with MIN.


I could see 10-15 mil.

Mike likes it here, his family likes it here, and he's a multi, multi millionaire. If we win then he's the type of guy willing to make a little less to stay in a good situation.
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,208
And1: 3,142
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#394 » by TimberKat » Sat Jul 22, 2023 9:30 pm

Nick K wrote:
minimus wrote:In the world where CP3 and Lowry get 20+ deals, I don't see us resigning Conley at 5 mil, unless he wins championship with MIN.


I could see 10-15 mil.

Mike likes it here, his family likes it here, and he's a multi, multi millionaire. If we win then he's the type of guy willing to make a little less to stay in a good situation.

I give Mike at most 8.5M maybe do a 5M for 3 years.

Lowry sign his 30m contract at age 34 (maybe 35). If Lowry is a free agent today, how much would he get? How much would he get next year?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,660
And1: 19,757
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edit 

Post#395 » by shrink » Sun Jul 23, 2023 2:51 am

younggunsmn wrote:I agree with the sentiment generally about middle class players getting squeezed, but Malik Beasley is a poor example. His play was awful last year with 2 teams, he's a very limited player, couldn't get run in the playoffs, and I think his career is on a Bryn Forbes trajectory and if he has another year like last year he will be fighting to stay in the league next summer.

You may be surprised to learn that there was a lot of talk in the Lakers camp leading up to free agency about picking up Beasley’s $16.52 team option! The delay with knowing if they would have to match a big offer for Austin Reeves from another team helped the Lakers see that free agent dollars were evaporating fast, and that the middle class would get squeezed. They dodged a big bullet there, by accident.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,758
And1: 23,086
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edit 

Post#396 » by Klomp » Sun Jul 23, 2023 2:51 am

younggunsmn wrote:Thought experiment: Conley hits unrestricted free agency next summer.
How many teams are interested in him and what are they willing and able to spend?
I think he has a huge market. For the same reasons we love him, many teams both contending and rebuilding would absolutely love to sign him. Perfect veteran mentor to Victor and Tre in San Antonion for example or OKC/Portland for their young guards.
All teams who will have plenty of money to spend.
Miami, New Orleans, Chicago, Clippers, Toronto, Memphis, possibly Philly, Utah.
Some teams would be limited to the 5 mil taxpayer MLE, but others would have raw cap room.
I think his market in that scenario is easily the non-taxpayer MLE, so 13 million or so, unless he misses most of the season to injury or his play falls off a cliff. I think almost every team in the league would be thrilled to give him the 5 mil taxpayer MLE.
His play was absolutely stellar at the end of last season and in the playoffs, and not just for a player of his age.

You might be right. But I see so many other PGs in the same mold, many of which are 5 or 10 years younger than Conley. While Conley is arguably still better than most of them today, I think those teams may struggle to choose the aging Conley over them.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,660
And1: 19,757
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edit 

Post#397 » by shrink » Sun Jul 23, 2023 2:55 am

Klomp wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:Thought experiment: Conley hits unrestricted free agency next summer.
How many teams are interested in him and what are they willing and able to spend?
I think he has a huge market. For the same reasons we love him, many teams both contending and rebuilding would absolutely love to sign him. Perfect veteran mentor to Victor and Tre in San Antonion for example or OKC/Portland for their young guards.
All teams who will have plenty of money to spend.
Miami, New Orleans, Chicago, Clippers, Toronto, Memphis, possibly Philly, Utah.
Some teams would be limited to the 5 mil taxpayer MLE, but others would have raw cap room.
I think his market in that scenario is easily the non-taxpayer MLE, so 13 million or so, unless he misses most of the season to injury or his play falls off a cliff. I think almost every team in the league would be thrilled to give him the 5 mil taxpayer MLE.
His play was absolutely stellar at the end of last season and in the playoffs, and not just for a player of his age.

You might be right. But I see so many other PGs in the same mold, many of which are 5 or 10 years younger than Conley. While Conley is arguably still better than most of them today, I think those teams may struggle to choose the aging Conley over them.

I agree. If Conley himself was right when he said it takes a year to get used to passing to Gobert, then he has extra value to whatever team has Rudy. If people want a good citizen, team first vet to be a role model .. well, he’s an inferior player, but let’s see what Austin Rivers gets.
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,208
And1: 3,142
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#398 » by TimberKat » Sun Jul 23, 2023 4:22 pm

Let’s look at how some of the max/supermax non-Alpha guys perform in last year’s playoffs: pts; reb; ast
Brown: 22.7; 5.6; 3.4
Harden: 20.3; 6.2; 8.3
Garland: 20.6; 1.8; 5.0
D Murray: 23; 7.2; 6.8 (not max, ~30M a year)
Bam: 17.9; 9.9; 3.7
Beal: MIA
J Murray: 26.1; 5.7; 7.1
Bane: 23.5; 6.0; 3.2
Sabonis: 16.4; 11.0; 4.7
Booker: 33.7; 4.8; 7.2
PG-13: MIA
Thompson: 18.5; 4.2; 2.2
Davis: 22.6; 14.1; 2.6 (Some of you were writing him off in the beginning of the season)
Towns: 18.2; 10.2; 2.0
Gobert: 15.0; 12.2; 2.0
Ingram: 24.7; 5.5; 5.8
Kyrie: MIA

Towns/Gobert wasn't the best in this group but is not too far off. If AD can comeback from injury to have a strong year. I totally expect Towns to do the same. Certainly expect him to put up around 25pts. So if we could trade Towns/Gobert for the players on this list and above, great. If not, they aren't bad options.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,304
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#399 » by thinktank » Sun Jul 23, 2023 4:58 pm

TimberKat wrote:Let’s look at how some of the max/supermax non-Alpha guys perform in last year’s playoffs: pts; reb; ast
Brown: 22.7; 5.6; 3.4
Harden: 20.3; 6.2; 8.3
Garland: 20.6; 1.8; 5.0
D Murray: 23; 7.2; 6.8 (not max, ~30M a year)
Bam: 17.9; 9.9; 3.7
Beal: MIA
J Murray: 26.1; 5.7; 7.1
Bane: 23.5; 6.0; 3.2
Sabonis: 16.4; 11.0; 4.7
Booker: 33.7; 4.8; 7.2
PG-13: MIA
Thompson: 18.5; 4.2; 2.2
Davis: 22.6; 14.1; 2.6 (Some of you were writing him off in the beginning of the season)
Towns: 18.2; 10.2; 2.0
Gobert: 15.0; 12.2; 2.0
Ingram: 24.7; 5.5; 5.8
Kyrie: MIA

Towns/Gobert wasn't the best in this group but is not too far off. If AD can comeback from injury to have a strong year. I totally expect Towns to do the same. Certainly expect him to put up around 25pts. So if we could trade Towns/Gobert for the players on this list and above, great. If not, they aren't bad options.


Our two guys are both at the low end of production. At least Rudy is playing some good defense, which doesn’t show up well here. I’m not buoyed by what you’ve shown but I appreciate the work you put in.
User avatar
m2002brian
Analyst
Posts: 3,365
And1: 1,398
Joined: May 29, 2009
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#400 » by m2002brian » Sun Jul 23, 2023 5:05 pm

Serious question…

Who the worst maxed out pf/c at off ball defense?
BLUEGREENRED

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves