For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
- henshao
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 942
- And1: 448
- Joined: Jul 29, 2018
For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
For instance, if somehow you have Shaq and Hakeem on your team, you obviously put them on the floor at the same time, but Shaq pretty much has to be center.
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,612
- And1: 2,845
- Joined: Jan 06, 2012
- Location: Sacramento
-
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 30,302
- And1: 9,865
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
-
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
Are you asking which NBA centers you would use Hakeem as the man coverage guy out on the floor rather than the drop coverage rim protector because your best lineup starts two career centers? That's a lot, maybe even most of them, as Hakeem has better quickness and foot speed than most of the other candidates. Offensively, less so, but in terms of positions I always tend to think defense first except for the PG arguments.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,854
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
What do you mean?
If I have Hakeem and Shaq, I try to come up with a game plan that plays to both of their strengths. If it doesn't work, you trade one for a premium perimeter talent.
This is extremely era relative as well.
If I have Hakeem and Shaq, I try to come up with a game plan that plays to both of their strengths. If it doesn't work, you trade one for a premium perimeter talent.
This is extremely era relative as well.
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
- prolific passer
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,149
- And1: 1,459
- Joined: Mar 11, 2009
-
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
I'm thinking Robinson, Parish, Ewing. Low post and high post interchangeable.
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
- henshao
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 942
- And1: 448
- Joined: Jul 29, 2018
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
penbeast0 wrote:Are you asking which NBA centers you would use Hakeem as the man coverage guy out on the floor rather than the drop coverage rim protector because your best lineup starts two career centers? That's a lot, maybe even most of them, as Hakeem has better quickness and foot speed than most of the other candidates. Offensively, less so, but in terms of positions I always tend to think defense first except for the PG arguments.
I think a lot of guys I would strongly consider trading instead of playing them both, like maybe Mourning or Mutumbo. Then there are the cases of Olajuwon/Sampson and Robinson/Duncan where the new guy either does or doesn't naturally take the center slot. Shaq, Kareem, Wilt are guys who would be allowed to live in the low post up to and including at Olajuwon's expense if required; others like Garnett or Dirk are obvious in the other direction. But I'm curious about some fringe cases between trade material and center-lock, for instance Ewing would go a long way in a trade for some help
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,740
- And1: 9,239
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
Re: For which players historically would you "demote" Hakeem to PF?
Probably just Russell if we define your position as how you guard