ImageImageImageImage

Official Spec Thread: Regular Season

Moderators: Howard Mass, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, UCFJayBird, ChosenSavior

User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,945
And1: 5,506
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#701 » by fendilim » Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:40 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
89Magicfan wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:Celtics signed Brown on supermax ... My God.



How do you even build a team around that kind of contract?

Once needed two all stars at least. Now it seems you can only have one?


I just don't get scale of contracts. It work against teams and make winning impossible to sustian.
Maybe "parity" for them is to have every team building something for 3,4 years , compete for title for 2 years than rebuild again? I don't know, but current salaries are unsustainable for current cap space.

The thing with max contracts are… its supposed to be for superstars… but then, almost every team’s best player ends up getting rewarded with the max…. So now, we have overpaid players. Lol
Image
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,604
And1: 19,717
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#702 » by pepe1991 » Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:48 pm

yoyojw17 wrote:You take up 35% of the salary cap... and then go... "I NEED HELP"? lmao

If someone is legit about winning they will find a happy grey area and not the max just cuz they could. if you are single handedly winning the majority of games... then shoot... i get it. But good to pretty damn good players who can be replaced in some way shape or form... should not be eating up that kind of space.


Wait until Arabs figure they like basketball and find out some Joel Embiid is leaving nba in middle of his prime to play for $450 000 000 per season. Pretty much already happened in soccer now.


From player's pov it makes simply no sense to not ask for max if you are max money type player, and even if you are not, you can get one :lol:

For example, Franz isn't "max contract" type of player, but most of us are 100% sure he will sign designed max contract in June of 2024. Even if he becomes max contract worthy, he will still stagger our flexibility.


I simply don't get whole scale of nba contracts. Nobody should be making 35% of maximum team has. Etiher remove salary cap all together, or boost salary but in same limit max contracts to 20% of cap.

Lebron and Davis make $87M of projected $136M salary, what's the point? Does limiting teams ability to compete help league? Or parity is just fabricated with terrible conditions players sign players to, and by default, it forces them to tear down rosters after several years because model isn't sustainable? I tend to belive in second.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
Last Guardian
RealGM
Posts: 27,630
And1: 4,445
Joined: Feb 22, 2004
Location: New Jersey
 

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#703 » by Last Guardian » Tue Jul 25, 2023 6:31 pm

Can't believe they gave a better version of JR Smith that contract. Every time I watch Jaylen play he just makes a lot of dumb decisions. He can put the ball in the basket but is that enough to justify that $$$?

With also losing Smart...I'm thinking the C's start trending backwards. Rebuilding by 2025/2026.
J the Drafter
Starter
Posts: 2,229
And1: 318
Joined: Sep 17, 2009

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#704 » by J the Drafter » Tue Jul 25, 2023 6:43 pm

Fortune Teller wrote:My take on Anthony Black and Jett Howard is based less on how they looked in summer league, and more on how the roster is currently constructed. The Magic now have 6 guards, 4 on rookie contracts, all battling for playing time. Not one of them is even close to being an all-star. So what is the plan?

Savvy GM's trade assets when they have value. It's the only way to get something in return. There is risk in it -- what if Player X blows up on his next team -- but with no risk comes no reward.

Suggs and Fultz may have some value right now, but if you wait until they get hurt again this season, which they probably will, then you missed your chance.

Cole might have more value than we think. He improved a lot last season and could be due for a breakout year.

And yes, if someone likes Anthony Black, and is willing to give us something good in return, why not? There is no rule that says we have to wait and see what every prospect will eventually become before making a decision on them. They mystery is part of the perceived value. And then if Anthony Black becomes Elfrid Payton Part 2, then you made a good decision.


Given the roster, there’s every reason to use a dual point guard lineup and no reason not. That gives all four of Cole, Suggs, Black and Fultz chances to contribute. Harris becomes the odd man out and Howard becomes backup small forward.

Every one of our point guards except Suggs can comfortably play off-ball—Cole by spotting up and Black and Fultz by cutting—and along with giving all our point guards chances to produce, the team gets the benefit of having multiple playmakers on the floor. The Magic need to see if playing two point guards together helps the team, imo.
Remember when Kobe elbowed Jameer in the chin so hard Jameer was knocked down and sent skidding across the floor?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.*

*Futurama
JBSouthpaw
Analyst
Posts: 3,373
And1: 1,354
Joined: Mar 01, 2011

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#705 » by JBSouthpaw » Tue Jul 25, 2023 7:00 pm

Last Guardian wrote:Can't believe they gave a better version of JR Smith that contract. Every time I watch Jaylen play he just makes a lot of dumb decisions. He can put the ball in the basket but is that enough to justify that $$$?

With also losing Smart...I'm thinking the C's start trending backwards. Rebuilding by 2025/2026.


they have a core right now, Tatum, Brown, White, Brogdon, Williams, Horford and Kristaps for $160M+ a year, for this and next year.
They have pushed their chips in. IMO, this is the way to do it, IF they stay healthy, I think they can play for the title.
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,912
And1: 11,335
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#706 » by KillMonger » Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:22 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
User avatar
thelead
RealGM
Posts: 47,375
And1: 30,787
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
 

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#707 » by thelead » Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:36 pm

KillMonger wrote:
Read on Twitter

I love Suggs and truly believe he still has star potential but he likely picked the wrong sport. What makes him special on the basketball court would be utilized much more frequently on a football field IMO. His instincts are amazing. If the dude could dribble at a high level, he would unquestionably be a star.
Image
yoyojw17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,870
And1: 3,460
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Location: Gainesville,FL
 

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#708 » by yoyojw17 » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:35 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
yoyojw17 wrote:You take up 35% of the salary cap... and then go... "I NEED HELP"? lmao

If someone is legit about winning they will find a happy grey area and not the max just cuz they could. if you are single handedly winning the majority of games... then shoot... i get it. But good to pretty damn good players who can be replaced in some way shape or form... should not be eating up that kind of space.


Wait until Arabs figure they like basketball and find out some Joel Embiid is leaving nba in middle of his prime to play for $450 000 000 per season. Pretty much already happened in soccer now.


From player's pov it makes simply no sense to not ask for max if you are max money type player, and even if you are not, you can get one :lol:

For example, Franz isn't "max contract" type of player, but most of us are 100% sure he will sign designed max contract in June of 2024. Even if he becomes max contract worthy, he will still stagger our flexibility.


I simply don't get whole scale of nba contracts. Nobody should be making 35% of maximum team has. Etiher remove salary cap all together, or boost salary but in same limit max contracts to 20% of cap.

Lebron and Davis make $87M of projected $136M salary, what's the point? Does limiting teams ability to compete help league? Or parity is just fabricated with terrible conditions players sign players to, and by default, it forces them to tear down rosters after several years because model isn't sustainable? I tend to belive in second.

brooo.... like for real! smh getting way out of hand now.

and Mbappe and Saudi Arabia ain't helping. lol
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,970
And1: 29,949
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#709 » by Knightro » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:57 pm

J the Drafter wrote:Given the roster, there’s every reason to use a dual point guard lineup and no reason not. That gives all four of Cole, Suggs, Black and Fultz chances to contribute. Harris becomes the odd man out and Howard becomes backup small forward.

Every one of our point guards except Suggs can comfortably play off-ball—Cole by spotting up and Black and Fultz by cutting—and along with giving all our point guards chances to produce, the team gets the benefit of having multiple playmakers on the floor. The Magic need to see if playing two point guards together helps the team, imo.


There's no such thing as a dual point guard lineup though if you think about it. One of them plays point guard and is the primary ball handler and initiating the sets and one of them doesn't.

Right now none of Fultz, Anthony or Black seem like they're capable of playing off the basketball offensively at a high level.
yoyojw17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,870
And1: 3,460
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Location: Gainesville,FL
 

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#710 » by yoyojw17 » Wed Jul 26, 2023 1:02 am

Knightro wrote:
J the Drafter wrote:Given the roster, there’s every reason to use a dual point guard lineup and no reason not. That gives all four of Cole, Suggs, Black and Fultz chances to contribute. Harris becomes the odd man out and Howard becomes backup small forward.

Every one of our point guards except Suggs can comfortably play off-ball—Cole by spotting up and Black and Fultz by cutting—and along with giving all our point guards chances to produce, the team gets the benefit of having multiple playmakers on the floor. The Magic need to see if playing two point guards together helps the team, imo.


There's no such thing as a dual point guard lineup though if you think about it. One of them plays point guard and is the primary ball handler and initiating the sets and one of them doesn't.

Right now none of Fultz, Anthony or Black seem like they're capable of playing off the basketball offensively at a high level.

I get it.... threes are king in everyones eyes.... new shiny toy.... but we are not going to be that type of team. I do believe we will be a much more capable shooting team than the recent past... but i believe that all this positional size, High IQ hoarding will show its fruits this year. We will be a much better defending team that will have multiple options on a nightly basis because of the developed mismatches. Just have to exploit all options... while taking open three and hitting them at a decent clip. People are pigeonholing this teams potential cuz all the answers seem to land at the back of the 3 point line.
Bensational
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,896
And1: 13,971
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
     

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#711 » by Bensational » Wed Jul 26, 2023 3:18 am

yoyojw17 wrote:
Knightro wrote:
J the Drafter wrote:Given the roster, there’s every reason to use a dual point guard lineup and no reason not. That gives all four of Cole, Suggs, Black and Fultz chances to contribute. Harris becomes the odd man out and Howard becomes backup small forward.

Every one of our point guards except Suggs can comfortably play off-ball—Cole by spotting up and Black and Fultz by cutting—and along with giving all our point guards chances to produce, the team gets the benefit of having multiple playmakers on the floor. The Magic need to see if playing two point guards together helps the team, imo.


There's no such thing as a dual point guard lineup though if you think about it. One of them plays point guard and is the primary ball handler and initiating the sets and one of them doesn't.

Right now none of Fultz, Anthony or Black seem like they're capable of playing off the basketball offensively at a high level.

I get it.... threes are king in everyones eyes.... new shiny toy.... but we are not going to be that type of team. I do believe we will be a much more capable shooting team than the recent past... but i believe that all this positional size, High IQ hoarding will show its fruits this year. We will be a much better defending team that will have multiple options on a nightly basis because of the developed mismatches. Just have to exploit all options... while taking open three and hitting them at a decent clip. People are pigeonholing this teams potential cuz all the answers seem to land at the back of the 3 point line.


One of our strengths as far as off-ball play goes is cutting, where we rank 4th in efficiency but only 20th in frequency. We have the right personnel to be ranking much higher in volume/frequency and making it more of a feature of our game.

Between Paolo/Franz/Fultz/Cole/Suggs/Black and even Howard we have a bunch of options who can drive and dish and 5/7 are a threat from 3. The other two are capable of continuing to drive and dish as the defense scrambles, continuing the play until a good look opens up. They don’t move like JJ (or Harris or even Houstan), but they still remain a threat. They’ll also have Wendell, Harris and Ingles as outlets this season too.

We definitely need to improve shooting, but what I like is that fundamentally the team has the pieces to disrupt a defense and generate good looks.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,970
And1: 29,949
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#712 » by Knightro » Wed Jul 26, 2023 3:41 am

yoyojw17 wrote:People are pigeonholing this teams potential cuz all the answers seem to land at the back of the 3 point line.


I mean there's a reason for that.

It's extremely difficult to have a good NBA offense if a team is low volume *and* low accuracy from 3PT. Teams can be successful if they are one or the other, but it just can't really be both.

The Magic were 27th in volume and 24th in accuracy. Until one of those two numbers increases significantly, it's not likely they're going to have a good offense.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,970
And1: 29,949
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#713 » by Knightro » Wed Jul 26, 2023 4:02 am

Bensational wrote:One of our strengths as far as off-ball play goes is cutting, where we rank 4th in efficiency but only 20th in frequency. We have the right personnel to be ranking much higher in volume/frequency and making it more of a feature of our game.

Between Paolo/Franz/Fultz/Cole/Suggs/Black and even Howard we have a bunch of options who can drive and dish and 5/7 are a threat from 3. The other two are capable of continuing to drive and dish as the defense scrambles, continuing the play until a good look opens up. They don’t move like JJ (or Harris or even Houstan), but they still remain a threat. They’ll also have Wendell, Harris and Ingles as outlets this season too.

We definitely need to improve shooting, but what I like is that fundamentally the team has the pieces to disrupt a defense and generate good looks.


So this data on how efficient the Magic were at scoring on cuts is certainly very interesting, but my sense is that the solution is a bit more complex than Mosley just saying “we are very efficient on cuts, so let’s cut more often!”

It feels like - and I haven’t done a deep dive into the numbers yet so I’m just spitballing - is that cut frequency is more directly tied into how well and how often a team shoots threes than the opposite.

To put it another way…

I don’t think the Magic increasing the frequency of cuts will make them shoot better because I think their inability to shoot is what is actually hindering their ability to increase their cutting in the first place.

If defenders aren’t playing up on Orlando’s shooters as much as they do on other teams who are higher volume and higher accuracy from 3PT, that ultimately is going to takes away cutting opportunities.

TL:DR - better shooting creates more cutting opportunities, but more cutting can’t really happen without better shooting.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,604
And1: 19,717
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#714 » by pepe1991 » Wed Jul 26, 2023 6:18 am

You can't have high frequency of cuts if there is no spacing and teams zone you up. It's very hard to "leak" and get away from eyes of your defender, if he keeps "defending" you by standing 10 feet from you.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
The-Stallion70
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,927
And1: 705
Joined: Mar 22, 2022

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#715 » by The-Stallion70 » Wed Jul 26, 2023 6:24 am

yoyojw17 wrote:You take up 35% of the salary cap... and then go... "I NEED HELP"? lmao

If someone is legit about winning they will find a happy grey area and not the max just cuz they could. if you are single handedly winning the majority of games... then shoot... i get it. But good to pretty damn good players who can be replaced in some way shape or form... should not be eating up that kind of space.


That contract is taking up 40%-50% of it currently, not 35%.
California Gold wrote:This is extra because people hate the Lakers and their brand so much.

This trade wasn't some conspiracy - it was just a GM wanting AD bad enough where in most people's eyes he overpaid by a long shot to get him.
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,388
And1: 9,019
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#716 » by drsd » Wed Jul 26, 2023 6:36 am

pepe1991 wrote:Wait until Arabs figure they like basketball and find out some Joel Embiid is leaving nba in middle of his prime to play for $450 000 000 per season. Pretty much already happened in soccer now.


From player's pov it makes simply no sense to not ask for max if you are max money type player, and even if you are not, you can get one :lol:

For example, Franz isn't "max contract" type of player, but most of us are 100% sure he will sign designed max contract in June of 2024. Even if he becomes max contract worthy, he will still stagger our flexibility.


I simply don't get whole scale of nba contracts. Nobody should be making 35% of maximum team has. Etiher remove salary cap all together, or boost salary but in same limit max contracts to 20% of cap.

Lebron and Davis make $87M of projected $136M salary, what's the point? Does limiting teams ability to compete help league? Or parity is just fabricated with terrible conditions players sign players to, and by default, it forces them to tear down rosters after several years because model isn't sustainable? I tend to belive in second.


WIth the coming CBA, essentially all medicore and good teams will have two maxed players, 2 or 3 MLE exepption players, and 10 LLE / rookies. That's just how it is.

THe good news, and the reason 50.1% of the players got behind this new deal: the salary floor is going to explode. From next year, the two-way players are annual millionaires. In a couple years, a player with experience will ALWAYS make at least 3M a year.

So those up-to-ten min guys are all likely to have 10M or more in cumulative NBA salary (three years in the NBA is a pretty standard run). We are talking about a guy like Kevon Harris signing a contract that will pay him this sort of money. Let me say it another way: the 400th best player in the NBA will earn more than 10M in income to be a bench warmer and practice squad guy.

Cris Duhon played in the wrong era!

pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,604
And1: 19,717
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#717 » by pepe1991 » Wed Jul 26, 2023 7:32 am

drsd wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:Wait until Arabs figure they like basketball and find out some Joel Embiid is leaving nba in middle of his prime to play for $450 000 000 per season. Pretty much already happened in soccer now.


From player's pov it makes simply no sense to not ask for max if you are max money type player, and even if you are not, you can get one :lol:

For example, Franz isn't "max contract" type of player, but most of us are 100% sure he will sign designed max contract in June of 2024. Even if he becomes max contract worthy, he will still stagger our flexibility.


I simply don't get whole scale of nba contracts. Nobody should be making 35% of maximum team has. Etiher remove salary cap all together, or boost salary but in same limit max contracts to 20% of cap.

Lebron and Davis make $87M of projected $136M salary, what's the point? Does limiting teams ability to compete help league? Or parity is just fabricated with terrible conditions players sign players to, and by default, it forces them to tear down rosters after several years because model isn't sustainable? I tend to belive in second.


WIth the coming CBA, essentially all medicore and good teams will have two maxed players, 2 or 3 MLE exepption players, and 10 LLE / rookies. That's just how it is.

THe good news, and the reason 50.1% of the players got behind this new deal: the salary floor is going to explode. From next year, the two-way players are annual millionaires. In a couple years, a player with experience will ALWAYS make at least 3M a year.

So those up-to-ten min guys are all likely to have 10M or more in cumulative NBA salary (three years in the NBA is a pretty standard run). We are talking about a guy like Kevon Harris signing a contract that will pay him this sort of money. Let me say it another way: the 400th best player in the NBA will earn more than 10M in income to be a bench warmer and practice squad guy.

Cris Duhon played in the wrong era!



I don't give a crap how much money players make, only reason why it matters in nba is salary cap.

IF Brown plays in league where salary cap is sub $140M and he makes $60M a year, it means his salary eats 45% of salary cap.

Celtics for 2024-25 season will have $116M invested into 3 players.

Under those contions it's simply impossible to operate. And those conditions might do execlly opposite of what you said.

If you are nba team that knows your star will become $60M a year player, there is good chance that you won't resign anybody if it's not for very little money. So in near future we might see Suns type buildups. 3-4 elite players and rest of a group made out of minimum salary guys.

We already know Harris & Middelton aren't payed based on fact what they do, but based on fact team's can't afford anybody better. if new CBA was activated under their exstensions, odds are, both would get traded instad of resigned and probably by default would be forced to sign for less ( or enter UFA and make way less ).

Current CBA, to me, makes no sense.


As i was writing this, i went on hoops hype page and Marc Stein reported execlly same thing as i've just typed

: There is already considerable frustration circulating among some NBA players and agents about the new collective bargaining agreement and how it threatens to squeeze the league’s middle class while also shortening deals for numerous players.. Seeing the sorts of figures that are being thrown at athletes in sports that don’t operate with a salary cap is bound to only exacerbate those frustrations.



Middle class of nba will simply disappear. You won't be giving some Wendell Carter $18M deal, you will save every dollar to give Banchero his $50M; so you will rather sign Goga on $5M and save yourself $13M to piss it off on Banchero's bloated contract. So once that same Wendell enters FA, he will NOT be offered $18M deal from anybody, rather $10M and shorter years.


On top of all this, due crazy inflation of stats, every team has "2 max contract " type players, where in reality, only 5-10 nba players should be max contract guys. But teams can't afford to lose players for nothing, especially early in rebuild, so they slap max contract on Ingram, Siakam, Gobert, Lavine , Holiday etc and figure down the line, those players more often than not should be payed 1/3rd of what they are, become untradable, lose value, don't help you win and become unhappy because team stinks. One of reasons why team stinks is- their salary.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,604
And1: 19,717
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#718 » by pepe1991 » Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:37 am

CBA breakdown via reddit user, credit to him

FIRST APRON RULES

Currently about $7mm over luxury tax. Lux tax starts at 164mm this year.

now be unable to sign buyout players [waived during regular season, salary higher than MLE]

In this season:

can only match salaries up to 110 percent of the players in a trade

Next season and future:

only be able to trade for a player who makes up to the value of the salary being dealt away.

Also:

traded player exceptions generated in the prior year cease to be useable unless they get back down below the apron

SECOND APRON RULES

This is set at 17.5mm, but will increase proportionally with cap.

Teams will not be able to use their taxpayer midlevel salary exception.

This one will hurt:

teams cannot aggregate player salaries together in a trade

That means you can't add Spencer Dinwiddie + Dorian Finney Smith's salaries to add up to Kyrie's salary.

will not be able to send out its own player in a sign-and-trade to acquire another team's player

That will hurt the players more.

cannot send cash in a deal

No buying a draft pick anymore.

If a team is above the second apron as of the last day of the regular season, starting with the 2024-25 cap year (July 1, 2024), then its first-round pick seven years out cannot be traded. That's called the frozen pick. If that team is also above the second apron in two of the ensuing four years, that frozen pick will also be moved to the end of the first round in that year.

So if the Clippers didn't let Gordon go, they could have their future pick frozen, then later moved to the back, even though KL and PG have long since retired and they are rebuilding.

SALARY FLOOR

need to hit [Salary floor] by the first day of the regular season

It used to be last day of season

Any team under the cap floor will have the difference between its team salary and the floor added to its payroll, so it can't use that amount as available cap space anymore.

Can't hold that cap space to try to fleece a team during the trade deadline. Like the Spurs picked up 4 firsts and Graham.

It also won't be allowed to perform any transactions after the first day of the regular season that would further decrease its team salary.

And the big one:

teams that don't hit the floor won't receive any of the money paid out to non-taxpaying teams


This is wild. Like. Bat**** crazy wild.
If you are over second apron of tax, you are f***. Salary cap also won't see any dramatic raise, 10% maximum per year.

" Starting with the 2024 free-agency period, players and their agents will not be allowed to announce their new deals until the end of the moratorium period, unless that deal can legally be signed during it. The NBA will be able to fine teams or team personnel for violating the rules on premature free-agency talks. Those punishments include a fine up to $2 million, taking away draft picks and/or suspending people that work for that team."




All this, to me, seems to be going into " 2 max players + team of minimum contract players" type of roster bulid. There simply wont' be middle ground of players to sign. You won't look to add some Bojan Bogdanovic; Vucevic, Robinson, Levert, Struss, Isaac type of middle ground, slight gamble type of deals. They will all be payed near league's minimum, because any other type of money will put your team step closer to second apron of punishment for going over cap.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Catledge
Starter
Posts: 2,403
And1: 859
Joined: Mar 04, 2003
     

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#719 » by Catledge » Wed Jul 26, 2023 2:48 pm

pepe1991 wrote:All this, to me, seems to be going into " 2 max players + team of minimum contract players" type of roster bulid. There simply wont' be middle ground of players to sign. You won't look to add some Bojan Bogdanovic; Vucevic, Robinson, Levert, Struss, Isaac type of middle ground, slight gamble type of deals. They will all be payed near league's minimum, because any other type of money will put your team step closer to second apron of punishment for going over cap.


I expect that at least some teams will try a model of one star + solid supporting cast.

If it were up to me, they would just collectively bargain it: Each team gets only one max contract, with the next-highest possible contract being 25% below the max. The max contract exists outside of the salary cap, so teams don't have to save up space to offer one, and a max contract can only be traded for another max contract (so most would expire without being traded).
dsg2021
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,836
And1: 1,239
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: Official Spec Thread: Off-season Edition - The Draft 

Post#720 » by dsg2021 » Wed Jul 26, 2023 3:11 pm

The older CBA of like 10 years ago that I read most of was way better (Larry Coon’s version at least). Shouldn’t have to punish large market teams this badly. It used to be not so crazy to pay Lux in intervals of 3 of 4 years.

It’s getting more strict and I’d say it makes Ingles deal look absolutely brilliant. A FO definitely needs to think about though if they can make a sustainable elite contender like Weltman wants.

I wonder if they can make star player contracts have the same value as today but count only halfway towards the cap. A simple solution.
Keep max, keep super max. And anything over 32 mil per starts getting some proportionate amount off of the cap sheet (not payroll sheet) up to half off. The luxury cap raises proportionately as well. Done. Only the Owners are stuck, but maybe give them an extra point or two in the BRI.

Return to Orlando Magic