RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Stephen Curry)
Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,395
- And1: 18,828
- Joined: Mar 08, 2012
-
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
I think ZeppelinPage's post has really sold me on West's defense. I was always high on it before but did not really fully take into account just how elite he probably was.
I think West is about as good of a two way player a player his size can be. He likely is not far off the goat PG in terms of PGs, and by my calculation he is the best scoring PG as well.
West is tremendous when it comes to both volume and efficiency. Along with Big O these guys were putting up good efficiency even by modern standards. West also had 3 point range (plenty of footage of him hitting hard long range jumpers, and also we know he is a 90% FT shooter so that's a pretty strong sign).
He had the most 40 point games in the post season if we are talking about heroics for a couple decades. Then after Jordan came it took another couple of decades of James to bump him down. These type of heroic records are often a big thing brought up with Kobe (like how many high scoring games he had in the RS), but West had 7 more 40+ games.
Really tremendous efficiency as well as deep playoff runs (weak conference, but it does say a lot about the sample size that he is a legit performer).
Took a while for him to probably become a legit floor general but he became one none the less. I have a hard time thinking Curry is better than him, as dramatic as Curry's 3 point warping his, I am fairly certain West has a more resilient and physical game while also being able to do a pretty good imitation of a long range bomber. The defense that West brings to the table would likely make me put him over Magic, never mind Curry.
My vote is for Jerry West
Alternate vote is for Larry Bird (not sold on him, but again, waiting for people to discuss him in depth before I make an updated decision)
Nomination is for Oscar Robertson
I think West is about as good of a two way player a player his size can be. He likely is not far off the goat PG in terms of PGs, and by my calculation he is the best scoring PG as well.
West is tremendous when it comes to both volume and efficiency. Along with Big O these guys were putting up good efficiency even by modern standards. West also had 3 point range (plenty of footage of him hitting hard long range jumpers, and also we know he is a 90% FT shooter so that's a pretty strong sign).
He had the most 40 point games in the post season if we are talking about heroics for a couple decades. Then after Jordan came it took another couple of decades of James to bump him down. These type of heroic records are often a big thing brought up with Kobe (like how many high scoring games he had in the RS), but West had 7 more 40+ games.
Really tremendous efficiency as well as deep playoff runs (weak conference, but it does say a lot about the sample size that he is a legit performer).
Took a while for him to probably become a legit floor general but he became one none the less. I have a hard time thinking Curry is better than him, as dramatic as Curry's 3 point warping his, I am fairly certain West has a more resilient and physical game while also being able to do a pretty good imitation of a long range bomber. The defense that West brings to the table would likely make me put him over Magic, never mind Curry.
My vote is for Jerry West
Alternate vote is for Larry Bird (not sold on him, but again, waiting for people to discuss him in depth before I make an updated decision)
Nomination is for Oscar Robertson
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,565
- And1: 5,704
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
rk2023 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:rk2023 wrote:Durant’s strong MVP span for me is 2012 (maybe?), 13-14, 16-19 for me. Post achilles, I’m not as high due to load management in 2021 and a dip in production since then.
Robinson’s for me would be 1990-91, 93 (maybe?), 94-96, 98-99 (maybe). 92 is on the fringes, as I deduct for his time missed.
So as high as 7 for Durant and 8 for Robinson.
Post achilles Durant was still 95% as good as pre-Achilles KD probably. Certainly his stats still suggest as much, and blow Kobe out of the water.
How did that efficient scoring and face value Offensive rating look against Boston or Denver? Though nobody mentioned him, what In those stats suggest blowing Kobe out of the water?
That's where the 95% comes in. KD is older, he can't be playing so many minutes against elite teams with good defenders and expect to maintain that production as consistently every year. He managed to in 21, but 22 and 23 remind you that KD is 33-34 and post achilles injury. Not nearly as bad as some if the dog series Kobe has had though, without anything like the excuses.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,989
- And1: 9,452
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
One_and_Done wrote:rk2023 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:Post achilles Durant was still 95% as good as pre-Achilles KD probably. Certainly his stats still suggest as much, and blow Kobe out of the water.
How did that efficient scoring and face value Offensive rating look against Boston or Denver? Though nobody mentioned him, what In those stats suggest blowing Kobe out of the water?
That's where the 95% comes in. KD is older, he can't be playing so many minutes against elite teams with good defenders and expect to maintain that production as consistently every year. He managed to in 21, but 22 and 23 remind you that KD is 33-34 and post achilles injury. Not nearly as bad as some if the dog series Kobe has had though, without anything like the excuses.
Kobe’s had some absolutely terrible **** series, but none of them were as bad as KD against Boston unless maybe you go back to his teenage years where he was coming off the bench. That was an all-time terrible series for a superstar.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,266
- And1: 2,273
- Joined: Jul 01, 2022
-
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
iggymcfrack wrote:One_and_Done wrote:rk2023 wrote:
How did that efficient scoring and face value Offensive rating look against Boston or Denver? Though nobody mentioned him, what In those stats suggest blowing Kobe out of the water?
That's where the 95% comes in. KD is older, he can't be playing so many minutes against elite teams with good defenders and expect to maintain that production as consistently every year. He managed to in 21, but 22 and 23 remind you that KD is 33-34 and post achilles injury. Not nearly as bad as some if the dog series Kobe has had though, without anything like the excuses.
Kobe’s had some absolutely terrible **** series, but none of them were as bad as KD against Boston unless maybe you go back to his teenage years where he was coming off the bench. That was an all-time terrible series for a superstar.
Plus, I would absolutely love to see Durant play the 04 Pistons or 08 Celtics
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,565
- And1: 5,704
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
Really? KD in 22 was 33, post achilles, without enough help, and being guarded by long, elite defensive wings. Yet he still put up 26-6-6 on 526 TS%.
Kobe had none of those excuses when he posted 22-3-4 on 456 TS% in the 04 finals, when on the highest stage he literally shot his team out of the series. A classic example of how if Kobe couldn't win his way, he'd rather lose. How about his 2011 spanking by the Mavs. He put up 22-3-2 on 519 TS%. I can keep going. The 08 Boston series saw him post worse stats too. The claim Kobe never had a series that bad is simply wrong. He had plenty that were worse.
Kobe had none of those excuses when he posted 22-3-4 on 456 TS% in the 04 finals, when on the highest stage he literally shot his team out of the series. A classic example of how if Kobe couldn't win his way, he'd rather lose. How about his 2011 spanking by the Mavs. He put up 22-3-2 on 519 TS%. I can keep going. The 08 Boston series saw him post worse stats too. The claim Kobe never had a series that bad is simply wrong. He had plenty that were worse.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,531
- And1: 3,754
- Joined: Jan 27, 2013
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
Any good posts on Larry Bird vs David Robinson? I could be convinced of Bird at #11 in theory, but my issue is, we have a guy with similar longevity, who is superior from a modernism POV, who isn't even receiving votes to be added to the pool of nominations. What is the case that Bird is clearly better than Robinson?
Now that's the difference between first and last place.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Senior
- Posts: 613
- And1: 272
- Joined: Jun 17, 2022
- Location: Sydney
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
Spoiler:
I have KD as All-NBA level from 2010 season. Weak MVP IN 2012. MVP level from 2013. So 6 MVP years pre injury. 9 all nba level years pre injury.
3 more all NBA seasons after. Brings him to 12. (MVP level in 2021, great playoffs). I must have a typo in the chart. Thanks for spotting.
12 all NBA, 13 All-star
In terms of weighted accomplishments, he comes out as a tie with D Rob. But I value D Rob higher. D-Rob was borderline all-time in a few seasons.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
- Narigo
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,805
- And1: 885
- Joined: Sep 20, 2010
-
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
Vote: Larry Bird
Alternate: Kobe Bryant
Nominate: Oscar Robertson
A tossup for me between Bird and Kobe. Kobe is better scorer imo mostly because Bird has problems getting to the free throw line which hurt his efficiency. Although Bird was a better off-ball player and outside shooter, and passer. Kobe was much better slasher. Bird was better help defender, Kobe was a better man defender. Bird was better at their best. But Kobe has better prime longevity. It's a tough call for me... I might prefer bird slightly over Kobe mostly cause I think bird has better intangibles
Alternate: Kobe Bryant
Nominate: Oscar Robertson
A tossup for me between Bird and Kobe. Kobe is better scorer imo mostly because Bird has problems getting to the free throw line which hurt his efficiency. Although Bird was a better off-ball player and outside shooter, and passer. Kobe was much better slasher. Bird was better help defender, Kobe was a better man defender. Bird was better at their best. But Kobe has better prime longevity. It's a tough call for me... I might prefer bird slightly over Kobe mostly cause I think bird has better intangibles
Narigo's Fantasy Team
PG: Damian Lillard
SG: Sidney Moncrief
SF:
PF: James Worthy
C: Tim Duncan
BE: Robert Horry
BE:
BE:
PG: Damian Lillard
SG: Sidney Moncrief
SF:
PF: James Worthy
C: Tim Duncan
BE: Robert Horry
BE:
BE:
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,468
- And1: 3,102
- Joined: Apr 13, 2013
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
One_and_Done wrote:Really? KD in 22 was 33, post achilles, without enough help, and being guarded by long, elite defensive wings. Yet he still put up 26-6-6 on 526 TS%.
Kobe had none of those excuses when he posted 22-3-4 on 456 TS% in the 04 finals, when on the highest stage he literally shot his team out of the series. A classic example of how if Kobe couldn't win his way, he'd rather lose. How about his 2011 spanking by the Mavs. He put up 22-3-2 on 519 TS%. I can keep going. The 08 Boston series saw him post worse stats too. The claim Kobe never had a series that bad is simply wrong. He had plenty that were worse.
I’m not as down on Durant as a lot of others, but I think “still put up . . . 0.526 TS%” is a bit of an odd statement. That’s a bad TS% in this era! Even accounting for era/opponent, Kobe’s TS% in the 2004 Finals was a bit worse, but the gap between them isn’t nearly as big as the raw numbers look. It’s basically the difference between a -4 rTS% for Durant and a -6 rTS% for Kobe.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,914
- And1: 16,424
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
ceiling raiser wrote:Any good posts on Larry Bird vs David Robinson? I could be convinced of Bird at #11 in theory, but my issue is, we have a guy with similar longevity, who is superior from a modernism POV, who isn't even receiving votes to be added to the pool of nominations. What is the case that Bird is clearly better than Robinson?
Robinson's regular season stats are amazing but I never loved the skillset analysis of his offensive game as much as his PPG/efficiency. He is neither an elite post up player or midrange shooter, acceptable at both but a player like Hakeem is better at both. His face up game is mostly driven by being more athletic and bigger than opponents. When looking at how Robinson's scoring dropped in playoffs it makes sense to me that he got gameplanned and not really being lock down from a finesse skill perspective caught up to him. I think Giannis scoring stats are a good modern comp to me in that I think they lie a bit, I can't believe how high his scoring numbers are per minute (35 pts per 36 on .60 TS% last season) for a guy who has some holes in his skill level and relies heavily on physical dominance. I would have more players above Giannis as a scoring talent than his stats would indicate for sure. When Robinson is putting up 30ppg numbers in regular season I feel the same way that it just seems high for what his game actually is.
Now with that said Robinson doesn't have to be a perfect offensive player to get consideration, I don't consider Duncan, Hakeem or KG to be perfect ones, and unlike Giannis he actually is legit ATG D. I also think post injury Robinson has some underrated years comparable in value to the first few years of Bird. I definitely think Bird is way better on offense, but depending on how you feel about his D it could be close with Robinson.
Liberate The Zoomers
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,272
- And1: 2,984
- Joined: Dec 25, 2019
-
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
DraymondGold wrote:Thanks for collecting the Box stats f4p!f4p wrote:so for all the people picking steph, i just want to go back to playoff resiliency again. i looked at the last project's Top 33 (just stopped at pippen due to time and less interest in the players below him) plus newer guys like jokic, giannis, embiid, and kawhi and then put in tatum and butler. i would've put in doncic but i only did ages 22-35 and doncic only had one season (though he would have led the list below).
all the data is from ages 22 to 35 and it looks at the BBRef stats PER, WS48, BPM, and TS% and compares each year to the regular season. the resilience at the end is just an average of the normalized increase/decrease for each value. +1 is a top 95% value and -1 is a bottom 6.5% value (couldn't use 5% because the lower values were so low that they were making the average season as slightly "resilient"). for playoff runs shorter than 10 games, the final value was multiplied by "Games/10" so a 5 game, 1 round playoffs would get weighed at 50%. the 2nd table is all 416 playoff runs for these guys. the 1st table is their career average (each playoff run weighed equally to essentially average your resiliency from year to year).Code: Select all
Rank Player Name Career Avg
1 Kawhi Leonard 0.4561
2 Hakeem Olajuwon 0.3315
3 George Mikan 0.3246
4 Lebron James 0.2747
5 Bill Russell 0.2548
6 Walt Frazier 0.2318
7 Jerry West 0.2142
8 Michael Jordan 0.2081
9 Tim Duncan 0.166
10 Magic Johnson 0.0968
11 Scottie Pippen 0.0963
12 Oscar Robertson 0.0865
13 Kobe Bryant 0.0856
14 Charles Barkley 0.0779
15 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 0.0554
16 Dirk Nowitzki 0.0534
17 Jayson Tatum 0.0247
18 Nikola Jokic 0.0205
19 Shaquille O'neal 0.0179
20 Moses Malone 0.0093
21 Dwyane Wade -0.0021
22 Chris Paul -0.0156
23 Julius Erving -0.0231
24 Jimmy Butler -0.0341
25 Wilt Chamberlain -0.0851
26 Kevin Garnett -0.1115
27 Larry Bird -0.1327
28 Kevin Durant -0.1435
29 Patrick Ewing -0.1446
30 David Robinson -0.1552
31 Steve Nash -0.1582
32 Stephen Curry -0.1613
33 Bob Pettit -0.1624
34 John Stockton -0.182
35 Giannis Antetokounmpo -0.1975
36 James Harden -0.1982
37 Karl Malone -0.2959
38 Joel Embiid -0.533Code: Select all
Rank Player Name Season Age PER TS% WS/48 BPM Resilience
1 George Mikan 1953-54 29 4.6 7.7 0.133 1.3491
2 Tim Duncan 2005-06 29 7.3 10.2 0.065 3.6 1.2829
3 Jerry West 1960-61 22 5.3 8.5 0.09 1.2777
4 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1969-70 22 6.9 5.6 0.099 1.2741
5 Hakeem Olajuwon 1996-97 34 4.9 7 0.075 5.7 1.2296
6 Hakeem Olajuwon 1986-87 24 4.7 10.5 0.062 4 1.1957
7 Dirk Nowitzki 2008-09 30 5.3 7.1 0.067 3.5 1.0901
8 Jimmy Butler 2021-22 32 6.3 1.2 0.063 5.5 1.0544
9 Lebron James 2008-09 24 5.7 2.7 0.081 4.3 1.0482
10 Kawhi Leonard 2016-17 25 3.9 6.2 0.05 4.8 1.0369
11 Lebron James 2019-20 35 4.7 7 0.065 2.3 0.9788
12 Hakeem Olajuwon 1987-88 25 15.6 8.6 0.203 10.1 0.9464
13 Kawhi Leonard 2020-21 29 4.6 5.7 0.039 3.4 0.9338
14 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1976-77 29 4.6 3.8 0.049 2.8 0.8582
15 Scottie Pippen 1989-90 24 2.4 4.1 0.062 3.6 0.8555
16 Julius Erving 1975-76 25 3.3 4.1 0.059 3 0.8493
17 Bill Russell 1964-65 30 1.4 6.8 0.052 0.8415
18 Bill Russell 1965-66 31 2.9 6.6 0.026 0.8314
19 Dirk Nowitzki 2009-10 31 5.4 6.5 0.097 6.5 0.8056
20 George Mikan 1948-49 24 4.3 0.8001
21 Charles Barkley 1993-94 30 5 1.2 0.023 3.6 0.7728
22 Lebron James 2017-18 33 3.6 -0.2 0.048 4 0.7544
23 Michael Jordan 1994-95 31 2.7 6.4 -0.017 3.8 0.7539
24 Lebron James 2016-17 32 3.1 3 0.054 2.2 0.7401
25 Stephen Curry 2016-17 28 2.5 3.5 0.043 2.8 0.7399
26 Bill Russell 1961-62 27 3.2 3 0.04 0.7373
27 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1973-74 26 3.9 1.9 0.047 2.4 0.7334
28 Larry Bird 1983-84 27 2.1 5.5 0.021 2.7 0.7257
29 Kobe Bryant 2009-10 31 2.8 2.2 0.03 2.9 0.6826
30 Dwyane Wade 2015-16 34 2 1.5 0.043 3 0.6639
31 Bill Russell 1962-63 28 2.3 4.4 0.012 0.65
32 Nikola Jokic 2018-19 23 3.3 0.7 0.037 2.5 0.6474
33 Julius Erving 1976-77 26 2 2.4 0.027 2.9 0.6462
34 Oscar Robertson 1972-73 34 3.8 6.1 0.088 0.6455
35 Larry Bird 1980-81 24 1.9 0.4 0.038 3.4 0.6353
36 Kobe Bryant 2008-09 30 2.4 0.3 0.032 3.2 0.6259
37 Tim Duncan 1998-99 22 1.9 3.2 0.03 2.1 0.6253
38 Julius Erving 1978-79 28 2 3 0.038 2.8 0.6194
39 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1983-84 36 2.7 -1.6 0.043 3.3 0.6106
40 Kawhi Leonard 2018-19 27 2.1 1.3 0.025 2.9 0.6088
41 Chris Paul 2010-11 25 5.2 9.2 0.01 3.4 0.6012
42 Michael Jordan 1997-98 34 2.9 1.2 0.027 2.1 0.5951
43 Walt Frazier 1973-74 28 2.6 2.9 0.021 1.6 0.5912
44 Bill Russell 1960-61 26 3.9 0.3 0.02 0.5896
45 Jerry West 1968-69 30 2.9 -1.5 0.058 0.5818
46 James Harden 2020-21 31 -0.6 5.5 0.055 1.9 0.5791
47 Tim Duncan 2002-03 26 1.5 1.3 0.031 2.6 0.5787
48 Kevin Durant 2018-19 30 2.6 3 0.002 2.1 0.5772
49 Stephen Curry 2021-22 33 3 0.5 0.03 1.9 0.5712
50 Bill Russell 1959-60 25 1.9 0.8 0.038 0.5561
51 Jerry West 1967-68 29 1.9 0.6 0.037 0.5438
52 Hakeem Olajuwon 1985-86 23 1.4 0.6 0.045 1.9 0.5427
53 Lebron James 2015-16 31 2.5 -0.3 0.032 2 0.534
54 Kobe Bryant 2000-01 22 0.5 0.3 0.064 1.7 0.5294
55 Magic Johnson 1985-86 26 1.6 -1.1 0.041 2.6 0.529
56 Dirk Nowitzki 2003-04 25 5 0 0.097 5.7 0.5288
57 Tim Duncan 2001-02 25 4.8 -2.6 -0.01 3.8 0.5083
58 Scottie Pippen 1988-89 23 -0.5 2 0.024 2.7 0.502
59 Bob Pettit 1962-63 30 1.1 1.8 0.022 0.4983
60 Charles Barkley 1985-86 22 1.4 1.2 0.013 2.1 0.4927
61 Kobe Bryant 2011-12 33 2.5 -0.2 0.011 2.1 0.4894
62 Jerry West 1962-63 24 1.2 2.5 0.008 0.487
63 Moses Malone 1982-83 27 0.6 0.9 0.012 2.7 0.4829
64 Luka Doncic 2021-22 22 3.5 0.6 0.005 1.1 0.4812
65 Walt Frazier 1974-75 29 7.4 13.5 0.09 5.3 0.471
66 Lebron James 2013-14 29 1.7 1.9 0.005 1.5 0.4704
67 Jimmy Butler 2018-19 29 0.9 -0.7 0.022 2.5 0.456
68 Walt Frazier 1970-71 25 0.7 1.6 0.019 0.4555
69 Shaquille O'neal 1995-96 23 1 0.5 -0.015 3.1 0.4429
70 Shaquille O'neal 1997-98 25 2.2 1.7 -0.024 2 0.4427
71 Hakeem Olajuwon 1993-94 31 2.4 0.3 -0.002 1.7 0.4426
72 Chris Paul 2015-16 30 7 0 0.069 6.1 0.4396
73 Dwyane Wade 2009-10 28 1.4 8.8 0.005 4.3 0.4325
74 Kevin Durant 2011-12 23 1.3 2.2 0.001 1.1 0.427
75 Michael Jordan 1990-91 27 0.4 -0.5 0.012 2.6 0.4211
76 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1979-80 32 2.6 -2.8 0.026 1.7 0.4206
77 Tim Duncan 2013-14 37 -0.2 3.3 0.04 -0.2 0.4156
78 Kawhi Leonard 2015-16 24 2.6 -1.9 -0.006 2.4 0.4123
79 Magic Johnson 1981-82 22 -0.4 2.4 0.024 1 0.4117
80 John Stockton 1986-87 24 -0.8 14.5 0.026 0.8 0.3948
81 Kevin Durant 2016-17 28 -0.1 3.2 0.002 1 0.3947
82 Larry Bird 1985-86 29 -1.7 3.5 0.019 1.2 0.3907
83 Scottie Pippen 1990-91 25 1.4 0.3 0.018 0.7 0.3866
84 Moses Malone 1988-89 33 2.9 2.6 0.03 3.8 0.3788
85 Wilt Chamberlain 1964-65 28 -1.5 3.9 0.003 0.373
86 Tim Duncan 2011-12 35 0.4 -0.2 0.01 1.7 0.3687
87 Dwyane Wade 2004-05 23 1.2 0 0.003 1.3 0.3672
88 Walt Frazier 1972-73 27 0 2.5 -0.007 0.3647
89 Chris Paul 2007-08 22 2.4 -1.1 0.005 0.9 0.3632
90 Kevin Durant 2010-11 22 0.5 -0.7 0.028 1 0.3585
91 Michael Jordan 1989-90 26 0.5 -1.4 -0.001 2.5 0.3555
92 Jerry West 1961-62 23 -0.7 2 0.008 0.353
93 Scottie Pippen 1999-00 34 1.1 -1.1 0.003 1.7 0.3515
94 Dwyane Wade 2005-06 24 -0.7 1.6 0.001 1.6 0.3505
95 Charles Barkley 1998-99 35 5.9 3.3 0.023 3.4 0.3479
96 Tim Duncan 2000-01 24 1.6 -0.5 -0.027 2.2 0.3478
97 Shaquille O'neal 1996-97 24 1.9 -0.4 0.018 0.7 0.3468
98 Kevin Garnett 2000-01 24 1 3.8 0.079 4.1 0.3437
99 Jimmy Butler 2019-20 30 0.2 3.1 -0.012 0.5 0.3367
100 Karl Malone 1993-94 30 1.7 -1.9 0.016 0.9 0.3341
101 Steve Nash 2009-10 35 0.8 1.9 -0.003 0.3 0.3337
102 Magic Johnson 1987-88 28 -0.2 1.9 -0.001 0.9 0.3329
103 Walt Frazier 1971-72 26 -0.1 1 0.004 0.3301
104 Dwyane Wade 2010-11 29 0.7 -1.1 -0.002 1.8 0.3273
105 Oscar Robertson 1970-71 32 1.5 -3 0.027 0.3258
106 Kevin Durant 2020-21 32 0.5 -3.6 0.008 2.8 0.3245
107 Kawhi Leonard 2019-20 28 0.9 0.4 0.002 0.5 0.3138
108 Dirk Nowitzki 2010-11 32 1.8 -0.3 -0.003 0.4 0.3109
109 Oscar Robertson 1973-74 35 0.9 0.1 -0.007 0.9 0.306
110 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1978-79 31 1 2.4 0.003 0.4 0.3049
111 Chris Paul 2014-15 29 -0.3 3.1 -0.022 0.7 0.3015
112 Chris Paul 2012-13 27 2.8 3.9 -0.02 0.9 0.2897
113 Kobe Bryant 2007-08 29 0.8 0.1 -0.03 1.6 0.2866
114 Charles Barkley 1994-95 31 1.4 0.8 -0.008 -0.1 0.2852
115 Giannis Antetokounmpo 2017-18 23 -0.7 2.2 0.032 0.9 0.2843
116 Wilt Chamberlain 1963-64 27 -0.3 0.6 -0.002 0.2798
117 Karl Malone 1991-92 28 -0.4 1.9 -0.017 0.8 0.2763
118 Shaquille O'neal 2003-04 31 0.4 -1.3 0.01 0.7 0.2685
119 Shaquille O'neal 2002-03 30 1.1 -3.2 -0.01 1.9 0.2606
120 John Stockton 1990-91 28 -1.6 4 -0.009 0.4 0.2597
121 Jerry West 1965-66 27 0.1 0.8 -0.019 0.2537
122 Patrick Ewing 1992-93 30 0.8 -1.1 -0.015 1.1 0.2536
123 Moses Malone 1979-80 24 0.8 1.7 -0.024 1.5 0.2443
124 Kawhi Leonard 2022-23 31 6 4.7 0.033 7.7 0.244
125 Magic Johnson 1986-87 27 -0.8 0.5 0.002 0.5 0.2421
126 Hakeem Olajuwon 1992-93 30 -0.6 -0.9 -0.013 1.6 0.2354
127 Michael Jordan 1992-93 29 0.4 -1.1 0 0.4 0.2302
128 David Robinson 1990-91 25 -1.3 14.5 -0.03 0 0.2288
129 Dirk Nowitzki 2005-06 27 -1.3 0.7 -0.012 1.1 0.2286
130 Jayson Tatum 2020-21 22 2.8 0.1 -0.023 2.6 0.2283
131 Dwyane Wade 2003-04 22 0.1 -0.3 0.001 0.1 0.2271
132 Magic Johnson 1983-84 24 0.2 -2.7 0.007 1 0.2243
133 Dirk Nowitzki 2007-08 29 1.7 0.3 -0.027 3 0.2149
134 Bob Pettit 1959-60 27 -0.4 0.5 -0.019 0.2109
135 George Mikan 1951-52 27 1 1.8 -0.062 0.2029
136 Tim Duncan 2008-09 32 2.9 0.5 -0.02 1.3 0.1997
137 Wilt Chamberlain 1959-60 23 -1.1 0.5 -0.004 0.1993
138 Chris Paul 2016-17 31 1.6 -2.2 -0.018 1.7 0.1979
139 Michael Jordan 1985-86 22 2.6 5.1 0.001 2.2 0.1953
140 John Stockton 1985-86 23 0.2 7.8 0.008 -0.6 0.19
141 Jimmy Butler 2014-15 25 -0.5 -2.1 -0.011 1.2 0.1796
142 Steve Nash 2004-05 30 1.4 -0.2 -0.039 0 0.1781
143 Kawhi Leonard 2013-14 22 -0.7 0.4 -0.002 -0.4 0.1756
144 Kevin Garnett 1998-99 22 1.7 -0.5 -0.011 2.8 0.1727
145 Nikola Jokic 2019-20 24 -0.1 0.9 -0.03 0 0.1718
146 Charles Barkley 1995-96 32 2.7 -2.3 0.006 2.3 0.1712
147 James Harden 2019-20 30 -1.6 1 -0.001 -0.2 0.1712
148 David Robinson 2000-01 35 0.8 -2.1 -0.039 1.3 0.1709
149 Julius Erving 1973-74 23 -1.7 0.8 0.014 -0.7 0.1671
150 John Stockton 1996-97 34 0.6 -2.9 -0.025 1.2 0.1653
151 Tim Duncan 2006-07 30 1.3 -2.3 -0.016 -0.1 0.1568
152 Walt Frazier 1968-69 23 1.1 -3.5 -0.009 0.156
153 John Stockton 1988-89 26 3 -2.3 -0.006 3.7 0.1498
154 Hakeem Olajuwon 1990-91 28 -1.1 8 0.001 0.8 0.1486
155 Oscar Robertson 1961-62 23 -0.6 3.2 -0.004 0.1483
156 George Mikan 1949-50 25 -0.6 0.147
157 Kevin Durant 2017-18 29 -0.9 -3.4 0.022 0.3 0.1467
158 Hakeem Olajuwon 1994-95 32 0.7 -0.3 -0.038 0 0.1465
159 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1982-83 35 -0.8 -1.1 -0.033 1.1 0.1364
160 Jerry West 1963-64 25 0.9 0.2 -0.022 0.1319
161 Dirk Nowitzki 2001-02 23 0.7 -2.2 -0.029 0.9 0.1309
162 David Robinson 1998-99 33 -1.6 -0.1 -0.018 0.4 0.1287
163 Joel Embiid 2019-20 25 0.8 1 -0.027 1.5 0.1272
164 Julius Erving 1977-78 27 -0.5 -2.2 -0.008 0.2 0.1204
165 Dirk Nowitzki 2000-01 22 -0.5 -2.8 -0.018 0.9 0.1191
166 Patrick Ewing 1996-97 34 -0.3 -0.1 -0.035 0.1 0.1108
167 Chris Paul 2020-21 35 -0.7 -1.5 -0.023 0.4 0.1089
168 Bill Russell 1967-68 33 -0.3 -0.3 -0.042 0.102
169 Oscar Robertson 1962-63 24 0.1 -1.4 -0.035 0.1008
170 Shaquille O'neal 2007-08 35 1.8 -10.3 0.024 2.8 0.1
171 Kevin Garnett 2011-12 35 0.1 -0.9 -0.029 -0.4 0.0978
172 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1984-85 37 -0.8 -2.6 -0.01 0.3 0.095
173 Scottie Pippen 1991-92 26 -1.4 -1.1 -0.024 0.5 0.095
174 George Mikan 1955-56 31 0.4 -1.3 0.016 0.0896
175 Shaquille O'neal 2000-01 28 -1.5 -1 0.015 -1.2 0.0867
176 Michael Jordan 1988-89 25 -1.2 -1.2 -0.022 0.2 0.0866
177 Jimmy Butler 2012-13 23 -0.8 0.1 -0.053 0.5 0.0866
178 Hakeem Olajuwon 1988-89 26 -1.1 -0.3 -0.015 1.4 0.0862
179 Jerry West 1972-73 34 -0.5 -2.1 -0.022 0.0792
180 Lebron James 2006-07 22 -0.6 -3.6 -0.006 0 0.0618
181 Charles Barkley 1988-89 25 -2.7 3.8 -0.037 0.9 0.0578
182 Patrick Ewing 1995-96 33 -2.8 0.6 -0.039 0.8 0.0561
183 Giannis Antetokounmpo 2019-20 25 -0.6 -0.3 -0.041 -0.3 0.056
184 Julius Erving 1972-73 22 -2.8 2.4 -0.034 0.0512
185 Dirk Nowitzki 2011-12 33 0.8 -0.4 -0.036 -0.5 0.0484
186 Lebron James 2011-12 27 -0.4 -2.9 -0.014 -0.4 0.0479
187 Giannis Antetokounmpo 2020-21 26 -1.6 -3.4 -0.02 0.9 0.0453
188 Jayson Tatum 2022-23 24 -1.1 -2.2 -0.017 -0.2 0.0452
189 Scottie Pippen 1997-98 32 -0.9 -3.3 -0.027 0.6 0.0424
190 Oscar Robertson 1966-67 28 -2.6 3.4 -0.051 0.04
191 Michael Jordan 1991-92 28 -0.5 -0.8 -0.058 0.2 0.0378
192 Michael Jordan 1995-96 32 -2.7 -1.8 -0.011 0.2 0.0288
193 Wilt Chamberlain 1960-61 24 -1.1 -2.7 -0.001 0.0269
194 John Stockton 1987-88 25 -0.7 -2.7 -0.037 0.3 0.0263
195 Magic Johnson 1984-85 25 -0.9 -3.8 -0.01 -0.1 0.0252
196 Moses Malone 1978-79 23 5 -10.3 -0.034 1.7 0.0243
197 Karl Malone 1999-00 36 -1.3 0.2 -0.055 -0.2 0.0181
198 David Robinson 1999-00 34 1 -10.5 -0.018 2.6 0.0147
199 Steve Nash 1997-98 23 0.9 -4.5 -0.056 1 0.0129
200 Patrick Ewing 1994-95 32 -3 0.4 -0.006 -1.2 0.0128
201 David Robinson 1989-90 24 -1.9 -1.6 -0.022 -0.3 0.0106
202 Bob Pettit 1956-57 24 -3.2 1 -0.038 0.0028
203 Kevin Garnett 2001-02 25 1.7 -2.2 -0.073 -0.5 0.0015
204 Hakeem Olajuwon 1984-85 22 -1.4 -7.4 -0.008 1.7 0.0014
205 Jerry West 1966-67 28 -4.6 0 -0.2 0
206 Patrick Ewing 1987-88 25 -1.2 -3.2 -0.034 0.2 -0.0044
207 Shaquille O'neal 2001-02 29 -1.4 -2.1 -0.026 -0.5 -0.007
208 Stephen Curry 2012-13 24 -0.8 -3.1 -0.019 -0.7 -0.0085
209 Patrick Ewing 1989-90 27 -0.4 -2 -0.05 -0.3 -0.0088
210 Michael Jordan 1996-97 33 -0.7 -4.3 -0.048 1 -0.0109
211 Charles Barkley 1990-91 27 -2.1 -0.5 -0.041 -0.4 -0.0136
212 Michael Jordan 1986-87 23 -1.7 -3.3 -0.082 1.9 -0.0157
213 Scottie Pippen 1998-99 33 1.9 -8.2 -0.035 0.2 -0.0173
214 Wilt Chamberlain 1971-72 35 -0.7 -4.8 -0.014 -0.025
215 John Stockton 1992-93 30 -2.7 -2.4 -0.032 0.1 -0.0259
216 Kevin Garnett 2009-10 33 -1.8 -3.9 -0.023 0.3 -0.0261
217 Jimmy Butler 2013-14 24 -2.1 -1.5 -0.035 -0.8 -0.0301
218 Shaquille O'neal 1994-95 22 -2.5 0.7 -0.05 -0.6 -0.0307
219 Moses Malone 1987-88 32 -2.9 -1.4 -0.038 -0.3 -0.0341
220 Moses Malone 1986-87 31 -4.5 0.6 -0.073 0.4 -0.0355
221 Chris Paul 2019-20 34 -2.4 -0.6 -0.052 -0.3 -0.039
222 Jerry West 1964-65 26 1.7 -3.8 -0.072 -0.0392
223 Oscar Robertson 1963-64 25 -2.9 -0.8 -0.033 -0.0423
224 Lebron James 2009-10 25 -2.5 0.3 -0.057 -0.3 -0.043
225 Larry Bird 1989-90 33 -1.2 -0.7 -0.051 -1.6 -0.043
226 Nikola Jokic 2022-23 27 -0.3 -7 -0.003 -0.2 -0.0432
227 Scottie Pippen 1995-96 30 -1.6 -7.8 -0.014 1.5 -0.0476
228 Chris Paul 2013-14 28 -2.3 0.3 -0.075 0.2 -0.049
229 James Harden 2014-15 25 -1.9 1.5 -0.063 -1.2 -0.0493
230 Stephen Curry 2018-19 30 -1.8 -2.1 -0.014 -1.4 -0.0509
231 Moses Malone 1981-82 26 -2.5 -8.7 -0.035 1.4 -0.0534
232 Kobe Bryant 2006-07 28 -2 -1.9 -0.078 0.2 -0.0584
233 Julius Erving 1981-82 31 -3.4 -1.2 -0.044 0.3 -0.061
234 Bill Russell 1968-69 34 0.1 -1.9 -0.077 -0.0662
235 Chris Paul 2018-19 33 -2.1 -0.3 -0.04 -1.4 -0.0713
236 John Stockton 1997-98 35 -1.8 -5.9 -0.027 0.8 -0.0713
237 Julius Erving 1984-85 34 -3.1 -2.9 -0.027 0.1 -0.0732
238 Walt Frazier 1967-68 22 -1.8 -3.2 -0.062 -0.0736
239 Kawhi Leonard 2014-15 23 -2.1 0.4 -0.061 -1.5 -0.0761
240 Wilt Chamberlain 1961-62 25 -2.4 -2.8 -0.026 -0.0776
241 Shaquille O'neal 1999-00 27 -0.1 -2.2 -0.059 -1.2 -0.0827
242 Larry Bird 1979-80 23 -2.2 -2.7 -0.046 -0.2 -0.0855
243 Karl Malone 1988-89 25 -2.3 -1.8 -0.093 -1.8 -0.0878
244 Oscar Robertson 1965-66 27 -0.9 -3.3 -0.074 -0.0885
245 Julius Erving 1979-80 29 -2.9 -1.5 -0.035 -0.7 -0.0892
246 Bill Russell 1958-59 24 -1.9 -3.9 -0.024 -0.0901
247 James Harden 2015-16 26 -3.5 -4.3 -0.098 2.2 -0.0938
248 Charles Barkley 1992-93 29 -1 -4.4 -0.027 -0.9 -0.094
249 Steve Nash 2001-02 27 -2 -1.7 -0.057 -0.8 -0.0955
250 David Robinson 1992-93 27 -2.6 -4 -0.025 -0.3 -0.108
251 Kevin Garnett 2002-03 26 -1.4 -1.4 -0.084 -1.4 -0.1145
252 Dwyane Wade 2016-17 35 -3 -3.6 -0.027 -1.5 -0.1163
253 Karl Malone 1994-95 31 -0.5 -4 -0.096 -0.9 -0.1185
254 Lebron James 2014-15 30 -0.6 -9 -0.026 0.8 -0.119
255 Scottie Pippen 1993-94 28 -0.4 -2.3 -0.045 -2.1 -0.1203
256 Bill Russell 1963-64 29 -0.4 -5.5 -0.039 -0.1246
257 Charles Barkley 1997-98 34 -5.4 -0.6 -0.063 -1.8 -0.1248
258 Nikola Jokic 2021-22 26 0.3 -1.8 -0.094 -3 -0.1283
259 Bill Russell 1957-58 23 -1.2 -4.5 -0.044 -0.1301
260 Bill Russell 1956-57 22 -2.2 -5.2 -0.014 -0.1311
261 Moses Malone 1983-84 28 -4.8 -1.5 -0.065 -0.9 -0.1317
262 James Harden 2011-12 22 -0.2 -5.5 -0.046 -0.8 -0.1381
263 George Mikan 1950-51 26 -3.2 -0.1397
264 Hakeem Olajuwon 1997-98 35 -2 -8.2 -0.082 1.1 -0.1399
265 Kevin Garnett 1999-00 23 -3.1 -10.4 -0.07 1.1 -0.1483
266 Shaquille O'neal 2006-07 34 -1.8 -3.8 -0.111 -1.7 -0.1509
267 Scottie Pippen 1992-93 27 -2.3 -0.6 -0.049 -2 -0.1516
268 Joel Embiid 2020-21 26 -4.1 -0.5 -0.069 0 -0.1523
269 Moses Malone 1980-81 25 -2.7 -4.8 -0.028 -0.4 -0.1532
270 Kobe Bryant 2001-02 23 -2.7 -3.3 -0.051 -0.3 -0.1563
271 Steve Nash 2005-06 31 -2 -1.7 -0.059 -1.3 -0.1563
272 Magic Johnson 1989-90 30 -1.6 -2.4 -0.048 -2.1 -0.166
273 Patrick Ewing 1991-92 29 -2.9 -6.1 -0.031 0.3 -0.1686
274 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1980-81 33 -3.1 -9.9 -0.071 -2.2 -0.1699
275 Scottie Pippen 1994-95 29 -3.7 -1 -0.038 -1.6 -0.1729
276 Wilt Chamberlain 1965-66 29 -2.3 -4.7 -0.082 -0.1746
277 George Mikan 1952-53 28 -2.3 -2.6 -0.059 -0.1766
278 Bob Pettit 1958-59 26 -5.3 -1.5 -0.058 -0.1805
279 Michael Jordan 1987-88 24 -3.3 -0.5 -0.074 -0.8 -0.1808
280 Dirk Nowitzki 2002-03 24 -2.4 1.2 -0.077 -2.2 -0.1811
281 Joel Embiid 2018-19 24 -4.3 -3.4 -0.045 0.2 -0.183
282 Giannis Antetokounmpo 2016-17 22 -4.2 -3.6 -0.072 -0.7 -0.1874
283 Tim Duncan 2004-05 28 -2.1 -1.4 -0.054 -2.1 -0.1887
284 Wilt Chamberlain 1968-69 32 -3.6 -4.6 -0.015 -0.1903
285 James Harden 2021-22 32 -4.1 0.1 -0.04 -2.1 -0.1908
286 David Robinson 1995-96 30 -0.3 -2 -0.076 -2.2 -0.1924
287 Magic Johnson 1982-83 23 -2.4 -4.8 -0.051 -0.3 -0.1931
288 Chris Paul 2017-18 32 -1.6 -3.9 -0.072 -0.5 -0.1947
289 Jerry West 1969-70 31 -3.5 -2.2 -0.05 -0.1984
290 Scottie Pippen 1996-97 31 -3.2 -2.8 -0.058 -0.6 -0.1989
291 Jayson Tatum 2021-22 23 -4.2 -1.6 -0.059 -0.5 -0.1993
292 James Harden 2012-13 23 -2.1 -5.2 -0.106 -0.3 -0.2012
293 Hakeem Olajuwon 1989-90 27 -3.6 -6.3 -0.092 -1.9 -0.2015
294 Tim Duncan 2003-04 27 -3 2.6 -0.066 -3.3 -0.2024
295 Magic Johnson 1990-91 31 -2.4 -2.5 -0.058 -1.4 -0.2044
296 Dwyane Wade 2008-09 27 -4.1 -0.9 -0.037 -3.3 -0.2049
297 Larry Bird 1991-92 35 -4.6 -3.3 -0.09 -3.3 -0.2127
298 Karl Malone 1987-88 24 -2.3 -3.1 -0.058 -1.4 -0.22
299 Lebron James 2010-11 26 -3.6 -3.1 -0.046 -1 -0.221
300 Charles Barkley 1986-87 23 -4.9 -1.1 -0.06 -4.1 -0.2225
301 Kobe Bryant 2003-04 25 -2.7 -4.5 -0.065 -0.3 -0.2325
302 Magic Johnson 1988-89 29 -3.5 -1.6 -0.067 -1.2 -0.2336
303 Bob Pettit 1960-61 28 -2.9 -1.7 -0.078 -0.2374
304 Oscar Robertson 1964-65 26 -5.9 -3.3 -0.112 -0.2409
305 Tim Duncan 2012-13 36 -3.1 -3.1 -0.03 -2.4 -0.2465
306 Moses Malone 1984-85 29 -4.5 -6.8 -0.033 0.6 -0.2487
307 Stephen Curry 2014-15 26 -3.5 -3.1 -0.06 -1.1 -0.2591
308 Karl Malone 1986-87 23 -4.6 -5.4 -0.064 -3.1 -0.2609
309 Julius Erving 1985-86 35 -3.3 -2.9 -0.046 -2 -0.2646
310 Wilt Chamberlain 1967-68 31 -2 -4.6 -0.064 -0.265
311 Scottie Pippen 2000-01 35 -5.5 -5.2 -0.178 -4 -0.272
312 Patrick Ewing 1993-94 31 -2.3 -5.6 -0.061 -0.8 -0.2729
313 Charles Barkley 1996-97 33 -2.5 -2.4 -0.06 -2.4 -0.2742
314 Larry Bird 1982-83 26 -3.8 -8.3 -0.091 -0.1 -0.2773
315 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1981-82 34 -3.3 -5.8 -0.048 -0.6 -0.2774
316 Bob Pettit 1964-65 32 -7.3 -4.8 -0.096 -0.2785
317 Kobe Bryant 2010-11 32 -3.3 -1.2 -0.079 -1.8 -0.2806
318 Bob Pettit 1957-58 25 -3.7 -2 -0.075 -0.2875
319 Shaquille O'neal 1998-99 26 -1.8 -6.9 -0.079 -1.1 -0.2878
320 Shaquille O'neal 2005-06 33 -4.5 -1.5 -0.061 -1.7 -0.2907
321 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1977-78 30 -7.3 -6.3 -0.127 -5.6 -0.2978
322 Tim Duncan 2007-08 31 -2.5 -5.8 -0.078 -0.3 -0.3006
323 Kevin Garnett 2007-08 31 -2.3 -4.6 -0.066 -1.6 -0.3034
324 Wilt Chamberlain 1966-67 30 -1.2 -9.1 -0.032 -0.3075
325 Steve Nash 2007-08 33 -4.3 -10.3 -0.078 -1.8 -0.3127
326 Dwyane Wade 2013-14 32 -3.5 -2.8 -0.063 -2 -0.3141
327 Steve Nash 2006-07 32 -1.9 -7.7 -0.06 -0.7 -0.3163
328 Karl Malone 1990-91 27 -3.4 -6 -0.071 -0.7 -0.3189
329 Hakeem Olajuwon 1995-96 33 -5.5 -1.4 -0.087 -1.8 -0.324
330 Jimmy Butler 2017-18 28 -6.8 -3.3 -0.1 -3.2 -0.3242
331 Lebron James 2007-08 23 -4.8 -4.3 -0.055 -0.8 -0.3245
332 Oscar Robertson 1971-72 33 -2.5 -7.8 -0.033 -0.3298
333 Kevin Durant 2012-13 24 -2.3 -7.3 -0.081 0 -0.3304
334 Joel Embiid 2017-18 23 -4.8 -5.4 -0.059 -1.5 -0.3328
335 Stephen Curry 2013-14 25 -5.3 -1.1 -0.094 -3 -0.3364
336 Karl Malone 1997-98 34 -3.7 -6.3 -0.075 -0.2 -0.3561
337 Lebron James 2012-13 28 -3.5 -5.5 -0.062 -1.3 -0.357
338 Patrick Ewing 1988-89 26 -3 -7.1 -0.043 -2.3 -0.3624
339 Karl Malone 1995-96 32 -2.4 -7.7 -0.062 -1 -0.3626
340 Julius Erving 1983-84 33 -7.7 -3.1 -0.109 -3.8 -0.3714
341 Moses Malone 1990-91 35 -4.1 -16.9 -0.052 -1.4 -0.3719
342 Wilt Chamberlain 1969-70 33 -4.5 -2.6 -0.081 -0.3819
343 Steve Nash 2003-04 29 -5 -13 -0.07 -2.5 -0.385
344 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1970-71 23 -3.7 -5.8 -0.055 -0.3874
345 Stephen Curry 2022-23 34 -3.7 -6.8 -0.061 -1 -0.3875
346 Dwyane Wade 2011-12 30 -4.3 -3.3 -0.062 -2.6 -0.4016
347 Steve Nash 2002-03 28 -4.5 -1.1 -0.093 -2.4 -0.4045
348 James Harden 2016-17 27 -4.4 -3 -0.088 -1.7 -0.406
349 Tim Duncan 2010-11 34 -6.4 -3.7 -0.118 -3.3 -0.4182
350 James Harden 2022-23 33 -3.1 -6.9 -0.077 -1.3 -0.4247
351 James Harden 2013-14 24 -5.2 -9.9 -0.11 -1.4 -0.4254
352 Larry Bird 1990-91 34 -3.9 -4 -0.062 -3 -0.4327
353 Steve Nash 2000-01 26 -4.5 -5 -0.087 -1.1 -0.4364
354 Kobe Bryant 2002-03 24 -4 -1.9 -0.079 -3.4 -0.4365
355 John Stockton 1991-92 29 -3.4 -4.2 -0.093 -2.1 -0.4402
356 Walt Frazier 1969-70 24 -4.6 -4.4 -0.073 -0.4402
357 Karl Malone 2000-01 37 -5 -8.8 -0.169 -2.7 -0.4494
358 Giannis Antetokounmpo 2022-23 28 -10.2 -8 -0.23 -6.5 -0.4503
359 Bill Russell 1966-67 32 -3.3 -6.4 -0.088 -0.4538
360 Charles Barkley 1989-90 26 -2.1 -7.2 -0.093 -1.8 -0.4637
361 Patrick Ewing 1990-91 28 -13.4 -8.9 -0.204 -5.6 -0.4643
362 Larry Bird 1981-82 25 -4.7 -8.3 -0.051 -1.2 -0.4685
363 Jimmy Butler 2016-17 27 -5.7 -5.8 -0.12 -4 -0.4714
364 Wilt Chamberlain 1970-71 34 -1.2 -7.9 -0.097 -0.4782
365 Bob Pettit 1955-56 23 -5.9 -2 -0.128 -0.4798
366 John Stockton 1994-95 32 -3.8 -10.5 -0.146 -4.7 -0.485
367 John Stockton 1993-94 31 -2.6 -8.5 -0.07 -2.3 -0.5014
368 Julius Erving 1974-75 24 -6.1 -5.8 -0.154 -5.9 -0.506
369 Kobe Bryant 2005-06 27 -8.1 2.8 -0.137 -5.2 -0.5077
370 Karl Malone 1989-90 26 -7.5 -12.1 -0.138 -2.9 -0.5258
371 John Stockton 1999-00 37 -4 -4.3 -0.09 -3.1 -0.5258
372 David Robinson 1997-98 32 -3.7 -8.5 -0.086 -2.2 -0.5265
373 Larry Bird 1986-87 30 -4.6 -3.5 -0.091 -3.1 -0.5283
374 James Harden 2018-19 29 -5.4 -4.9 -0.065 -2.9 -0.5303
375 Giannis Antetokounmpo 2018-19 24 -4.4 -7.4 -0.073 -2 -0.5329
376 Kevin Garnett 2010-11 34 -3.3 -9.6 -0.081 -2.3 -0.5377
377 Nikola Jokic 2020-21 25 -1.7 -5.6 -0.12 -3.1 -0.5451
378 David Robinson 1993-94 28 -8.7 -10.6 -0.191 -5.7 -0.5479
379 Dwyane Wade 2012-13 31 -5.3 -7.3 -0.084 -1.3 -0.5533
380 John Stockton 1989-90 27 -5.9 -12.5 -0.132 -5.4 -0.5689
381 Jimmy Butler 2022-23 33 -3.6 -8.2 -0.088 -2.2 -0.5758
382 Stephen Curry 2017-18 29 -5.9 -8.5 -0.085 -0.6 -0.5779
383 Larry Bird 1984-85 28 -5.6 -4.9 -0.083 -2.8 -0.5793
384 Julius Erving 1980-81 30 -4.5 -4.5 -0.114 -2.7 -0.5912
385 Giannis Antetokounmpo 2021-22 27 -5.3 -8.1 -0.103 -0.8 -0.5973
386 Kevin Garnett 2003-04 27 -4.4 -3.4 -0.109 -3.7 -0.6008
387 Kevin Durant 2022-23 34 -4.8 -7.8 -0.08 -2.5 -0.6138
388 Karl Malone 1992-93 29 -9.6 -8.4 -0.153 -6.1 -0.6316
389 Tim Duncan 2009-10 33 -5 -3.3 -0.124 -3.3 -0.6373
390 John Stockton 1998-99 36 -3.8 -8.4 -0.101 -2.5 -0.6439
391 John Stockton 1995-96 33 -4.9 -9.8 -0.058 -2.9 -0.6534
392 Dirk Nowitzki 2006-07 28 -6.7 -9.6 -0.15 -5.2 -0.6661
393 James Harden 2017-18 28 -4.9 -7.1 -0.126 -1.8 -0.6693
394 Karl Malone 1998-99 35 -4.4 -8.5 -0.117 -2.2 -0.696
395 Bob Pettit 1963-64 31 -5.3 -5.2 -0.129 -0.71
396 Larry Bird 1987-88 31 -7.6 -7 -0.092 -2.1 -0.7164
397 David Robinson 1994-95 29 -6.5 -6.6 -0.097 -3.1 -0.731
398 Patrick Ewing 1997-98 35 -12.6 -14.5 -0.201 -8.2 -0.7426
399 Kevin Durant 2021-22 33 -12 -10.8 -0.224 -10.1 -0.7548
400 Dwyane Wade 2006-07 25 -13.7 -10.4 -0.279 -8.8 -0.8033
401 Julius Erving 1982-83 32 -7.1 -7 -0.104 -3.6 -0.8207
402 Shaquille O'neal 2004-05 32 -8.9 -2.9 -0.122 -4.2 -0.8482
403 Dirk Nowitzki 2004-05 26 -6 -7.3 -0.144 -3.6 -0.8855
404 Jerry West 1971-72 33 -4.3 -10.1 -0.138 -0.8998
405 Kevin Durant 2013-14 25 -7.2 -6.5 -0.15 -3.8 -0.94
406 Karl Malone 1996-97 33 -6.7 -9.9 -0.141 -4.3 -1.0398
407 Dirk Nowitzki 2013-14 35 -9.7 -12.3 -0.188 -6.3 -1.0506
408 Jimmy Butler 2020-21 31 -16.8 -21.3 -0.319 -9.1 -1.0524
409 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1972-73 25 -10.8 -13.3 -0.242 -1.0699
410 Chris Paul 2011-12 26 -7 -5.6 -0.175 -5.5 -1.0739
411 Chris Paul 2008-09 23 -13.9 -9.4 -0.327 -9.5 -1.0762
412 Stephen Curry 2015-16 27 -9.2 -6.6 -0.166 -4.9 -1.143
413 Kevin Durant 2015-16 27 -7.9 -9.2 -0.14 -5.9 -1.1686
414 Joel Embiid 2021-22 27 -12.1 -2.6 -0.135 -9.1 -1.3246
415 Joel Embiid 2022-23 28 -11.1 -9.4 -0.169 -7.3 -1.3324
416 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1971-72 24 -7.5 -14.1 -0.193 -1.4556
ignoring the gargantuan outlier that is joel embiid, and also karl malone, steph finds himself lumped in way down at the bottom. i feel like he's way more james harden than people want to admit. and to the thrust of some of my earlier points, here is how it looks at his 2015-2019 peak in the 4 seasons where there was actually some threat (warriors down in series/playing competitive series):Code: Select all
2014-15 -0.2591
2015-16 -1.143
2017-18 -0.5779
2018-19 -0.0509
that's an average of -0.508. in other words, when it wasn't the easiest, most pressure-free playoff run ever, at his peak he basically showed the same anti-resilience as massive anti-resilience outlier joel embiid. and he somehow got 2 titles and a another finals where game 7 was tied with a minute to go. so much of his ring total seems to be based on having one of the largest margins of error ever and managing to win rings even when significantly underperforming his regular season play, either because the other team got injured at just the right time (2015 cleveland/2018 rockets) or he had the most talented roster ever at his side (2016 1 minute away from winning/2018). it's such a luxury so many others didn't get.
from 2014-2023, except for 2022:
regular season: he never dipped below a PER of 24, with 3 seasons above 28 (and a 31.5).
post season: dipped below a PER of 23 (5x) more than he was above 24 (3x), with no seasons above 28 and only 1 above 25 (27.1). the one of course in 2017.
regular season: 7 seasons of 0.200 WS48 (ok, one was 0.199) or above with 3 of at least 0.267 WS48
post season: only 3 seasons that even eclipsed 0.185 WS48 and one of those was right at 0.203 WS48 (to his credit, it was 2022). only 1 up there in the 0.267 range, and it was 2017 of course.
he does a little better in BPM but still, seasons of 8.7, 9.9, and 11.9 in the regular season, and then 8.8 and 9.7 in the playoffs, with the 9.7 of course being 2017.
this is steph compared to known playoff maestro james harden. see a difference in these numbers? i really don't (average rank is the average of the rank of the individual stats). even down to them being best over their whole careers and worst at their peaks.
to me, it's hard to see him over kobe. kobe already has the longevity. he has playoff resilience. he has more absolute titles, and let's not act like playing with shaq was way easier than being on the durant warriors.
where steph's average series victory is as a +4.2 SRS favorite and his average series loss is only as a -0.1 SRS underdog, kobe's average series victory is as a paltry +1.4 SRS favorite and his average series loss as a -2.6 SRS underdog.
this isn't strictly just a shaq thing. if you don't include anything with shaq, the numbers are still only +1.9 and -3.0 for kobe. from the 2009 finals to the 2010 finals, the lakers played 5 series as an average of a 0.6 SRS favorite and won them all. that's pretty impressive.
resultantly, kobe has the actual vs expected titles advantage, and is actually pretty amazing in that regard.
kobe has 5 titles with an amazing 1.4 expected titles. his +3.6 delta is behind only people from the 60's celtics and his +254% is behind only hakeem. steph isn't terrible, but +1.4 and +51% isn't as shiny of an accomplishment. and he has a little bit of an advantage from not racking up a lot of playoff appearances on good/not great teams, where you tend to collect at least a fraction of an expected championship but with no real chance of winning one. steph just either made the playoffs with a team that could go to the finals or just missed the playoffs.
throw together the longevity on top of the playoff resiliency, both team and individual and it seems like kobe should be above steph. what i'm less clear on, and what i've been dreading, is what to do with bird. i can't very well be the playoff resiliency guy and the "actual vs expected" guy and pimp for bird, who is about even with steph in resiliency and worse in "actual vs expected" and certainly doesn't have amazing longevity. 4 years of "meh" playoffs to start his career up to 1983 and then 1987 is basically his last dominant playoffs? it's hard to ignore him showing up as a rookie and the celtics just immediately becoming a +7 SRS, 60 win team and then staying there for about a decade. it's also hard to ignore 1991, well past his prime, where the celtics are 46-14 with him (63 win pace) and 10-12 without him (37 win pace), for a nice +26 WOWY at the age of 34. that's a lot of WOWY as a rookie and out to 12 years into his career. with 8 straight top 2 MVP finishes in there. but man, playoff underperformance after playoff underperformance.
i don't know if i've posted it here, but between the ages of 23-35, larry bird had 5 playoff series with a TS% below 46. all of them were at home and he lost 4 of them, and 4 of them were during his 1981-1988 prime and he lost 3 of them, with only the 1981 finals against a sub 0.500 team being the win.
playoff series below 46 TS% between the ages of 23-35
larry bird - 5
Jordan, Lebron, Hakeem, Shaq, Duncan, Magic, Wilt, Kobe, Durant, Curry, Harden, Kawhi, Dirk, Malone, Barkley combined - 5
and wilt's 1 series arguably shouldn't count given the era he was playing in.
There's an issue with the playoff resilience argument though: these stats don't really get at what the pro-Steph supporters are actually arguing. It's talking past their point a bit.
Which Stats do we use?
Most of the crowd supporting Steph are incorporating some combination of actual impact stats. Not PER or WS48, but plus minus, or RAPM, or EPM, or WOWY, or WOWYR. And these stats are much more favorable to Curry in the playoffs.
Why do we (the pro-Steph crowd) prefer these stats? Well there's a few reasons, that you well know.
-They measure actual value in a role. They don't overrate scoring or underrate playmaking, they're not blind to defensive value or offensive leadership or off-ball value. They measure actual value.
-They do a better job in tests of stats. They correlate with wins in a game better, they correlate with good team performance better (i.e. they do a better job at 'describing' value in a game), they are better predictors of future games and future team performance (they are better at predicting value in future games)
Why does this matter for Steph?
The pro-Steph crowd has argued it's specifically important to use these stats when evaluating Steph, because so much of Steph's value specifically comes from stuff that gets missed in the basic box stats. GOAT level Off ball motion, GOAT level stretching the floor, GOAT level gravity, all-time guard screening, GOAT-level volume at drawing double teams, being the driver of a GOAT level offensive system, being a strong offensive communicator, fitting well alongside other talented stars, playing sound positional defense, strong defensive communication
... every single one of these things are missed by PER and WS48. Entirely. Yet these are some of the key things that puts Steph in contention for this vote
Which do the more accurate stats portray Steph in the playoffs?
Well, a lot more positively than you are. BPM is the most accurate box stat out of the ones you mentioned... it performs best on tests of how well it predicts team success and player value in the moment and in the future. And by your own admission, Steph gets betterin BPM.
This trend continues if we look to other stats. In AuPM (i.e. RAPM but stabler in short samples), pre-2022, Steph does not decline in the playoffs. And in fact is more valuable than Kobe. If we add 2022 and 2023, Steph actually improves in the playoffs on average.
Why does Steph show decline in certain playoffs? And what years do we focus on for our sample?
Steph was majorly injured in 2016. Steph was (slightly) injured in 2018. We've been over this. When looking at his 4-year peak (while throwing out 2017 for... reasons...), you'll note that Steph shows his biggest decline in 2016 in your own stat (when he had a major playoff injury). People who have been arguing for Steph's resiliency have argued that you need to separate playoff decline due to injury (2016) compared to healthy years, that the majority of the perceived decline is exclusively from taking injured samples with his healthy samples, and that he basically maintains value (a higher value than Kobe) or even gets better in a variety of impact stats when looking at healthy years.
Meanwhile, you throw out 2017 because it was "the easiest, most pressure-free playoff run ever,"... while ignoring the fact that it was only so easy and pressure free when Steph as playing. Also conveniently throwing out his single best playoff run ever. I bet playoff Hakeem would look worse without 1994, or playoff Shaq would look worse without 2001, or playoff Wilt would look worse without 1967.
It's interesting that you also don't include 2022 or 2023 in your later year by year focus, when Steph seemed to get better quite clearly in the playoffs. It also happened to be when he was healthy for the playoffs... but I'm sure that's just a coincidence![]()
Meanwhile, your team arguments (looking at championship delta) seem to also miss all the arguments pro-Steph people have been making (that Steph's teams near his peak were pretty universally better than Kobe's teams... by basically every team stat we have).
I don't know man. The box stats are certainly interesting stuff, and the championship deltas are at least interesting. But basically none of this actually addresses the actual points that the pro-Steph crowd is arguing, nor does it address the concerns other people have raised with using this criteria (championships vs expected championships have a lot of potential noise and biases that we've discussed already). It's okay to have different criteria than others! But I'm not sure this actually addresses any of the arguments in favor of Steph.
Good post Draymond, however I slightly disagree with Steph maintaining his impact per AuPM at least if you look at his MVP level years. If you look at Steph's AuPM/G from 14-22.
14
RS-5.3
PS-4.8
15
RS-6.5
PS-5.7
16
RS-7.5
PS-3.4
17
RS-6.6
PS-7.5
18
RS-5.2
PS-4.8
19
RS-5.6
PS-5.4
22
RS-4.4
PS-4.3
Steph also had his AupM/G decrease in 2023 from the RS to the PS, however, the Backpicks 23 Playoff Site is currently being funky, so I can't get a correct number. However, I did take note of this number when it happened, as it was a continued trend of Steph's impact falling.
In this time span, we have 1 PS, when Steph rose in impact from the RS to the PS, and then every other year of his prime, his impact decreased per AuPM/G. This does not suggest to me that Steph's impact holds. AuPM was made to hopefully be a decent approximate for RAPM. The amount of the decline from Steph might be show up as greater in pure box-score numbers however than something like AuPM/G.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,989
- And1: 9,452
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
One_and_Done wrote:Really? KD in 22 was 33, post achilles, without enough help, and being guarded by long, elite defensive wings. Yet he still put up 26-6-6 on 526 TS%.
Kobe had none of those excuses when he posted 22-3-4 on 456 TS% in the 04 finals, when on the highest stage he literally shot his team out of the series. A classic example of how if Kobe couldn't win his way, he'd rather lose. How about his 2011 spanking by the Mavs. He put up 22-3-2 on 519 TS%. I can keep going. The 08 Boston series saw him post worse stats too. The claim Kobe never had a series that bad is simply wrong. He had plenty that were worse.
There’s more to basketball than TS%. KD averaged over 5 turnovers per game against Boston and had an on/off of -52.9. The second worst on/off for any of their top 7 rotation guys was Bruce Brown at -10.0. KD broke the Nets’ offense and his turnovers were the best offense for Boston as well.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,531
- And1: 3,754
- Joined: Jan 27, 2013
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
HeartBreakKid wrote:I think ZeppelinPage's post has really sold me on West's defense. I was always high on it before but did not really fully take into account just how elite he probably was.
I think West is about as good of a two way player a player his size can be. He likely is not far off the goat PG in terms of PGs, and by my calculation he is the best scoring PG as well.
West is tremendous when it comes to both volume and efficiency. Along with Big O these guys were putting up good efficiency even by modern standards. West also had 3 point range (plenty of footage of him hitting hard long range jumpers, and also we know he is a 90% FT shooter so that's a pretty strong sign).
He had the most 40 point games in the post season if we are talking about heroics for a couple decades. Then after Jordan came it took another couple of decades of James to bump him down. These type of heroic records are often a big thing brought up with Kobe (like how many high scoring games he had in the RS), but West had 7 more 40+ games.
Really tremendous efficiency as well as deep playoff runs (weak conference, but it does say a lot about the sample size that he is a legit performer).
Took a while for him to probably become a legit floor general but he became one none the less. I have a hard time thinking Curry is better than him, as dramatic as Curry's 3 point warping his, I am fairly certain West has a more resilient and physical game while also being able to do a pretty good imitation of a long range bomber. The defense that West brings to the table would likely make me put him over Magic, never mind Curry.
My vote is for Jerry West
Alternate vote is for Larry Bird (not sold on him, but again, waiting for people to discuss him in depth before I make an updated decision)
Nomination is for Oscar Robertson
Not a box score guy, but a thought…
Kobe seems to look better than Bird in box creation, and is pretty close is passer rating, eh? Both might be a bit too optimistic on Larry.
Now that's the difference between first and last place.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,468
- And1: 3,102
- Joined: Apr 13, 2013
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
Good post Draymond, however I slightly disagree with Steph maintaining his impact per AuPM at least if you look at his MVP level years. If you look at Steph's AuPM/G from 14-22.
14
RS-5.3
PS-4.8
15
RS-6.5
PS-5.7
16
RS-7.5
PS-3.4
17
RS-6.6
PS-7.5
18
RS-5.2
PS-4.8
19
RS-5.6
PS-5.4
22
RS-4.4
PS-4.3
Steph also had his AupM/G decrease in 2023 from the RS to the PS, however, the Backpicks 23 Playoff Site is currently being funky, so I can't get a correct number. However, I did take note of this number when it happened, as it was a continued trend of Steph's impact falling.
In this time span, we have 1 PS, when Steph rose in impact from the RS to the PS, and then every other year of his prime, his impact decreased per AuPM/G. This does not suggest to me that Steph's impact holds. AuPM was made to hopefully be a decent approximate for RAPM. The amount of the decline from Steph might be show up as greater in pure box-score numbers however than something like AuPM/G.
For what it’s worth, if we look at RAPTOR, Steph rose in impact in the playoffs in 2013-2014, 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2021-2022. So that’s Steph rising in half of the years he went to the playoffs in the last decade. And while RAPTOR doesn’t go back this far, it’s fairly obvious he rose in impact in the playoffs in 2012-2013, given that he had a +2.7 RS on-off and a +25.2 playoff on-off. So this would actually suggest he rose in impact more than half of the nine playoffs he’s been to in his career.
Also, if we look at raw on-off, please note that in games Steph played (i.e. excluding the early-round playoff games he missed) and excluding low-leverage garbage time, Steph has a +12.13 on-off in the playoffs in the last decade. (There’s no “leverage” data for earlier than 2013-2014, but this number would surely go up if 2012-2013 were included, given that he had a +25.2 playoff on-off that year). The pbpstats website keeps crashing when I try to run similar data on Steph’s non-low-leverage on-off in regular season games he played for the entire time period, but if I look at individual seasons and run weighted averages of the “on” and “off” net ratings by minutes (which should be pretty close to accurate, but will be slightly off due to pace differences between years), it comes out to around +11.6 on-off. So this isn’t suggestive of his impact being lower in the playoffs either.
And, please note that rising in number or not, Steph’s impact in the playoffs in terms of AuPM/g was really high. In the last decade, Steph ranked the following in the league in playoff AuPM/g in the years he was in the playoffs: 2nd, 2nd, 9th, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, and 3rd. There’s legitimately no player in the NBA that finished ahead of him in more than two of those eight playoffs! And, it’s worth mentioning that he was also 5th in playoff AuPM/g in 2012-2013, while not even in his prime yet.
I think it’s very hard to argue that Steph hasn’t had really great impact in the playoffs. Whether his impact went down or not compared to the regular season is a more difficult question, for which I think there’s some competing evidence. But we can certainly say that if it went down it wasn’t by a lot and his playoff impact was still extremely high. Which I feel like is ultimately what matters, particularly when talking about someone whose regular season impact numbers have often been complete historical outliers (see, for instance, the five-year impact chart I posted from Ben Taylor’s recent video, where Steph is just completely off on his own at the top right corner of the chart).
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Senior
- Posts: 703
- And1: 903
- Joined: May 19, 2022
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
Don't have time to check which years Thinking Basketball disagrees (maybe just including 2013?), but he did a calculation of who changes in AuPM in RS vs PS here: https://thinkingbasketball.net/2021/07/10/playoff-plus-minus-part-iii-changes-in-the-postseason/.lessthanjake wrote:LukaTheGOAT wrote:
Good post Draymond, however I slightly disagree with Steph maintaining his impact per AuPM at least if you look at his MVP level years. If you look at Steph's AuPM/G from 14-22.
14
RS-5.3
PS-4.8
15
RS-6.5
PS-5.7
16
RS-7.5
PS-3.4
17
RS-6.6
PS-7.5
18
RS-5.2
PS-4.8
19
RS-5.6
PS-5.4
22
RS-4.4
PS-4.3
Steph also had his AupM/G decrease in 2023 from the RS to the PS, however, the Backpicks 23 Playoff Site is currently being funky, so I can't get a correct number. However, I did take note of this number when it happened, as it was a continued trend of Steph's impact falling.
In this time span, we have 1 PS, when Steph rose in impact from the RS to the PS, and then every other year of his prime, his impact decreased per AuPM/G. This does not suggest to me that Steph's impact holds. AuPM was made to hopefully be a decent approximate for RAPM. The amount of the decline from Steph might be show up as greater in pure box-score numbers however than something like AuPM/G.
For what it’s worth, if we look at RAPTOR, Steph rose in impact in the playoffs in 2013-2014, 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2021-2022. So that’s Steph rising in half of the years he went to the playoffs in the last decade. And while RAPTOR doesn’t go back this far, it’s fairly obvious he rose in impact in the playoffs in 2012-2013, given that he had a +2.7 RS on-off and a +25.2 playoff on-off. So this would actually suggest he rose in impact more than half of the nine playoffs he’s been to in his career.
Also, if we look at raw on-off, please note that in games Steph played (i.e. excluding the early-round playoff games he missed) and excluding low-leverage garbage time, Steph has a +12.13 on-off in the playoffs in the last decade. (There’s no “leverage” data for earlier than 2013-2014, but this number would surely go up if 2012-2013 were included, given that he had a +25.2 playoff on-off that year). The pbpstats website keeps crashing when I try to run similar data on Steph’s non-low-leverage on-off in regular season games he played, but if I look at individual seasons and weigh the “on” and “off” net ratings by minutes (which should be pretty close accurate, but will be slightly off due to pace differences between years), it comes out to around +11.6. So this isn’t suggestive of his impact being lower in the playoffs either.
And, please note that rising in number or not, Steph’s impact in the playoffs in terms of AuPM/g was really high. In the last decade, Steph ranked the following in the league in playoff AuPM/g in the years he was in the playoffs: 2nd, 2nd, 9th, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, and 3rd. There’s legitimately no player in the NBA that finished ahead of him in more than two of those eight playoffs! And, it’s worth mentioning that he was also 5th in playoff AuPM/g in 2012-2013, while not even in his prime yet.
I think it’s very hard to argue that Steph hasn’t had really great impact in the playoffs. Whether his impact went down or not compared to the regular season is a more difficult question, for which I think there’s some competing evidence. But we can certainly say that if it went down it wasn’t by a lot and his playoff impact was still extremely high. Which I feel like is ultimately what matters, particularly when talking about someone whose regular season impact numbers have often been complete historical outliers (see, for instance, the five-year impact chart I posted from Ben Taylor’s recent video, where Steph is just completely off on his own at the top right corner of the chart).
1997–2022, Curry had a...
-Regular Season AuPM of 5.11 (1st all time in that list... though there are certain minute thresholds to get on this list)
-Postseason AuPM of 5.04 (3rd all time in that list, behind Jordan and LeBron).
This is a change of -0.07, or 1.3%. He got worse in 43% of his playoff runs in this sample, and got better in 57% of his playoff runs.
He didn't really decline in 2022, sounds like you recall he got worse in 2023 (but the calculation have been messed up for a while, so we can't check).
I don't know -- a 1% decline is not a major sign of decline overall, at least not beyond uncertainty range. Regardless, even in decline, he's still 3rd ever in PS AuPM post 1997, ahead of all the other modern candidates up for vote/nomination. And again, given his biggest personal decline year happened in 2016, when he was injured, there's an even stronger argument that he doesn't decline when healthy. Pulling my list from the Duncan thread and adding a few people:
Playoff Improvements by AuPM (1997-2021):
Jordan (only in 97-98) improves 22%. (1st in PS AuPM all time)
Hakeem (only 97-98) improves 15%
LeBron improves 13% (2nd all time)
Shaq improves 7% (5th all time)
Garnett improves 9% (9th all time)
Duncan improves 8% (8th all time)
Kobe improves by 4%
Wade improves by 0%
Jokic (pre-2022) gets worse by -0%
Curry (pre-2022) gets worse by -1% (3rd all time)
Durant gets worse by -1% (10th all time)
Dirk gets worse by -1% (7th all time)
Chris Paul gets worse by -4%
Giannis gets worse by -8%
Karl Malone (97+) gets worse by -17%
Sometimes I think people over-index on playoff changes relative to the player in the regular season, because comparing a player to himself is easier. Like the fact that Player A declines or doesn't improve... doesn't mean they're worse than Player B who does improve. Curry doesn't improve as much as some of the other guys... and is still 3rd all time in this time frame, only behind Jordan and LeBron. Yet we're punishing him for not improving enough? Playoff change just doesn't seem like the right metric... and regardless, I don't see it as all that critical of Curry even if we do want to focus on it.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,468
- And1: 3,102
- Joined: Apr 13, 2013
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
DraymondGold wrote:Don't have time to check which years Thinking Basketball disagrees (maybe just including 2013?), but he did a calculation of who changes in AuPM in RS vs PS here: https://thinkingbasketball.net/2021/07/10/playoff-plus-minus-part-iii-changes-in-the-postseason/.lessthanjake wrote:LukaTheGOAT wrote:
Good post Draymond, however I slightly disagree with Steph maintaining his impact per AuPM at least if you look at his MVP level years. If you look at Steph's AuPM/G from 14-22.
14
RS-5.3
PS-4.8
15
RS-6.5
PS-5.7
16
RS-7.5
PS-3.4
17
RS-6.6
PS-7.5
18
RS-5.2
PS-4.8
19
RS-5.6
PS-5.4
22
RS-4.4
PS-4.3
Steph also had his AupM/G decrease in 2023 from the RS to the PS, however, the Backpicks 23 Playoff Site is currently being funky, so I can't get a correct number. However, I did take note of this number when it happened, as it was a continued trend of Steph's impact falling.
In this time span, we have 1 PS, when Steph rose in impact from the RS to the PS, and then every other year of his prime, his impact decreased per AuPM/G. This does not suggest to me that Steph's impact holds. AuPM was made to hopefully be a decent approximate for RAPM. The amount of the decline from Steph might be show up as greater in pure box-score numbers however than something like AuPM/G.
For what it’s worth, if we look at RAPTOR, Steph rose in impact in the playoffs in 2013-2014, 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2021-2022. So that’s Steph rising in half of the years he went to the playoffs in the last decade. And while RAPTOR doesn’t go back this far, it’s fairly obvious he rose in impact in the playoffs in 2012-2013, given that he had a +2.7 RS on-off and a +25.2 playoff on-off. So this would actually suggest he rose in impact more than half of the nine playoffs he’s been to in his career.
Also, if we look at raw on-off, please note that in games Steph played (i.e. excluding the early-round playoff games he missed) and excluding low-leverage garbage time, Steph has a +12.13 on-off in the playoffs in the last decade. (There’s no “leverage” data for earlier than 2013-2014, but this number would surely go up if 2012-2013 were included, given that he had a +25.2 playoff on-off that year). The pbpstats website keeps crashing when I try to run similar data on Steph’s non-low-leverage on-off in regular season games he played, but if I look at individual seasons and weigh the “on” and “off” net ratings by minutes (which should be pretty close accurate, but will be slightly off due to pace differences between years), it comes out to around +11.6. So this isn’t suggestive of his impact being lower in the playoffs either.
And, please note that rising in number or not, Steph’s impact in the playoffs in terms of AuPM/g was really high. In the last decade, Steph ranked the following in the league in playoff AuPM/g in the years he was in the playoffs: 2nd, 2nd, 9th, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, and 3rd. There’s legitimately no player in the NBA that finished ahead of him in more than two of those eight playoffs! And, it’s worth mentioning that he was also 5th in playoff AuPM/g in 2012-2013, while not even in his prime yet.
I think it’s very hard to argue that Steph hasn’t had really great impact in the playoffs. Whether his impact went down or not compared to the regular season is a more difficult question, for which I think there’s some competing evidence. But we can certainly say that if it went down it wasn’t by a lot and his playoff impact was still extremely high. Which I feel like is ultimately what matters, particularly when talking about someone whose regular season impact numbers have often been complete historical outliers (see, for instance, the five-year impact chart I posted from Ben Taylor’s recent video, where Steph is just completely off on his own at the top right corner of the chart).
1997–2022, Curry had a...
-Regular Season AuPM of 5.11 (1st all time in that list... though there are certain minute thresholds to get on this list)
-Postseason AuPM of 5.04 (3rd all time in that list, behind Jordan and LeBron).
This is a change of -0.07, or 1.3%. He got worse in 43% of his playoff runs in this sample, and got better in 57% of his playoff runs.
He didn't really decline in 2022, sounds like you recall he got worse in 2023 (but the calculation have been messed up for a while, so we can't check).
I don't know -- a 1% decline is not a major sign of decline overall, at least not beyond uncertainty range. Regardless, even in decline, he's still 3rd ever in PS AuPM post 1997, ahead of all the other modern candidates up for vote/nomination. And again, given his biggest personal decline year happened in 2016, when he was injured, there's an even stronger argument that he doesn't decline when healthy. Pulling my list from the Duncan thread and adding a few people:
Playoff Improvements by AuPM (1997-2021):
Jordan (only in 97-98) improves 22%. (1st in PS AuPM all time)
Hakeem (only 97-98) improves 15%
LeBron improves 13% (2nd all time)
Shaq improves 7% (5th all time)
Garnett improves 9% (9th all time)
Duncan improves 8% (8th all time)
Kobe improves by 4%
Wade improves by 0%
Jokic (pre-2022) gets worse by -0%
Curry (pre-2022) gets worse by -1% (3rd all time)
Durant gets worse by -1% (10th all time)
Dirk gets worse by -1% (7th all time)
Chris Paul gets worse by -4%
Giannis gets worse by -8%
Karl Malone (97+) gets worse by -17%
Great find! I’d not seen that article, and it’s hard to really look at it and argue against Curry’s huge playoff impact or to really argue that his impact drops a bunch in the playoffs.
I’d add that this article was written in 2021. Since then, there’s been two playoffs. Curry did actually technically go down in AuPM/g in the 2022 playoffs (a bit of a surprise TBH), but it was 4.4 in the regular season and 4.3 in the playoffs, so not meaningfully different and wouldn’t change this article’s analysis in any meaningful way. Meanwhile, the numbers for 2023 playoff AuPM/g are weird (they appear to be scaled much higher than the regular season numbers), so the 2023 playoff number for Curry is a lot higher than in the 2023 regular season but that’s probably not meaningful in and of itself. That said, I find it very hard to believe he wouldn’t have been higher in AuPM/g in the playoffs this season if it were scaled the same, given that he was ranked 12th in AuPM/g in the regular season and 3rd in the playoffs. There is no year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t a higher number than 12th in RS AuPM/g, nor is there a year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t a higher number than Curry’s actual RS AuPM/g in this past regular season. Looking at the numbers, I have a feeling the 2023 playoff AuPM/g numbers are just doubled (in which case, Steph would have improved quite a bit from RS to playoffs) but I can’t be sure if I’m right about that specific theory.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,272
- And1: 2,984
- Joined: Dec 25, 2019
-
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
DraymondGold wrote:Don't have time to check which years Thinking Basketball disagrees (maybe just including 2013?), but he did a calculation of who changes in AuPM in RS vs PS here: https://thinkingbasketball.net/2021/07/10/playoff-plus-minus-part-iii-changes-in-the-postseason/.lessthanjake wrote:LukaTheGOAT wrote:
Good post Draymond, however I slightly disagree with Steph maintaining his impact per AuPM at least if you look at his MVP level years. If you look at Steph's AuPM/G from 14-22.
14
RS-5.3
PS-4.8
15
RS-6.5
PS-5.7
16
RS-7.5
PS-3.4
17
RS-6.6
PS-7.5
18
RS-5.2
PS-4.8
19
RS-5.6
PS-5.4
22
RS-4.4
PS-4.3
Steph also had his AupM/G decrease in 2023 from the RS to the PS, however, the Backpicks 23 Playoff Site is currently being funky, so I can't get a correct number. However, I did take note of this number when it happened, as it was a continued trend of Steph's impact falling.
In this time span, we have 1 PS, when Steph rose in impact from the RS to the PS, and then every other year of his prime, his impact decreased per AuPM/G. This does not suggest to me that Steph's impact holds. AuPM was made to hopefully be a decent approximate for RAPM. The amount of the decline from Steph might be show up as greater in pure box-score numbers however than something like AuPM/G.
For what it’s worth, if we look at RAPTOR, Steph rose in impact in the playoffs in 2013-2014, 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2021-2022. So that’s Steph rising in half of the years he went to the playoffs in the last decade. And while RAPTOR doesn’t go back this far, it’s fairly obvious he rose in impact in the playoffs in 2012-2013, given that he had a +2.7 RS on-off and a +25.2 playoff on-off. So this would actually suggest he rose in impact more than half of the nine playoffs he’s been to in his career.
Also, if we look at raw on-off, please note that in games Steph played (i.e. excluding the early-round playoff games he missed) and excluding low-leverage garbage time, Steph has a +12.13 on-off in the playoffs in the last decade. (There’s no “leverage” data for earlier than 2013-2014, but this number would surely go up if 2012-2013 were included, given that he had a +25.2 playoff on-off that year). The pbpstats website keeps crashing when I try to run similar data on Steph’s non-low-leverage on-off in regular season games he played, but if I look at individual seasons and weigh the “on” and “off” net ratings by minutes (which should be pretty close accurate, but will be slightly off due to pace differences between years), it comes out to around +11.6. So this isn’t suggestive of his impact being lower in the playoffs either.
And, please note that rising in number or not, Steph’s impact in the playoffs in terms of AuPM/g was really high. In the last decade, Steph ranked the following in the league in playoff AuPM/g in the years he was in the playoffs: 2nd, 2nd, 9th, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, and 3rd. There’s legitimately no player in the NBA that finished ahead of him in more than two of those eight playoffs! And, it’s worth mentioning that he was also 5th in playoff AuPM/g in 2012-2013, while not even in his prime yet.
I think it’s very hard to argue that Steph hasn’t had really great impact in the playoffs. Whether his impact went down or not compared to the regular season is a more difficult question, for which I think there’s some competing evidence. But we can certainly say that if it went down it wasn’t by a lot and his playoff impact was still extremely high. Which I feel like is ultimately what matters, particularly when talking about someone whose regular season impact numbers have often been complete historical outliers (see, for instance, the five-year impact chart I posted from Ben Taylor’s recent video, where Steph is just completely off on his own at the top right corner of the chart).
1997–2022, Curry had a...
-Regular Season AuPM of 5.11 (1st all time in that list... though there are certain minute thresholds to get on this list)
-Postseason AuPM of 5.04 (3rd all time in that list, behind Jordan and LeBron).
This is a change of -0.07, or 1.3%. He got worse in 43% of his playoff runs in this sample, and got better in 57% of his playoff runs.
He didn't really decline in 2022, sounds like you recall he got worse in 2023 (but the calculation have been messed up for a while, so we can't check).
I don't know -- a 1% decline is not a major sign of decline overall, at least not beyond uncertainty range. Regardless, even in decline, he's still 3rd ever in PS AuPM post 1997, ahead of all the other modern candidates up for vote/nomination. And again, given his biggest personal decline year happened in 2016, when he was injured, there's an even stronger argument that he doesn't decline when healthy. Pulling my list from the Duncan thread and adding a few people:
Playoff Improvements by AuPM (1997-2021):
Jordan (only in 97-98) improves 22%. (1st in PS AuPM all time)
Hakeem (only 97-98) improves 15%
LeBron improves 13% (2nd all time)
Shaq improves 7% (5th all time)
Garnett improves 9% (9th all time)
Duncan improves 8% (8th all time)
Kobe improves by 4%
Wade improves by 0%
Jokic (pre-2022) gets worse by -0%
Curry (pre-2022) gets worse by -1% (3rd all time)
Durant gets worse by -1% (10th all time)
Dirk gets worse by -1% (7th all time)
Chris Paul gets worse by -4%
Giannis gets worse by -8%
Karl Malone (97+) gets worse by -17%
Sometimes I think people over-index on playoff changes relative to the player in the regular season, because comparing a player to himself is easier. Like the fact that Player A declines or doesn't improve... doesn't mean they're worse than Player B who does improve. Curry doesn't improve as much as some of the other guys... and is still 3rd all time in this time frame, only behind Jordan and LeBron. Yet we're punishing him for not improving enough? Playoff change just doesn't seem like the right metric... and regardless, I don't see it as all that critical of Curry even if we do want to focus on it.
That article is old and AuPM has been updated since then. The formula is not the same. Also, you said no player has more than 2 PS higher in AuPM. Well yeah, but Curry has missed years. Lebron in 2016 and 2017 is higher, and if my memory serves correctly, he was higher in the 2023 PS as well (numbers are messed up and can't be checked sadly).
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,272
- And1: 2,984
- Joined: Dec 25, 2019
-
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
lessthanjake wrote:DraymondGold wrote:Don't have time to check which years Thinking Basketball disagrees (maybe just including 2013?), but he did a calculation of who changes in AuPM in RS vs PS here: https://thinkingbasketball.net/2021/07/10/playoff-plus-minus-part-iii-changes-in-the-postseason/.lessthanjake wrote:
For what it’s worth, if we look at RAPTOR, Steph rose in impact in the playoffs in 2013-2014, 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2021-2022. So that’s Steph rising in half of the years he went to the playoffs in the last decade. And while RAPTOR doesn’t go back this far, it’s fairly obvious he rose in impact in the playoffs in 2012-2013, given that he had a +2.7 RS on-off and a +25.2 playoff on-off. So this would actually suggest he rose in impact more than half of the nine playoffs he’s been to in his career.
Also, if we look at raw on-off, please note that in games Steph played (i.e. excluding the early-round playoff games he missed) and excluding low-leverage garbage time, Steph has a +12.13 on-off in the playoffs in the last decade. (There’s no “leverage” data for earlier than 2013-2014, but this number would surely go up if 2012-2013 were included, given that he had a +25.2 playoff on-off that year). The pbpstats website keeps crashing when I try to run similar data on Steph’s non-low-leverage on-off in regular season games he played, but if I look at individual seasons and weigh the “on” and “off” net ratings by minutes (which should be pretty close accurate, but will be slightly off due to pace differences between years), it comes out to around +11.6. So this isn’t suggestive of his impact being lower in the playoffs either.
And, please note that rising in number or not, Steph’s impact in the playoffs in terms of AuPM/g was really high. In the last decade, Steph ranked the following in the league in playoff AuPM/g in the years he was in the playoffs: 2nd, 2nd, 9th, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, and 3rd. There’s legitimately no player in the NBA that finished ahead of him in more than two of those eight playoffs! And, it’s worth mentioning that he was also 5th in playoff AuPM/g in 2012-2013, while not even in his prime yet.
I think it’s very hard to argue that Steph hasn’t had really great impact in the playoffs. Whether his impact went down or not compared to the regular season is a more difficult question, for which I think there’s some competing evidence. But we can certainly say that if it went down it wasn’t by a lot and his playoff impact was still extremely high. Which I feel like is ultimately what matters, particularly when talking about someone whose regular season impact numbers have often been complete historical outliers (see, for instance, the five-year impact chart I posted from Ben Taylor’s recent video, where Steph is just completely off on his own at the top right corner of the chart).
1997–2022, Curry had a...
-Regular Season AuPM of 5.11 (1st all time in that list... though there are certain minute thresholds to get on this list)
-Postseason AuPM of 5.04 (3rd all time in that list, behind Jordan and LeBron).
This is a change of -0.07, or 1.3%. He got worse in 43% of his playoff runs in this sample, and got better in 57% of his playoff runs.
He didn't really decline in 2022, sounds like you recall he got worse in 2023 (but the calculation have been messed up for a while, so we can't check).
I don't know -- a 1% decline is not a major sign of decline overall, at least not beyond uncertainty range. Regardless, even in decline, he's still 3rd ever in PS AuPM post 1997, ahead of all the other modern candidates up for vote/nomination. And again, given his biggest personal decline year happened in 2016, when he was injured, there's an even stronger argument that he doesn't decline when healthy. Pulling my list from the Duncan thread and adding a few people:
Playoff Improvements by AuPM (1997-2021):
Jordan (only in 97-98) improves 22%. (1st in PS AuPM all time)
Hakeem (only 97-98) improves 15%
LeBron improves 13% (2nd all time)
Shaq improves 7% (5th all time)
Garnett improves 9% (9th all time)
Duncan improves 8% (8th all time)
Kobe improves by 4%
Wade improves by 0%
Jokic (pre-2022) gets worse by -0%
Curry (pre-2022) gets worse by -1% (3rd all time)
Durant gets worse by -1% (10th all time)
Dirk gets worse by -1% (7th all time)
Chris Paul gets worse by -4%
Giannis gets worse by -8%
Karl Malone (97+) gets worse by -17%
Great find! I’d not seen that article, and it’s hard to really look at it and argue against Curry’s huge playoff impact or to really argue that his impact drops a bunch in the playoffs.
I’d add that this article was written in 2021. Since then, there’s been two playoffs. Curry did actually technically go down in AuPM/g in the 2022 playoffs (a bit of a surprise TBH), but it was 4.4 in the regular season and 4.3 in the playoffs, so not meaningfully different and wouldn’t change this article’s analysis in any meaningful way. Meanwhile, the numbers for 2023 playoff AuPM/g are weird (they appear to be scaled much higher than the regular season numbers), so the 2023 playoff number for Curry is a lot higher than in the 2023 regular season but that’s probably not meaningful in and of itself. That said, I find it very hard to believe he wouldn’t have been higher in AuPM/g in the playoffs this season if it were scaled the same, given that he was ranked 12th in AuPM/g in the regular season and 3rd in the playoffs. I’m not aware of any year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t a higher number than 12th in RS AuPM/g, nor am I aware of a year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t a higher number than Curry’s actual RS AuPM/g in this past regular season. Looking at the numbers, I have a feeling the 2023 playoff AuPM/g numbers are just doubled (in which case, Steph would have improved quite a bit from RS to playoffs) but I can’t be sure if I’m right about that specific theory.
The article contains the older version of AuPM and then therefore is not what I am referring to.
Also, I can't prove to you that his 2023 PS AuPM/G is lower because the playoffs numbers are screwed (like Jokic has a rTS% of 62.9%, lol). But considering Curry's scoring numbers were much worse, in the PS versus the RS, I don't see how it is crazy to argue his impact dropped. Also his playmaking value dropped from the RS to PS if you look his PlayVal.
I never said Curry didn't have top tier impact. I argued against the idea that his AuPM suggests he maintains his RS impact into the PS.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,468
- And1: 3,102
- Joined: Apr 13, 2013
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
LukaTheGOAT wrote:lessthanjake wrote:DraymondGold wrote: Don't have time to check which years Thinking Basketball disagrees (maybe just including 2013?), but he did a calculation of who changes in AuPM in RS vs PS here: https://thinkingbasketball.net/2021/07/10/playoff-plus-minus-part-iii-changes-in-the-postseason/.
1997–2022, Curry had a...
-Regular Season AuPM of 5.11 (1st all time in that list... though there are certain minute thresholds to get on this list)
-Postseason AuPM of 5.04 (3rd all time in that list, behind Jordan and LeBron).
This is a change of -0.07, or 1.3%. He got worse in 43% of his playoff runs in this sample, and got better in 57% of his playoff runs.
He didn't really decline in 2022, sounds like you recall he got worse in 2023 (but the calculation have been messed up for a while, so we can't check).
I don't know -- a 1% decline is not a major sign of decline overall, at least not beyond uncertainty range. Regardless, even in decline, he's still 3rd ever in PS AuPM post 1997, ahead of all the other modern candidates up for vote/nomination. And again, given his biggest personal decline year happened in 2016, when he was injured, there's an even stronger argument that he doesn't decline when healthy. Pulling my list from the Duncan thread and adding a few people:
Playoff Improvements by AuPM (1997-2021):
Jordan (only in 97-98) improves 22%. (1st in PS AuPM all time)
Hakeem (only 97-98) improves 15%
LeBron improves 13% (2nd all time)
Shaq improves 7% (5th all time)
Garnett improves 9% (9th all time)
Duncan improves 8% (8th all time)
Kobe improves by 4%
Wade improves by 0%
Jokic (pre-2022) gets worse by -0%
Curry (pre-2022) gets worse by -1% (3rd all time)
Durant gets worse by -1% (10th all time)
Dirk gets worse by -1% (7th all time)
Chris Paul gets worse by -4%
Giannis gets worse by -8%
Karl Malone (97+) gets worse by -17%
Great find! I’d not seen that article, and it’s hard to really look at it and argue against Curry’s huge playoff impact or to really argue that his impact drops a bunch in the playoffs.
I’d add that this article was written in 2021. Since then, there’s been two playoffs. Curry did actually technically go down in AuPM/g in the 2022 playoffs (a bit of a surprise TBH), but it was 4.4 in the regular season and 4.3 in the playoffs, so not meaningfully different and wouldn’t change this article’s analysis in any meaningful way. Meanwhile, the numbers for 2023 playoff AuPM/g are weird (they appear to be scaled much higher than the regular season numbers), so the 2023 playoff number for Curry is a lot higher than in the 2023 regular season but that’s probably not meaningful in and of itself. That said, I find it very hard to believe he wouldn’t have been higher in AuPM/g in the playoffs this season if it were scaled the same, given that he was ranked 12th in AuPM/g in the regular season and 3rd in the playoffs. I’m not aware of any year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t a higher number than 12th in RS AuPM/g, nor am I aware of a year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t a higher number than Curry’s actual RS AuPM/g in this past regular season. Looking at the numbers, I have a feeling the 2023 playoff AuPM/g numbers are just doubled (in which case, Steph would have improved quite a bit from RS to playoffs) but I can’t be sure if I’m right about that specific theory.
The article contains the older version of AuPM and then therefore is not what I am referring to.
Also, I can't prove to you that his 2023 PS AuPM/G is lower because the playoffs numbers are screwed (like Jokic has a rTS% of 62.9%, lol). But considering Curry's scoring numbers were much worse, in the PS versus the RS, I don't see how it is crazy to argue his impact dropped.
Given that he was 12th in AuPM/g in the regular season and 3rd in AuPM/g in the playoffs, I do actually think it would be a bit crazy to argue his impact dropped (at least as measured by AuPM/g), because in the entire history of AuPM/g there is not a single year where 12th in RS AuPM/g was as high a number as 3rd in playoff AuPM/g (nor is there a single year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t higher than Curry’s RS AuPM/g this past year).
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,272
- And1: 2,984
- Joined: Dec 25, 2019
-
Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #11 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 8/3/23)
lessthanjake wrote:LukaTheGOAT wrote:lessthanjake wrote:
Great find! I’d not seen that article, and it’s hard to really look at it and argue against Curry’s huge playoff impact or to really argue that his impact drops a bunch in the playoffs.
I’d add that this article was written in 2021. Since then, there’s been two playoffs. Curry did actually technically go down in AuPM/g in the 2022 playoffs (a bit of a surprise TBH), but it was 4.4 in the regular season and 4.3 in the playoffs, so not meaningfully different and wouldn’t change this article’s analysis in any meaningful way. Meanwhile, the numbers for 2023 playoff AuPM/g are weird (they appear to be scaled much higher than the regular season numbers), so the 2023 playoff number for Curry is a lot higher than in the 2023 regular season but that’s probably not meaningful in and of itself. That said, I find it very hard to believe he wouldn’t have been higher in AuPM/g in the playoffs this season if it were scaled the same, given that he was ranked 12th in AuPM/g in the regular season and 3rd in the playoffs. I’m not aware of any year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t a higher number than 12th in RS AuPM/g, nor am I aware of a year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t a higher number than Curry’s actual RS AuPM/g in this past regular season. Looking at the numbers, I have a feeling the 2023 playoff AuPM/g numbers are just doubled (in which case, Steph would have improved quite a bit from RS to playoffs) but I can’t be sure if I’m right about that specific theory.
The article contains the older version of AuPM and then therefore is not what I am referring to.
Also, I can't prove to you that his 2023 PS AuPM/G is lower because the playoffs numbers are screwed (like Jokic has a rTS% of 62.9%, lol). But considering Curry's scoring numbers were much worse, in the PS versus the RS, I don't see how it is crazy to argue his impact dropped.
Given that he was 12th in RS AuPM/g in the regular season and 3rd in AuPM/g in the playoffs, I do actually think it is a bit crazy to argue his impact dropped (at least as measured by AuPM/g), because in the entire history of AuPM/g there is not a single year where 12th in RS AuPM/g was as high a number as 3rd in playoff AuPM/g (nor is there a single year where 3rd in playoff AuPM/g wasn’t higher than Curry’s RS AuPM/g this past year).
The AuPM/G you are referring too I am quite confident is off. The numbers in general are greatly off. Before the numbers were screwed up, I am pretty confident Curry wasn't 3rd. However, since Backpicks does not want to work the way it is supposed to, I can't show you the real AuPM/G number.