Post#516 » by thesack12 » Thu Aug 17, 2023 12:05 am
I'm going to preface this post saying that after they made the trade to #3, Zach Wilson was my desired target. Once it became obvious that the Jets were going to take Wilson at 2, I then pivoted to Justin Fields being my preferred prospect. That said, I was not upset with Lance, as I saw him as high upside pick albeit a very raw one. At the time, I mentioned several times that I MUCH preferred the boom or bust type prospect like Lance, as opposed to the low ceiling / (relatively) high floor type like Mac Jones.
I'm not sure why some people are surprised or seemingly offended by the criticism Trey has received from the media. Bagging on 49er QB's has been en vogue for at least a decade now. Kaepernick (pre-protests) and Garoppolo never were given a lot of flowers from the media, despite both having pretty notable success. In Trey's case, he's literally done nothing. Granted he's hasn't really had much opportunity to do anything, still in the limited opportunities he's had he hasn't shown much.
I also find it ironic that some folks are claiming that Kyle can't develop QB's. The funny part about that take, is it completely disregards the 7th round rookie that has surpassed Trey Lance. I don't think some people realize just how impressive it is that Purdy played as well as he did last season. That's both from a coaching standpoint and praise for Brock himself. Going beyond Brock, Kyle got elite efficiency from Garoppolo as well as turning him into a top 12-15 QB despite limited raw talent. Kyle developed Nick Mullens (an undrafted guy) into a decent backup/spot starter. Kyle developed CJ Beathard who is still in the league as a backup. Kyle transformed Matt Ryan into an MVP. Kyle helped RG3 win ROY and turned him into a superstar for a short time, and also played a large role into the early development of Kirk Cousins. The notion that Kyle can't develop QB's is complete rubbish in my opinion.
To build on the Kyle angle a bit further, many people claim that his system is super QB friendly and makes the quarterback look better than they actually are. If we are going to employ that claim, then don't we also have to give Kyle some credit for "developing" quarterback play? Which coincidentally enough, if the system is indeed mostly about the structure and less about the QB specifically, then why is Lance struggling so badly?
First round QB's flame out constantly, even ones taken at the top of the draft. Sometimes guys just don't develop, busts can and do happen frequently. Of course we would all like to see more of Trey on the field before we start throwing that B word around. But if Trey doesn't develop, its pretty short sighted to say that Kyle can't develop QB's.
I also hear a little bit of chatter of people trying to play the racisim card in regards to how Lance is supposedly treated by the organization. While that topic is not one that I want to elaborate on a whole lot, I will say that if racism was as big of a factor in how the organization views/treats Lance, then why would they have drafted him in the first place? Lance was not inherited by this regime. Trey is their guy, and it cost them a ton to get him.
To reflect on the thoughts of some other posters in this thread, while yes there are a lot of things that are absolutely not Lance's fault. Such as covid effects, injuries, the team situation he got drafted into, etc. Still those factors can't be disregarded.
Trey Lance was a pretty unique prospect going into his draft. He really only played 1 season, in a low level of college football at that. He attempted the fewest collegiate passes of any QB ever taken in the first 1st round in NFL history. In fact, since he entered college in 2018 Lance has barely thrown 400 passes in competition (including preseason games.) Yesterday Dan Orlovsky made a point that there were several college QB's who attempted more passes in a couple month span, than Trey has in the last 5 seasons combined.
The 49ers holding the #3 pick in the 2021 NFL draft, was also a pretty unique situation. They were a legitimate super bowl contender, and in their eyes they felt they needed an upgrade at QB to get them over the hump. Its exceedingly rare that a contender holds a top 3 pick, let alone have a #3 pick in addition to openly trying to upgrade the QB position. In other words QB's picked that high in the draft almost universally go to terrible teams. What is one thing terrible teams usually have in common? They have the means to be patient and allow young QB's to be thrown into the fire from jump and take their lumps. A super bowl contender, can't throw a young QB to the wolves, because those guys have high potential to have a low floor level of play/production. Allowing a young QB to take his lumps while simultaneously trying to compete at a high level, really aren't parallel paths.
So having said that, would lead you to believe that drafting a super raw prospect into a contender might not have been the best idea. Which is a completely logical take, however if you consider they made that trade/pick with the thought process that you had a solid QB already in house, and were looking at the longer term vision then it starts to make a lot of sense. Having Jimmy in the fold, afforded the time to be able to have Trey basically redshirt as a rookie and develop. Which is actually how they approached going into last season, they obviously fully intended to hand the keys to Trey and they did. Unfortunately, he got hurt early in week 2, which de-railed their plans/vision. Nobody would have expected Mr Irrelevant to step in and play at such a high level, and maintain the team's ability to be a legit contender.
Again its not Trey's fault that he got hurt, nor is it Trey's fault that Jimmy got hurt which allowed Purdy to get his opportunity. Unfortunately for Trey, Purdy absolutely took full advantage of his opportunity and proved that he is capable of helping the team remain a contender. Trey has not proved that, so its really not surprising that Brock has surpassed Lance.
The criticism of making the trade itself (and who they picked) is certainly valid and warranted depending on your point of view. But for me personally, I actually give a lot of credit to Kyle, etc for not feeling the pressure to play Trey simply because of his draft position. It would be easy to plug in Trey simply because he cost so much and was drafted so high, hell that kind of stuff happens constantly league wide. But if they feel Trey either doesn't give the team the best chance to win and/or feel he isn't the best long term prospect for this team, then credit to them for not falling into that dreaded sunken cost fallacy trap.
Having said all that, I'm not ready to give up on Trey and cut bait with him yet but man there isn't a whole lot of tangible things to continue to try and build hope on. As someone else posted, at some point he's going to have to show it. We can talk about potential until the cows come home, but potential isn't going to put W's on the board and apparently its not gonna get Trey on the field either.
And to bring this post full circle, as I alluded to in the 1st paragraph if Trey does end up flaming out while I will be quite disappointed, at the same time I will be ok with it. I would much prefer being able to make a clean break with a bust, as opposed to feeling like you need to hold on to an "ok" young QB then feeling to need to give that guy a big 2nd contract and thus force yourself to be committed to him for the next several years. Specifically talking about a guy like Mac Jones.