The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

ceiling raiser
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,531
And1: 3,754
Joined: Jan 27, 2013

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#61 » by ceiling raiser » Thu Aug 31, 2023 12:44 am

O_6 wrote:I'll start off by saying I'm an MJ > LeBron guy when it comes to Peak play. To keep it as simple as possible, LeBron's shooting is hot/cold enough for me to consider MJ the safer #1 option and the safest #1 offensive hub ever. I know this site ranks GOATs on kind of a "Career Accumulated Value / WAR" type of methodology like they do in baseball, so by that measure I totally get why LeBron ranks ahead of MJ on the current GOAT list. But if you were to ask me my GOAT, I'd still say MJ quite honestly.

But I do get "moments" where I feel like I'm wrong about the MJ/LeBron debate, because LeBron is just such a rare kind of talent. One of those moments was when I got an incredibly weird feeling watching the 2nd half of Game 4 of the WCF.

- Oldest actual player in the league
- 2nd most career minutes played ever (500 mins away from most ever)
- Played every minute of the 1st half and game
- Dropped 31/4/4 on 11/13 shooting in the 1st half
- Was switching between guarding the Legendary MVP Center and the stud PG

And yet, JVG and co. were basically questioning "What else can LeBron do? He needs to do more" when it was clear he was running out of gas in the 2nd half.

JVG talking about the oldest player in the league in that manner just really made an impact on me. It literally doesn't even make sense that an NBA athlete can be held to such absurd standards.

The oldest player in the league and guy 500 mins from being the all-time leader in career mins played? Oh yea that guy led the league in transition scoring per game this past season ahead of even the in-his-prime freak from Milwaukee. EXCUSE ME? ARE WE SUPPOSED TO ACT LIKE THIS ISN'T RIDICULOUS?

Longevity is more prevalent in today's era across all sports, the financial potential is simply too much to not try and lengthen your career. We've seen guys like Brady in the NFL and Djokovic in tennis who were/are still legendary performers at "geezer" ages for their sport. But even with all that context, what LeBron has done and who he is is still absurd.

Maybe I'm just still caught up in MJ's aura. I still believe him to be the better basketball player than LeBron at their best. But it really is a very hard question for me and one that I'm not dead set on. I also believe that the "feeling" I get with stuff like the above about LeBron might eventually flip my thoughts on this discussion once I start "reminiscing" about his play post-retirement instead of watching it in real time.


I don't think Jordan's peak being on the same level, or within one tier of LeBron is reasonable given LeBron's advantages on the defensive side of the ball, passing and playmaking, and just an overall quarterback/middle linebacker hybrid.

The stronger impact profile casts further doubt on this. A lot more of the data on MJ is particularly dicey. There is promise in the RAPM, but it's a small sample as of yet. The RWOWY from Moonbeam is complete, and paints a different picture of Jordan's peak. LeBron is a proven quantity in a ton of context. Forward. Guard. Center. On-Ball. Off-Ball. Inside-Out. Outside-In. Isolation. Motion. The whole package.

Really, what is MJ's case against even a year like 2015, outside of the box score? LeBron at his best in 2009 or 2016 is just levels above Jordan - and hitting jumpers at a better rate as well in the playoffs - especially in impact data.

I had Jordan #1 a few months ago because frankly, I prefer his game aesthetically. But it just doesn't hold up. It's NEVER held up. But I think it's time we stop talking about Jordan and LeBron as peak-to-peak. Jordan vs Magic is a better, fairer discussion. Even then, Magic was a better floor raiser and better ceiling raiser.
Now that's the difference between first and last place.
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,273
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#62 » by rk2023 » Thu Aug 31, 2023 2:34 am

One of the major feathers in James' cap when arguing for the highest apex All-Time is his defense and the ability to, at multiple times, fit in various defensive roles / ecosystems in which his impact is felt. OhayoKd pointed out a fair share of this for 2009 and in principle/theory, but here is some more:

For various use-cases in such -

2009 - Physical/Motor Peak, Monster Stopper at Wing (Thanks Colts18):
Spoiler:
Defense:

On court: 100.6 D rating (-7.7 relative to league average)
Off court: 108.8 D rating (+0.5 rel to LA)
Difference: -8.2 (According to BasketballValue.com, that difference is the 2nd highest in the league behind Pryzbilla)

The Cavs went from #1 D in the league with LeBron on the court to the equivalent of 18th when he left.

6.5 Defensive win shares (#2 in the league, only SF with more in a season are Pippen and Havlicek)

10.4 opponent counterpart PER according to 82games (equivalent to this year Alonzo Gee and Francisco Garcia)
82games also has opponent SF scoring 12.8 pts/36 and .525 TS% vs LeBron while opposing PF scored 13.3 pts/36 and .484 TS% when LeBron played PF.

Top 5 in on court defensive rating in 2009 (min. 2000 MP):
1. West: 99.2
2. LeBron 100.6
3. Odom 101.4
4. Turkoglu 101.4
5. Howard 101.8

LeBron is also 3rd in FG%, 4th in 3P%, and 3rd in eFG%.

Here is what some of the top SF of 2009 did vs LeBron offensively (their regular season per 36 in parenthesis)

Durant- 16.4 PPG, .518 TS% (23.3 PPG, .577 TS%)
Pierce- 18.1 PPG, .474 TS% (19.7 PPG, .582 TS%)
Johnson- 13.7 PPG, .475 TS% (19.5 PPG, .534 TS%)
Carmelo- 15.8 PPG, .488 TS% (23.8 PPG, .532 TS%)
Butler- 14.2 PPG, .438 TS% (19.4 PPG, .552 TS%)
Gay- 10.9 PPG, .357 TS% (18.3 PPG, .528 TS%)
Average dropoff: -5.8 PPG, -9.3 TS%

What’s amazing is that when faced Cleveland and LeBron was off the court, they dominated:

The 6 SF’s stats when (Per 36):
LeBron on court: 15.1 PPG, .461 TS%, 3.3 Reb, 3.6 AST-3.4 TOV, -9.4 +/-
LeBron off court: 24.6 PPG, .596 TS%, 5.9 Reb, 2.3 AST-1.8 TOV, +0.9 +/-

That is a 9.5 points per 36 and 13.5 TS% difference. In the playoffs, LeBron continued playing elite man defense. Here are how some of his guys did when LeBron was on the court (per 36 minutes):

Tayshaun Prince: 3.9 PPG, .260 TS%
Joe Johnson: 15.3 PPG, .480 TS%
Marvin Williams: 5.8 PPG, .337 TS%
Dropoff from regular season averages: -7.6 PPG, -18.1 TS% :o :o :o

Defensive stats from Hoopsstats.com for his position:
17.3 pts/game allowed (1st in league) (13.2 points per 36 minutes)
41.2 FG% allowed (1st)
15.1 FGA allowed (2nd fewest)
16.6 Efficiency allowed (1st)
1.3 Offensive rebounds allowed (3rd)

+2.8 Defensive RAPM [2nd among qualifying perimeter players (Artest)]


2012/13 - Back-line anchor and Swiss-army knife PF:
https://www.businessinsider.com/raptors-computer-program-lebron-james-2013-3

Spoiler:
With the help of camera-tracking technology, the team spent years inventing a computer program that (among other things) shows you what every Raptors player should have done on every defensive possession.

one of the more interesting conclusions from the computer is this: NBA teams should play more aggressive help defense, meaning players should leave the guys they are guarding in order to defend the ball way more often than they currently are.

The only problem with playing super-aggressive help defense is that you get tired. The computer says players should be running all over the place all the time, but actual, human NBA players don't have the ability to sustain that type of energy.

Except LeBron James.

According to Raptors analytics director Alex Rucker, LeBron plays defense like the idealized "ghost" defenders in the computer program play defense:

"The Heat have three of the best wing defenders in the league in Shane Battier, LeBron James, and Dwyane Wade, and the latter two are among the NBA's most gifted pure athletes. James can mimic [a computerized] hyperactive ghost in a way no other player can, Rucker says. 'LeBron basically messes up the system and the ghosts,' Rucker says. 'He does things that are just unsustainable for most players.'"


https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1667652-the-definitive-case-for-lebron-james-as-the-nbas-best-defensive-player

Spoiler:
Like any distinguished defender, James has the statistics to support his claim.

His Heatles allowed 3.4 points per 100 possessions fewer with him on the floor during the regular season, which really isn't enough to prove anything other than that he makes his team better defensively. We've come to expect that. It's his individual numbers that really begin to separate him from the rest.

Per Synergy Sports (subscription required), James allowed a mere 0.84 points per possession on defense. The Heat as a team ranked fifth in the league relinquishing 0.86. James' mark is even better.

James defended 833 individual defensive sets and was shot on 688 times (via Synergy). He held his opponents to just 37.6 percent shooting

James ranked seventh in points allowed per post-up (0.58) and third when guarding the roll man off of pick-and-rolls (0.51). The type of movement and positioning he's forced to guard doesn't affect him as much as it would anyone else.


2016 - Same role as 2013 kind-of, with better Defensive BBIQ / awareness and worse personnel:

Spoiler:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
Regular Season Defense

Defensively, I’m high on 2016 Lebron.

I’ll get more into it on his playoff defense and particularly his finals defense, but homecourtloss summarizes it nicely here


homecourtloss wrote:LeBron, 2016 was not only top 50% in all play type tracking but at worst was top 27% in post up defense. Yes, there may not be many possessions in certain play types so there’s less meaning there, but every other player falls short somewhere. I haven’t seen a single player in the tracking area who is top 30% in all areas and very very few who are top 50% minimum in each.

Top 12% in defending the pick and roll ball handler
Top 3% in defending hand offs
Top 16% in defending the roll man in pick and roll
Top 15% in defending off of screens
Top 7% in defending in ISO
Top 27% in post up defense
Top 13% in spot up defense

Compare these numbers with these:
Kawhi, 2016—DPOY on a GOATy defensive team and maybe co-#1 option with LMA
Top 10% in defending the pick and roll ball handler
Top 22% in defending hand offs
Top 2% in defending the roll man in pick and roll
Bottom 31% in defending off of screens
Top 17% in defending in ISO
Top 29% in post up defense
Top 25% in spot up defense

Draymond, 2016—2nd in DPOY voting on a GOAT team and not the #1 option on offense
Top 29% in defending the pick and roll ball handler
Bottom 43% in defending hand offs
Top 25% in defending the roll man in pick and roll
Top 2% in defending off of screens
Top 15% in defending in ISO
Top 11% in post up defense
Top 34% in spot up defense


ISO defense
LeBron: .59 points per possession (PPP), 93rd percentile
Draymond: .68, 85th percentile
Kawhi: .69 PPP, 83rd percentile

Pick and roll ball handler
Kawhi: .65 PPP, 90th percentile
LeBron: .66 PPP, 88th percentile
Draymond: .88, 71st percentile

Pick and roll roll man
Kawhi: .50 PPP, 98th percentile
LeBron: .70 PPP, 84th percentile
Draymond: .77 PPP, 75th percentile

Post defense
Draymond: .65 PPP, 89th percentile
LeBron: .77 PPP, 73rd percentile
Kawhi: .77 PPP, 71st percentile (numbers are rounded so James might have been at .772 and Kawhi at .768 or something)

Spot up defense
LeBron: .80 PPP, 87th percentile
Kawhi: .88 PPP, 75th percentile
Draymond: .91 PPP, 66th percentile

Off screens defense
Draymond: .45 PPP, 98th percentile
LeBron: .74PPP, 85th percentile
Kawhi: 1.05 PPP, 31st percentile

Hand offs defense
LeBron: .49 97th percentile
Kawhi: .72 PPP, 78th percentile
Draymond: .91 PPP, 43rd percentile

Regular season
Draymond Green:
Overall: 39.4 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 45.5%, -6.1%
Threes: 29.4 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 34.6%, -5.1%
Twos: 42.9 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 49.2%, -6.3%
<6ft: 51.9 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 60.6%, -8.7%


Kawhi
Overall: 39.2 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 44.8%, -5.6%
Threes: 33.7 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 34.9, -1.2%
Twos: 41.7 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 48.8%, -7.2%
<6ft: 53.5 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 60.5%, -7.0%

LeBron:
Overall: 37.4 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 44.7%, -7.3%
Threes: 32.1 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 34.6%, -2.6%
Twos: 40.8 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 49.0%, -8.2%
<6ft: 48.6 DFG%, opponents usually shoot 59.9%, -11.3%


Tracking data isnt super great, I know the rim protection data is at least more referred and i think more respected even if it also is imperfect, and synergy data also isn’t perfect.

RAPM data puts him as a strong positive, a bit more than a standard deviation ahead, and as I said before luck adjustment helps his defense a bit which could imply that this underrated him slightly.

In any case, while his RS wasnt DPOY worthy, I would say a combination of these things makes me pretty confident in saying he was an All-NBA defensive first team calibre defender. *Caveat that draymond and kawhi were both better on defense because they were crazy.

Either way, I think his Regular season can be defined as a high level Lebron offensive season + All NBA first team type defender. Kawhi and Draymond are standouts of course, but in a more typical year I think he had around a best perimeter defender in the nba season or close to it. I think he quarterbacked more on defense this season, and obviously we know his defensive IQ.

Defense[/u][/b]
My argument for lebron being the GOAT peak revolves more around his defensive improvement in these playoffs.
RAPM increase here is much more pronounced
In NPI RAPM, his defensive RAPM increase from 1.86 to 2.89
In multiyear RAPM, his defensive RAPM increase from 2.04 to 2.74
The tracking data i think demonstrates this as well
Rim protection data is more useful here, I know its much more respected around analytics circles at least

Regular season tracking data
DEFENSE CATEGORY GP G DFGM DFGA DFG% FREQ% FG% DIFF%
Overall 76 76 3.2 8.4 38.4 100 44.7 -6.3
3 Pointers 76 75 1.0 3.2 32.2 38.1 34.7 -2.5
2 Pointers 76 75 2.2 5.2 42.2 61.9 49.0 -6.8
Less Than 6 Ft 76 71 1.2 2.3 50.9 27.2 59.4 -8.5
Less Than 10 Ft 76 72 1.4 2.9 48.4 34.8 54.6 -6.2
Greater Than 15 Ft 76 75 1.6 4.9 32.2 58.3 36.6 -4.5

Playoffs tracking data
DEFENSE CATEGORY GP G DFGM DFGA DFG% FREQ% FG% DIFF%
Overall 21 21 3.3 10.1 32.4 100 45.9 -13.5
3 Pointers 21 21 0.9 3.9 24.4 38.5 36.8 -12.4
2 Pointers 21 21 2.3 6.2 37.4 61.5 50.5 -13.1
Less Than 6 Ft 21 18 1.2 3.1 38.5 30.5 60.7 -22.3
Less Than 10 Ft 21 21 1.5 4.0 36.5 39.9 55.4 -18.9
Greater Than 15 Ft 21 21 1.4 5.2 27.3 51.6 37.5 -10.3



Rim protection data is about equal to his finals run surprisingly.
He wasnt contesting as many shots as centers or anything but the tracking data does come out to be quite elite.
Heres on off data for him in the playoffs
Round 1, vs Pistons (off rank 15, avg Rel Ortg)
Lebron on court Off RTG 103.7
Lebron off court Off RTG 130.9

Round 2, vs Hawks (off rank 20, -0.9 Rel Ortg)
Lebron on court Off RTG 103.2
Lebron off court Off RTG 112.9

ECF, vs Raptors (off rank 5th, +4 Rel Ortg)
Lebron on court Off RTG 102.2
Lebron off court Off RTG 83.9

Finals, vs Warriors (off rank 1, +8.2 Rel Ortg)
Lebron on court Off RTG 104.1
Lebron off court Off RTG 122

Playoffs overall
Lebron on court off RTG 103.3
Lebron off court Off RTG 107.2
League avg is about 105.5

As a whole, thats consistent with DPOY impact, and a raptors series where the raptors sucked in garbage time. It should be noted that a 102.2 defense vs a +4 offense turns to somethjing like a -7 defense although im not sure how much i agree with that method. In any case, despite his actualy on off in toronto defensively being sub par, lineups he was in were still elite, so its pretty consistent with noise in the off portion rather than the on portion. Ill break down the finals later
From a playoff perspective, having a ridiculous bball iq and the chance to play “chess” in this regard leads to him having a stronger impact in the playoffs on defense, I think the reasons for that would be fairly obvious, and statistically it seems theres a decent amount of evidence for it.
I wanted to see this play out so i decided to just review a few of the games i could find, took a quick peek at g1 vs the raptors and g5 and g6 vs the warriors, obviously looked more at the raptors game.
It pops up how much he is zooming past screens, he definitely had recovered alot of speed both laterally and agility wise by slimming down.
He isnt the main rim protector or anything, but they are a team that protects the rim by committee, he/Klove/TT all kind of switched around as guys who would defend at teh rim, by rotatiotions, but he was by far the most effective one. Teams constantly fumbled drop offs against him with a combination of brons quick hands and quickness to stop the dump offs,
Occasionally gambled but generally was great at reading plays and not getting “tricked” by them if that makes sense, and there were definitely times where his activity ramped up vs others, but he was never bad
It was crazy hard to score 1v1 on him, even when you get past him he applied so much back pressure you wouldnt even want to attempt a shot, and hed usually send you to the help.
There were alot of times that guys would iso on bron and not end up even taking a shot and passing it out with 5 seconds on the shotclock, or hed get past off a screen but bron would engulf them so hard that hed force a turnover, he applied crazy pressure when trapping, was quick enough to cover fo rhis mistakes if he overthought something and made a mistake doing so, and on another note the cavs seemed like a crazy smart team on defense despite their roster from an individual basis not being anything crazy defensively, and id assume that mostly comes from Lebron.
From an impact basis he played like a DPOY type, it should be noted that even in the raptors series, thats consistent with he played elite D while on the court, he cant control if the raptors get cold while he is off of it.
Im not calling his overall playoff performance a greatest defensive performance ever or anything, on the whole he wasnt better than dray over the playoffs of defense i think.
Otoh, 2016 Draymond was a strong DPOY that becomes roided up to an absurd degree over the playoffs, realistically i think literally EVERYTHING points to draymond being on the best playoff defenders ever shortlist.
Defensively he probably outdid green over the last few games of the finals though, which given his offensive load is absurd.

Overall, when evaluating his playoff defense there are reasons for it to be more effective, and it does seem like almost all the data pretty consistently would have him at a DPOY type of defender in the playoffs, and logically it does make sense


2020 (Older, low-activity, QB and helper role):

Synergy Report-Card (Happy to share other years and touch on this later):
https://i.imgur.com/r4JFM2z.png

Some videos for better context of how exactly James is deployed:








In Aggregate:
Spoiler:
letskissbro wrote:
To show this I’ll turn to to DRAPM. Here are the top perimeter defenders by PS DRAPM from 1997-2019.

Among qualifying players (2000+ MP):
1. Manu Ginobili (3.52)
2. LeBron James (2.28)
3. Kawhi Leonard ( 2.09)

4. Tony Allen (2.09)
5. Josh Howard (2.00)
6. Shawn Marion (1.84)
7. Paul George (1.72)
8. Jason Kidd (1.70)
9. Tayshaun Prince (1.67)
10. Rajon Rondo (1.64)
11. Bruce Bowen (1.53)
12. Danny Green (1.50)
13. Mike Conley (1.40)
14. Dwyane Wade (1.37)
15. Luol Deng (1.25)
16. Metta World Peace (1.23)

Besides Ginobili, who appears to be a clear case of collinearity due to playing heavy minutes with Duncan, LeBron leads the competition. And he does so with 10049 minutes played, far more than anyone else on the list. Kawhi only has 3806 minutes. This is important because more minutes typically suppresses career averages since it’s pulling from pre-prime and post-prime samples.
What about the regular season? LeBron’s often criticized for not giving full effort year-round and coasting but is this actually true or just the product of lazy analysis?

At first glance, RS DRAPM appears to support the LeCoast narrative. However, there's something very important to consider here. One issue with comparing non-big defenders, particularly small forwards, through a statistical lens is that some of them spend significant time at the 4 spot, which hurts them since they’re usually playing with less rim protection as the second biggest defender on the court. The ability to place your SF at the 4 can be a luxury offensively because it allows for better spaced lineups. But it often comes at a cost to your defense that I don't believe should be factored when trying to decide the best non-big defender(s), since you're essentially assigning them responsibilities that are typically reserved for a big man.

I did a rough adjustment of scaled Goldstein DRAPM which attempts to account for discrepancies in rim protection and find the average quality of a player’s prime defensive season on the perimeter. It’s a simple calculation and the methodology isn’t flawless, but it passes my smell test a lot better than the raw numbers. To calculate it I simply took the years which I interpreted to be the player’s defensive prime and used bballref’s position estimates to weigh DRAPM proportionately to how much time they actually spent on the perimeter. If they exceeded 40% of their minutes played at PF/C I scrapped the season altogether, since it made for some big outliers.

I included some notable guard defenders to show that—besides standouts like Tony Allen and Ron Harper (limited sample)—there is clearer separation between small forwards and guards with this model as well.

Shane Battier: 2.22
LeBron James: 2.21
Andrei Kirilenko: 1.99
Bruce Bowen: 1.99
Metta World Peace: 1.95
Ron Harper: 1.95*
Tony Allen: 1.88
Shawn Marion: 1.87
Kawhi Leonard: 1.72
Thabo Sefolosha: 1.64
Andre Iguodala: 1.50
Michael Jordan: 1.32*
Paul George: 1.30
Chris Paul: 1.22
Kyle Lowry: 1.16
Danny Green: 1.15
Jason Kidd: 1.13

Full results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ce25iFkdcfNb2ZRfszCLxmQ4uxrNlyBHObqhJhCB-VM/edit?usp=sharing

***It’s also worth mentioning that this data does not include LeBron’s 2020 RS/PS or his 2021 RS, which would likely increase his career averages. In 2020 he finished 2nd in the league in a different RS DRAPM dataset just behind Giannis and 2nd in PS DPIPM to AD. In 2021 he was 7th in DRAPM prior to his injury (2nd among “anchors”).***

Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
O_6
Rookie
Posts: 1,178
And1: 1,586
Joined: Aug 25, 2010

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#63 » by O_6 » Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:43 am

LeBron is incredible. Like I said, I get more and more impressed by him as an athlete by the day. Dude has been 250 fast strong and beasting for 20 years.

LeBron is unfair athletically. The older he gets and the less likely it looks like I’ll see another one of him, I just feel more amazed by him.

I’m excited about Paolo Banchero and Anthony Edwards. Two young dudes who look like they could overwhelm opponents physically in the future. And then I think about how they’re two of the best of this young bunch in that sense and just so far from what LeBron was at the same stage.

MJ’s offensive skill-set is just something I prefer to LeBron’s, and I don’t believe LeBron’s defensive/passing/overall freakish versatility quite makes up for it in most high level/talent contexts when MJ is still a freak.

MJ jumped from the FT line with grace and was clearly an outlier athlete himself. But his shooting and extremely calm/confident decision making made him able to sleepwalk his way into dominance in a way LeBron hasn’t.

LeBron works very hard. I respect him so much. I’m embarrassed by all those who underrate him for so many dumb reasons. GOAT transition scorer. GOAT transition defender? If that isn’t pure hustle, what is? For 20.

But I still just think MJ was better at their best. Just a more calm level of dominance due to shooting. Different styles though.
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,508
And1: 18,896
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#64 » by homecourtloss » Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:02 am

rk2023 wrote:One of the major feathers in James' cap when arguing for the highest apex All-Time is his defense and the ability to, at multiple times, fit in various defensive roles / ecosystems in which his impact is felt. OhayoKd pointed out a fair share of this for 2009 and in principle/theory, but here is some more:

letskissbro wrote:
To show this I’ll turn to to DRAPM. Here are the top perimeter defenders by PS DRAPM from 1997-2019.

Among qualifying players (2000+ MP):
1. Manu Ginobili (3.52)
2. LeBron James (2.28)
3. Kawhi Leonard ( 2.09)

4. Tony Allen (2.09)
5. Josh Howard (2.00)
6. Shawn Marion (1.84)
7. Paul George (1.72)
8. Jason Kidd (1.70)
9. Tayshaun Prince (1.67)
10. Rajon Rondo (1.64)
11. Bruce Bowen (1.53)
12. Danny Green (1.50)
13. Mike Conley (1.40)
14. Dwyane Wade (1.37)
15. Luol Deng (1.25)
16. Metta World Peace (1.23)

Besides Ginobili, who appears to be a clear case of collinearity due to playing heavy minutes with Duncan, LeBron leads the competition. And he does so with 10049 minutes played, far more than anyone else on the list. Kawhi only has 3806 minutes. This is important because more minutes typically suppresses career averages since it’s pulling from pre-prime and post-prime samples.
What about the regular season? LeBron’s often criticized for not giving full effort year-round and coasting but is this actually true or just the product of lazy analysis?

At first glance, RS DRAPM appears to support the LeCoast narrative. However, there's something very important to consider here. One issue with comparing non-big defenders, particularly small forwards, through a statistical lens is that some of them spend significant time at the 4 spot, which hurts them since they’re usually playing with less rim protection as the second biggest defender on the court. The ability to place your SF at the 4 can be a luxury offensively because it allows for better spaced lineups. But it often comes at a cost to your defense that I don't believe should be factored when trying to decide the best non-big defender(s), since you're essentially assigning them responsibilities that are typically reserved for a big man.

I did a rough adjustment of scaled Goldstein DRAPM which attempts to account for discrepancies in rim protection and find the average quality of a player’s prime defensive season on the perimeter. It’s a simple calculation and the methodology isn’t flawless, but it passes my smell test a lot better than the raw numbers. To calculate it I simply took the years which I interpreted to be the player’s defensive prime and used bballref’s position estimates to weigh DRAPM proportionately to how much time they actually spent on the perimeter. If they exceeded 40% of their minutes played at PF/C I scrapped the season altogether, since it made for some big outliers.

I included some notable guard defenders to show that—besides standouts like Tony Allen and Ron Harper (limited sample)—there is clearer separation between small forwards and guards with this model as well.

Shane Battier: 2.22
LeBron James: 2.21
Andrei Kirilenko: 1.99
Bruce Bowen: 1.99
Metta World Peace: 1.95
Ron Harper: 1.95*
Tony Allen: 1.88
Shawn Marion: 1.87
Kawhi Leonard: 1.72
Thabo Sefolosha: 1.64
Andre Iguodala: 1.50
Michael Jordan: 1.32*
Paul George: 1.30
Chris Paul: 1.22
Kyle Lowry: 1.16
Danny Green: 1.15
Jason Kidd: 1.13

Full results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ce25iFkdcfNb2ZRfszCLxmQ4uxrNlyBHObqhJhCB-VM/edit?usp=sharing

***It’s also worth mentioning that this data does not include LeBron’s 2020 RS/PS or his 2021 RS, which would likely increase his career averages. In 2020 he finished 2nd in the league in a different RS DRAPM dataset just behind Giannis and 2nd in PS DPIPM to AD. In 2021 he was 7th in DRAPM prior to his injury (2nd among “anchors”).***


What’s really wild about the bolded blue text about 2020 and 2021 is that you don’t have wing players who are 35 or 36 years old having these types of DRAPM numbers, AND you certainly don’t have a primary offense initiators of really any age have these types of DRAPM numbers and on top of everything in 2020, LeBron had one of his highest ball dominance seasons, led the league in assists per game, etc., and somehow posted these DRAPM numbers. 2020 and 2021 old LeBron was better defensively than any of Jordan’s seasons.

2021 numbers
Image

2020 Lakers’ DRtg when player is on court:

THT: 111.2
Rondo: 107.3
KCP: 107.2
AD: 106.4
Howard: 106.4
Green: 106.0
McGee: 105.7
Kuzma: 105.2
Dion: 105.0
Bradley: 104.0
Morris: 103.4
Daniels: 102.7
Cook: 102.5
Caruso: 101.0
Dudley: 98.4

DRtgs for LeBron Pairs:

James + Cook: 90.8 (11.7 better with LeBron)
James + Rondo: 100.1 (7.2 better with LeBron)
James + Caruso: 95.1 (5.9 better with LeBron)
James + Kuzma: 99.8 (5.4 better with LeBron)
James + Davis: 103.2 (3.2 better with LeBron)
James + KCP: 104.2 (3.0 better with LeBron)
James + Howard: 104.5 (1.9 better with LeBron)
James + Green: 104.7 (1.3 better with LeBron)
James + Bradley: 103.1 (.9 better with LeBron)
James + Morris: 102.5 (.9 better with LeBron)
James + McGee: 105.2 (.7 better with LeBron)
James + Daniels: 102.6 (.1 better with LeBron)
James + Dudley: 102.1 (3.7 worse with LeBron)
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
User avatar
MacGill
Veteran
Posts: 2,769
And1: 568
Joined: May 29, 2010
Location: From Parts Unknown...
     

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#65 » by MacGill » Thu Aug 31, 2023 12:34 pm

Mazter wrote:
Franco wrote:
MacGill wrote:but could also be your teams best defender as well.


If Jordan is your team's best defender, your defense isn't very good. At his peak Jordan was a great guard defender, but he was never the best defender on his own team when they had good ones.


Sometimes those defense stories about Jordan get way overblown.



A couple of weeks ago this highlight came forward. The Bulls were trailing 1-0 in the series and trailing by 3 in the the game. The Knicks had 3 guards on the floor, as did the Bulls.
Starks was Knicks 2nd leading scorer in the RS and had 10 points at that moment and was handling the ball, he was guarded by Armstrong.
Rivers had 21 points that game, he was guarded by Paxson.
Blackman had 0 points, he was guarded by Jordan.

There are more examples. He regularly skipped on difficult defensive tasks. The Bulls were packed with defensive players, just so Jordan could focus more on offense.


Agreed, but you can say that about every single player who ever played the game of basketball, right...?

Russell, Wilt, Hakeem, KG, Duncan, Shaq, LBJ etc, all of them have been guilty of the exact same thing. No player will talk about their defensive or offensive lows but when dialled in, and per position, MJ could be, not always was, or had the most impact, but could be your teams best defender as a guard. Whether that meant shutting down his opponent on the court to a higher degree than any other teammate, or that combined with stealing/stripping the ball, so be it, but he won DPOY as a 2-guard. And that was well before he ever 3-peated etc. It can't be ignored and the general understanding here is that no 2-way player in the history of the game could go 48 mins at 100% O & D without taking plays off.
Image
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,933
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#66 » by OhayoKD » Thu Aug 31, 2023 1:13 pm

MacGill wrote:
Mazter wrote:
Franco wrote:
If Jordan is your team's best defender, your defense isn't very good. At his peak Jordan was a great guard defender, but he was never the best defender on his own team when they had good ones.


Sometimes those defense stories about Jordan get way overblown.



A couple of weeks ago this highlight came forward. The Bulls were trailing 1-0 in the series and trailing by 3 in the the game. The Knicks had 3 guards on the floor, as did the Bulls.
Starks was Knicks 2nd leading scorer in the RS and had 10 points at that moment and was handling the ball, he was guarded by Armstrong.
Rivers had 21 points that game, he was guarded by Paxson.
Blackman had 0 points, he was guarded by Jordan.

There are more examples. He regularly skipped on difficult defensive tasks. The Bulls were packed with defensive players, just so Jordan could focus more on offense.


Agreed, but you can say that about every single player who ever played the game of basketball, right...?

Russell, Wilt, Hakeem, KG, Duncan, Shaq, LBJ etc, all of them have been guilty of the exact same thing. No player will talk about their defensive or offensive lows but when dialled in, and per position, MJ could be, not always was, or had the most impact, but could be your teams best defender as a guard. Whether that meant shutting down his opponent on the court to a higher degree than any other teammate, or that combined with stealing/stripping the ball, so be it, but he won DPOY as a 2-guard. And that was well before he ever 3-peated etc. It can't be ignored and the general understanding here is that no 2-way player in the history of the game could go 48 mins at 100% O & D without taking plays off.

"as a guard" is a silly qualifier. Are you planning to ding Jordan's offense because it was "as a guard"? He won dpoy during a stretch guards were winning all the DPOYs and of vastly more import is that it did not translate into results:
Spoiler:
[spoiler]
OhayoKD wrote:Interesting thoughts Doc. That said, I feel we put the cart a bit ahead of the horse
Doctor MJ wrote:
OhayoKD wrote:

Okay. Sure, the Bulls are the best defense in the league. But that is a team-achievement and it seems you are distributing a very big chunk of that credit to Jordan. Also notable to me is that Dennis Rodman is not mentioned. And here I think we get into a bit of a problem.

It was not built around a big, but Pippen is an all-time paint-protector for a non-big. So is Rodman. Even MJ is notable in a comparison with guards. So how do we decide where and how to allocate credit. How do we decide which traits to allocate credit to? Well, I'd say step one is to isolate for variables. And in this case those variables are each of these player's respective teammates. For simplicity, let's ignore Rodman. Instead let's key in on Scottie and MJ.

We've talked about 88 and 89. Jordan leads a -2 defense(some on this board have argued oakley was a co-lead but I wouldn't go that far). We can ignore that it fell apart in the playoffs for sample size, but then Oakley leaves and the Bulls regress to average. Now at this point you noted the Bulls do not spike in 1990. Indeed if you just look at the regular season they regress. But looking at what happens over the course of the season paints a different picture:
Image
There's alot of talk about the triangle offense. But let's talk first talk about the defense. Pre ASB, they are below average. Post ASB they are good. In the playoffs they are very good(around -3. In the last two rounds they are -5. This continues through 91 where they are -2.7 in the rs and then around-4 in the postseason(sans actually has them nearing -8 but that is a different process from 90(you scale-up from your opponents series ratings) where I'm just eyeballing bbr). All very impressive, but what caused this change? Did Jordan suddenly get better? I find that unlikely as

1. Jordan started suffering from jumper's foot(something he would have for the rest of his career)
2. By every source of tracking Jordan's defensive activity diminished post 89
3. When Jordan left, Chicago's defense wasn't significantly worse

I'd argue the catalyst was the ascension of Pippen and Grant. Two, very strong, for non-bigs, paint-protectors. From what I've seen(and per tracking I trust) I see Pippen protecting the paint as much as Grant, doing more on the perimeter than Mike, and telling everyone what to do more than anyone besides Jackson. IOW, while you seem to see the Bulls defense as "pippen and jordan", I see it as "pippen(gap), Grant and MJ". And here I'd say the Bulls may not have built around a big, but they built around the next best thing: a wing who can protect the paint.

I also think looking simply for "best in the league" obscures things...
Consider the possibility that when you build a defense around a big that you can't really emulate when he goes to the bench, you might be providing that big an opportunity for maximum DRAPM potential, but you might also be putting certain weaknesses in your overall team defense.

Okay but here's the thing. The Bulls were not better than the best big-led defenses of that time period. The Duncan/Robinson spurs were much better. In fact, Duncan's Spurs, without d-rob were better. The best defenses ever are not perimeter orientated. Even with 2nd-tier bigs, the 71-73 Bucks were all better defenses than anything that came out of Chicago. As were the 2019/2020 Raptors. A defense that turned all-time great with a 30+ Gasol, and then fell to mediocrity in his absence.

You bring up Lebron and Pippen's defenses, but Pippen and Lebron are all-time "paint-protectors" at their size. You know which dpoy-winning non-big has seen their defenses collapse repeatedly in the absence of top-tier rim-protection? Kawhi. The guy who quite arguably is the pinnacle of the archetype you seem to be ascribing unique resiliency to. And that one-year where Jordan was flanked by a strong front-court defender, rather than an exceptional one, that nice regular season defense collapsed in the playoffs.

And on that note
DraymondGold wrote:Some of those teams are pretty predictable: great defenses anchored behind a great defensive big. Nobody’s surprised to see the Russell Celtics, Kareem Bucks, Wilt Lakers, Wallace Pistons, Garnett Celtics or Duncan Spurs. Or the Draymond Warriors for that matter. But that’s only 14 of the 25. The 11 remaining don’t really have a dominant defensive big.


In other words, 44% of the best playoff defenses ever didn’t have great rim protectors, and instead had deep athleticism and perimeter defenders. That seems high, right? Let’s contrast this with the Top 25 defensive ratings in the regular season: … That’s 19 of the 25.

So what should we conclude? That big men are less critical in the playoffs? Or that the small sample size of playoffs is throwing things off? Either is possible. But I do think that there is a lot to suggest that great playoff defenses are more dependent on perimeter defense than they are in the regular season.

To be honest, I do not see how that conclusion logically follows from what you're highlighting. The best defenses from your list are the big-led ones. The top 6, and 8 of the top 9 are all led by bigs. The exception here are Pippen's Bulls. And Pippen is goat-tier rim-protecting non-big. The kawhi-raptors were literally unaffected by his absence and became all-time-great only when a big-man joined. Really the only defense here led by a not-strong paint-deterrent is Kawhi's Spurs, a team that had strong rim-help in the rs and then got yeeted out in the second round when their best rim-protector broke-down(Duncan).

I do not see any evidence here for rim-protection is less important in the postseason and I do not think your argument logically leads to such a conclusion.[/quote]

Why are you saying "before he even three-peated" when his defensive involvement declined?


MJ's only real defensive advantage would be his man-defense out on the perimiter, and history suggests guarding someone away from the basket isn't nearly as valuable as other advantages(rim-protection, help, play-calling). Jordan would have to be the best lockdown defender ever for this to be a debate. Probably by a margin considering that even the likes of Kawhi Leonard don't match Lebron in terms of discernible defensive influence:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2258950
He is not:
Spoiler:
Colts18 wrote:Colts18 did some tracking of Jordan's defense during the 92 finals against Clyde Drexler, and Drexler shot better against MJ than he did against everyone else by a decent margin. He shot 41% overall, but against Jordan specifically shot 44% while he shot 38% against everyone else

Why are you bringing up defense as a point in Mj's favor against someone who was more valuable defensively(especially in the playoffs) in his 30's?

Jordan led a -2 defense with oakley that was average in the playoffs. Lebron anchored a -5.5 defense with his best defensive teammate washed thanks to injury for the 2nd half the season(and were still good in the postseason), beofre leading a -3.5 defense when they replaced said teammate with a negative(shaq) and the rest of the defensive cast deteriorated. Then when he left, in games with the same starters(and no shaq) that defense completely collapsed. At the end of that three-peat the bulls defense mantained without Mike. They were average when they drafted him and average until better defenders took over(by tracking pippen was more involved in the paint, more involved on the perimiter, and was the floor-general much like draymond or kg or chris paul or...lebron).

Saying Jordan is a comparable defender is not serious
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,508
And1: 18,896
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#67 » by homecourtloss » Thu Aug 31, 2023 2:16 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
rk2023 wrote:.

letskissbro wrote:***It’s also worth mentioning that this data does not include LeBron’s 2020 RS/PS or his 2021 RS, which would likely increase his career averages. In 2020 he finished 2nd in the league in a different RS DRAPM dataset just behind Giannis and 2nd in PS DPIPM to AD. In 2021 he was 7th in DRAPM prior to his injury (2nd among “anchors”).***


What’s really wild about the bolded blue text about 2020 and 2021 is that you don’t have wing players who are 35 or 36 years old having these types of DRAPM numbers, AND you certainly don’t have a primary offense initiators of really any age have these types of DRAPM numbers and on top of everything in 2020, LeBron had one of his highest ball dominance seasons, led the league in assists per game, etc., and somehow posted these DRAPM numbers. 2020 and 2021 old LeBron was better defensively than any of Jordan’s seasons.

2021 numbers
Image

2020 Lakers’ DRtg when player is on court:

THT: 111.2
Rondo: 107.3
KCP: 107.2
AD: 106.4
Howard: 106.4
Green: 106.0
McGee: 105.7
Kuzma: 105.2
Dion: 105.0
Bradley: 104.0
Morris: 103.4
Daniels: 102.7
Cook: 102.5
Caruso: 101.0
Dudley: 98.4

DRtgs for LeBron Pairs:

James + Cook: 90.8 (11.7 better with LeBron)
James + Rondo: 100.1 (7.2 better with LeBron)
James + Caruso: 95.1 (5.9 better with LeBron)
James + Kuzma: 99.8 (5.4 better with LeBron)
James + Davis: 103.2 (3.2 better with LeBron)
James + KCP: 104.2 (3.0 better with LeBron)
James + Howard: 104.5 (1.9 better with LeBron)
James + Green: 104.7 (1.3 better with LeBron)
James + Bradley: 103.1 (.9 better with LeBron)
James + Morris: 102.5 (.9 better with LeBron)
James + McGee: 105.2 (.7 better with LeBron)
James + Daniels: 102.6 (.1 better with LeBron)
James + Dudley: 102.1 (3.7 worse with LeBron)


Wanted to add the play type tracking data that we have for old LeBron.

LeBron 2019 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

P&R ball handler: .64, 96th percentile
Hand off: .58, 94th
Off screens: .68, 89th
P&R Roll man: .75, 83rd
Post Up: .83, 83rd
ISO: .75, 79th
Spot up: .99, 58th

LeBron 2020 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

Post Up: .59, 95th percentile
P&R Roll man: .70, 87th
Spot up: .85, 87th
ISO: .71, 82nd
P&R ball handler: .78, 76th
Hand off: .83, 64th
Off screens: .88, 64th

LeBron 2021 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

Spot up: .81, 90th percentile
P&R ball handler: .75, 83rd
ISO: .72, 81st
Post Up: .80, 76th
P&R Roll man: .93, 63rd
Off screens: .96, 53rd
Hand off: .93, 50th

Now compare that to Kawhi

Kawhi: 2021 2nd team all defense
2020 2nd team all defense
2019 2nd team all defense
2017 1st team all defense

Kawhi 2021

Defensive Play type

Post Up: .86 PPP allowed, 67th percentile
P&R ball handler: .87, 58th
Off screens: .96, 53rd
Spot up: 1.03, 50th
Hand off: 1.06, 29th
ISO: 1.19, 10th
P&R Roll man: Not enough data

Team DRTg ON court: 109.2
Team DRtg OFF court: 110.4
DRAPM: 33rd in the NBA

Kawhi 2020

Defensive Play type
Spot up: .73, 96th percentile
ISO: .69, 87th
Hand off: .80, 70th
Off screens: .85, 67th
P&R ball handler: .84, 62nd
P&R Roll man: 1.27, 16th
Post Up: 1.17, 16th

Team DRTg ON court: 104.7
Team DRtg OFF court: 107.4
DRAPM: 6th in the NBA

Kawhi 2019

Defensive Play type
ISO: .55 PPP allowed, 96th percentile
Hand off: .57, 94th
Spot up: .91, 77th
P&R ball handler: .83, 63rd
P&R Roll man: not enough data
Post Up: 1.00, 36th
Off screens: 1.04, 32nd

Team DRTg ON court: 107.8
Team DRtg OFF court: 104.1
DRAPM: 278th in the NBA

Kawhi 2017

Defensive Play type

Hand off: .57, 94th percentile
P&R ball handler: .83, 63rd
Spot up: 1.02 45th
ISO: .93, 44th
P&R Roll man: not enough data
Post Up: 1.00, 36th
Off screens: 1.04, 32nd

Team DRTg ON court: 105.1
Team DRtg OFF court: 96.1
DRAPM: 278 in the NBA
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
oldregreg
Ballboy
Posts: 1
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 21, 2023

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#68 » by oldregreg » Thu Aug 31, 2023 2:22 pm

.....
MrVorp
Freshman
Posts: 51
And1: 38
Joined: Aug 03, 2020

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#69 » by MrVorp » Thu Aug 31, 2023 2:35 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
rk2023 wrote:.

letskissbro wrote:***It’s also worth mentioning that this data does not include LeBron’s 2020 RS/PS or his 2021 RS, which would likely increase his career averages. In 2020 he finished 2nd in the league in a different RS DRAPM dataset just behind Giannis and 2nd in PS DPIPM to AD. In 2021 he was 7th in DRAPM prior to his injury (2nd among “anchors”).***


What’s really wild about the bolded blue text about 2020 and 2021 is that you don’t have wing players who are 35 or 36 years old having these types of DRAPM numbers, AND you certainly don’t have a primary offense initiators of really any age have these types of DRAPM numbers and on top of everything in 2020, LeBron had one of his highest ball dominance seasons, led the league in assists per game, etc., and somehow posted these DRAPM numbers. 2020 and 2021 old LeBron was better defensively than any of Jordan’s seasons.

2021 numbers
Image

2020 Lakers’ DRtg when player is on court:

THT: 111.2
Rondo: 107.3
KCP: 107.2
AD: 106.4
Howard: 106.4
Green: 106.0
McGee: 105.7
Kuzma: 105.2
Dion: 105.0
Bradley: 104.0
Morris: 103.4
Daniels: 102.7
Cook: 102.5
Caruso: 101.0
Dudley: 98.4

DRtgs for LeBron Pairs:

James + Cook: 90.8 (11.7 better with LeBron)
James + Rondo: 100.1 (7.2 better with LeBron)
James + Caruso: 95.1 (5.9 better with LeBron)
James + Kuzma: 99.8 (5.4 better with LeBron)
James + Davis: 103.2 (3.2 better with LeBron)
James + KCP: 104.2 (3.0 better with LeBron)
James + Howard: 104.5 (1.9 better with LeBron)
James + Green: 104.7 (1.3 better with LeBron)
James + Bradley: 103.1 (.9 better with LeBron)
James + Morris: 102.5 (.9 better with LeBron)
James + McGee: 105.2 (.7 better with LeBron)
James + Daniels: 102.6 (.1 better with LeBron)
James + Dudley: 102.1 (3.7 worse with LeBron)


Wanted to add the play type tracking data that we have for old LeBron.

LeBron 2019 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

P&R ball handler: .64, 96th percentile
Hand off: .58, 94th
Off screens: .68, 89th
P&R Roll man: .75, 83rd
Post Up: .83, 83rd
ISO: .75, 79th
Spot up: .99, 58th

LeBron 2020 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

Post Up: .59, 95th percentile
P&R Roll man: .70, 87th
Spot up: .85, 87th
ISO: .71, 82nd
P&R ball handler: .78, 76th
Hand off: .83, 64th
Off screens: .88, 64th

LeBron 2021 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

Spot up: .81, 90th percentile
P&R ball handler: .75, 83rd
ISO: .72, 81st
Post Up: .80, 76th
P&R Roll man: .93, 63rd
Off screens: .96, 53rd
Hand off: .93, 50th

Now compare that to Kawhi

Kawhi: 2021 2nd team all defense
2020 2nd team all defense
2019 2nd team all defense
2017 1st team all defense

Kawhi 2021

Defensive Play type

Post Up: .86 PPP allowed, 67th percentile
P&R ball handler: .87, 58th
Off screens: .96, 53rd
Spot up: 1.03, 50th
Hand off: 1.06, 29th
ISO: 1.19, 10th
P&R Roll man: Not enough data

Team DRTg ON court: 109.2
Team DRtg OFF court: 110.4
DRAPM: 33rd in the NBA

Kawhi 2020

Defensive Play type
Spot up: .73, 96th percentile
ISO: .69, 87th
Hand off: .80, 70th
Off screens: .85, 67th
P&R ball handler: .84, 62nd
P&R Roll man: 1.27, 16th
Post Up: 1.17, 16th

Team DRTg ON court: 104.7
Team DRtg OFF court: 107.4
DRAPM: 6th in the NBA

Kawhi 2019

Defensive Play type
ISO: .55 PPP allowed, 96th percentile
Hand off: .57, 94th
Spot up: .91, 77th
P&R ball handler: .83, 63rd
P&R Roll man: not enough data
Post Up: 1.00, 36th
Off screens: 1.04, 32nd

Team DRTg ON court: 107.8
Team DRtg OFF court: 104.1
DRAPM: 278th in the NBA

Kawhi 2017

Defensive Play type

Hand off: .57, 94th percentile
P&R ball handler: .83, 63rd
Spot up: 1.02 45th
ISO: .93, 44th
P&R Roll man: not enough data
Post Up: 1.00, 36th
Off screens: 1.04, 32nd

Team DRTg ON court: 105.1
Team DRtg OFF court: 96.1
DRAPM: 278 in the NBA

Worth noting that synergy defensive play types are mostly random noise from season to season
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,451
And1: 3,086
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#70 » by lessthanjake » Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:29 pm

This is an extremely thorough overview of LeBron’s and Jordan’s defense, based on film analysis:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/k11s3h/who_was_a_better_defender_lebron_james_or_michael/

Of course there’s always room to disagree with film analysis and with the conclusions thereof, but FWIW the conclusion that that poster comes to is that (1) comparing prime to prime, LeBron has a “slight edge” over Jordan as a defender; but that (2) Jordan had a better overall defensive career.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,508
And1: 18,896
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#71 » by homecourtloss » Thu Aug 31, 2023 6:03 pm

MrVorp wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:


What’s really wild about the bolded blue text about 2020 and 2021 is that you don’t have wing players who are 35 or 36 years old having these types of DRAPM numbers, AND you certainly don’t have a primary offense initiators of really any age have these types of DRAPM numbers and on top of everything in 2020, LeBron had one of his highest ball dominance seasons, led the league in assists per game, etc., and somehow posted these DRAPM numbers. 2020 and 2021 old LeBron was better defensively than any of Jordan’s seasons.

2021 numbers
Image

2020 Lakers’ DRtg when player is on court:

THT: 111.2
Rondo: 107.3
KCP: 107.2
AD: 106.4
Howard: 106.4
Green: 106.0
McGee: 105.7
Kuzma: 105.2
Dion: 105.0
Bradley: 104.0
Morris: 103.4
Daniels: 102.7
Cook: 102.5
Caruso: 101.0
Dudley: 98.4

DRtgs for LeBron Pairs:

James + Cook: 90.8 (11.7 better with LeBron)
James + Rondo: 100.1 (7.2 better with LeBron)
James + Caruso: 95.1 (5.9 better with LeBron)
James + Kuzma: 99.8 (5.4 better with LeBron)
James + Davis: 103.2 (3.2 better with LeBron)
James + KCP: 104.2 (3.0 better with LeBron)
James + Howard: 104.5 (1.9 better with LeBron)
James + Green: 104.7 (1.3 better with LeBron)
James + Bradley: 103.1 (.9 better with LeBron)
James + Morris: 102.5 (.9 better with LeBron)
James + McGee: 105.2 (.7 better with LeBron)
James + Daniels: 102.6 (.1 better with LeBron)
James + Dudley: 102.1 (3.7 worse with LeBron)


Wanted to add the play type tracking data that we have for old LeBron.

LeBron 2019 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

P&R ball handler: .64, 96th percentile
Hand off: .58, 94th
Off screens: .68, 89th
P&R Roll man: .75, 83rd
Post Up: .83, 83rd
ISO: .75, 79th
Spot up: .99, 58th

LeBron 2020 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

Post Up: .59, 95th percentile
P&R Roll man: .70, 87th
Spot up: .85, 87th
ISO: .71, 82nd
P&R ball handler: .78, 76th
Hand off: .83, 64th
Off screens: .88, 64th

LeBron 2021 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

Spot up: .81, 90th percentile
P&R ball handler: .75, 83rd
ISO: .72, 81st
Post Up: .80, 76th
P&R Roll man: .93, 63rd
Off screens: .96, 53rd
Hand off: .93, 50th

Now compare that to Kawhi

Kawhi: 2021 2nd team all defense
2020 2nd team all defense
2019 2nd team all defense
2017 1st team all defense

Kawhi 2021

Defensive Play type

Post Up: .86 PPP allowed, 67th percentile
P&R ball handler: .87, 58th
Off screens: .96, 53rd
Spot up: 1.03, 50th
Hand off: 1.06, 29th
ISO: 1.19, 10th
P&R Roll man: Not enough data

Team DRTg ON court: 109.2
Team DRtg OFF court: 110.4
DRAPM: 33rd in the NBA

Kawhi 2020

Defensive Play type
Spot up: .73, 96th percentile
ISO: .69, 87th
Hand off: .80, 70th
Off screens: .85, 67th
P&R ball handler: .84, 62nd
P&R Roll man: 1.27, 16th
Post Up: 1.17, 16th

Team DRTg ON court: 104.7
Team DRtg OFF court: 107.4
DRAPM: 6th in the NBA

Kawhi 2019

Defensive Play type
ISO: .55 PPP allowed, 96th percentile
Hand off: .57, 94th
Spot up: .91, 77th
P&R ball handler: .83, 63rd
P&R Roll man: not enough data
Post Up: 1.00, 36th
Off screens: 1.04, 32nd

Team DRTg ON court: 107.8
Team DRtg OFF court: 104.1
DRAPM: 278th in the NBA

Kawhi 2017

Defensive Play type

Hand off: .57, 94th percentile
P&R ball handler: .83, 63rd
Spot up: 1.02 45th
ISO: .93, 44th
P&R Roll man: not enough data
Post Up: 1.00, 36th
Off screens: 1.04, 32nd

Team DRTg ON court: 105.1
Team DRtg OFF court: 96.1
DRAPM: 278 in the NBA

Worth noting that synergy defensive play types are mostly random noise from season to season


So..data I don’t like = random noise, right?

Look at 2014, 2018, 2023 numbers for James—they’re way below these other years. Look at rim protection numbers for everyone .

If you’re talking about tracking correlating with DRAPM…That’s another story.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
MrVorp
Freshman
Posts: 51
And1: 38
Joined: Aug 03, 2020

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#72 » by MrVorp » Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:01 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
MrVorp wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
Wanted to add the play type tracking data that we have for old LeBron.

LeBron 2019 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

P&R ball handler: .64, 96th percentile
Hand off: .58, 94th
Off screens: .68, 89th
P&R Roll man: .75, 83rd
Post Up: .83, 83rd
ISO: .75, 79th
Spot up: .99, 58th

LeBron 2020 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

Post Up: .59, 95th percentile
P&R Roll man: .70, 87th
Spot up: .85, 87th
ISO: .71, 82nd
P&R ball handler: .78, 76th
Hand off: .83, 64th
Off screens: .88, 64th

LeBron 2021 Defensive Play type, points per possession (PPP allowed), percentile

Spot up: .81, 90th percentile
P&R ball handler: .75, 83rd
ISO: .72, 81st
Post Up: .80, 76th
P&R Roll man: .93, 63rd
Off screens: .96, 53rd
Hand off: .93, 50th

Now compare that to Kawhi

Kawhi: 2021 2nd team all defense
2020 2nd team all defense
2019 2nd team all defense
2017 1st team all defense

Kawhi 2021

Defensive Play type

Post Up: .86 PPP allowed, 67th percentile
P&R ball handler: .87, 58th
Off screens: .96, 53rd
Spot up: 1.03, 50th
Hand off: 1.06, 29th
ISO: 1.19, 10th
P&R Roll man: Not enough data

Team DRTg ON court: 109.2
Team DRtg OFF court: 110.4
DRAPM: 33rd in the NBA

Kawhi 2020

Defensive Play type
Spot up: .73, 96th percentile
ISO: .69, 87th
Hand off: .80, 70th
Off screens: .85, 67th
P&R ball handler: .84, 62nd
P&R Roll man: 1.27, 16th
Post Up: 1.17, 16th

Team DRTg ON court: 104.7
Team DRtg OFF court: 107.4
DRAPM: 6th in the NBA

Kawhi 2019

Defensive Play type
ISO: .55 PPP allowed, 96th percentile
Hand off: .57, 94th
Spot up: .91, 77th
P&R ball handler: .83, 63rd
P&R Roll man: not enough data
Post Up: 1.00, 36th
Off screens: 1.04, 32nd

Team DRTg ON court: 107.8
Team DRtg OFF court: 104.1
DRAPM: 278th in the NBA

Kawhi 2017

Defensive Play type

Hand off: .57, 94th percentile
P&R ball handler: .83, 63rd
Spot up: 1.02 45th
ISO: .93, 44th
P&R Roll man: not enough data
Post Up: 1.00, 36th
Off screens: 1.04, 32nd

Team DRTg ON court: 105.1
Team DRtg OFF court: 96.1
DRAPM: 278 in the NBA

Worth noting that synergy defensive play types are mostly random noise from season to season


So..data I don’t like = random noise, right?

Look at 2014, 2018, 2023 numbers for James—they’re way below these other years. Look at rim protection numbers for everyone .

If you’re talking about tracking correlating with DRAPM…That’s another story.

Nope, random noise is random noise. Which is basically what synergy defensive data is because
1) splitting it up into all those “play types” (whichever the synergy logger guesses) makes it into small sample size theater
2) any dfg%/ppp outside of the rim is mostly noise
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,508
And1: 18,896
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#73 » by homecourtloss » Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:32 pm

MrVorp wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
MrVorp wrote:Worth noting that synergy defensive play types are mostly random noise from season to season


So..data I don’t like = random noise, right?

Look at 2014, 2018, 2023 numbers for James—they’re way below these other years. Look at rim protection numbers for everyone .

If you’re talking about tracking correlating with DRAPM…That’s another story.

Nope, random noise is random noise. Which is basically what synergy defensive data is because
1) splitting it up into all those “play types” (whichever the synergy logger guesses) makes it into small sample size theater
2) any dfg%/ppp outside of the rim is mostly noise


Based on…? You have a study? Want to cite one?

Also, I notice you don’t mention this when RAPTOR is brought up and its “tracking component.” Or maybe you just missed those posts.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,508
And1: 18,896
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#74 » by homecourtloss » Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:53 pm

lessthanjake wrote:This is an extremely thorough overview of LeBron’s and Jordan’s defense, based on film analysis:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/k11s3h/who_was_a_better_defender_lebron_james_or_michael/

Of course there’s always room to disagree with film analysis and with the conclusions thereof, but FWIW the conclusion that that poster comes to is that (1) comparing prime to prime, LeBron has a “slight edge” over Jordan as a defender; but that (2) Jordan had a better overall defensive career.


Only Jordan hagiographers on Reddit conducting “film analysis” can come up with “slight edge” on defense or that Jordan had a “ better overall career” defensively.

There is really no data backed argument that Jordan had a better overall defensive career nor really is anything closer than a tier down or a tier and a half defensively.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
MrVorp
Freshman
Posts: 51
And1: 38
Joined: Aug 03, 2020

The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#75 » by MrVorp » Thu Aug 31, 2023 8:04 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
MrVorp wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
So..data I don’t like = random noise, right?

Look at 2014, 2018, 2023 numbers for James—they’re way below these other years. Look at rim protection numbers for everyone .

If you’re talking about tracking correlating with DRAPM…That’s another story.

Nope, random noise is random noise. Which is basically what synergy defensive data is because
1) splitting it up into all those “play types” (whichever the synergy logger guesses) makes it into small sample size theater
2) any dfg%/ppp outside of the rim is mostly noise


Based on…? You have a study? Want to cite one?

Also, I notice you don’t mention this when RAPTOR is brought up and its “tracking component.” Or maybe you just missed those posts.

In regards to shot defense: https://fansided.com/2017/01/12/nylon-calculus-shot-defense-metrics-actions/

It looks at tracking data, which should be more objective than Synergy data.

Awhile ago I looked at the year to year correlation of ISO defensive ppp and the correlation was ~.15. Everyone is expected to regress to the mean heavily. And I don’t know what RAPTOR posts you are talking about.
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,451
And1: 3,086
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#76 » by lessthanjake » Thu Aug 31, 2023 8:18 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:This is an extremely thorough overview of LeBron’s and Jordan’s defense, based on film analysis:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/k11s3h/who_was_a_better_defender_lebron_james_or_michael/

Of course there’s always room to disagree with film analysis and with the conclusions thereof, but FWIW the conclusion that that poster comes to is that (1) comparing prime to prime, LeBron has a “slight edge” over Jordan as a defender; but that (2) Jordan had a better overall defensive career.


Only Jordan hagiographers on Reddit conducting “film analysis” can come up with “slight edge” on defense or that Jordan had a “ better overall career” defensively.

There is really no data backed argument that Jordan had a better overall defensive career nor really is anything closer than a tier down or a tier and a half defensively.


It’s funny because a large number of the responses to that thread are people saying that the poster is completely biased in LeBron’s favor. I think if you’re calling someone a “Jordan hagiographer” that Jordan fans are saying the opposite about, perhaps the poster is actually just making pretty balanced/unbiased analysis.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
User avatar
Heej
General Manager
Posts: 8,469
And1: 9,170
Joined: Jan 14, 2011

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#77 » by Heej » Thu Aug 31, 2023 8:45 pm

lessthanjake wrote:This is an extremely thorough overview of LeBron’s and Jordan’s defense, based on film analysis:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/k11s3h/who_was_a_better_defender_lebron_james_or_michael/

Of course there’s always room to disagree with film analysis and with the conclusions thereof, but FWIW the conclusion that that poster comes to is that (1) comparing prime to prime, LeBron has a “slight edge” over Jordan as a defender; but that (2) Jordan had a better overall defensive career.

This post is incomplete because it doesn't discuss post defense and switchability/versatility. Nor does it appear to have any kind of awareness as far as defensive communication and rebounding/boxing out goes. This is what I'd consider the work of an experienced casual, and not someone with any kind of cursory experienced or self-education regarding coaching and what affects impact on defense in totality. So there's that for you, and something I think people who are not good at breaking down game film should be aware of. That there's a lot to defense.

Anyways, it seems clear to me that RealGM in totality will never beat the allegations that the board only measure portability in terms of offensive impact, and maybe our OG Ben Taylor is to blame for that. Very telling that the post being championed here from Reddit is a post that fails to properly account for the most important aspects of defense that account for the majority of the impact necessary to exhibit defensive portability. That guy should know better if he's marketing it as a complete defensive breakdown lol
LeBron's NBA Cup MVP is more valuable than either of KD's Finals MVPs. This is the word of the Lord
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,451
And1: 3,086
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#78 » by lessthanjake » Thu Aug 31, 2023 8:55 pm

Heej wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:This is an extremely thorough overview of LeBron’s and Jordan’s defense, based on film analysis:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/k11s3h/who_was_a_better_defender_lebron_james_or_michael/

Of course there’s always room to disagree with film analysis and with the conclusions thereof, but FWIW the conclusion that that poster comes to is that (1) comparing prime to prime, LeBron has a “slight edge” over Jordan as a defender; but that (2) Jordan had a better overall defensive career.

This post is incomplete because it doesn't discuss post defense and switchability/versatility.


Huh? It absolutely does talk about those things. We don’t have to take an in-depth Reddit post as gospel of course, but let’s not besmirch the analysis for frivolous reasons.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,272
And1: 2,983
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#79 » by LukaTheGOAT » Thu Aug 31, 2023 9:18 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:This is an extremely thorough overview of LeBron’s and Jordan’s defense, based on film analysis:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/k11s3h/who_was_a_better_defender_lebron_james_or_michael/

Of course there’s always room to disagree with film analysis and with the conclusions thereof, but FWIW the conclusion that that poster comes to is that (1) comparing prime to prime, LeBron has a “slight edge” over Jordan as a defender; but that (2) Jordan had a better overall defensive career.


Only Jordan hagiographers on Reddit conducting “film analysis” can come up with “slight edge” on defense or that Jordan had a “ better overall career” defensively.

There is really no data backed argument that Jordan had a better overall defensive career nor really is anything closer than a tier down or a tier and a half defensively.


The person who wrote the post literally has LeBron as the GOAT with Kareem being #2 all-time...
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,976
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: The argument for Peak LeBron > Peak MJ 

Post#80 » by AEnigma » Thu Aug 31, 2023 10:22 pm

You guys are fighting over a post written by a high-schooler.

Return to Player Comparisons