
UCF wins by 50, racks up over 700 yards of offense and generally speaking no one is all that happy about it.
Just a sign of the times as a CFB fan.
Moderators: Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF
Knightro wrote:What's more real - lifestyle creep or college football fandom creep?![]()
UCF wins by 50, racks up over 700 yards of offense and generally speaking no one is all that happy about it.
Just a sign of the times as a CFB fan.
UCF wrote:Expectations have changed. As a fan base we expect to win and that’s a bit weird for me as a long time fan. I’ve seen both winless years in person as a season ticket holder. I think this year we go 8-4 if I’m being honest with my expectations.
Viper1500 wrote:Update on Plumlee?
UCFJayBird wrote:The team looked really good IMO, just had some really unfortunate and badly timed turnovers/bounces. Two TDs basically nullified because the receivers bobbled the passes and it fell into a defenders lap. The first one, maybe you could argue it was a little high, but Hudson should've caught it. The second was literally in Baker's breadbasket and he somehow bobbled it and basically tossed it into the defender.
Outside of that JRP looked poised, made good throws, made the right decisions for the most part, etc. Hopefully his injury isn't too severe and he's in back in a few weeks. But I won't be surprised if he's done for the year either the way his leg bent.
I thought McClain looked good in the limited action he got against Kent State. He's experienced so hopefully he'll be able to manage with JRP out. I get more worried about depth at this point if something were to also happen to McClain. After him I think it's a true freshman (Dylan Rizk), and after him I don't even know.
Defense looked inconsistent at times, but at the end of the day only gave up one touchdown and 16 points. Boise hadn't lost their home owner in over 20 years, so this was a nice win.
dsg2003mach1 wrote:UCFJayBird wrote:The team looked really good IMO, just had some really unfortunate and badly timed turnovers/bounces. Two TDs basically nullified because the receivers bobbled the passes and it fell into a defenders lap. The first one, maybe you could argue it was a little high, but Hudson should've caught it. The second was literally in Baker's breadbasket and he somehow bobbled it and basically tossed it into the defender.
Outside of that JRP looked poised, made good throws, made the right decisions for the most part, etc. Hopefully his injury isn't too severe and he's in back in a few weeks. But I won't be surprised if he's done for the year either the way his leg bent.
I thought McClain looked good in the limited action he got against Kent State. He's experienced so hopefully he'll be able to manage with JRP out. I get more worried about depth at this point if something were to also happen to McClain. After him I think it's a true freshman (Dylan Rizk), and after him I don't even know.
Defense looked inconsistent at times, but at the end of the day only gave up one touchdown and 16 points. Boise hadn't lost their home owner in over 20 years, so this was a nice win.
i didnt get to catch much of the game, didn't realize he hurt his leg. The glimpse I caught on the bar tv was thinking concussion on a possible targeting call as he going down. Hope we get an update soon, kinda feels like the more time that passes the less likely it's good news
Knightro wrote:I have full faith in Timmy.
OrlandoMagic wrote:If I’ve never mentioned it throughout the years before I will say it. I absolutely HATE any ranking prior to week 4 at minimum. NOBODY has any clue how any team will be and always base rankings on the previous year.
UCFJayBird wrote:OrlandoMagic wrote:If I’ve never mentioned it throughout the years before I will say it. I absolutely HATE any ranking prior to week 4 at minimum. NOBODY has any clue how any team will be and always base rankings on the previous year.
Agreed. I wish there was an agreed upon moratorium amongst the major polls and sports sites to not do polls until at least after Week 4 (ideally not until after Week 6 IMO). It'll never happen though, since fans would just flock to the random site polls that would still pop up and those would get used and shared by fans to get hyped, taunt each other, etc.
At best I think would be maybe if the major broadcasters could agree not to use the rankings in their coverage for a few weeks. It'd be great if ESPN, Fox, etc all agreed "we'll have our own polls, we'll see other polls out there, but we won't have the rankings on screen and we won't reference them until X week." Something like that would make a lot of sense and is actually possible and I don't think fans would largely care.
It still will never happen, but nice to dream, haha.