Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- artsncrafts
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,359
- And1: 26,035
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013
- Location: Shambleland, Ont.
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
Raptors could have obviously beaten it but why would they? I mean the Raptors have no direction and have made some poor decisions the past 2 years so I would have been fine with acquiring Lillard for the luls, but long term rebuild, no trade was better.
Harold_and_Kumar wrote:What if the 10 incher was overrated and the 4 incher was too small for any playing time, but the 7 incher was a perfect fit for our roster and the 5 incher was good for specific situations, like backdoor cuts?
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
-
C_Money
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,583
- And1: 26,827
- Joined: Jun 30, 2008
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
kalel123 wrote:Not surprisngly, much ado about nothing.
I'm getting sick and tired of this. I'll see what they make of Siakam and OG but after that and things go similar to how it's gone the last year or so, I think it's time to part ways with management and start fresh.
I’m starting to lean this way also. I don’t think Masai has it anymore.

Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- DonDoolie
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,038
- And1: 4,056
- Joined: Nov 17, 2018
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
I'm just so confused at what our direction is, Im not even mad that we didn't land Dame. Like what the actual **** is the direction of our roster?

Weaseling out of things is important to learn; it’s what separates us from the animals … except the weasel
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
-
Zeno
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,781
- And1: 23,022
- Joined: Jun 06, 2001
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
mtcan wrote:And1Skip wrote:?s=20
Jimmy sounds salty........
For him to claim tampering after what Miami pulled. Like they weren’t working with Dame on this. He had to be joking.
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?
Please advise….
Dan G.
Please advise….
Dan G.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- SharoneWright
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,227
- And1: 13,529
- Joined: Aug 03, 2006
- Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
djsunyc wrote:side benefit - now teams know what our offer was for dame...so if they have any inclination to move on from their "star" player, there's a framework to approach masai with.
Negative aspect - League just witnessed Ayton valued higher than OG + Dick
Is anybody here a marine biologist?
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
-
Fairview4Life
- RealGM
- Posts: 70,304
- And1: 34,116
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
Dalek wrote:T-d0t wrote:I need an apology from Shams for that deleted tweet blunder.
How could he have done that? Trolling TO fans!
Lol, we get Lillard for nothing! Masai the goat.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- Son Goku 25
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,094
- And1: 41,180
- Joined: Jan 18, 2010
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
uS media wanted us to push Barnes out for Lillard LMAO that's why you never listen to those people they want to ** us over.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
-
Dalek
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,877
- And1: 10,677
- Joined: Jan 24, 2005
- Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
On the Phoenix side, Gambo was right about Ayton for Nurk swap all along:
That's a legit reporter, not like the greenhorns we have in Toronto who sit on their hands.
That's a legit reporter, not like the greenhorns we have in Toronto who sit on their hands.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- Psubs
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,855
- And1: 11,914
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Toronto
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
Duffman100 wrote:I'd take a look at Jrue. What does Portland want?
Achiuwa, Boucher, Otto Porter, Flynn and 1st pick LETS GOOOOOOOO!

Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- Madvillainy2004
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,521
- And1: 8,865
- Joined: Jul 03, 2019
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
I'm more annoyed about our lack of direction now. I'm not being sold on internal growth and subbing out Fred for a worst player in Dennis. And just praying Scottie/Trent/Gradey/Achuiwa all progress. Oh and we have OG/Trent/Siakam FA looming over our heads. And we have no pick lmao.
D+ offseason for me lol.
D+ offseason for me lol.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
-
sofargone
- Starter
- Posts: 2,150
- And1: 1,748
- Joined: Dec 11, 2010
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
im guessing they had tor and Milwaukee as the final two and let dame choose which would explain shams botched tweet
sucks, with that being said im ignoring all trade rumours like this from now lmao.
sucks, with that being said im ignoring all trade rumours like this from now lmao.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- LBJKB24MJ23
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,368
- And1: 21,707
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
- Location: Bermuda
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
Kinger95 wrote:Brutal trade for the bucks.
Lillard is 33 this season they’re gonna pay him 46 mill then age 34 its 49 mill
Age 35- 59 million and lastly he’s gonna opt in for 63 million at age 36.
Lillard has missed over 70 games the last 2 years, is getting older and plays no defence. This is a terrible trade
we will see. I see them as the favorites coming out of the East now, better odds if they make some adjustments to the bench i guess.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- LoveMyRaps
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,646
- And1: 49,987
- Joined: Jun 10, 2013
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
Man fk this FO
But also love this FO
But yo fk Shams
But FKKKK WE MISSED OUT AGAIN.
But also love this FO
But yo fk Shams
But FKKKK WE MISSED OUT AGAIN.
In Masai We Trust 


Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
-
MiamiSPX
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,133
- And1: 6,348
- Joined: May 19, 2023
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
DonDoolie wrote:I'm just so confused at what our direction is, Im not even mad that we didn't land Dame. Like what the actual **** is the direction of our roster?
Same. I couldn't care less about not landing Dame. I am still just confused that Masai is willing to go into the season with 3 starters as pending UFAs and you cannot afford all 3 without going into the tax. Make it make sense.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
-
suntzuballin
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,807
- And1: 2,770
- Joined: Feb 07, 2011
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
Wonder what masai didn't want to add achuwia / koloko...../certain protection on picks or unprotected pick.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- LoveMyRaps
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,646
- And1: 49,987
- Joined: Jun 10, 2013
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
Madvillainy2004 wrote:I'm more annoyed about our lack of direction now. I'm not being sold on internal growth and subbing out Fred for a worst player in Dennis. And just praying Scottie/Trent/Gradey/Achuiwa all progress. Oh and we have OG/Trent/Siakam FA looming over our heads. And we have no pick lmao.
D+ offseason for me lol.
We will lose one of Siakam or OG for nothing.
Take it to the bank.
In Masai We Trust 


Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
-
Fairview4Life
- RealGM
- Posts: 70,304
- And1: 34,116
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
suntzuballin wrote:Wonder what masai didn't want to add achuwia / koloko...../certain protection on picks or unprotected pick.
I would assume that it was more a choice of Dame's than the Blazers.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
-
mtcan
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,873
- And1: 24,299
- Joined: May 19, 2001
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
MiamiSPX wrote:DonDoolie wrote:I'm just so confused at what our direction is, Im not even mad that we didn't land Dame. Like what the actual **** is the direction of our roster?
Same. I couldn't care less about not landing Dame. I am still just confused that Masai is willing to go into the season with 3 starters as pending UFAs and you cannot afford all 3 without going into the tax. Make it make sense.
Trent and Siakam extensions coming...now that the trade talk has settled.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- LBJKB24MJ23
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,368
- And1: 21,707
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
- Location: Bermuda
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
artsncrafts wrote:Raptors could have obviously beaten it but why would they? I mean the Raptors have no direction and have made some poor decisions the past 2 years so I would have been fine with acquiring Lillard for the luls, but long term rebuild, no trade was better.
i'm just assuming our assets don't have contracts after this season. OG, GTJ etc.
yes they are good players but they can just walk. too much risk for Portland. Also, maybe they want to keep Jrue to mentor Scoot. if Jrue can pass on his defensive mentality to make Scoot a more complete player, that would be a win.
of course i'm just speculating on why they wanted Jrue but I guess they needed some front court stability as well.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
- LoveMyRaps
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,646
- And1: 49,987
- Joined: Jun 10, 2013
-
Re: Shams: Lillard to Milwaukee in three team deal
Madvillainy2004 wrote:I'm more annoyed about our lack of direction now. I'm not being sold on internal growth and subbing out Fred for a worst player in Dennis. And just praying Scottie/Trent/Gradey/Achuiwa all progress. Oh and we have OG/Trent/Siakam FA looming over our heads. And we have no pick lmao.
D+ offseason for me lol.
We will lose one of Siakam or OG for nothing.
Take it to the bank.
In Masai We Trust 














