ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,299
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#641 » by minimus » Thu Sep 28, 2023 12:27 pm

Sorry, your formatting is a bit weird. I try to answer some points
Note30 wrote:Lastly, how long can you even run those limited lineups? Maybe 2, 3 years? Before Conley and Jrue are way too washed.

Exactly, 2-3 yrs before McDaniels and Edwards are in their primes. Conley has one year left and Jrue have two years left (one year PO). They are for sure declining, but both are high IQ players, professionals who take care of their bodies, avoided serious injuries AND as I wrote before transforming their games to be more catch-and-shoot, off ball scorers. Steph Curry just had the best season in his career at age 35y

Note30 wrote:As for his catch and shoot role, unfortunately given our poor roster construction and youth we need someone who can play that traditional PG role. His 3's are a positive but not any more than KAT.

As I wrote before Holiday is taking more and more pullup 3s, stepback 3s. He does his on regular basis, while having same amount of three-point shots as Towns (~6 3PTA). These are high difficulty self created shots. These are part of Holiday arsenal. Look what role played Conley last season, how successful he was at shooting pullup threes, relocating on perimeter, filling open spot.





Towns cant do this on regular basis simply because he is so big, and his feet are so big. And that is ok.

Note30 wrote:Who?! Giannis may not have a bag but he can create his own shot. He takes a lot of the pressure of Jrue to playmake because he can also take those responsibilities. Brook Lopez is a straight bucket, his post game was elite when he was younger and he has a solid 3pt shot now. Those two are far from limited, Brook may need to be fed the ball but definitely not Giannis.

Giannis struggles mightly in halfcourt offense, he simply does not have enough space to operate AND does not have shooting. I agree that Lopez is better than Gobert as scorer, but what I was trying to say is that both Giannis and Lopez are very specific players. So playing with them should help Jrue to play with Gobert. So yeah, maybe word limited is not the best word to describe Giannis and Lopez.

Note30 wrote:We were an elite offensive team before we traded for the worst starting offensive player in the league. I genuinely think there's a better chance that if we can work out a real motion offense, not this flats crap that Finch keeps running, we can turn this boat around. We need more delay action, more Chicago action, it would be nice to see empty side plays with any combination of our players, basically anything but this offense Finch is running.

Actually we ran a good defense last season, with empty side pnrs, double, staggered screens, split actions, DHOs etc. But it was a short stint of last games of regular seasons and playoffs when Conley got comfortable in MIN. There were also good games with DLo, when he played more as a movement shooter, with Anderson sharing PG duties. So I think that we (surprise!) need a solid PG rotation (starting + backup PG) to run any resemblance of modern offense. Proposed idea of two-headed PG rotation solves this issue: it creates depth at PG position, it gives us two veteran PG who can run offense and play off the ball.

I dont want to carry this conversation further, I understand your points, but I feel like Holiday is a bit underrated. I think that he is still en elite defender and improving scorer who fits well next to Edwards and McDaniels.

Read on Twitter
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,627
And1: 19,725
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#642 » by shrink » Thu Sep 28, 2023 4:32 pm

I’ve always loved Jrue, but the fact that he could leave next summer makes a KAT-Jrue trade a non-starter
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,941
And1: 3,622
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#643 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Sep 28, 2023 5:37 pm

shrink wrote:I’ve always loved Jrue, but the fact that he could leave next summer makes a KAT-Jrue trade a non-starter


Exactly. And on a team you're building around Ant and Jaden, do you want to give ~250M to a guy who will be 38 at the end of the deal?
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,196
And1: 3,133
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#644 » by TimberKat » Thu Sep 28, 2023 5:46 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
shrink wrote:I’ve always loved Jrue, but the fact that he could leave next summer makes a KAT-Jrue trade a non-starter


Exactly. And on a team you're building around Ant and Jaden, do you want to give ~250M to a guy who will be 38 at the end of the deal?

Let's save Towns for the Embiid trade :D It seems Connelly maybe wrong about how often a top 20 player is available in trades/free agency these days. There seems to be one available every year. If Kyrie and Harden keeps on playing at a high level. There is always two available every summer :D
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,958
And1: 2,594
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#645 » by Slim Tubby » Thu Sep 28, 2023 7:37 pm

minimus wrote:
Note30 wrote:
minimus wrote:I would trade Towns for Jrue Holiday in a heartbeat

Are you high?


Nah, I am too low. But someone of FO/owners was high when traded for Gobert.

Note30 wrote:Jrue is 33. Maybe when he was 26 this would have been a good deal. We have a PG in Conley unless your plan includes swapping him for a big we have two old declining PGs making a ton of money.


I think you can play two PGs together, especially if they play on both ends of the floor, but it is difficult to play two one dimensional bigs.

Note30 wrote:Do you really think Jrue is the needle mover for Minnesota?


Yes, I think that if trade for him he immediately fills following needs:

1) elite PoA defender. Yes, he struggled against bigger Jimmy Butler in playoffs, but it does not mean he is not elite PoA defender anymore. He is still big, smart, physical defender. Just watch how much technique he has in defensive arsenal



2) volume three point shooter. In 2022-23 he had career-high 6.1 3PA, made 38.4%. He REALLY likes pull-up threes, he made 102 (36%) pull up threes last season. He is 11th in NBA in made pull up threes last season. Pull up and step back threes is something he has added in his arsenal during his career. Also proportion of open and wide open shots increased to 57.7%, which is a sign of Jrue adjusting to more off ball, catch and shoot role in offense.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/pullup?PerMode=Totals&dir=D&sort=PULL_UP_FG3M

3) veteran presence. From what I read about him, he is a great, calming locker room presence

4) playmaking. Even though he is not a pure PG he has continuously improved as facilitator and decision maker.

Note30 wrote:Enough to move our franchise cornerstone?

Fortunately, I can say now that Edwards is our franchise cornerstone.

Note30 wrote:Will he be able to play with Gobert?

This concern is legit. However, Giannis and Lopez are very limited and specific bigs as well. It might help Jrue to integrate

Note30 wrote:Prior to Milwaukee which had a stacked roster, Jrue didn't have much playoff success - what separates him from KAT?

Championship ring. And the fact that Holiday plays on both ends of the floor

Note30 wrote:It's not playoff success - he's played worse in the playoffs than regular season - he had three other really solid players around him. KATs never gotten that kind of supporting cast.

In PHI and NOP Holiday did not have strong supporting cast.

Note30 wrote:It's not healthy - he's about the same and now getting older.

I watched some his training, workout videos. He looks very professional in preparing his body for NBA season. There is always risk when you invest in veteran guard, but I have not found any serious injuries that may affect him. Also as I stated before he is becoming more shooter, and there is a hope that his games ages well.

Note30 wrote:He plays a coveted position sure, but we already have Conley, if you trade KAT we have Anderson and???.

I'd keep Conley even if we would trade for Holiday. Yes, Anderson is the only PF left, with Miller, Minott all being long-term prospects. This need should be definetely addressed. But finding PF should be easier that getting starting PG

Note30 wrote:Defense is about the only thing you can call out and if you watched the last playoff series it didn't go well for him defensively. He's slowing down.

MIL collapsed as team because Giannis is elite as roaming defender. Holiday will be same elite PoA if Gobert control paint, while NAW and Edwards locking perimeter, and McDaniels roaming.

Note30 wrote:KAT may not be the best, and he has his issues but I'm not about to trade him for a declining guard.



I love your posts, Minimus...you put a lot of thought and research behind them. However, a vast majority of your recent trade proposals have been overly defense-centric that don't offer equal value to the offense and value going out.

Holiday is 33 years old, on the last year of his deal, doesn't fit Ant and Jaden's timeline to warrant an extension and he's completely disappeared in recent playoffs.

Jrue can help any team in the league significantly but he just doesn't fit the Wolves roster, salary cap and direction at this time. Trading KAT specifically for Holiday would be a gross mishandling of the asset we have in Towns IMO.
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,238
And1: 1,930
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#646 » by Note30 » Thu Sep 28, 2023 11:26 pm

minimus wrote:Actually we ran a good defense last season, with empty side pnrs, double, staggered screens, split actions, DHOs etc. But it was a short stint of last games of regular seasons and playoffs when Conley got comfortable in MIN. There were also good games with DLo, when he played more as a movement shooter, with Anderson sharing PG duties. So I think that we (surprise!) need a solid PG rotation (starting + backup PG) to run any resemblance of modern offense. Proposed idea of two-headed PG rotation solves this issue: it creates depth at PG position, it gives us two veteran PG who can run offense and play off the ball.

I dont want to carry this conversation further, I understand your points, but I feel like Holiday is a bit underrated. I think that he is still en elite defender and improving scorer who fits well next to Edwards and McDaniels.



Cool, whatever floats your boat, well put response.

I would want to argue your last point around the offense however.
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,167
And1: 4,659
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#647 » by wolves_89 » Fri Sep 29, 2023 2:05 am

I would love to get Jrue, but there isn't a deal that makes any sense for the Wolves. First, Minnesota already has multiple plus perimeter defenders meaning Holiday's defense (which is the majority of his value) isn't all that important to the team. Second, unless the Blazers would be open to a Conley/Anderson based package, there isn't a deal I'd consider (there is no way I'd trade KAT for him). Lastly, trading for a 33-year-old with one year of team control is not the direction the team should be going. If the roster doesn't work this season Connelly should be looking to make moves to strengthen the Ant timeline, which means younger talent with more team control.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,299
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#648 » by minimus » Fri Sep 29, 2023 7:22 am

Slim Tubby wrote:I love your posts, Minimus...you put a lot of thought and research behind them. However, a vast majority of your recent trade proposals have been overly defense-centric that don't offer equal value to the offense and value going out.

Holiday is 33 years old, on the last year of his deal, doesn't fit Ant and Jaden's timeline to warrant an extension and he's completely disappeared in recent playoffs.

Jrue can help any team in the league significantly but he just doesn't fit the Wolves roster, salary cap and direction at this time. Trading KAT specifically for Holiday would be a gross mishandling of the asset we have in Towns IMO.


Yeah, thank you. As I said, I am often being anxious, because I cant play basketball anymore as much as I used to play (I have torn shoulder and recovery is not that smooth). Some play fantasy games, some play video games, I write these weird trade proposals. It is more like a game for me with multiple if-then-else, and it gives me desire to research and learn more about NBA. And sure it has nothing to do with reality (although I would say that reality is bigger than ANY my trade idea! who knew that we would trade for Gobert, or Dame will play in MIL). So bear with me, I just tried to have some fun.

P.S. Yes, I am literally obsessed with idea of building defensive identity. Finch said that they to zig, when all others zag (not sure about correct spelling). Building defensive minded team will be exactly this way.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,299
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#649 » by minimus » Sun Oct 1, 2023 6:12 pm

So for injury prone 33yo bad defender Dame on 150mil/3yrs POR FO got:

Deandre Ayton
Robert Williams
Malcolm Brogdon
Toumani Camara
three first-round picks 2024 (Golden State, Top-4 protected), 2029 (Bucks and Celtics unprotected)
2028 and 2030 Milwaukee pick swaps.

I hope if we trade Towns (big IF) Connelly will make me eat all my weird trade proposals.
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,196
And1: 3,133
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#650 » by TimberKat » Sun Oct 1, 2023 6:22 pm

minimus wrote:So for injury prone 33yo bad defender Dame on 150mil/3yrs POR FO got:

Deandre Ayton
Robert Williams
Malcolm Brogdon
Toumani Camara
three first-round picks 2024 (Golden State, Top-4 protected), 2029 (Bucks and Celtics unprotected)
2028 and 2030 Milwaukee pick swaps.

I hope if we trade Towns (big IF) Connelly will make me eat all my weird trade proposals.

If we do end up trading Towns, you will eat your proposals :D. POR still can flip Williams, Brogdon, and Ayton for more picks or move ahead with this group.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,754
And1: 23,084
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#651 » by Klomp » Sun Oct 1, 2023 6:32 pm

TimberKat wrote:POR still can flip Williams, Brogdon, and Ayton for more picks or move ahead with this group.

I'd expect Brogdon to be dealt, but probably not anyone else.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,813
And1: 5,299
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#652 » by minimus » Wed Oct 4, 2023 2:06 pm

Found one interesting article about possible very active trade deadline in 2024:

1) after this 2023-24 season tax payers wont be allowed to get more salaries back in trade than they trade

2) after this 2023-24 season teams over 2nd appron wont be able to sum up contract in trade

If new CBA rule would have been fully activated this season it would mean that for instance, MIL (182.5 mil) would not get Dame, because it was Holiday+Allen contracts, the only player with equal salary is Giannis. BOS (183.5 mil) would not get Porzi and Holiday. PHI (188.7 млн) would not get Beal

So if I understand correctly the statement that these rich teams did superstar trades WITHOUT looking new CBA, 2nd appron etc is completely inaccurate. They did these trades EXACTLY because they understand that next season they technically wont be able to do such trades. They are willing to pay luxury tax, but whole mechanism trade will change.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,627
And1: 19,725
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#653 » by shrink » Wed Oct 4, 2023 2:29 pm

minimus wrote:Found one interesting article about possible very active trade deadline in 2024:

1) after this 2023-24 season tax payers wont be allowed to get more salaries back in trade than they trade

2) after this 2023-24 season teams over 2nd appron wont be able to sum up contract in trade

If new CBA rule would have been fully activated this season it would mean that for instance, MIL (182.5 mil) would not get Dame, because it was Holiday+Allen contracts, the only player with equal salary is Giannis. BOS (183.5 mil) would not get Porzi and Holiday. PHI (188.7 млн) would not get Beal

So if I understand correctly the statement that these rich teams did superstar trades WITHOUT looking new CBA, 2nd appron etc is completely inaccurate. They did these trades EXACTLY because they understand that next season they technically wont be able to do such trades. They are willing to pay luxury tax, but whole mechanism trade will change.

Correct. In fact, this will actually add to Towns trade value for teams that want to act over the second apron.

If MIN wants to trade him by the deadline, trading teams only have to salary match $36, and they could do it by adding up multiple contracts to reach $28 mil. Next season, when Towns makes $49, that would allow these teams to trade him for superstar vets that make $49 or less. Those include Jimmy Butler, Dame and Giannis.

Said another way, next year Towns will be the 9th highest paid player in the NBA (until all the new deals come out) and Gobert is 15th. We can moan that these guys shouldn’t be paid that much, BUT for a team that’s over the second apron (which could be us!), if they acquire Towns, he allows them the flexibility to legally trade for all but the top eight players.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,849
And1: 2,679
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#654 » by younggunsmn » Wed Oct 4, 2023 7:54 pm

minimus wrote:Found one interesting article about possible very active trade deadline in 2024:

1) after this 2023-24 season tax payers wont be allowed to get more salaries back in trade than they trade

2) after this 2023-24 season teams over 2nd appron wont be able to sum up contract in trade

If new CBA rule would have been fully activated this season it would mean that for instance, MIL (182.5 mil) would not get Dame, because it was Holiday+Allen contracts, the only player with equal salary is Giannis. BOS (183.5 mil) would not get Porzi and Holiday. PHI (188.7 млн) would not get Beal

So if I understand correctly the statement that these rich teams did superstar trades WITHOUT looking new CBA, 2nd appron etc is completely inaccurate. They did these trades EXACTLY because they understand that next season they technically wont be able to do such trades. They are willing to pay luxury tax, but whole mechanism trade will change.


Correct. This effectively means taxpayer teams effectively can't trade with each other without involving a 3rd, non-taxpaying team to offload salary to, to make the first 2 a net-positive in salary matching.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,627
And1: 19,725
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#655 » by shrink » Tue Oct 10, 2023 3:34 am

I have always believed that to properly develop young players, a team needs to provide each one an opportunity and a role in actual nba games. Whether that develops the player for your later use, or simply to generate value trading him elsewhere, finding minutes is key.

But I honestly feel Josh Minott should be getting minutes this year (and probably Leonard Miller next year), and we simply don’t have opportunities for him. Normally in this situation, our ever-rebuilding team would trade a vet player for future draft picks, that don’t require immediate minutes. However, this year we hope to go deep in the playoffs, so we’re unlikely to make a trade that makes us worse this year. Unless the season goes totally off the rails. I think our great depth and goals will prevent us from adequately developing Minott, and I’m not really sure what the team’s best strategy is.
frankenwolf
Senior
Posts: 580
And1: 523
Joined: Oct 06, 2008

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#656 » by frankenwolf » Tue Oct 10, 2023 1:59 pm

shrink wrote:I have always believed that to properly develop young players, a team needs to provide each one an opportunity and a role in actual nba games. Whether that develops the player for your later use, or simply to generate value trading him elsewhere, finding minutes is key.

But I honestly feel Josh Minott should b getting minutes this year (and probably Leonard Miller next year), and we simply don’t have opportunities for him. Normally in this situation, our ever-rebuilding team would trade a vet player for future draft picks, that don’t require immediate minutes. However, this year we hope to go deep in the playoffs, so we’re unlikely to make a trade that makes us worse this year. Unless the season goes totally off the rails. I think our great depth and goals will prevent us from adequately developing Minott, and I’m not really sure what the team’s best strategy is.


That is the way it used to be, but I believe with the investment in the G-league, that development is possible without sacrificing big league minutes. Utilize the Iowa Wolves and ( IDK the protocol on this, if it is OK by league rules) bring up the team and scrimmage with the Big Wolves. Even if they are playing mostly our bench guys ( I can't believe I'm saying this) that should give them some "game time" against the higher caliber talent. We definitely have something we haven't had in a while and that is an abundance of talent.
Your 2026-2027 NBA Champions!! :D
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,627
And1: 19,725
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#657 » by shrink » Tue Oct 10, 2023 4:58 pm

frankenwolf wrote:
shrink wrote:I have always believed that to properly develop young players, a team needs to provide each one an opportunity and a role in actual nba games. Whether that develops the player for your later use, or simply to generate value trading him elsewhere, finding minutes is key.

But I honestly feel Josh Minott should b getting minutes this year (and probably Leonard Miller next year), and we simply don’t have opportunities for him. Normally in this situation, our ever-rebuilding team would trade a vet player for future draft picks, that don’t require immediate minutes. However, this year we hope to go deep in the playoffs, so we’re unlikely to make a trade that makes us worse this year. Unless the season goes totally off the rails. I think our great depth and goals will prevent us from adequately developing Minott, and I’m not really sure what the team’s best strategy is.


That is the way it used to be, but I believe with the investment in the G-league, that development is possible without sacrificing big league minutes. Utilize the Iowa Wolves and ( IDK the protocol on this, if it is OK by league rules) bring up the team and scrimmage with the Big Wolves. Even if they are playing mostly our bench guys ( I can't believe I'm saying this) that should give them some "game time" against the higher caliber talent. We definitely have something we haven't had in a while and that is an abundance of talent.

I hope you’re right. Luka Garza can’t learn anything more dominating G-League players (31-11, 65%/44% last year). But maybe Miller and Minott are different type players, with high athletic upsides that just need any basketball experience? They both sort of spent their last season at that level already.

The other thing that I forgot to mention is that this process can be a profit pump for the Wolves, especially with a great talent evaluator like Tim Connelly at the helm. MIN sells off decent NBA players for profit (more picks), and creates opportunities for younger, cheaper players. As those guys develop and have success against other nba players, they trade them to eager teams for more profit, and continue to bring in young talent. Now, I understand this is much more complicated when your team with some vet stars can legitimately contend (and I think MIN has a shot this year if everything falls right!), but this process serves as a way for a team like MIN to improve the team even without elite free agents walking in the door.
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,196
And1: 3,133
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#658 » by TimberKat » Tue Oct 10, 2023 5:13 pm

shrink wrote:
frankenwolf wrote:
shrink wrote:I have always believed that to properly develop young players, a team needs to provide each one an opportunity and a role in actual nba games. Whether that develops the player for your later use, or simply to generate value trading him elsewhere, finding minutes is key.

But I honestly feel Josh Minott should b getting minutes this year (and probably Leonard Miller next year), and we simply don’t have opportunities for him. Normally in this situation, our ever-rebuilding team would trade a vet player for future draft picks, that don’t require immediate minutes. However, this year we hope to go deep in the playoffs, so we’re unlikely to make a trade that makes us worse this year. Unless the season goes totally off the rails. I think our great depth and goals will prevent us from adequately developing Minott, and I’m not really sure what the team’s best strategy is.


That is the way it used to be, but I believe with the investment in the G-league, that development is possible without sacrificing big league minutes. Utilize the Iowa Wolves and ( IDK the protocol on this, if it is OK by league rules) bring up the team and scrimmage with the Big Wolves. Even if they are playing mostly our bench guys ( I can't believe I'm saying this) that should give them some "game time" against the higher caliber talent. We definitely have something we haven't had in a while and that is an abundance of talent.

I hope you’re right. Luka Garza can’t learn anything more dominating G-League players (31-11, 65%/44% last year). But maybe Miller and Minott are different type players, with high athletic upsides that just need any basketball experience? They both sort of spent their last season at that level already.

The other thing that I forgot to mention is that this process can be a profit pump for the Wolves, especially with a great talent evaluator like Tim Connelly at the helm. MIN sells off decent NBA players for profit (more picks), and creates opportunities for younger, cheaper players. As those guys develop and have success against other nba players, they trade them to eager teams for more profit, and continue to bring in young talent. Now, I understand this is much more complicated when your team with some vet stars can legitimately contend (and I think MIN has a shot this year if everything falls right!), but this process serves as a way for a team like MIN to improve the team even without elite free agents walking in the door.

Minott is the Vanderbilt of Denver years. I am not sure we will get any value out of Moore JR. Kessler, we drafted for someone else. So, I am still waiting to see some drafting magic for Connelly. Granted he put himself in a very tough situation. Even I could had been a great GM for SAS last year :D
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,754
And1: 23,084
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#659 » by Klomp » Tue Oct 10, 2023 7:32 pm

shrink wrote:I have always believed that to properly develop young players, a team needs to provide each one an opportunity and a role in actual nba games. Whether that develops the player for your later use, or simply to generate value trading him elsewhere, finding minutes is key.

But I honestly feel Josh Minott should be getting minutes this year (and probably Leonard Miller next year), and we simply don’t have opportunities for him. Normally in this situation, our ever-rebuilding team would trade a vet player for future draft picks, that don’t require immediate minutes. However, this year we hope to go deep in the playoffs, so we’re unlikely to make a trade that makes us worse this year. Unless the season goes totally off the rails. I think our great depth and goals will prevent us from adequately developing Minott, and I’m not really sure what the team’s best strategy is.

While I understand this line of thinking, I think ultimately it's about priorities.

Tim and Chris have talked about getting in on guys like Josh and Leonard a year or two early. Meaning they feel there's still that development needed.

Personally, I believe you can develop without regular NBA minutes. That's where the importance of the G League comes in. At that level, it's not about wins and losses or even outdueling your opponent, it's about continuing to strengthen your skill development. I get that Luka Garza is probably "too talented" for the G League. But now it's about continuing to refine his skills to where he can make a similar dominant impact on the NBA level. Garza, Miller and Minott are all fringe rotation guys at best at the NBA level right now. And on this roster, it's too deep for them to find time when fully healthy. But showing you can come in and produce when the team is shorthanded (Garza last year or the COVID game against Boston a few years ago), gives them confidence that they can make it at this level along with a list of things they need to work on to get to a point where they'll stay in the NBA.

And with how cash-strapped the franchise is, these guys serve as hopeful replacements for more expensive guys like Kyle Anderson and others moving forward.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,754
And1: 23,084
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Thirteen): 2023 Offseason Edition 

Post#660 » by Klomp » Tue Oct 10, 2023 7:37 pm

TimberKat wrote:Minott is the Vanderbilt of Denver years. I am not sure we will get any value out of Moore JR. Kessler, we drafted for someone else. So, I am still waiting to see some drafting magic for Connelly. Granted he put himself in a very tough situation. Even I could had been a great GM for SAS last year :D

This is false. This wasn't your typical draft-day trade. The trade report first came down a full week after the draft. Tim drafted him with the intention to keep him, before the trade possibility came about.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves