eminence wrote:Owly wrote:eminence wrote:The only thing I don't like about Bostons moves is letting Grant Williams walk.
Smart/Brogdon/Robert Williams for Jrue/Porzingis are deals I'd do all day (and apologies again to Kristaps for thinking he was cooked in Dallas).
The thing is net out of all of that they've gone from a 9 man quality rotation with one injury prone "true big" out 3 to a 7 man quality rotation with one injury prone "true big" out of 2.
The bigs that went would be 25, 26; the one that's in will be 28.
The guards that went would be 29, 31; the one that's in will be 33 (all ages from Reference).
And both the arrivals are expensive so going from 9 to 7 isn't something that makes them more sustainable long term (haven't looked closely but perhaps one way is to figure G Williams is functionally part of the cost of the trades, not something separate).
I'm not going to say it's a clear loss or whatever ... we don't know health and fit ... but Boston had the best SRS in '22 and looked better after acquiring White. They had it again in '23. And I think they didn't just shake things up but made things less sustainable around a best player going into their age 25 season.
That's before looking and draft equity lost. This feels like a big risk on Boston's part.
I'm not trying to say Boston hosed everybody, obviously there's a risk/reward ratio. But put simply, Jrue is a lot better than anybody they sent out. If you have a chance to send out some middling starters for a title winning #2 who still looks to be in his late prime, you should do it 99/100.
The Grant thing is arguable either way, and the saving money reasoning is clear, but as a fan I'll usually frown on letting talent walk if they're signing a reasonable deal.
The draft equity overall is relatively minor, 1 future first in the Portland deal, and positive value in the Porzingis deal (moving up from 35 to 25 - they got kind of funky after that, but wound up with Jordan Walsh and four future 2nds).
Don't disagree that Jrue has been the best player of those in or out. I was late on the train recognizing it I think but the impact signal RS and playoffs is very strong and hasn't dimmed looking at the raw-on off stuff. He has been superb.
He is entering his 33 season and then you have to make a decision about how you want to pay him into the back end of his 30s. That said this isn't a referendum on him.
I haven't looked closely but haven't seen anything saying the Boston pick has protection. [edit: not that you're saying it has but in this context of concern about long-term picture that makes such an unprotected pick potential more valuable]
I now see 4 big money "assets" and I'm not confident that 3 of the four are smart money to exceed their contract values in the longer term (Brown ... I don't like absolute statements but ...
is unlikely to, and the arrivals have semi-star status and have been paid pretty big to this point, have risk via injury and age and with reduced options (via good player consolidation) the team are more likely to get stuck in a "we've got to keep it together ... can't let someone leave for nothing where we can't replace them" trap). I don't know, maybe they get the chip and then everything's great. But I think they've got a very good young centerpiece and made the long term picture messier, tougher (granting I haven't watched them closely, don't know what some of the guys sent out would have asked on their next contracts, don't know how torched Brogdon's relationship with Boston was). And in that light that pick might be throwing away the next guy's asset in a rebuild which as a general "look" (i.e. probably not my problem) I don't love.
I think 99 out of 100 is (substantially) too aggressive and ignores the context in which such a deal is likely to be done (and the picks [think GS is was sent out by Boston] again not mentioned).
They probably are still a dangerous team but given the past two seasons I think I'm seeing less upside than some and more immediately obvious long-term risk (again I don't know the ins and outs of everyone's contracts).