eureca20 wrote:BelgradeNugget wrote:eureca20 wrote:
It's a silly comparison. Lakers were leaving Klay freaking Thompson wide open all series just so they could focus on Steph. To compare the numbers of Steph having the entire Lakers defense focused just on him to Jamal Murray's is not a fair comparison. Give Murray Draymond/Looney on offense instead of Joker/Gordon and have the entire defense focus on Murray and lets see what numbers he puts up.
I don't get this now. You said
"He did not outplay Steph/Booker. And Devin Booker just absolutely torched the Nuggets. Jamal in no playoff round played near Booker's level."Now when I proved you wrong, you are starting with excuses. Yes, Murray had Joker and yes he was better than Curry in these playoffs. Who cares about what-ifs?
You are reading off stats with no context was my point. Stats never tell the full story. Steph outplayed everybody but probably Joker because Steph creates the entire Warriors offense. It's all on him. Everyone is focused on Joker/Giannis/Steph/Jimmy. It's much easier to play off someone like that because they are the ones drawing all the attention.
And the Booker argument doesn't even make sense. Booker was by far the most efficient scorer in the playoffs while having to be out of position and be the PG for the injured CP3 in the Nuggets series.
So your argument is based on what you think without any proof, stats or anything. Curry was 2nd best in the playoffs says you and we have to accept it as fact.
Have you seen Murray playing 1 on 5 against Lakers torching AD, LeBron, Vando, Schroeder, or whoever again, and again? You haven't obviously because you wouldn't argue if you did. Joker even said he just moved out of Murray's way during that stretch in the WCF because Murray was unstoppable. Have you watched the finals when Miami started throwing double teams on Murray the moment he crossed the halfcourt, leaving Joker to play 4 on 3 because Murray was killing them so bad?
And again if you didn't understand - you said "Jamal in no playoff round played near Booker's level." Yes he did I proved you wrong, what doesn't make sense here? That you want to argue without argument.
In WCF Jamal averaged 32.5/6.3/5.3 with 2.8 stl shooting 53/41/95, read again. That is as good as Booker was against Nuggets, while you said he wasn't near. Yes, he was. I brought stats and facts. You brought opinion. Keep it if you can't back it up with anything.