_AIJ_ wrote:Trade him to the knicks already!
The Knicks have nobody I want.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
_AIJ_ wrote:Trade him to the knicks already!

Nick K wrote:thinktank wrote:KGdaBom wrote:I will reiterate. If we make even 40% of our shots we win this game with ease. That was the only real problem. We shot like sheet.
The root cause of shooting poorly was horrible offensive structure.
And that is coaching I'm afraid to say.
Neeva wrote:I am still pissed off at this game, obviously we can’t have both Ant and Kat shooting like **** in the same game and hope that is the last time it happens.

Merc_Porto wrote:Unbelievable, a game with a final score of 97-94 you have two players going for 8-27 and 8-25.
This team continues to have characters that only care about their personal numbers and where is the coaching staff to hold these guys accountable for this?
How can you shoot so much with such low efficiency?
What the hell?
KGdaBom wrote:Neeva wrote:I am still pissed off at this game, obviously we can’t have both Ant and Kat shooting like **** in the same game and hope that is the last time it happens.
That was the reason for the loss. Bad shooting. Nothing else. Bad shooting was the result of bad shooting. Nothing else. If we had just shot really, really bad. Say 40% we would have won with ease.
Note30 wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Neeva wrote:I am still pissed off at this game, obviously we can’t have both Ant and Kat shooting like **** in the same game and hope that is the last time it happens.
That was the reason for the loss. Bad shooting. Nothing else. Bad shooting was the result of bad shooting. Nothing else. If we had just shot really, really bad. Say 40% we would have won with ease.
Did you watch the game?
KGdaBom wrote:Note30 wrote:KGdaBom wrote:That was the reason for the loss. Bad shooting. Nothing else. Bad shooting was the result of bad shooting. Nothing else. If we had just shot really, really bad. Say 40% we would have won with ease.
Did you watch the game?
Yes. I watched us miss shot after shot after shot. If we had shot really, really bad say 40% instead of what we did we would have won with ease. The one and only reason for the loss was the horrific shooting.

Merc_Porto wrote:Unbelievable, a game with a final score of 97-94 you have two players going for 8-27 and 8-25.
This team continues to have characters that only care about their personal numbers and where is the coaching staff to hold these guys accountable for this?
How can you shoot so much with such low efficiency?
What the hell?
Note30 wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Note30 wrote:
Did you watch the game?
Yes. I watched us miss shot after shot after shot. If we had shot really, really bad say 40% instead of what we did we would have won with ease. The one and only reason for the loss was the horrific shooting.
So no other factors other than the actual output of poor shooting are attributable to this loss? Let's say for example, shot selection?
Note30 wrote:Merc_Porto wrote:Unbelievable, a game with a final score of 97-94 you have two players going for 8-27 and 8-25.
This team continues to have characters that only care about their personal numbers and where is the coaching staff to hold these guys accountable for this?
How can you shoot so much with such low efficiency?
What the hell?
Did you watch the game? We have no offense. Like we ran maybe the same 3 plays over and over. Most of the issue with the ball stopping came from a lack of players moving, not just the lack of ball movement. NAW and Conley were both parked on the corner wings while Ant and KAT sat up top and Ant, KAT, and Rudy just ran the same bored floppy screen action over and over. If Ant started off the possession he often passed it to KAT either at the top of the 3 or on the high post, Rudy would crash to the dunkers spot, and he would try to go one on one.
If the coach didn't see this he must have been at the concession stand.
We don't have any semblance of an offense how are guys supposed to do anything else?
Domejandro wrote:To be fair, Jaden McDaniels’ cutting and ability to hit an open jumper will be exceptionally important. I think our facilitating situation is a real problem, though.
KGdaBom wrote:Note30 wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Yes. I watched us miss shot after shot after shot. If we had shot really, really bad say 40% instead of what we did we would have won with ease. The one and only reason for the loss was the horrific shooting.
So no other factors other than the actual output of poor shooting are attributable to this loss? Let's say for example, shot selection?
If we had made 40% of our shots we would have won with ease. It was the shooting.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves