Dynasty Leaders

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Raonak
Sophomore
Posts: 197
And1: 190
Joined: Jan 28, 2021
 

Re: Dynasty Leaders 

Post#21 » by Raonak » Tue Nov 7, 2023 8:59 pm

Cavsfansince84 wrote:
Raonak wrote:Warriors is a tough one to nail, because draymond is the vocal leader, and kerr being the coach, and the GM and owner also being very important too.

But Curry is the leader, not because he nessicerily makes decisions, but because of his charisma and his amazing of play.
Everybody knows the warriors dynasty only exists because of him, and thus every decision made revolves around him.


I can buy that Curry's overall personality/intangibles are a major factor towards the Warriors success over the last 10 years but not sure I can buy into the idea that he is truly a leader. It's just not an easy sell for me personally given how much more vocal/emotional Draymond is and how Kerr has said numerous times how Draymond is the emotional leader and why imo the Warriors' staff/brass refuse to stand up to him. They've given every indication possible for an organization to make that Draymond's value goes far beyond his numbers/defense and they need his presence in order to win titles. So on that basis I think he is the leader, probably much more so than Steph is. I mean Steph can have a huge impact on winning without really being a leader.


I think you're only look as "leader" as the guy who talks the most. It isn't that at all. Draymond is the emotional leader for sure, but he's not the true leader. Even draymond will always deferr to steph, and has never ever undermined him.

Th reason why the FO didn't do anything about draymond is NOT because draymond. It's because steph himself backs draymond. If Curry wasn't there, draymond would be traded and poole would be build around.
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,865
And1: 11,371
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Dynasty Leaders 

Post#22 » by Cavsfansince84 » Tue Nov 7, 2023 9:19 pm

Raonak wrote:
I think you're only look as "leader" as the guy who talks the most. It isn't that at all. Draymond is the emotional leader for sure, but he's not the true leader. Even draymond will always deferr to steph, and has never ever undermined him.

Th reason why the FO didn't do anything about draymond is NOT because draymond. It's because steph himself backs draymond. If Curry wasn't there, draymond would be traded and poole would be build around.


I think you are reading some stuff into it that you want to tbh. I mean that's fine, I don't think there's a black/white way to look at it all but we've seen Dray do whatever he wants way too often to say he defers to anyone since he's literally shouted down Kerr from about 10 ft away before. He definitely respects Steph but Steph is pretty passive for the most part to say he's the leader of the team. I mean you can believe it and others may also but personally I don't really see it that way. He is without a doubt the star of the team and as I said I think he has positive intangibles but that doesn't make him the leader of it.
Raonak
Sophomore
Posts: 197
And1: 190
Joined: Jan 28, 2021
 

Re: Dynasty Leaders 

Post#23 » by Raonak » Tue Nov 7, 2023 10:01 pm

Cavsfansince84 wrote:
Raonak wrote:
I think you're only look as "leader" as the guy who talks the most. It isn't that at all. Draymond is the emotional leader for sure, but he's not the true leader. Even draymond will always deferr to steph, and has never ever undermined him.

Th reason why the FO didn't do anything about draymond is NOT because draymond. It's because steph himself backs draymond. If Curry wasn't there, draymond would be traded and poole would be build around.


I think you are reading some stuff into it that you want to tbh. I mean that's fine, I don't think there's a black/white way to look at it all but we've seen Dray do whatever he wants way too often to say he defers to anyone since he's literally shouted down Kerr from about 10 ft away before. He definitely respects Steph but Steph is pretty passive for the most part to say he's the leader of the team. I mean you can believe it and others may also but personally I don't really see it that way. He is without a doubt the star of the team and as I said I think he has positive intangibles but that doesn't make him the leader of it.


Once again, you're making the mistake of thinking the one doing the talking is the leader.
There's different leadership styles, and curry absolutely leads the warriors.
What you're describing is KD, who is a star who doesn't lead.

Do you seriously think that the warriors FO would let draymond do anything if steph had a problem with it? absolutely not.
Draymond will shout at anyone.... except steph.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,371
And1: 98,216
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Dynasty Leaders 

Post#24 » by Texas Chuck » Tue Nov 7, 2023 10:26 pm

One thing I have learned is with very few exceptions Warriors fans really bristle at the idea of anyone but Steph being the leader. And maybe they are right, but I think even us non-Warriors fans are pretty familiar with that team and this constant trying to set Draymond aside doesn't match what I've seen and heard reported.

Like Dirk eventually became the leader in Dallas, but it was Fin and Nash before they were jettisoned and then he gladly let Kidd (and Chandler) do a lot of the leading once he arrived.

It's not a knock on the franchise player to acknowledge other guys can lead. I mean Iggy plays a pretty big role in things too.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,865
And1: 11,371
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Dynasty Leaders 

Post#25 » by Cavsfansince84 » Tue Nov 7, 2023 10:33 pm

Raonak wrote:
Once again, you're making the mistake of thinking the one doing the talking is the leader.
There's different leadership styles, and curry absolutely leads the warriors.
What you're describing is KD, who is a star who doesn't lead.

Do you seriously think that the warriors FO would let draymond do anything if steph had a problem with it? absolutely not.
Draymond will shout at anyone.... except steph.


That's one way of looking at it. The other way is simply that no one in the org wants to stand up to him and know how valuable he is in terms of the roles he provides. I think you feel like I am attacking Steph or something when all I am doing is giving honest opinions. Does this mean I am right? no. It's just my opinion based on what I've seen and having observed how players take on roles and it isn't to say Steph doesn't lead at times. I don't think he is in the KD mold in that regard. I just don't see him as the de facto leader of his team over the last 10 years.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,827
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Dynasty Leaders 

Post#26 » by HeartBreakKid » Wed Nov 8, 2023 1:27 pm

Raonak wrote:
Cavsfansince84 wrote:
Raonak wrote:
I think you're only look as "leader" as the guy who talks the most. It isn't that at all. Draymond is the emotional leader for sure, but he's not the true leader. Even draymond will always deferr to steph, and has never ever undermined him.

Th reason why the FO didn't do anything about draymond is NOT because draymond. It's because steph himself backs draymond. If Curry wasn't there, draymond would be traded and poole would be build around.


I think you are reading some stuff into it that you want to tbh. I mean that's fine, I don't think there's a black/white way to look at it all but we've seen Dray do whatever he wants way too often to say he defers to anyone since he's literally shouted down Kerr from about 10 ft away before. He definitely respects Steph but Steph is pretty passive for the most part to say he's the leader of the team. I mean you can believe it and others may also but personally I don't really see it that way. He is without a doubt the star of the team and as I said I think he has positive intangibles but that doesn't make him the leader of it.


Once again, you're making the mistake of thinking the one doing the talking is the leader.
There's different leadership styles, and curry absolutely leads the warriors.
What you're describing is KD, who is a star who doesn't lead.

Do you seriously think that the warriors FO would let draymond do anything if steph had a problem with it? absolutely not.

Draymond will shout at anyone.... except steph.


That mean's that the FO values him more as a player than Green not that he is the leader. If Curry has to go to the FO to tell Green what to do then that would be a point against his leadership not for it.
User avatar
OldSchoolNoBull
General Manager
Posts: 9,076
And1: 4,468
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Ohio
 

Re: Dynasty Leaders 

Post#27 » by OldSchoolNoBull » Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:29 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
eminence wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:.


Hey Doc, I was curious on your thoughts on the 80s Lakers in particular.

My own initial picks.

90s Bulls: Jackson


Okay so my thoughts:

90s Bulls: Phil Jackson
Very tricky here because I think Michael Jordan actually probably did more yelling than Jackson, but the team's breakthrough comes from Jackson taking the reins, changing the scheme, and empowering Scottie Pippen as a co-leader. Then there's the whole stretch where Jordan isn't there and the team still does pretty dang good despite the fact that Pippen doesn't really seem to function as an ideal leader. Given that we're fine separating out "the most valuable" from "the leader", it seems fair to give Jordan the first title and Jackson the second.


scrabbarista wrote:EDIT: Just saw OP was going for "the commander." In that case, it's Auerbach for the Russell Celtics. Riley for the Magic Lakers. Jackson for the Bulls and Lakers. Pop for the Spurs. Kerr for the Warriors. I'm not sure for Mikan's and Bird's teams. In basically every case, the best player has to let the coach command. You can say some coaches demanded or earned that more than others, but the reason I initially put the players is because that's where the true power was in every case.


So I know this conversation is from days ago, but as one of the few Bulls fans on the PC Board, I just wanted to chime in on this.

Firstly, I think Jordan was a more of a leader than some give him credit for.

For example, though he was skeptical at first, I think he bought into the triangle more than Kobe ever did - I mean, once Jordan bought in, there was a clear understanding between everyone, that he would play fully within the offense and help his teammates get involved, and then if necessary, he'd do his thing in the 4th, whereas with Kobe it felt like a constant battle to get him to trust his teammates and he didn't really get there until the Gasol years. I think Jordan's buy-in to the triangle made it easier for the coaching staff to get everyone else to go with it.

And for as much as he'd yell at his teammates, he also always wanted to win for them too. I distinctly remember him saying they needed to in 1992 for Bobby Hansen, and then in 96, that they had to win for all the guys on that team that hadn't done it(Kukoc, Kerr, Harper, Longley, etc).

But anyway, my reason for this post isn't really about MJ. The quoted posts above went with Phil Jackson, and I fully understand why, but I couldn't help but notice that there hasn't been a single mention in the thread of the man who hired Phil, Jerry Krause. If you're going to go with the management side of things, then I think there's an argument for Krause. It depends, of course, on how we're defining leader, and if the definition is the guy that inspires his soldiers to follow him, then that's not Krause. But there's something to be said for the type of leadership that makes decisions that will improve the outcomes even if they're not popular with his soldiers.

When Jerry Reinsdorf and his group purchased the Bulls in 1985, one of the first things he did was to hire Krause to run the show. As a New Yorker, Reinsdorf had been a fan of the Holtzman-era Knicks as younger man in the late 60s/early 70s, and he wanted Krause to build a team like that - with constant, fluid, unselfish ball-movement and hard-nosed defense. And that's what Krause did.

(Decisions that were unpopular in the organization or considered risky are bolded.)

He hired Tex Winter, the architect of the triangle, almost immediately in 1985, well before Phil was in the picture.

He drafted Oakley in 1985.

He hired Doug Collins and Johnny Bach(who ended up being the being the defensive architect of the dynasty) in 1986.

He traded second-string center Jawann Oldham in the fall of 1986 for a second FRP in the 1987 draft.
He then moved that FRP and a future FRP to move up in the 1987 draft.
He drafted Pippen and Grant in that draft.

He hired Phil Jackson, a former player from those Knicks teams under Holtzman, from the CBA to be an assistant under Doug Collins in 1987.

He traded Oakley for Cartwright in 1988, despite Oakley being MJ's best friend on the team. MJ wasn't happy, but it was the right move for the team.

In 1989, he traded Brad Sellers, his disappointing 1986 draft pick, to Seattle to get back the 1989 FRP he'd traded away in the Pippen deal, and he ended up using that #18 pick on BJ Armstrong, who became an important piece.

In 1989, he had the balls to fire Doug Collins - despite it coming on the heels of the team's best season in ages(a 6 game ECF loss to the Pistons) and despite Jordan and Collins being close - in order to promote Phil, because Collins didn't want to use Winters' triangle.

In 1990, he draft-and-stashed Toni Kukoc in the second round of the draft before draft-and-stash was common, and in the years that followed, he made no secret of how badly he wanted Toni to come over, much to the chagrin of Jordan and Pippen.


In 1991, he signed the undrafted Scott Williams who hadn't found an NBA home yet. Williams ended up being a solid role player for the Bulls and a long career, including playing decent minutes and starting a fair number of games for the Allen/Big Dog/Cassell Bucks of the early 00s.

In the 1992 offseason, after the departures of Cliff Levingston and Craig Hodges, Krause signed Trent Tucker and Rodney McCray, role players of the 80s, to fill the bench out; they both got a ring, and Tucker in particular was solid contributor.

In the 1993 offseason, he signed Steve Kerr and Bill Wennington, and finally signed Toni.

At the 1994 trade deadline, he swapped Stacey King, who would be out of the league a few years later, for Luc Longley, who ended up starting on three championship teams and being a serviceable role player for the better part of another decade.

In the 1994 offseason, he signed Ron Harper despite the reality of his post-ACL abilities.

He did the Perdue-for-Rodman deal in 1995 when few other teams wanted him.

He signed Brian Williams/Bison Dele as essentially a rental for the 1997 playoffs to take the place of the injured Bill Wennington, and he ended up being sparkplug(and played well enough to get paid the following season).

Even his seeming afterthought of an acquisition of Scott Burrell in the fall of 1997 ended being a necessary 3&D depth piece on the wing when Scottie missed the first half of the season(he shot 35% from 3 that season and recorded a 1.46 D-RAPM in just under 14mpg).

I know people will remember his stand-off-ish personality and the fact that he wanted to prematurely dismantle the dynasty and all of that, but he was also one of the greatest GMs ever, and every single piece that mattered to that dynasty not named Michael Jordan was his doing. Yes, starting with rookie Michael Jordan is a great hand to be dealt, but there have been plenty of GMs that had elite talent and couldn't build a team around it(LeBron's first-stint Cavs and KG's Wolves come to mind, heck a number of Hakeem's years in Houston before his championships come to mind).

You can't call him an emotional leader, no, but I think he's worth at least discussing, considering the GMs of some of these other teams have been mentioned(Auerbach, Sharman, etc).

Return to Player Comparisons