ImageImageImage

Welcome Jusuf Nurkić

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

User avatar
sashaturiaf
Analyst
Posts: 3,492
And1: 3,915
Joined: Jan 18, 2021
 

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#141 » by sashaturiaf » Wed Nov 8, 2023 11:44 pm

suns12345 wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:
bigfoot wrote:
I wouldn't even consider Ayton a better player. He has has better shooting skills and the agility to cover the perimeter.

Anything other than those and Nurk is better including motor, boxing out, IQ, passing, screening, ball handling, rebounding, getting free throws, etc.

I can live with a couple of dumb Nurk plays per game versus being extremely frustrated when Ayton isn't even trying for half a game.

Stats Per 36 minutes for

DA 12.5p/15.9r/1.5a/2.7s/1.2b/0.5ft
Nurk 12.9p/11.7r/6.1a/2s/1.6b/5.1ft

The difference in assists and free throws is quite stark


DA is more of a finesse player, while Nurkic uses his body. Definitely love that about Nurkic because his shooting is atrocious for a big man.

I actually think this article written for the Oregon state newspaper was a fairly accurate assessment of Nurkic (this past summer).
https://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/2023/04/jusuf-nurkic-wants-to-remain-with-the-portland-trail-blazers-but-contract-could-help-facilitate-blockbuster-trade.html

A big knock on Nurkic is missing shots near the basket. In another article It was mentioned that Nurkic was taking too many floaters early in the 2021-22 season, and Billups told him not to shoot those anymore since the Blazers have plenty of guards to take floaters, and that Nurkic should be dominating the paint. Totally agree with that, and I am hopeful when the team is at full strength Nurkic gets these easy buckets right under the rim.

Also... a bit annoyed about that article linked above as it says if the Blazers plan on trading Nurkic, they likely have to include Sharpe or Anfernee Simons. Welp... Suns didn't get either of those guys :lol:


They were taking on a bad contract too though. DA's contract is a lot for a rebuilding team if you assume he isn't going to improve much.

I don't think DA was really a desirable asset at all.


I agree. Who actually wants to pay a 5 the max in the NBA today unless if he had MVP or at least all star level impact, which DA wasn't even close to providing.

DA was a meh asset value wise and the Suns had about half a season to trade him, since once the new CBA kicks in next season we wouldn't be able to split his contract into several smaller ones in a trade.

Say what you want about Nurk, Allen and Little bit they all can play a bit and also crucially have very tradeable contracts. If they don't work out we can always get another piece back for them.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#142 » by bwgood77 » Thu Nov 9, 2023 1:00 am

sashaturiaf wrote:
suns12345 wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:
DA is more of a finesse player, while Nurkic uses his body. Definitely love that about Nurkic because his shooting is atrocious for a big man.

I actually think this article written for the Oregon state newspaper was a fairly accurate assessment of Nurkic (this past summer).
https://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/2023/04/jusuf-nurkic-wants-to-remain-with-the-portland-trail-blazers-but-contract-could-help-facilitate-blockbuster-trade.html

A big knock on Nurkic is missing shots near the basket. In another article It was mentioned that Nurkic was taking too many floaters early in the 2021-22 season, and Billups told him not to shoot those anymore since the Blazers have plenty of guards to take floaters, and that Nurkic should be dominating the paint. Totally agree with that, and I am hopeful when the team is at full strength Nurkic gets these easy buckets right under the rim.

Also... a bit annoyed about that article linked above as it says if the Blazers plan on trading Nurkic, they likely have to include Sharpe or Anfernee Simons. Welp... Suns didn't get either of those guys :lol:


They were taking on a bad contract too though. DA's contract is a lot for a rebuilding team if you assume he isn't going to improve much.

I don't think DA was really a desirable asset at all.


I agree. Who actually wants to pay a 5 the max in the NBA today unless if he had MVP or at least all star level impact, which DA wasn't even close to providing.

DA was a meh asset value wise and the Suns had about half a season to trade him, since once the new CBA kicks in next season we wouldn't be able to split his contract into several smaller ones in a trade.

Say what you want about Nurk, Allen and Little bit they all can play a bit and also crucially have very tradeable contracts. If they don't work out we can always get another piece back for them.


You guys just got done justifying why Nurkic's untradeable contract was ok to take without one of those good young players, saying DA's was as well, and now you are saying it's a very tradeable contract we could get an asset back for..lol.

Allen is expiring so I guess we could trade him for something maybe. Little makes $28 million over 4 years...not a lot but he's not really playable, so I don't know if he will be very desirable.

I seriously doubt any team will want Nurkic at that price since he isn't really starter quality...I can't think of a team that would want him, let alone give up an asset for him.
garrick
Head Coach
Posts: 7,349
And1: 4,066
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
     

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#143 » by garrick » Thu Nov 9, 2023 1:16 am

bwgood77 wrote:
Jdiddy701 wrote:We all said when the trade went down that DA is definitely the better player. Nobody disagreed with that. Ayton’s lazy play is still better than Nurk’s best play.

Nurk will be better when Book and Beal return. Right now, we’re asking Nurk to do things offensively that he may be doing soon but a lot less and will come easier when the attention is drawn to Book, KD and Beal.

I still much rather have Ayton off the team. His contract was one of the worst in the league. I’m OK with Nurk. He’s not the best option but Nurk is a really good passer and sets solid screens. I think those things are really undervalued with him. It will get better soon with him.

DA didn’t wanna be in Phoenix. We had to move him. While it hurts to lose Camara, Grayson Allen will be a very important piece for us this year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I agree we had to move Ayton, but just was hoping for a better package. I am not sure why people care about his contract, as we are so far over the cap we never would have had cap space. Nurkic being cheaper doesn't matter...unless people care about Ishbia saving money.

Unless the rationale is getting Grayson Allen with the extra salary difference (and Little), and he helps some, but doesn't really make up for the difference.

Would have loved to at least get someone like Capela. A guy like Lopez would have been perfect....or Porzingis, and I wouldn't be surprised if Washington would have dealt us him for Ayton had we gotten into that earlier.


Ayton is far from the worst player with a 30m per contract.

MPJ and Jerami Grant also have similar contracts and both are pretty 1 dimensional players who don't provide anything when their shots aren't falling.

Agreed we did not get enough for Ayton & neither Little nor Nurkic look like assets another team would covet. Allen is nice but he might be gone next season anyway since he's an expiring.
User avatar
sashaturiaf
Analyst
Posts: 3,492
And1: 3,915
Joined: Jan 18, 2021
 

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#144 » by sashaturiaf » Thu Nov 9, 2023 1:18 am

bwgood77 wrote:
sashaturiaf wrote:
suns12345 wrote:
They were taking on a bad contract too though. DA's contract is a lot for a rebuilding team if you assume he isn't going to improve much.

I don't think DA was really a desirable asset at all.


I agree. Who actually wants to pay a 5 the max in the NBA today unless if he had MVP or at least all star level impact, which DA wasn't even close to providing.

DA was a meh asset value wise and the Suns had about half a season to trade him, since once the new CBA kicks in next season we wouldn't be able to split his contract into several smaller ones in a trade.

Say what you want about Nurk, Allen and Little bit they all can play a bit and also crucially have very tradeable contracts. If they don't work out we can always get another piece back for them.


You guys just got done justifying why Nurkic's untradeable contract was ok to take without one of those good young players, saying DA's was as well, and now you are saying it's a very tradeable contract we could get an asset back for..lol.

Allen is expiring so I guess we could trade him for something maybe. Little makes $28 million over 4 years...not a lot but he's not really playable, so I don't know if he will be very desirable.

I seriously doubt any team will want Nurkic at that price since he isn't really starter quality...I can't think of a team that would want him, let alone give up an asset for him.



- Nurk is expiring in a seasons time and an expiring of that size is perfect for bringing back another role guy.

- bird rights are held with Allen. Bring him back on a reasonable deal and that's another tradeable contract. We might have a surplus of SGs now but we can't do that with Gordon so Allen is good insurance.

- little hasn't even been given a chance so how can we say he's not playable. He's still young so if he breaks out we've got the most desirable archetype in the NBA on a cheap contract. That's big upside.

Yeah I'd rather have all that rather than one Ayton albatross that becomes untradeable after this season.
dremill24
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,917
And1: 3,205
Joined: Jan 11, 2016
Contact:

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#145 » by dremill24 » Thu Nov 9, 2023 1:50 am

Why would Ayton all of a sudden be untradeable after this season? He's just gonna **** the bed that hard?
Trying out this Substack thing. Suns and NBA thoughts. Check it out: https://hoopsnexus.substack.com/
garrick
Head Coach
Posts: 7,349
And1: 4,066
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
     

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#146 » by garrick » Thu Nov 9, 2023 1:58 am

dremill24 wrote:Why is Ayton all of a sudden untradeable after this season? He's just gonna **** the bed that hard?

Jerami Grant is a lot harder of a contract to offload.

Can't defend, can't rebound and is a black hole on offense plus he's already 29 years old which is a good 4 years older than Ayton.

His contract runs until 2028-2029 so he is on the hook for a long time.
User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,553
And1: 14,846
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#147 » by Qwigglez » Thu Nov 9, 2023 2:07 am

sashaturiaf wrote:

- Nurk is expiring in a seasons time and an expiring of that size is perfect for bringing back another role guy.

- bird rights are held with Allen. Bring him back on a reasonable deal and that's another tradeable contract. We might have a surplus of SGs now but we can't do that with Gordon so Allen is good insurance.

- little hasn't even been given a chance so how can we say he's not playable. He's still young so if he breaks out we've got the most desirable archetype in the NBA on a cheap contract. That's big upside.

Yeah I'd rather have all that rather than one Ayton albatross that becomes untradeable after this season.


Nurk and Ayton both expire after the 2025-26 season. There are plenty of players that are within the 20% salary range of Ayton including players like Julius Randle, CJ MCollum, Middelton, Grant, Poole, Vassell, Bane, MPJ, Ingram, Murray, KP. I don't think Ayton is as untradeable as you think.
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,229
And1: 24,587
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#148 » by lilfishi22 » Thu Nov 9, 2023 2:19 am

The NBA has proven time and time again, very very very few contract are truly untradeable. It's just what you're willing to give up to move a contract that is the point of contention. DA will be tradeable but to get something halfway decent back, he'll need to be more than a 10/13 C who has gotten to line 3 times in 211 minutes because no one is trading anything of value for that and his max contract
dremill24
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,917
And1: 3,205
Joined: Jan 11, 2016
Contact:

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#149 » by dremill24 » Thu Nov 9, 2023 2:30 am

garrick wrote:
dremill24 wrote:Why is Ayton all of a sudden untradeable after this season? He's just gonna **** the bed that hard?

Jerami Grant is a lot harder of a contract to offload.

Can't defend, can't rebound and is a black hole on offense plus he's already 29 years old which is a good 4 years older than Ayton.

His contract runs until 2028-2029 so he is on the hook for a long time.


Im reasonably certain he was citing CBA restrictions for 2nd apron teams making him untradeable when I asked (but has it backwards). But was just trying to confirm first. But now everyone piling on a different argument so that backfired lol.
Trying out this Substack thing. Suns and NBA thoughts. Check it out: https://hoopsnexus.substack.com/
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,459
And1: 3,568
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#150 » by enigmatics » Thu Nov 9, 2023 4:15 am

Read on Twitter
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,359
And1: 16,996
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#151 » by Saberestar » Thu Nov 9, 2023 12:10 pm

lonea
Rookie
Posts: 1,121
And1: 535
Joined: Jan 16, 2012

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#152 » by lonea » Thu Nov 9, 2023 3:15 pm

10 games in, I 120% want Nurkic over ayton

This guy is really a poor man's joker.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#153 » by bwgood77 » Thu Nov 9, 2023 4:58 pm

enigmatics wrote:
Read on Twitter



Huge game for him. Hopefully he can keep it up. Obviously I don't expect that, but even 12, 10 and 4 or 5 would be nice if he can stay at around 2 turnovers a game.
spanishninja
General Manager
Posts: 8,095
And1: 6,196
Joined: Jan 07, 2014
 

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#154 » by spanishninja » Thu Nov 9, 2023 5:07 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
enigmatics wrote:
Read on Twitter



Huge game for him. Hopefully he can keep it up. Obviously I don't expect that, but even 12, 10 and 4 or 5 would be nice if he can stay at around 2 turnovers a game.


i mean, currently he is basically right at 10/10/5. I can't see him finish quite as badly from the rim going forward once we are fully healthy, even with his history of being a bad finisher.
Jdiddy701
RealGM
Posts: 10,145
And1: 6,555
Joined: Jun 05, 2006

Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#155 » by Jdiddy701 » Thu Nov 9, 2023 5:10 pm

lonea wrote:10 games in, I 120% want Nurkic over ayton

This guy is really a poor man's joker.

I did not like Ayton and am not that high on Nurk. The difference to me is the $$$ between the two, and factoring in that we also have Grayson Allen, who has been really good for us. I prefer DA than Nurk but would still make the trade if that makes sense. I do wish we would have kept Camara though. I think our ceiling as a team remains the same with/without this trade so it’s whatever to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,459
And1: 3,568
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#156 » by enigmatics » Thu Nov 9, 2023 5:18 pm

Jdiddy701 wrote:
lonea wrote:10 games in, I 120% want Nurkic over ayton

This guy is really a poor man's joker.

I did not like Ayton and am not that high on Nurk. The difference to me is the $$$ between the two, and factoring in that we also have Grayson Allen, who has been really good for us. I prefer DA than Nurk but would still make the trade if that makes sense. I do wish we would have kept Camara though. I think our ceiling as a team remains the same with/without this trade so it’s whatever to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Respectfully, I find your last comment to be wild. The combination of Nurk/Allen raise the ceiling considerably.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#157 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Nov 9, 2023 5:21 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Jdiddy701 wrote:We all said when the trade went down that DA is definitely the better player. Nobody disagreed with that. Ayton’s lazy play is still better than Nurk’s best play.

Nurk will be better when Book and Beal return. Right now, we’re asking Nurk to do things offensively that he may be doing soon but a lot less and will come easier when the attention is drawn to Book, KD and Beal.

I still much rather have Ayton off the team. His contract was one of the worst in the league. I’m OK with Nurk. He’s not the best option but Nurk is a really good passer and sets solid screens. I think those things are really undervalued with him. It will get better soon with him.

DA didn’t wanna be in Phoenix. We had to move him. While it hurts to lose Camara, Grayson Allen will be a very important piece for us this year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I agree we had to move Ayton, but just was hoping for a better package. I am not sure why people care about his contract, as we are so far over the cap we never would have had cap space. Nurkic being cheaper doesn't matter...unless people care about Ishbia saving money.

Unless the rationale is getting Grayson Allen with the extra salary difference (and Little), and he helps some, but doesn't really make up for the difference.

Would have loved to at least get someone like Capela. A guy like Lopez would have been perfect....or Porzingis, and I wouldn't be surprised if Washington would have dealt us him for Ayton had we gotten into that earlier.
? It's not Ishbias pocket book it's the penalties for being over the 2nd apron 3 out of 5 years that matters cap/contact wise. There are real draft/roster penalties that they really need to avoid.

So having Nurk at basically half the cost giving around the same production is huge for the suns and how they can build the roster the next few years. Heck by some advanced stats Nurk has been slightly better that DA this season.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,459
And1: 3,568
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#158 » by enigmatics » Thu Nov 9, 2023 5:33 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:It's not Ishbias pocket book it's the penalties for being over the 2nd apron 3 out of 5 years that matters cap/contact wise. There are real draft/roster penalties that they really need to avoid.

So having Nurk at basically half the cost giving around the same production is huge for the suns and how they can build the roster the next few years. Heck by some advanced stats Nurk has been slightly better that DA this season.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app


Some guys won't even pay any attention to the advanced stats unfortunately.
spanishninja
General Manager
Posts: 8,095
And1: 6,196
Joined: Jan 07, 2014
 

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#159 » by spanishninja » Thu Nov 9, 2023 5:47 pm

enigmatics wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:It's not Ishbias pocket book it's the penalties for being over the 2nd apron 3 out of 5 years that matters cap/contact wise. There are real draft/roster penalties that they really need to avoid.

So having Nurk at basically half the cost giving around the same production is huge for the suns and how they can build the roster the next few years. Heck by some advanced stats Nurk has been slightly better that DA this season.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app


Some guys won't even pay any attention to the advanced stats unfortunately.


I think advanced stats can be kind of misleading just like with traditional box. like, Nurk has a high DBPM but part of that is because we don't have him in there when we know that he would be cooked on defense. It really speaks to the benefit of having a guy like Eubanks backing him up.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić 

Post#160 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Nov 9, 2023 5:57 pm

spanishninja wrote:
enigmatics wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:It's not Ishbias pocket book it's the penalties for being over the 2nd apron 3 out of 5 years that matters cap/contact wise. There are real draft/roster penalties that they really need to avoid.

So having Nurk at basically half the cost giving around the same production is huge for the suns and how they can build the roster the next few years. Heck by some advanced stats Nurk has been slightly better that DA this season.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app


Some guys won't even pay any attention to the advanced stats unfortunately.


I think advanced stats can be kind of misleading just like with traditional box. like, Nurk has a high DBPM but part of that is because we don't have him in there when we know that he would be cooked on defense. It really speaks to the benefit of having a guy like Eubanks backing him up.
I think lineup flexibility was an aspect of this trade. You can play Nurk 18 minutes and not close out a game if it's a bad matchup and it's not going to be some big post game topic like it would be if you do that with DA.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.

Return to Phoenix Suns