Klomp wrote:Since shrink brought up picks, I think it's worth bringing up...
The fear-mongering around the KAT trade is that "we need to replenish assets from the Gobert trade." But with high-potential guys like Minott and Miller as DNP-CDs, plus two more likely Top 40 picks coming this summer, do we really?! Do we really need to sell (low) on KAT, when things obviously (to this point) have been working.
I understand the idea of asset management around the young guys, but selling others low to make room in the rotation for them doesn't seem wise.
I don't think it's about replenishing assets at all, it's about being being able to maintain the quality in our top 8 players in the rotation and whether or not our ownership will be willing/able to pay 60-80 million in luxury taxes just to keep Conley and fill the PG spot, let alone thinking about keeping Kyle Anderson.
The starting PG position, and the quality of player we would be able to afford there, is of particular concern.
Conley and Anderson are also absolutely keys to our culture and so key to our offensive and defensive schemes.
Denver is an interesting comparison, they are paying their top 5 players. After that they have Reggie Jackson at 5 million. The rest of their roster is players on rookie contracts and vet minimums.
The hope for us is that guys like Miller and Moore would be able to step into the main rotation.
Trading KAT is simply the best and most obvious way out of that financial hole.
That's why it's such a big talker and will continue to be. His contract will still be very tradable through the draft next year, but when the new CBA kicks in, in July, the list of suitors will dwindle with the new rules kicking in for luxury tax and supertax teams.
I think we need one quality rotation player back in any KAT deal.
Trading KAT would hinder our offensive ceiling, but will Jaden and/or Naz have stepped up enough by the end of the season to fill that void and make starting Naz or Kyle next to Gobert viable? Do we find a cheaper starting PF coming back in the trade?
I don't like what the Knicks have to offer. I don't think Robinson or Quickley are quality starters and Quickley is only attractive because of his rookie contract and he asked for 25 million on his extension. No thanks.
Keep Randle away from this team.
The Nets are an attractive suitor with a ton of draft assets, and Dinwiddie and Finney-Smith as potential salary filler (Simmons is a an absolute no at this point).
We could potentially save 4-5 million by declining Shake and Brown's options next year and replacing them with vet mins.
We could also get hit with another 7.5 million if Ant makes an All-NBA team.
I think the chances of KAT being traded by this year's deadline are very small unless we are really struggling.