Audi wrote:Can’t wait to see who the next whipping boy becomes once Fultz is gone.
Whoever the worst, least equipped for their role, overpaid, ridiculously emotionally defended guy is…that’s who
Moderators: UCFJayBird, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
Audi wrote:Can’t wait to see who the next whipping boy becomes once Fultz is gone.
eyriq wrote:AB > Fultz, Colethelead wrote:Just throwing this out there since I'm a big fan of AB: he shot 1-2 from deep tonight in his 17 minutes. That will bring his 3pt % DOWN for the season
Knightro wrote:The beauty of this thing is the Magic are in a position where they could make a consolidation trade that gets them a higher end starter/rotation player *and* get Black and Jett more minutes at the same time.
Of course I don’t anticipate them doing anything until at least December or January, if not closer to the trade deadline.
California Gold wrote:This is extra because people hate the Lakers and their brand so much.
This trade wasn't some conspiracy - it was just a GM wanting AD bad enough where in most people's eyes he overpaid by a long shot to get him.
The-Stallion70 wrote:Everyone besides Paolo and Franz are on the table now.
pepe1991 wrote:Black doesn't play PG for us now. I think it's important to point out, but in same time, why i need to point out ? If you watch games, you will see that Black isn't playmaking. He plays SF.
BlueBalls wrote:The-Stallion70 wrote:Everyone besides Paolo and Franz are on the table now.
I want no part of trading Suggs. The lotto picks that became Black & Howard probably should have been dealt - at least one of them - but the players those picks became are not going to be dealt anytime soon.
California Gold wrote:This is extra because people hate the Lakers and their brand so much.
This trade wasn't some conspiracy - it was just a GM wanting AD bad enough where in most people's eyes he overpaid by a long shot to get him.
SloNick Russia wrote:What is the last team to make playoffs with a rookey PG starting?
The-Stallion70 wrote:BlueBalls wrote:The-Stallion70 wrote:Everyone besides Paolo and Franz are on the table now.
I want no part of trading Suggs. The lotto picks that became Black & Howard probably should have been dealt - at least one of them - but the players those picks became are not going to be dealt anytime soon.
Suggs is very inconsistent and a poor decision maker which is not good for a player the size of a point guard.
He shot it well last night but even so that still brought his true shooting percentage to 51.8% on the year which is well below the league average of 57%.
MagicMatic wrote:
No
California Gold wrote:This is extra because people hate the Lakers and their brand so much.
This trade wasn't some conspiracy - it was just a GM wanting AD bad enough where in most people's eyes he overpaid by a long shot to get him.
Skybox wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Black doesn't play PG for us now. I think it's important to point out, but in same time, why i need to point out ? If you watch games, you will see that Black isn't playmaking. He plays SF.
Do you think, in today’s NBA, that Black, Franz, and Paolo could share the “formerly known as PG” role, in a more progressive offense?
* I’m presuming reasonable maturing from Black as a ball handler getting comfortable vs NBA defenders
And posters here are still saying he can't guard PGs or even guards in general.KillMonger wrote:
He isn't asked to run the offense. He guards mostly guards, but he's strong enough to hold his own against SFs. He's definitely a guard.pepe1991 wrote:Black doesn't play PG for us now. I think it's important to point out, but in same time, why i need to point out ? If you watch games, you will see that Black isn't playmaking. He plays SF.
pepe1991 wrote:Skybox wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Black doesn't play PG for us now. I think it's important to point out, but in same time, why i need to point out ? If you watch games, you will see that Black isn't playmaking. He plays SF.
Do you think, in today’s NBA, that Black, Franz, and Paolo could share the “formerly known as PG” role, in a more progressive offense?
* I’m presuming reasonable maturing from Black as a ball handler getting comfortable vs NBA defenders
Well i hope Banchero and Franz improve as shooters, Franz should be at least average shooter ( he already is).
Lakers won championship in 2020 on very suspect spacing ( Lebron- Davis- McGee/Howard ). But their level of talent was so superior to competition to a point i guess it didn't really matter?
I think you can get away in regular season with just about everything. Ultra small, ultra tall , 5 out lineups etc, but playoffs force you to be more formulatic as transition points are limited and teams defend 3 point line better.
I want Magic to make playoffs to see them play under different circumstances, it would be good learning experience for not just players and coach but for fans as well.
Skybox wrote:eyriq wrote:AB > Fultz, Colethelead wrote:Just throwing this out there since I'm a big fan of AB: he shot 1-2 from deep tonight in his 17 minutes. That will bring his 3pt % DOWN for the season
AB isn’t my ideal Fultz replacement, but he’s here and he’s very promising…the fit questions are nearly the same but far less due to what else AB may bring (I’m just considering him not a 3pt threat despite the first few games). The idea that lottery picks in a loaded draft are unplayable is absurd…they’ll make mistakes but better they do it now than next year.
I really like Suggs and that’s likely my hesitation because he’s also not a great pairing with Black. Jett might be but it’s more likely someone not on our roster. Suggs & Cole off the bench make a lot of sense and pair nicely. That duo will win games for us but probably aren’t the long-term starting solution. A trade is the obvious move. The need for shooting threats is not debatable. Shooting is not everything, but lack of shooters in the mix is fatal to the other players…tired of watching us play offense with one hand behind our back![]()
I’m so sick of hearing about Fultz being our best chance to win…finally seeing the resolve fading as reality among the apologists sets in but it’s still maddening. Win what? People stating with certainty that the GOAL is the playoffs. Says who? The goal should be to figure out who’s in for the long haul to contending even if it means losing a few more games this year…and, by the way, I’m not sure we would lose more, now or later. We should have a legit shot at .500 and/or playoffs if we make the obvious adjustments. Give it up…it’s become a ridiculously obvious conclusion. Maybe maybe we can get something of value from a team with shooting who lacks a floor general- I doubt it. More likely, when some team hits a wall and quietly declares a sell off, they’d value his expiring salary. That’s also our best chance to use our upcoming cap space in a productive way…rather than expect to entice a FA.
One more time I ask…what other team comes with a serious bid to get Fultz the FA? Would we even be thinking about Fultz with our cap space if he was on another team?Stop the fantasy…that’s not who he is
basketballRob wrote:He isn't asked to run the offense. He guards mostly guards, but he's strong enough to hold his own against SFs. He's definitely a guard.pepe1991 wrote:Black doesn't play PG for us now. I think it's important to point out, but in same time, why i need to point out ? If you watch games, you will see that Black isn't playmaking. He plays SF.
Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
He isn't asked to run the offense.