cgf wrote:Godymas wrote:cgf wrote:
Pretty sure that poster's point was that LeBron having a bad TS after 85 games didn't stop him from being successful, not that Cade = LeBron...
which is still incorrect because LeBron was better compared to the rest of the league than Cade is today
LeBron's team stats were better than Cade's has ever been
it's idiotic to compare Cade to LeBron anyways, they have very little in common outside of being the #1 pick
The point seems to be going right over some of your heads. Nobody is comparing LeBron to Cade. The point that poster was trying to make was simply that one of the greatest players of all time had a bad TS through 85 games, so a bad TS after 85 games on its own doesn't doom a prospect to failure.
Not that LeBron's league-relative-TS was as bad as Cade's, not that Cade would be better than LeBron, or is even near his level. Just that LeBron's TS was well below league average after 85 games and he still turned out ok. So cade wouldn't be the first #1 pick to have a bad TS after 85 games and still succeed, if he does make it.
It’s not going over anyone’s heads like it’s some subtle, nuanced thought. The whole point falls apart the second you apply even a little bit of context.
Cade has the worst athletic profile of any player drafted #1 since 2003. LeBron unquestionably has the best.
LeBrons growth trajectory was surreal. He was 2nd team all NBA his second season. His third season he was 1st team all NBA and runner up to MVP and he was younger than Cade.
LeBron was a dynamic slasher and playmaker and scorer almost immediately,
Cade will always have a difficult shot diet because he’s a horrible athlete, has a loose handle and an awful first step, and isn’t a great passer despite being shoehorned into a lead guard. If Cade doesn’t learn to how make difficult jumpers he’s always going to struggle scoring because he won’t be able to generate easy looks for himself.