DC_Melo wrote:hardenASG13 wrote:Green89 wrote:I bet it's the Stotts thing that had something to do with it, combined with he didn't want to be there in the first place, combined with him aging a bit.
So when stotts left Dame decided, you know what, if he's gone I'm just not going to play good?
Is that why he had the best season of his career the year after Stotts left?
I believe he had added Milwaukee to his trade list (if he hadn't, his whole wanting to win a title thing was complete BS, as Giannis is the best player he's ever played with, by far). The aging thing is legit, and his slowing down was masked the last couple years on Portland, where he had free reign to score with 0 expectations. Now he's got expectations for the first time, no more hiding in Portland posting phony scoring numbers.
I mean… he made the playoffs 8 times as a Blazer, including a WCF run… he didn’t have a great supporting cast but he was the leader of a perennial playoff team. Not sure how that is a “no expectations” kind of role. He led the Blazers as far as Harden ever led any of his teams… and without any superstar teammates.
It’s almost like you have literally no idea what you’re talking about.
I'm no Harden fan, just was an OKC fan back in the day and was predicting he'd be an all star the next season before he was traded (which he was, just not with OKC). In either case, Hardens Houston teams were much more respected than any of Dames Portland teams, and they weren't stacked rosters by any means.
As far as me not knowing what I'm talking about (?) I was making light of the stotts thing, not agreeing with it. I know Dame was able to lead a team to the playoffs perennially, where they weren't a threat at all. Lots of guys do that, they arent superstars, just very good players.There were no expectations in that nobody viewed Portland as a team that could win a title. They played out west, often late at night, and nobody noticed his flaws or hot and cold streaks as much as they are now, as the Bucks are supposed to be title contenders this year swapping jrue for him. I think people look at his scoring numbers from Portland and assumed he'd be a massive upgrade, which hasn't been the case.
The spotlight is on him and the Bucks now, if you dont realize the difference in expectations i guess I cant help you, and I think people will slowly realize he doesn't impact winning all that much, especially at this stage of his career. He really never has, as if he were a true superstar he would've had at least one good postseason run. The time they made the WCF they were easily swept by a warriors team that was without KD. Just not sure why people thought adding him would be a major upgrade for the Bucks. I think they are old, slow, and in trouble.