TimDunkin wrote:Miami_Lux wrote:This is not supposed to be a reactionary thread. I understand that we are not even one quarter into the season but nonetheless there are quite a few concerning observations about Wemby's actual ceiling.
Let's look at his numbers over the last six games following his 38-point game against the Suns. 38/100 (38%) from the field, 9/35 (26%) from three. I understand that San Antonio has a bad team, a PG that is not a PG (i.e. Sochan), and overall his teammates don't give him the ball in good spots as much as they should.
However, I was told Wemby was a great shooter for his length but he demonstrately is not. While his three-point shot may look good, his percentages are just abysmal. I don t think he will ever become a great shooter if he can t shoot even 30% from the three-point line.
Second, from watching the game, I think his handles are very suspect. He gets stripped a lot and his movement with the ball is very clunky at times making it easy for good defenders to strip the ball away from.
I don t think Wemby will be a bust. He can become an elite defender but offensively right now he just looks like a taller Porzingis.
Please don t hate me.
Why take what is already a small sample size of 11 games and make it even smaller?
Because the dude has an agenda. He started the OP by saying "this is not a reactionary post" ... and then proceeded with nothing but reactionary responses the entire thread.
People point out that Durant shot worse his rookie season. But, well, that doesn't count cuz it was a few years ago
He can't bulk at all and get better physically because that will cause him to get injured. Cuz we all know strength training is no good for an athlete.
He says his handles are no good. Because we've all seen so many other guys his size handle the ball better.
People pointing out that having the right teammates in place can help a rookie, but nah, the first few games of his rookie season prove his trajectory going forward.
