who better offball: mj or bron?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

ShaqAttac
Rookie
Posts: 1,189
And1: 370
Joined: Oct 18, 2022

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#21 » by ShaqAttac » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:15 am

Djoker wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:..


I still can't believe you said arguing Jordan is a dumb take. :noway:

Even big Lebron fans like Heej disagreed with you.

Anyway this is comfortably Jordan:
- much better shooter
- better at navigating around screens to get open; smaller frame, quicker
- better offensive rebounder (surprisingly..)
- quicker decision maker on the catch vs. Lebron's slower, more deliberate play
- also a lob threat - 6'6'' 48 inch vertical lol
- more proof of concept; actually scored many more points off ball vs. a bunch of hypotheticals for Lebron; we've seen Jordan lead elite offenses while playing a lot off-ball whereas we've never seen it with Lebron

tbh given everyone is saying mj i kinda wanna see uni d up
Gregoire
Analyst
Posts: 3,517
And1: 667
Joined: Jul 29, 2012

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#22 » by Gregoire » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:39 am

Its MJ and its not close. Its like to ask who had better jumper or who was better scorer?
Heej wrote:
These no calls on LeBron are crazy. A lot of stars got foul calls to protect them.
falcolombardi wrote:
Come playoffs 18 lebron beats any version of jordan
AEnigma wrote:
Jordan is not as smart a help defender as Kidd
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#23 » by MyUniBroDavis » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:52 am

Djoker wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:..


I still can't believe you said arguing Jordan is a dumb take. :noway:

Even big Lebron fans like Heej disagreed with you.

Anyway this is comfortably Jordan:
- much better shooter
- better at navigating around screens to get open; smaller frame, quicker
- better offensive rebounder (surprisingly..)
- quicker decision maker on the catch vs. Lebron's slower, more deliberate play
- also a lob threat - 6'6'' 48 inch vertical lol
- more proof of concept; actually scored many more points off ball vs. a bunch of hypotheticals for Lebron; we've seen Jordan lead elite offenses while playing a lot off-ball whereas we've never seen it with Lebron


Tagging me in a different thread while I’m suspended is hilarious lol.

You don’t understand Xs and Os sadly

What makes Lebron better off ball is you can conceptually do a lot more with him if you lean into that, Jordan did end up doing more off ball throughout their careers in the roles and offenses they played in, but that’s not the same thing as who was better off ball.

First of all, generally speaking the type of empty side clear out cuts (I forgot the name ngl) to create get overhyped as some sort of massive brained play, as well as cuts to draw help defenders, alot of those are built in or dependent on how a team functions. We saw in 2021 and 2022 the Lakers were stupid stagnant in their post offense, in terms of cutting off of both stunts and baseline hep, whereas in 2023 and 2024 they’ve id when to cut and when to flash or set pin in flares (digging vs baseline help) and you see the post data for AD suddenly looks alot better. Of those guys brons certainly the best cutter off of stunts to the point they can’t really do it off of him or they have to stunt and rotate high and give up the cut to someone else instead

And 45 stampede cut + lift people overhype the crap out of thinking it’s the pinnacle of bball intelligence lol, it’s really just how the offense decides to align for those opportunities and we’ve seen it with brin

There REALLY isn’t a comparison in terms of what they could do though

First of all, lebron is a better shooter off ball, because he can shoot the three. Yes, era matters there and it’s unfair to Jordan but in an absolute sense yeah this isn’t a close comparison, brons abour a 37-42% three point shooter throughout 2010-2023, he takes a lot of pullup jumpers in pick and roll and hits them at a respectable rate (relative to average players) that brings down his averages (35% off the dribble would be about 40% off the shoot probably)

Lebrons catch and shoot three point data per Synergy:

2010: 34.7%
2011: 39.3%
2012 34.7%
2013 42.1%
2014 42.5%
2015: 42%
2016 36.0%
2017 40%
2018 41.4%
2019 35.0%
2020 40.6%
2021 37.6%
2022 37.1%
2023 31.8%
2024 45.9%

In any case spot up shooting is much more not being bad than being an outlier unless ur a crazy outlier which neither of them are, I agree it’s unfair to say jordan didn’t shoot well from three therefore he’s worse because of era but arguing the other way around because bron doesn’t shoot catch and shoot midrange jump shots off of screens which has been largely phased out is equally unfair and it’s also a less valuable skill period if ur talking about midrange shots

As for being a lob threat:

Jordan was around 6ft4-6ft5 barefoot and his vertical from what I recall was measured at 45 inches in some UNC paper off an unlimited run ip and 41 inches with the ball. If you’ve ever played basketball you know that it’s not 1 to 1 with vertical and height, ur never gonna see a guard be a roll man lob threat consistently

That’s not a lob threat in a way that functionally matters at all in the context I was describing, which was as a roller. Lebron barely qualifies being 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40+ inch vert as well, and I’m taking about pre Lakers for sure (maybe even only up to Miami but not sure)

It’s mitigated a tad by the fact that lebron on the move with the ball is basically unstoppable, but that doesn’t mitigate it all that much in the context of why you want a lob threat in pick and roll vs aggressive coverages

There’s a much stronger argument that neither of them are in that context than Jordan being one as well. Jordan isn’t tall enough to be one, bron probably barely meets the mark but I get the argument he doesn’t in the context of what I said

The entirety of how he improved in 2023 outside of Lebron getting to be more physical rather than quick was them starting to get him the ball on the move more, in the playoffs he couldn’t do anything on ball at all

Offensive rebounding:

I mean neither are threats in the way that someone should consider an off ball player, (using raw rebounding % makes no sense when that number has changed lol). But regardless of a 0-1% change either way, lebron technically is a bigger threat just based on size since off ball offensive rebounding is probably more about in mismatch situations on certain switches (beyond that, offensive rebounding is just… offensive rebounding lol)


Quicker decision maker on the catch:
Being a quick decision maker off the catch isn’t equivalent to possessions resetting when they pass it out at times but this really isn’t comparable to the other advantages lol


Anyways, a 38 year old lebron currently averaging less touches a game than Brandon Ingram with less time of possession than Austin reaves, he’s averaging 26-8-7 on 67%TS and noticeably taking it easy till the fourth, and is a +17.4 on offense which ranks poorly overall because they can’t function without him (which is a bit from bad luck to be clear)

A 37 year old bron in the 18 game stretch where AD was hurt and we desperately were clinging to the playoffs, with no spacing, averages 80.6 touches a game (14th) , an average time of possession of 6.3 minutes (15th) , an average time of 4.66 seconds per touch (52nd). Those numbers aren’t quite as low as they were in Miami (2014 only) where people say off ball bron was somewhat of a thing but they’re close ish, especially considering who the team had around them and the raw volume of their offensice production. If I recall lebron was like a +17-18 on offense and we were top 5 in the games he played on that end

Wouldn’t call it off ball at first, the caveat is he was averaging 33.5/8/8 on great effeciency (62.5TS), so those rankings are insane considering the production

So what we have here is a VASTLY declined Lebron put his foot on the gas for 20 games and pretty consistently was a top 3 offensive player in a league with Jokic, Luka, Curry, in that stretch before injuries got him, and currently brons averaging a career high percentage inside the arc and his average career numbers despite sleepwalking untill the fourth quarter because he definately wants that clutch player of the year award unless 500k is on the line or it’s a marquee/revenge game matchup (anyone that doubts this has not seen the Lakers, lebron is currently leading the league in ppg in the fourth other than tyus Jones whose played 1 fourth quarter, averaging 32-8-8 per 36 on 70.8TS)


Now shooting off of screens is genuinely important, but not as much from the midrange nowadays


Jordan is good in the context of an elite normal player off ball whereas Lebron has much more unique value off ball which is the main thing here

Jordan doesnt open things up schematically for you to be more creative and diverse with what you can do for your offense or to make your actions more effective, he is an incredibly smart and skilled player off ball

Lebron, especially the younger versions of him that would be a lob threat that still shoot well off the catch, if you play into that absolutely does those things.

As cutters their values aren’t even remotely close, an issue with synergy tracking is some post ups are considered cuts and stampede cuts aren’t classified as cuts iirc, but not only is bron historically effecient off cuts for awhile now, but it’s one of those things where it’s a unique value vs other guys. With most players off cuts it’s cuz they’re so fast and smart with it but if you can wall up it’s fine, with bron it’s because he’s fast and huge so if you wall up he’ll go overpower you and he knows how to not foul in those situations, hes unstoppable on the move and it shows in those situations. This should be a non starter, lebrons shooting 80-90% on cuts throughout his career, his cutting has unique value because of the combination of size, finishing, speed, and playmaking. An argument for Jordan here is as much of a non starter as saying he’s better in transition

The synergy stat sheet that’s someone made for Jordan awhile back is a bit broke because turnovers weren’t accounted for, but iirc over 142 games jordan was at 68% inside the arc on cuts with a little more than one a game

That is both impressive and lower than any season bron has had since and including 2010, especially in recent years where brons relied on it and focused on it more he’s at hovering at around 80%, on a bit more volume as well per game (My mistake, one year they had a similar percentage where bron was at 67%, but bron had more volume)



As an off rolling big, its REALLY hard to name a guy that has basically all the skills you need vs every coverage, spot up shooting, short roll passing, punishing mismatches, lob threat. Throw in offensive rebounding there too but that’s not usually one I think of to beat coverages as much as a bonus but its valid. There are ways to mitigate lacking in some of those skills but that gets tied into the ball handler and coaching.

Lebron checks at least 3/4 boxes super comfortably, and as a lob threat he’s 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40-45 inch vert, At least when he was younger, he’s a tad short for that but he’s an inch or two shorter than AD and dwight so he could still be one.

Jordan does not qualify as a lob threat in that situation and it doesn’t even make sense to care about him in that situation


A lot of Arguments for Jordan on here in the context of their off ball ability are focused on what occurred situationally in the situations they were in ans the systems they played in (which is valid), but the arguments that hes actually better just always end up being super vague and not actual descriptive which just sounds like waffling things out of thin air lol, throwing out super vague descriptions of what happens on the court m to make a point is barely step better than throwing out a narrative out there imo. In a concrete sense lebrons just so more of a potent tool off ball you can do more things with, feel that’s a given if you have schematic knowledge of the freedom a guy like bron gives you over a guy like Jordan

I see a better argument for Jordan on ball than off ball in terms of them as players, people don’t get how ridiculous younger versions of lebron would be as a rolling small ball big that’s still a huge lob threat, but obviously it goes without saying he’s more impactful on ball than off ball. There are less than 5 players in nba history that check all the boxes as an rolling big probably and he would be one of them. You don’t need to check all
The boxes but it gives you so much more versatility and reseliency against coverages, we saw the warriors pick and roll attack somewhat die this past postseason against a high drop since Dray isn’t a lob threat and switching hurt it at times too even at their best, Westbrook and AD had issues because neither of them could should and Westbrook wasn’t as fast as he used to be so things like north south ball screens and flipping the screen weren’t quite as dominant as they had been

Heej is my boy but he was talking about shooting as a main point and more about the role bron did play, but also the fact that lebron was actually a good catch and shoot three point shooter is just a thing that’s weird and most people don’t expect, and he clarified it was a role thing and bron could be better even now if he leans into it more
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#24 » by MyUniBroDavis » Fri Nov 24, 2023 5:13 am

EmpireFalls wrote:This is obviously Jordan in terms of observed impact.

Though LeBron is good, very good even, off-ball. Check out these numbers (remember this stat from a while back)

LeBron James played three years with Kyrie Irving. Here are his numbers as a PNR roller:

14-15: 1.417 PPP (98th percentile)
15-16: 1.358 PPP (95th percentile)
16-17: 1.429 PPP (96th percentile)

I’d also say his cutting and spot up shooting in Miami was legitimately great, think he was something like a 80th percentile catch and shoot player in Miami. Plus, he was definitely not playing heliocentric ball in 11-13.


Spot up shooting is more about being not bad than being incredibly good, being a standstill catch and shoot 42% guy on the same quality looks isn’t a huuugely psignificantly bigger value add than the 38% guy on the same quality of looks because either way you don’t help off of them

Lebrons cutting being down compared to Miami isn’t something that aligns with reality, his cuts are essentially the same as they had been in volume (effeciency in this regard is absurd obviously, consistently 80-100th percentile which is insane for a non big, 98th last year). They’re somewhat better now relative to before but, but in Miami he was still ridiculously elite, now even with spacing he’s gone from being a 90th percentile type (synergy.com) to 95-100th


Lebrons volume has gone up a bit as a roll man last few years, elite effeciency despite being pretty declined

2022: 1.43ppp
2023: 1.25ppp (couldnt shoot a three)
2024: 1.39ppp
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#25 » by MyUniBroDavis » Fri Nov 24, 2023 5:38 am

rrravenred wrote:One of those questions that's heavily dependent on how they were actually used in-game. Jordan's decisiveness, confidence and huge sweet spots made him an ideal finisher and iso scorer once a mismatch is identified. Especially when you have a distributed offensive pattern like the triangle and a skilled facilitator like Pippen, it would be silly NOT to maximise his productive potential offball.

LeBron, otoh remains one of the deadlier and multi-pronged on-ball presences the NBA has seen. This versatility is a limiter however, given taking the ball out of his hands is going to downgrade your offensive sets, especially with modern heliocentric offences. Given that, Lebron's size, athleticism, strength and shooting touch make him a solid finishing threat, especially on the move. Not, however to the outlier level Jordan was, and not to the level that is worth sacrificing onball value for anything other than relatively short stints.





1. I’m confused what this means, if the idea is that bron is better on ball than most people he plays with sure, but I don’t see for example why, an a double drag series with Kyrie as the ball handler and bron as the first or second screener and the actions that come from that would not be effective, if anything brons a strong ideal one in that scenario because he can do most of the roles you need there whether he’s the first screener, second screener, or if they have to switch the first screener defender with the ball handler, or if the short roll happens where he only gives it to the corners, even if ur running like spain he can be either the screener or the backscreener and itd be annoying as hell for a defense

2. The arguable greatest finisher in basketball history is better than a “Solid finisher” lol, if you mean as a lob threat in the pick and roll if they do some aggressive or contain aggressive coverage I agree more but I don’t think that’s an area where jordan would have an advantage whatsoever
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,474
And1: 7,083
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#26 » by falcolombardi » Fri Nov 24, 2023 11:14 am

Lebron is arguably the best finisher outside of shaq in the modern era, period. Not even adjusted for positions

Solid is a hell of an understatement
User avatar
MacGill
Veteran
Posts: 2,768
And1: 568
Joined: May 29, 2010
Location: From Parts Unknown...
     

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#27 » by MacGill » Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:46 pm

falcolombardi wrote:
The thingh is...that new better era already arrived.... and a old lebron dominated there


Well, that is quite subjective though, would you not agree? Most likely, the age at which one begins to play and understand the game is usually the period they select, however, while I was very much looking forward to the future of the game I am underwhelmed from the product that I see. And the ratings confirm this as well too many.

And a 35 year old lebron was the best player of the season at that era (2020) which is lowkey the most impressive thingh about lebron, his 36 years old was arguably the league best player over legitimate "new era" basketball freaks like giannis and jokic as late as 2021 before the injury


Too much LBJ emotion here. Players like him do not have to be propped up by stating that 'In my opinion he was still the best...' etc. His game has basically remained the same since draft day and rule changes have had a larger impact on the overall game then any tweaks he has made. Athletes are a point in time but there hasn't been any 'super solider serum' invented yet that I am aware of outside of the advancement of sports science medicine for recovery, normal PED's, and adapting the game younger with better programs from that age etc.

His late 30's version adapted to a completely different era and thrived way out of his athletic prime


He played the exact same way and intangibly got smarter after mentoring from Wade. Unless you can tell me what fundementally LBJ did differently? And the answer isn't playing off the ball because he isn't a good enough shooter to really do that in the 3 pointer era. He really has no threatening mid-range game.

Just like his post athletic prime early late 20's/early 30's did adapt to dominate a changing league in the 2010's


His game thrived because of the league wanting more scoring which played exactly into his strengths. He's an athletic freak and like I always say, he did exactly what he was supposed to do as one of the best ever to play. I understand people will marvel for a bit but after you understand that this is how he plays normally, again, what is so shocking? Every sport is seeing more and more LBJ type athletes, this is where sports is going and soon LBJ will be seen as inferior to what will be coming down the pipe. It's how things work. But unlike the 60's until now, there isn't enough game separation to claim that any other athlete, like KG, Kobe, Duncan etc wouldn't have been able to adapt or grow in this league. It's like saying that Mr. Wiggles couldn't lock and pop in today's dance culture. He'd adapt to the times, or grow up with the ability to learn it. Vision and creativity are the only elements that go missing and none that a pro athlete in any time couldn't up. And I am talking about the ATG's of every era to be exact.
Image
Djoker
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 1,879
Joined: Sep 12, 2015
 

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#28 » by Djoker » Fri Nov 24, 2023 3:20 pm

trex_8063 wrote:
Djoker wrote:ORB% Averages

Regular Season
Jordan 4.7%
Lebron 3.6%

Playoffs
Jordan 4.8%
Lebron 4.4%


fwiw, I think you're overlooking how philosophy on crashing the glass (vs getting back on D) have changed, how increased 3pt usage (creating more long rebounds), etc have changed between their respective careers.

The league average OREB% [for a team] during Jordan's prime hovered somewhere around 31-33%.
In LeBron's prime it's been ~22-27%.

In light of that, the numbers you cite may not be suggesting what you think they do.


For sure. I'm well aware of the era differences but there are two sides to that coin.

For instance, the modern game has better spacing and bigs can't camp in the paint the way they used to before the 3-second rule anyway and yet hardly anyone takes that into account when discussing finishing in the paint. Context on this forum is only brought up when it helps Lebron's argument.
Djoker
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 1,879
Joined: Sep 12, 2015
 

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#29 » by Djoker » Fri Nov 24, 2023 3:51 pm

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
Tagging me in a different thread while I’m suspended is hilarious lol.

You don’t understand Xs and Os sadly

What makes Lebron better off ball is you can conceptually do a lot more with him if you lean into that, Jordan did end up doing more off ball throughout their careers in the roles and offenses they played in, but that’s not the same thing as who was better off ball.

First of all, generally speaking the type of empty side clear out cuts (I forgot the name ngl) to create get overhyped as some sort of massive brained play, as well as cuts to draw help defenders, alot of those are built in or dependent on how a team functions. We saw in 2021 and 2022 the Lakers were stupid stagnant in their post offense, in terms of cutting off of both stunts and baseline hep, whereas in 2023 and 2024 they’ve id when to cut and when to flash or set pin in flares (digging vs baseline help) and you see the post data for AD suddenly looks alot better. Of those guys brons certainly the best cutter off of stunts to the point they can’t really do it off of him or they have to stunt and rotate high and give up the cut to someone else instead

And 45 stampede cut + lift people overhype the crap out of thinking it’s the pinnacle of bball intelligence lol, it’s really just how the offense decides to align for those opportunities and we’ve seen it with brin

There REALLY isn’t a comparison in terms of what they could do though

First of all, lebron is a better shooter off ball, because he can shoot the three. Yes, era matters there and it’s unfair to Jordan but in an absolute sense yeah this isn’t a close comparison, brons abour a 37-42% three point shooter throughout 2010-2023, he takes a lot of pullup jumpers in pick and roll and hits them at a respectable rate (relative to average players) that brings down his averages (35% off the dribble would be about 40% off the shoot probably)

Lebrons catch and shoot three point data per Synergy:

2010: 34.7%
2011: 39.3%
2012 34.7%
2013 42.1%
2014 42.5%
2015: 42%
2016 36.0%
2017 40%
2018 41.4%
2019 35.0%
2020 40.6%
2021 37.6%
2022 37.1%
2023 31.8%
2024 45.9%

In any case spot up shooting is much more not being bad than being an outlier unless ur a crazy outlier which neither of them are, I agree it’s unfair to say jordan didn’t shoot well from three therefore he’s worse because of era but arguing the other way around because bron doesn’t shoot catch and shoot midrange jump shots off of screens which has been largely phased out is equally unfair and it’s also a less valuable skill period if ur talking about midrange shots

As for being a lob threat:

Jordan was around 6ft4-6ft5 barefoot and his vertical from what I recall was measured at 45 inches in some UNC paper off an unlimited run ip and 41 inches with the ball. If you’ve ever played basketball you know that it’s not 1 to 1 with vertical and height, ur never gonna see a guard be a roll man lob threat consistently

That’s not a lob threat in a way that functionally matters at all in the context I was describing, which was as a roller. Lebron barely qualifies being 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40+ inch vert as well, and I’m taking about pre Lakers for sure (maybe even only up to Miami but not sure)

It’s mitigated a tad by the fact that lebron on the move with the ball is basically unstoppable, but that doesn’t mitigate it all that much in the context of why you want a lob threat in pick and roll vs aggressive coverages

There’s a much stronger argument that neither of them are in that context than Jordan being one as well. Jordan isn’t tall enough to be one, bron probably barely meets the mark but I get the argument he doesn’t in the context of what I said

The entirety of how he improved in 2023 outside of Lebron getting to be more physical rather than quick was them starting to get him the ball on the move more, in the playoffs he couldn’t do anything on ball at all

Offensive rebounding:

I mean neither are threats in the way that someone should consider an off ball player, (using raw rebounding % makes no sense when that number has changed lol). But regardless of a 0-1% change either way, lebron technically is a bigger threat just based on size since off ball offensive rebounding is probably more about in mismatch situations on certain switches (beyond that, offensive rebounding is just… offensive rebounding lol)


Quicker decision maker on the catch:
Being a quick decision maker off the catch isn’t equivalent to possessions resetting when they pass it out at times but this really isn’t comparable to the other advantages lol


Anyways, a 38 year old lebron currently averaging less touches a game than Brandon Ingram with less time of possession than Austin reaves, he’s averaging 26-8-7 on 67%TS and noticeably taking it easy till the fourth, and is a +17.4 on offense which ranks poorly overall because they can’t function without him (which is a bit from bad luck to be clear)

A 37 year old bron in the 18 game stretch where AD was hurt and we desperately were clinging to the playoffs, with no spacing, averages 80.6 touches a game (14th) , an average time of possession of 6.3 minutes (15th) , an average time of 4.66 seconds per touch (52nd). Those numbers aren’t quite as low as they were in Miami (2014 only) where people say off ball bron was somewhat of a thing but they’re close ish, especially considering who the team had around them and the raw volume of their offensice production. If I recall lebron was like a +17-18 on offense and we were top 5 in the games he played on that end

Wouldn’t call it off ball at first, the caveat is he was averaging 33.5/8/8 on great effeciency (62.5TS), so those rankings are insane considering the production

So what we have here is a VASTLY declined Lebron put his foot on the gas for 20 games and pretty consistently was a top 3 offensive player in a league with Jokic, Luka, Curry, in that stretch before injuries got him, and currently brons averaging a career high percentage inside the arc and his average career numbers despite sleepwalking untill the fourth quarter because he definately wants that clutch player of the year award unless 500k is on the line or it’s a marquee/revenge game matchup (anyone that doubts this has not seen the Lakers, lebron is currently leading the league in ppg in the fourth other than tyus Jones whose played 1 fourth quarter, averaging 32-8-8 per 36 on 70.8TS)


Now shooting off of screens is genuinely important, but not as much from the midrange nowadays


Jordan is good in the context of an elite normal player off ball whereas Lebron has much more unique value off ball which is the main thing here

Jordan doesnt open things up schematically for you to be more creative and diverse with what you can do for your offense or to make your actions more effective, he is an incredibly smart and skilled player off ball

Lebron, especially the younger versions of him that would be a lob threat that still shoot well off the catch, if you play into that absolutely does those things.

As cutters their values aren’t even remotely close, an issue with synergy tracking is some post ups are considered cuts and stampede cuts aren’t classified as cuts iirc, but not only is bron historically effecient off cuts for awhile now, but it’s one of those things where it’s a unique value vs other guys. With most players off cuts it’s cuz they’re so fast and smart with it but if you can wall up it’s fine, with bron it’s because he’s fast and huge so if you wall up he’ll go overpower you and he knows how to not foul in those situations, hes unstoppable on the move and it shows in those situations. This should be a non starter, lebrons shooting 80-90% on cuts throughout his career, his cutting has unique value because of the combination of size, finishing, speed, and playmaking. An argument for Jordan here is as much of a non starter as saying he’s better in transition

The synergy stat sheet that’s someone made for Jordan awhile back is a bit broke because turnovers weren’t accounted for, but iirc over 142 games jordan was at 68% inside the arc on cuts with a little more than one a game

That is both impressive and lower than any season bron has had since and including 2010, especially in recent years where brons relied on it and focused on it more he’s at hovering at around 80%, on a bit more volume as well per game (My mistake, one year they had a similar percentage where bron was at 67%, but bron had more volume)



As an off rolling big, its REALLY hard to name a guy that has basically all the skills you need vs every coverage, spot up shooting, short roll passing, punishing mismatches, lob threat. Throw in offensive rebounding there too but that’s not usually one I think of to beat coverages as much as a bonus but its valid. There are ways to mitigate lacking in some of those skills but that gets tied into the ball handler and coaching.

Lebron checks at least 3/4 boxes super comfortably, and as a lob threat he’s 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40-45 inch vert, At least when he was younger, he’s a tad short for that but he’s an inch or two shorter than AD and dwight so he could still be one.

Jordan does not qualify as a lob threat in that situation and it doesn’t even make sense to care about him in that situation


A lot of Arguments for Jordan on here in the context of their off ball ability are focused on what occurred situationally in the situations they were in ans the systems they played in (which is valid), but the arguments that hes actually better just always end up being super vague and not actual descriptive which just sounds like waffling things out of thin air lol, throwing out super vague descriptions of what happens on the court m to make a point is barely step better than throwing out a narrative out there imo. In a concrete sense lebrons just so more of a potent tool off ball you can do more things with, feel that’s a given if you have schematic knowledge of the freedom a guy like bron gives you over a guy like Jordan

I see a better argument for Jordan on ball than off ball in terms of them as players, people don’t get how ridiculous younger versions of lebron would be as a rolling small ball big that’s still a huge lob threat, but obviously it goes without saying he’s more impactful on ball than off ball. There are less than 5 players in nba history that check all the boxes as an rolling big probably and he would be one of them. You don’t need to check all
The boxes but it gives you so much more versatility and reseliency against coverages, we saw the warriors pick and roll attack somewhat die this past postseason against a high drop since Dray isn’t a lob threat and switching hurt it at times too even at their best, Westbrook and AD had issues because neither of them could should and Westbrook wasn’t as fast as he used to be so things like north south ball screens and flipping the screen weren’t quite as dominant as they had been

Heej is my boy but he was talking about shooting as a main point and more about the role bron did play, but also the fact that lebron was actually a good catch and shoot three point shooter is just a thing that’s weird and most people don’t expect, and he clarified it was a role thing and bron could be better even now if he leans into it more


I don't know where you got the catch and shoot (CnS) 3P% for Lebron. The one I see on NBA.com starts in 2013-14 and his numbers are markedly lower, more in the 36-38% range than the 38-42% range you're citing. And Lebron is a (slightly) below league average 3pt shooter since 2014 so it's weird to bring that up as a strength.

Also worth noting that Lebron takes an average of 1-2 CnS 3pt shots per game. The volume is extremely low compared to Jordan who probably took 5x that volume of CnS jumpers.

Plus we don't know Jordan's 3P% in these situations. Given that he was a very low volume 3pt shooter much of his career and took a bunch of bailout 3pt shots, it's likely that he shot a very high % on CnS threes. We know that he shot 43.3% from Corner 3's from 1997-2003 (B-Ref) and these were mostly from his bad 3pt shooting years.

Jordan did actually have higher offensive rebounding rates.

Quick decision making is a huge part of playing off-ball. Catching the ball at the elbow as a triple threat - MJ had a quicker 1st step, way better midrange game and good passing - and being able to make a play quickly often starting his move as he's catching the ball prevents the defense from reacting. It's not that Lebron can't do this but he's usually slower and more deliberate than MJ. It's evident form watching almost any given game. MJ's game is way more quick hitting which lets him operate better as an off-ball hub.

When you said and I quote "Jordan did end up doing more off ball throughout their careers" that ends the argument really. Jordan played way more as an off-ball player and has incredible results in those roles on both an individual and team level. Lebron doesn't.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,974
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#30 » by AEnigma » Fri Nov 24, 2023 5:55 pm

Djoker wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:Tagging me in a different thread while I’m suspended is hilarious lol.

You don’t understand Xs and Os sadly

What makes Lebron better off ball is you can conceptually do a lot more with him if you lean into that, Jordan did end up doing more off ball throughout their careers in the roles and offenses they played in, but that’s not the same thing as who was better off ball.

First of all, generally speaking the type of empty side clear out cuts (I forgot the name ngl) to create get overhyped as some sort of massive brained play, as well as cuts to draw help defenders, alot of those are built in or dependent on how a team functions. We saw in 2021 and 2022 the Lakers were stupid stagnant in their post offense, in terms of cutting off of both stunts and baseline hep, whereas in 2023 and 2024 they’ve id when to cut and when to flash or set pin in flares (digging vs baseline help) and you see the post data for AD suddenly looks alot better. Of those guys brons certainly the best cutter off of stunts to the point they can’t really do it off of him or they have to stunt and rotate high and give up the cut to someone else instead

And 45 stampede cut + lift people overhype the crap out of thinking it’s the pinnacle of bball intelligence lol, it’s really just how the offense decides to align for those opportunities and we’ve seen it with brin

There REALLY isn’t a comparison in terms of what they could do though

First of all, lebron is a better shooter off ball, because he can shoot the three. Yes, era matters there and it’s unfair to Jordan but in an absolute sense yeah this isn’t a close comparison, brons abour a 37-42% three point shooter throughout 2010-2023, he takes a lot of pullup jumpers in pick and roll and hits them at a respectable rate (relative to average players) that brings down his averages (35% off the dribble would be about 40% off the shoot probably)

Lebrons catch and shoot three point data per Synergy:

2010: 34.7%
2011: 39.3%
2012 34.7%
2013 42.1%
2014 42.5%
2015: 42%
2016 36.0%
2017 40%
2018 41.4%
2019 35.0%
2020 40.6%
2021 37.6%
2022 37.1%
2023 31.8%
2024 45.9%

In any case spot up shooting is much more not being bad than being an outlier unless ur a crazy outlier which neither of them are, I agree it’s unfair to say jordan didn’t shoot well from three therefore he’s worse because of era but arguing the other way around because bron doesn’t shoot catch and shoot midrange jump shots off of screens which has been largely phased out is equally unfair and it’s also a less valuable skill period if ur talking about midrange shots

As for being a lob threat:

Jordan was around 6ft4-6ft5 barefoot and his vertical from what I recall was measured at 45 inches in some UNC paper off an unlimited run ip and 41 inches with the ball. If you’ve ever played basketball you know that it’s not 1 to 1 with vertical and height, ur never gonna see a guard be a roll man lob threat consistently

That’s not a lob threat in a way that functionally matters at all in the context I was describing, which was as a roller. Lebron barely qualifies being 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40+ inch vert as well, and I’m taking about pre Lakers for sure (maybe even only up to Miami but not sure)

It’s mitigated a tad by the fact that lebron on the move with the ball is basically unstoppable, but that doesn’t mitigate it all that much in the context of why you want a lob threat in pick and roll vs aggressive coverages

There’s a much stronger argument that neither of them are in that context than Jordan being one as well. Jordan isn’t tall enough to be one, bron probably barely meets the mark but I get the argument he doesn’t in the context of what I said

The entirety of how he improved in 2023 outside of Lebron getting to be more physical rather than quick was them starting to get him the ball on the move more, in the playoffs he couldn’t do anything on ball at all

Offensive rebounding:

I mean neither are threats in the way that someone should consider an off ball player, (using raw rebounding % makes no sense when that number has changed lol). But regardless of a 0-1% change either way, lebron technically is a bigger threat just based on size since off ball offensive rebounding is probably more about in mismatch situations on certain switches (beyond that, offensive rebounding is just… offensive rebounding lol)

Quicker decision maker on the catch:
Being a quick decision maker off the catch isn’t equivalent to possessions resetting when they pass it out at times but this really isn’t comparable to the other advantages lol

Anyways, a 38 year old lebron currently averaging less touches a game than Brandon Ingram with less time of possession than Austin reaves, he’s averaging 26-8-7 on 67%TS and noticeably taking it easy till the fourth, and is a +17.4 on offense which ranks poorly overall because they can’t function without him (which is a bit from bad luck to be clear)

A 37 year old bron in the 18 game stretch where AD was hurt and we desperately were clinging to the playoffs, with no spacing, averages 80.6 touches a game (14th) , an average time of possession of 6.3 minutes (15th) , an average time of 4.66 seconds per touch (52nd). Those numbers aren’t quite as low as they were in Miami (2014 only) where people say off ball bron was somewhat of a thing but they’re close ish, especially considering who the team had around them and the raw volume of their offensice production. If I recall lebron was like a +17-18 on offense and we were top 5 in the games he played on that end

Wouldn’t call it off ball at first, the caveat is he was averaging 33.5/8/8 on great effeciency (62.5TS), so those rankings are insane considering the production

So what we have here is a VASTLY declined Lebron put his foot on the gas for 20 games and pretty consistently was a top 3 offensive player in a league with Jokic, Luka, Curry, in that stretch before injuries got him, and currently brons averaging a career high percentage inside the arc and his average career numbers despite sleepwalking untill the fourth quarter because he definately wants that clutch player of the year award unless 500k is on the line or it’s a marquee/revenge game matchup (anyone that doubts this has not seen the Lakers, lebron is currently leading the league in ppg in the fourth other than tyus Jones whose played 1 fourth quarter, averaging 32-8-8 per 36 on 70.8TS)

Now shooting off of screens is genuinely important, but not as much from the midrange nowadays

Jordan is good in the context of an elite normal player off ball whereas Lebron has much more unique value off ball which is the main thing here

Jordan doesnt open things up schematically for you to be more creative and diverse with what you can do for your offense or to make your actions more effective, he is an incredibly smart and skilled player off ball

Lebron, especially the younger versions of him that would be a lob threat that still shoot well off the catch, if you play into that absolutely does those things.

As cutters their values aren’t even remotely close, an issue with synergy tracking is some post ups are considered cuts and stampede cuts aren’t classified as cuts iirc, but not only is bron historically effecient off cuts for awhile now, but it’s one of those things where it’s a unique value vs other guys. With most players off cuts it’s cuz they’re so fast and smart with it but if you can wall up it’s fine, with bron it’s because he’s fast and huge so if you wall up he’ll go overpower you and he knows how to not foul in those situations, hes unstoppable on the move and it shows in those situations. This should be a non starter, lebrons shooting 80-90% on cuts throughout his career, his cutting has unique value because of the combination of size, finishing, speed, and playmaking. An argument for Jordan here is as much of a non starter as saying he’s better in transition

The synergy stat sheet that’s someone made for Jordan awhile back is a bit broke because turnovers weren’t accounted for, but iirc over 142 games jordan was at 68% inside the arc on cuts with a little more than one a game

That is both impressive and lower than any season bron has had since and including 2010, especially in recent years where brons relied on it and focused on it more he’s at hovering at around 80%, on a bit more volume as well per game (My mistake, one year they had a similar percentage where bron was at 67%, but bron had more volume)

As an off rolling big, its REALLY hard to name a guy that has basically all the skills you need vs every coverage, spot up shooting, short roll passing, punishing mismatches, lob threat. Throw in offensive rebounding there too but that’s not usually one I think of to beat coverages as much as a bonus but its valid. There are ways to mitigate lacking in some of those skills but that gets tied into the ball handler and coaching.

Lebron checks at least 3/4 boxes super comfortably, and as a lob threat he’s 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40-45 inch vert, At least when he was younger, he’s a tad short for that but he’s an inch or two shorter than AD and dwight so he could still be one.

Jordan does not qualify as a lob threat in that situation and it doesn’t even make sense to care about him in that situation

A lot of Arguments for Jordan on here in the context of their off ball ability are focused on what occurred situationally in the situations they were in ans the systems they played in (which is valid), but the arguments that hes actually better just always end up being super vague and not actual descriptive which just sounds like waffling things out of thin air lol, throwing out super vague descriptions of what happens on the court m to make a point is barely step better than throwing out a narrative out there imo. In a concrete sense lebrons just so more of a potent tool off ball you can do more things with, feel that’s a given if you have schematic knowledge of the freedom a guy like bron gives you over a guy like Jordan

I see a better argument for Jordan on ball than off ball in terms of them as players, people don’t get how ridiculous younger versions of lebron would be as a rolling small ball big that’s still a huge lob threat, but obviously it goes without saying he’s more impactful on ball than off ball. There are less than 5 players in nba history that check all the boxes as an rolling big probably and he would be one of them. You don’t need to check all
The boxes but it gives you so much more versatility and reseliency against coverages, we saw the warriors pick and roll attack somewhat die this past postseason against a high drop since Dray isn’t a lob threat and switching hurt it at times too even at their best, Westbrook and AD had issues because neither of them could should and Westbrook wasn’t as fast as he used to be so things like north south ball screens and flipping the screen weren’t quite as dominant as they had been

Heej is my boy but he was talking about shooting as a main point and more about the role bron did play, but also the fact that lebron was actually a good catch and shoot three point shooter is just a thing that’s weird and most people don’t expect, and he clarified it was a role thing and bron could be better even now if he leans into it more

When you said and I quote "Jordan did end up doing more off ball throughout their careers" that ends the argument really. Jordan played way more as an off-ball player and has incredible results in those roles on both an individual and team level. Lebron doesn't.

Yeah crazy how arguments end when you ignore the arguments.
MyUniBroDavis wrote:The idea of Jordan being better off ball comes from not u understanding of how basketball scheme works and relying too much on the roles guys actually played rather than what they could,



A lot of Arguments for Jordan on here in the context of their off ball ability are focused on what occurred situationally in the situations they were in ans the systems they played in (which is valid), but the arguments that hes actually better just always end up being super vague and not actual descriptive which just sounds like waffling things out of thin air lol, throwing out super vague descriptions of what happens on the court m to make a point is barely step better than throwing out a narrative out there imo. In a concrete sense lebrons just so more of a potent tool off ball you can do more things with, feel that’s a given if you have schematic knowledge of the freedom a guy like bron gives you over a guy like Jordan

And the reason this is relevant at all is because so many Jordan people want him to be a perfect “in theory” player too. It is not enough to just say he made the most of his circumstances and accordingly won six titles in his era; no, for some reason most of you desperately want him to also be better in the abstract.

If you specifically need mid-range spacing — as the 1996-98 Bulls very much did — then Jordan absolutely has off-ball advantages. But that is not the only form of off-ball effect, and if people are capable of understanding the ways Anthony Davis and Amar’e Stoudemire are potent off-ball threats without a robust mid-range diet, and if people can see how Lebron continues to put up exemplary scoring production over a decade removed from his athletic peak even as he moves more off-ball every year, then it should not be pulling teeth to acknowledge that yeah, taking Lebron off-ball may not be the best use of him (because he is a top three on-ball playmaker ever), but that is still a role in which he thrives. It is not an issue of “processing speed” or whatever for one of the smartest basketball minds in the history of the sport, someone who recognises coverages at a glance and immediately knows what is supposed to happen; suggesting as much is just more empty grasping.

Like you ignored his entire point about what makes shooting important (and how much less important mid-range catch-and-shoots have become), and then whined about Lebron’s sample size on catch-and-shoots while gassing Jordan’s sample from the corner. NBA.com is a fine enough resource in absence of better ones, but it is not offering actual synergy data. Yet rather than engage with the real content of Unibro’s post, you instead saw fit to hyper-fixate on how “well NBA.com’s percentages are slightly less so nyeeeeh I just gave myself an excuse to ignore everything else.” Again we have a situation where it is not enough to acknowledge that Jordan did not focus on threes but also was not expected to nor needed to make that a real focus in his era; no, we also need to engage in this double-speak where we must theorise about Jordan the three-point shooter two paragraphs after throwing out Lebron’s off-ball value as being too theoretical. :blank:
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,474
And1: 7,083
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#31 » by falcolombardi » Fri Nov 24, 2023 9:58 pm

Djoker wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:
Djoker wrote:ORB% Averages

Regular Season
Jordan 4.7%
Lebron 3.6%

Playoffs
Jordan 4.8%
Lebron 4.4%


fwiw, I think you're overlooking how philosophy on crashing the glass (vs getting back on D) have changed, how increased 3pt usage (creating more long rebounds), etc have changed between their respective careers.

The league average OREB% [for a team] during Jordan's prime hovered somewhere around 31-33%.
In LeBron's prime it's been ~22-27%.

In light of that, the numbers you cite may not be suggesting what you think they do.


For sure. I'm well aware of the era differences but there are two sides to that coin.

For instance, the modern game has better spacing and bigs can't camp in the paint the way they used to before the 3-second rule anyway and yet hardly anyone takes that into account when discussing finishing in the paint. Context on this forum is only brought up when it helps Lebron's argument.


And jordan still was not a finishing outlier relative to his league the way lebron was....
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#32 » by MyUniBroDavis » Fri Dec 1, 2023 8:24 am

AEnigma wrote:
Djoker wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:Tagging me in a different thread while I’m suspended is hilarious lol.

You don’t understand Xs and Os sadly

What makes Lebron better off ball is you can conceptually do a lot more with him if you lean into that, Jordan did end up doing more off ball throughout their careers in the roles and offenses they played in, but that’s not the same thing as who was better off ball.

First of all, generally speaking the type of empty side clear out cuts (I forgot the name ngl) to create get overhyped as some sort of massive brained play, as well as cuts to draw help defenders, alot of those are built in or dependent on how a team functions. We saw in 2021 and 2022 the Lakers were stupid stagnant in their post offense, in terms of cutting off of both stunts and baseline hep, whereas in 2023 and 2024 they’ve id when to cut and when to flash or set pin in flares (digging vs baseline help) and you see the post data for AD suddenly looks alot better. Of those guys brons certainly the best cutter off of stunts to the point they can’t really do it off of him or they have to stunt and rotate high and give up the cut to someone else instead

And 45 stampede cut + lift people overhype the crap out of thinking it’s the pinnacle of bball intelligence lol, it’s really just how the offense decides to align for those opportunities and we’ve seen it with brin

There REALLY isn’t a comparison in terms of what they could do though

First of all, lebron is a better shooter off ball, because he can shoot the three. Yes, era matters there and it’s unfair to Jordan but in an absolute sense yeah this isn’t a close comparison, brons abour a 37-42% three point shooter throughout 2010-2023, he takes a lot of pullup jumpers in pick and roll and hits them at a respectable rate (relative to average players) that brings down his averages (35% off the dribble would be about 40% off the shoot probably)

Lebrons catch and shoot three point data per Synergy:

2010: 34.7%
2011: 39.3%
2012 34.7%
2013 42.1%
2014 42.5%
2015: 42%
2016 36.0%
2017 40%
2018 41.4%
2019 35.0%
2020 40.6%
2021 37.6%
2022 37.1%
2023 31.8%
2024 45.9%

In any case spot up shooting is much more not being bad than being an outlier unless ur a crazy outlier which neither of them are, I agree it’s unfair to say jordan didn’t shoot well from three therefore he’s worse because of era but arguing the other way around because bron doesn’t shoot catch and shoot midrange jump shots off of screens which has been largely phased out is equally unfair and it’s also a less valuable skill period if ur talking about midrange shots

As for being a lob threat:

Jordan was around 6ft4-6ft5 barefoot and his vertical from what I recall was measured at 45 inches in some UNC paper off an unlimited run ip and 41 inches with the ball. If you’ve ever played basketball you know that it’s not 1 to 1 with vertical and height, ur never gonna see a guard be a roll man lob threat consistently

That’s not a lob threat in a way that functionally matters at all in the context I was describing, which was as a roller. Lebron barely qualifies being 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40+ inch vert as well, and I’m taking about pre Lakers for sure (maybe even only up to Miami but not sure)

It’s mitigated a tad by the fact that lebron on the move with the ball is basically unstoppable, but that doesn’t mitigate it all that much in the context of why you want a lob threat in pick and roll vs aggressive coverages

There’s a much stronger argument that neither of them are in that context than Jordan being one as well. Jordan isn’t tall enough to be one, bron probably barely meets the mark but I get the argument he doesn’t in the context of what I said

The entirety of how he improved in 2023 outside of Lebron getting to be more physical rather than quick was them starting to get him the ball on the move more, in the playoffs he couldn’t do anything on ball at all

Offensive rebounding:

I mean neither are threats in the way that someone should consider an off ball player, (using raw rebounding % makes no sense when that number has changed lol). But regardless of a 0-1% change either way, lebron technically is a bigger threat just based on size since off ball offensive rebounding is probably more about in mismatch situations on certain switches (beyond that, offensive rebounding is just… offensive rebounding lol)

Quicker decision maker on the catch:
Being a quick decision maker off the catch isn’t equivalent to possessions resetting when they pass it out at times but this really isn’t comparable to the other advantages lol

Anyways, a 38 year old lebron currently averaging less touches a game than Brandon Ingram with less time of possession than Austin reaves, he’s averaging 26-8-7 on 67%TS and noticeably taking it easy till the fourth, and is a +17.4 on offense which ranks poorly overall because they can’t function without him (which is a bit from bad luck to be clear)

A 37 year old bron in the 18 game stretch where AD was hurt and we desperately were clinging to the playoffs, with no spacing, averages 80.6 touches a game (14th) , an average time of possession of 6.3 minutes (15th) , an average time of 4.66 seconds per touch (52nd). Those numbers aren’t quite as low as they were in Miami (2014 only) where people say off ball bron was somewhat of a thing but they’re close ish, especially considering who the team had around them and the raw volume of their offensice production. If I recall lebron was like a +17-18 on offense and we were top 5 in the games he played on that end

Wouldn’t call it off ball at first, the caveat is he was averaging 33.5/8/8 on great effeciency (62.5TS), so those rankings are insane considering the production

So what we have here is a VASTLY declined Lebron put his foot on the gas for 20 games and pretty consistently was a top 3 offensive player in a league with Jokic, Luka, Curry, in that stretch before injuries got him, and currently brons averaging a career high percentage inside the arc and his average career numbers despite sleepwalking untill the fourth quarter because he definately wants that clutch player of the year award unless 500k is on the line or it’s a marquee/revenge game matchup (anyone that doubts this has not seen the Lakers, lebron is currently leading the league in ppg in the fourth other than tyus Jones whose played 1 fourth quarter, averaging 32-8-8 per 36 on 70.8TS)

Now shooting off of screens is genuinely important, but not as much from the midrange nowadays

Jordan is good in the context of an elite normal player off ball whereas Lebron has much more unique value off ball which is the main thing here

Jordan doesnt open things up schematically for you to be more creative and diverse with what you can do for your offense or to make your actions more effective, he is an incredibly smart and skilled player off ball

Lebron, especially the younger versions of him that would be a lob threat that still shoot well off the catch, if you play into that absolutely does those things.

As cutters their values aren’t even remotely close, an issue with synergy tracking is some post ups are considered cuts and stampede cuts aren’t classified as cuts iirc, but not only is bron historically effecient off cuts for awhile now, but it’s one of those things where it’s a unique value vs other guys. With most players off cuts it’s cuz they’re so fast and smart with it but if you can wall up it’s fine, with bron it’s because he’s fast and huge so if you wall up he’ll go overpower you and he knows how to not foul in those situations, hes unstoppable on the move and it shows in those situations. This should be a non starter, lebrons shooting 80-90% on cuts throughout his career, his cutting has unique value because of the combination of size, finishing, speed, and playmaking. An argument for Jordan here is as much of a non starter as saying he’s better in transition

The synergy stat sheet that’s someone made for Jordan awhile back is a bit broke because turnovers weren’t accounted for, but iirc over 142 games jordan was at 68% inside the arc on cuts with a little more than one a game

That is both impressive and lower than any season bron has had since and including 2010, especially in recent years where brons relied on it and focused on it more he’s at hovering at around 80%, on a bit more volume as well per game (My mistake, one year they had a similar percentage where bron was at 67%, but bron had more volume)

As an off rolling big, its REALLY hard to name a guy that has basically all the skills you need vs every coverage, spot up shooting, short roll passing, punishing mismatches, lob threat. Throw in offensive rebounding there too but that’s not usually one I think of to beat coverages as much as a bonus but its valid. There are ways to mitigate lacking in some of those skills but that gets tied into the ball handler and coaching.

Lebron checks at least 3/4 boxes super comfortably, and as a lob threat he’s 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40-45 inch vert, At least when he was younger, he’s a tad short for that but he’s an inch or two shorter than AD and dwight so he could still be one.

Jordan does not qualify as a lob threat in that situation and it doesn’t even make sense to care about him in that situation

A lot of Arguments for Jordan on here in the context of their off ball ability are focused on what occurred situationally in the situations they were in ans the systems they played in (which is valid), but the arguments that hes actually better just always end up being super vague and not actual descriptive which just sounds like waffling things out of thin air lol, throwing out super vague descriptions of what happens on the court m to make a point is barely step better than throwing out a narrative out there imo. In a concrete sense lebrons just so more of a potent tool off ball you can do more things with, feel that’s a given if you have schematic knowledge of the freedom a guy like bron gives you over a guy like Jordan

I see a better argument for Jordan on ball than off ball in terms of them as players, people don’t get how ridiculous younger versions of lebron would be as a rolling small ball big that’s still a huge lob threat, but obviously it goes without saying he’s more impactful on ball than off ball. There are less than 5 players in nba history that check all the boxes as an rolling big probably and he would be one of them. You don’t need to check all
The boxes but it gives you so much more versatility and reseliency against coverages, we saw the warriors pick and roll attack somewhat die this past postseason against a high drop since Dray isn’t a lob threat and switching hurt it at times too even at their best, Westbrook and AD had issues because neither of them could should and Westbrook wasn’t as fast as he used to be so things like north south ball screens and flipping the screen weren’t quite as dominant as they had been

Heej is my boy but he was talking about shooting as a main point and more about the role bron did play, but also the fact that lebron was actually a good catch and shoot three point shooter is just a thing that’s weird and most people don’t expect, and he clarified it was a role thing and bron could be better even now if he leans into it more

When you said and I quote "Jordan did end up doing more off ball throughout their careers" that ends the argument really. Jordan played way more as an off-ball player and has incredible results in those roles on both an individual and team level. Lebron doesn't.

Yeah crazy how arguments end when you ignore the arguments.
MyUniBroDavis wrote:The idea of Jordan being better off ball comes from not u understanding of how basketball scheme works and relying too much on the roles guys actually played rather than what they could,



A lot of Arguments for Jordan on here in the context of their off ball ability are focused on what occurred situationally in the situations they were in ans the systems they played in (which is valid), but the arguments that hes actually better just always end up being super vague and not actual descriptive which just sounds like waffling things out of thin air lol, throwing out super vague descriptions of what happens on the court m to make a point is barely step better than throwing out a narrative out there imo. In a concrete sense lebrons just so more of a potent tool off ball you can do more things with, feel that’s a given if you have schematic knowledge of the freedom a guy like bron gives you over a guy like Jordan

And the reason this is relevant at all is because so many Jordan people want him to be a perfect “in theory” player too. It is not enough to just say he made the most of his circumstances and accordingly won six titles in his era, for some reason most of you desperately want him to also be better in the abstract.

If you specifically need mid-range spacing — as the 1996-98 Bulls very much did — then Jordan absolutely has off-ball advantages. But that is not the only form of off-ball effect, and if people are capable of understanding the ways Anthony Davis and Amar’e Stoudemire are potent off-ball threats without a robust mid-range diet, and if people can see how Lebron continues to put up exemplary scoring production over a decade removed from his athletic peak even as he moves more off-ball every year, then it should not be pulling teeth to acknowledge that yeah, taking Lebron off-ball may not be the best use of him (because he is a top three on-ball playmaker ever), but that is still a role in which he thrives. It is not an issue of “processing speed” or whatever for one of the smartest basketball minds in the history of the sport, someone who recognises coverages at a glance and immediately knows what is supposed to happen; suggesting as much is just more empty grasping.

Like you ignored his entire point about what makes shooting important (and how much less important mid-range catch-and-shoots have become), and then whined about Lebron’s sample size on catch-and-shoots while gassing Jordan’s sample from the corner. NBA.com is a fine enough resource in absence of better ones, but it is not offering actual synergy data. Yet rather than engage with the real content of Unibro’s post, you instead saw fit to hyper-fixate on how “well NBA.com’s percentages are slightly less so nyeeeeh I just gave myself an excuse to ignore everything else.” Again we have a situation where it is not enough to acknowledge that Jordan did not focus on threes but also was not expected to nor needed to make that a real focus in his era; no, we also need to engage in this double-speak where we must theorise about Jordan the three-point shooter two paragraphs after throwing out Lebron’s off-ball value as being too theoretical. :blank:


mah man
ShaqAttac
Rookie
Posts: 1,189
And1: 370
Joined: Oct 18, 2022

Re: who better offball: mj or bron? 

Post#33 » by ShaqAttac » Sun Dec 3, 2023 4:18 pm

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
AEnigma wrote:
Djoker wrote:When you said and I quote "Jordan did end up doing more off ball throughout their careers" that ends the argument really. Jordan played way more as an off-ball player and has incredible results in those roles on both an individual and team level. Lebron doesn't.

Yeah crazy how arguments end when you ignore the arguments.
MyUniBroDavis wrote:The idea of Jordan being better off ball comes from not u understanding of how basketball scheme works and relying too much on the roles guys actually played rather than what they could,



A lot of Arguments for Jordan on here in the context of their off ball ability are focused on what occurred situationally in the situations they were in ans the systems they played in (which is valid), but the arguments that hes actually better just always end up being super vague and not actual descriptive which just sounds like waffling things out of thin air lol, throwing out super vague descriptions of what happens on the court m to make a point is barely step better than throwing out a narrative out there imo. In a concrete sense lebrons just so more of a potent tool off ball you can do more things with, feel that’s a given if you have schematic knowledge of the freedom a guy like bron gives you over a guy like Jordan

And the reason this is relevant at all is because so many Jordan people want him to be a perfect “in theory” player too. It is not enough to just say he made the most of his circumstances and accordingly won six titles in his era, for some reason most of you desperately want him to also be better in the abstract.

If you specifically need mid-range spacing — as the 1996-98 Bulls very much did — then Jordan absolutely has off-ball advantages. But that is not the only form of off-ball effect, and if people are capable of understanding the ways Anthony Davis and Amar’e Stoudemire are potent off-ball threats without a robust mid-range diet, and if people can see how Lebron continues to put up exemplary scoring production over a decade removed from his athletic peak even as he moves more off-ball every year, then it should not be pulling teeth to acknowledge that yeah, taking Lebron off-ball may not be the best use of him (because he is a top three on-ball playmaker ever), but that is still a role in which he thrives. It is not an issue of “processing speed” or whatever for one of the smartest basketball minds in the history of the sport, someone who recognises coverages at a glance and immediately knows what is supposed to happen; suggesting as much is just more empty grasping.

Like you ignored his entire point about what makes shooting important (and how much less important mid-range catch-and-shoots have become), and then whined about Lebron’s sample size on catch-and-shoots while gassing Jordan’s sample from the corner. NBA.com is a fine enough resource in absence of better ones, but it is not offering actual synergy data. Yet rather than engage with the real content of Unibro’s post, you instead saw fit to hyper-fixate on how “well NBA.com’s percentages are slightly less so nyeeeeh I just gave myself an excuse to ignore everything else.” Again we have a situation where it is not enough to acknowledge that Jordan did not focus on threes but also was not expected to nor needed to make that a real focus in his era; no, we also need to engage in this double-speak where we must theorise about Jordan the three-point shooter two paragraphs after throwing out Lebron’s off-ball value as being too theoretical. :blank:


mah man

pnr went crazy

Return to Player Comparisons