Deeeez Knicks wrote:Game ball to Quick . He changed the game
?s=61&t=oWAQ5JzX5AK-44v89eypvw
Team IQ winning!
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Deeeez Knicks wrote:Game ball to Quick . He changed the game
?s=61&t=oWAQ5JzX5AK-44v89eypvw
jvsimonetti0514 wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Isn’t Jerry West in the clippers front office? Grimes and Randle since he is super high on Grimes…
Then start IQ and give Duece the extra guard bench minutse
Brunson/Duece
IQ/DD
PG13/Hart
RJ/Hart
Mitch/ihart
prosper!
This feels like same problem the clippers currently have, where there’s too many cooks with one ball. Probably need to replace RJ with a stretch 4 that can rebound.
Deeeez Knicks wrote:Game ball to Quick . He changed the game
?s=61&t=oWAQ5JzX5AK-44v89eypvw
Iron Mantis wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Game ball to Quick . He changed the game
?s=61&t=oWAQ5JzX5AK-44v89eypvw
Quickley has extraordinary spirit. He refused to let go of the rope, and fired up his teammates.
Knicks could use that in the starting lineup.
mpharris36 wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Game ball to Quick . He changed the game
?s=61&t=oWAQ5JzX5AK-44v89eypvw
Quickley has extraordinary spirit. He refused to let go of the rope, and fired up his teammates.
Knicks could use that in the starting lineup.
I still don't love the idea of moving IQ to the starting lineup. He will get infected by the slow pace and ISO ball...let him run free with the bench.
Bob Ross wrote:Is there any reason to care about this tournament? They're really hammering it hard on ESPN but I really dont care at all
Iron Mantis wrote:robillionaire wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:The Knicks definitely won that game.
They took it by force in the 4th with very tough defense, rebounds, good offense and timely buckets.
You just don't like that they did it all without Randle...
IQ is my other favorite player and he scored 14 points in the last 15 minutes was +22 basically dragged us there so I’d be more than happy to post a bunch of gifs about him and go on and on but I’m secure enough in his talent
Even with that I still think we stole it, the heat had a lot of uncharacteristic open misses
We were down 9 when Randle came back in and he had 3 rebs in the last 1:13 and we still won the game so it’s not like he prevented it, he was on the court for the final push/11 point swing
No one cares about how you feel about IQ. You make it quite clear Randle is your guy.
At any rate, When you play hard-nosed defense, you can disrupt the opponents' rhythm and make them feel uncomfortable and they rush or aim shots...they "feel you" on defense .
The Knicks were also getting buckets, the crowd responded, and the Heat felt the pressure and played tight: what the Knicks did caused the Heat to unravel.
Randle grabbed a few boards, good. They certainly refused to pass it to him thank goodness. You noticed when he got a board he got rid of the ball like a child afraid of getting a whooping. He should do that more often-----move the ball---- and stop ball hogging.
mpharris36 wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Game ball to Quick . He changed the game
?s=61&t=oWAQ5JzX5AK-44v89eypvw
Quickley has extraordinary spirit. He refused to let go of the rope, and fired up his teammates.
Knicks could use that in the starting lineup.
I still don't love the idea of moving IQ to the starting lineup. He will get infected by the slow pace and ISO ball...let him run free with the bench.
mpharris36 wrote:Assists generally aren't a great barometer for moving the ball. You can still ball hog with a lot of assists especially if no one else is touching the ball and you also nearly have a 1:1 assist to turnover ration which isn't good at all.
Ball hogging might not be the best term but the team def plays more stagnant and at a slow pace with Randle on the court.
robillionaire wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Assists generally aren't a great barometer for moving the ball. You can still ball hog with a lot of assists especially if no one else is touching the ball and you also nearly have a 1:1 assist to turnover ration which isn't good at all.
Ball hogging might not be the best term but the team def plays more stagnant and at a slow pace with Randle on the court.
A lot of the turnovers were in fact him trying to move the ball; he had a few bad passes that usually aren’t off the mark that bad credit Spo and the heat defense for that I guess. They’ll need to adjust for that next time we meet
It’s not a surprise we play at a faster pace when energy guys like IQ Donte Hart and iHart come in
Im Coming Home wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:robillionaire wrote:Upon reflection I’ll say to me it felt more like the heat lost the game more than we won it, just in terms of how terrible they played and missing everything at the end. Not to take anything away from the Knicks admirable effort but if the heat even make one more shot we still lose. So basically we stole one but I’ll take the W every day
The Knicks definitely won that game.
They took it by force in the 4th with very tough defense, rebounds, good offense and timely buckets.
You just don't like that they did it all without Randle...
100% correct![]()
![]()
mpharris36 wrote:robillionaire wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Assists generally aren't a great barometer for moving the ball. You can still ball hog with a lot of assists especially if no one else is touching the ball and you also nearly have a 1:1 assist to turnover ration which isn't good at all.
Ball hogging might not be the best term but the team def plays more stagnant and at a slow pace with Randle on the court.
A lot of the turnovers were in fact him trying to move the ball; he had a few bad passes that usually aren’t off the mark that bad credit Spo and the heat defense for that I guess. They’ll need to adjust for that next time we meet
It’s not a surprise we play at a faster pace when energy guys like IQ Donte Hart and iHart come in
Honestly randle is what he is at this point. I don't think there is much adjusting. Spo and teams in the playoffs attack Randle one he makes that first dribble and Randle just naturally doesn't know how to slow the game down and then force bad passes.
Also when it's just a randle ISO even when he is forcing help I feel we get way to stagnant. It's just 4 guys watching randle. When with Brunson/IQ/RJ there is at least some player movement because a screen is being set ect...
robillionaire wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:Quickley has extraordinary spirit. He refused to let go of the rope, and fired up his teammates.
Knicks could use that in the starting lineup.
I still don't love the idea of moving IQ to the starting lineup. He will get infected by the slow pace and ISO ball...let him run free with the bench.
We can kinda use him like Derrick Rose 2021. Didn’t start but still a big factor and closed games
Iron Mantis wrote:One of the pieces in the package you get for Randle could possibly be a 3&D PF.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
mpharris36 wrote:robillionaire wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
I still don't love the idea of moving IQ to the starting lineup. He will get infected by the slow pace and ISO ball...let him run free with the bench.
We can kinda use him like Derrick Rose 2021. Didn’t start but still a big factor and closed games
Correct unless one of the main offensive guys are hurt or even traded it probably makes sense to keep IQ coming off the bench. I think we would be wasting IQs skillet if he was being used as just a flor spacer the way Grimes and DD are being used. IQ is needed for more shot creation which he can get with the 2nd unit.
robillionaire wrote:mpharris36 wrote:robillionaire wrote:
A lot of the turnovers were in fact him trying to move the ball; he had a few bad passes that usually aren’t off the mark that bad credit Spo and the heat defense for that I guess. They’ll need to adjust for that next time we meet
It’s not a surprise we play at a faster pace when energy guys like IQ Donte Hart and iHart come in
Honestly randle is what he is at this point. I don't think there is much adjusting. Spo and teams in the playoffs attack Randle one he makes that first dribble and Randle just naturally doesn't know how to slow the game down and then force bad passes.
Also when it's just a randle ISO even when he is forcing help I feel we get way to stagnant. It's just 4 guys watching randle. When with Brunson/IQ/RJ there is at least some player movement because a screen is being set ect...
I think IQ being in the game vs not being in the game is the main difference with pace because he’s always in constant attack mode and doesn’t care to hoist early in the shot clock either. Starters try to run more set plays. Could be wrong though. Didn’t the starters have one of the better offensive ratings in the league or something like that
robillionaire wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:robillionaire wrote:
IQ is my other favorite player and he scored 14 points in the last 15 minutes was +22 basically dragged us there so I’d be more than happy to post a bunch of gifs about him and go on and on but I’m secure enough in his talent
Even with that I still think we stole it, the heat had a lot of uncharacteristic open misses
We were down 9 when Randle came back in and he had 3 rebs in the last 1:13 and we still won the game so it’s not like he prevented it, he was on the court for the final push/11 point swing
No one cares about how you feel about IQ. You make it quite clear Randle is your guy.
At any rate, When you play hard-nosed defense, you can disrupt the opponents' rhythm and make them feel uncomfortable and they rush or aim shots...they "feel you" on defense .
The Knicks were also getting buckets, the crowd responded, and the Heat felt the pressure and played tight: what the Knicks did caused the Heat to unravel.
Randle grabbed a few boards, good. They certainly refused to pass it to him thank goodness. You noticed when he got a board he got rid of the ball like a child afraid of getting a whooping. He should do that more often-----move the ball---- and stop ball hogging.
He led the team in assists once again as he has all season long and deliberately as you admit did not ball hog but yeah; ball hogging. Sure.
Nobody “refused to pass him the ball” another false narrative trying to frame it as the team hates him when they repeatedly say otherwise but if they did, that’s actual ball hogging
mpharris36 wrote:robillionaire wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
Honestly randle is what he is at this point. I don't think there is much adjusting. Spo and teams in the playoffs attack Randle one he makes that first dribble and Randle just naturally doesn't know how to slow the game down and then force bad passes.
Also when it's just a randle ISO even when he is forcing help I feel we get way to stagnant. It's just 4 guys watching randle. When with Brunson/IQ/RJ there is at least some player movement because a screen is being set ect...
I think IQ being in the game vs not being in the game is the main difference with pace because he’s always in constant attack mode and doesn’t care to hoist early in the shot clock either. Starters try to run more set plays. Could be wrong though. Didn’t the starters have one of the better offensive ratings in the league or something like that
Our starters have good offensive rating mainly due to Brunson and then Mitch's offensive rebounding ability. We aren't some elite shooting/passing team. We are a good offense because generally we don't turn the ball over and we take a high volume of shots since we rebound a high volume of our misses.
I don't think it's just IQ that picks up the pace. Just watch when Randle gets a rebound he walks it up the court. There is a big difference when someone like Hart or IQ or even RJ get the rebound...the pace is increased off a miss.