bape_lovers wrote:Dude, did Potel played all 48 mins? Did potel stop the guards from penetrating? Do you look at box score, OH THE CENTRE DIDNT DO ****
ConSarnit wrote:Shakril wrote:
Ah here is the baseless hate.
BTW:
In the Play-IN, he did his part.
It was not on him that we lost, but on all the other guys who choked harder than a Loose woman on gradey D.
We were 18/36 from the FT Line. Thats all you gonna know about the choking effort that game.
He did? CHI shot 20/26 (77%) in the restricted area in that game. They scored 52 points in the paint.
We got absolutely killed at the rim. Isn’t it Poeltl’s job to fix that? I don’t think he’s the main reason he lost but a big reason we brought him in was for rim protection and he definitely didn’t provide that in the play-in game.
He was brought in, in large part, to protect the rim. He definitely wasn’t brought in to score (scored 7 pts in the playin game and turned the ball over 5 times). Poeltl has 2 main jobs: roll to the rim and protect the rim. He didn’t do the second part. He’s not the only one to blame but when you’re a C a large part of your job is to clean up messes. That’s part of the job description, it’s why he’s making $20m a year. He was not good in that game. It’s the same as Gary going 0-5 from 3. When you have very specific roles on the team and you don’t come through you didn’t have a good game.
Our rim protection was terrible that game and that’s Poeltl’s job. If he can’t clean up the messes or he was being stretched out by Vuc and couldn’t recover that’s on Poeltl.
Again, not all of this is on Poeltl but he has very specific duties in which he failed. No one could have watched that game and thought we did a good job protecting the rim.
Consider these stats for Poeltl (a defensive minded C) and tell me it was a “good game”
7/8/3 with 5 turnovers in 37min
Opposing team shoots 20/26 at the rim.
How could anyone be satisfied with that performance?