wegotthabeet wrote:Scase wrote:wegotthabeet wrote:
yeah i just completely disagree.
it's obvious that retaining OG has now taken precedence over retaining Siakam. maybe you're just not paying attention.
I think you and I are arguing two different points.
I'm not saying they are, or should prioritize re-signing Siakam, I fully agree that OG should absolutely take priority.
I'm saying that from the player perspective, it's different. Siakam's value has tanked, and he knows that his value to this team, is greater than other teams, so he would be more likely to re-sign if we matched an offer.
OG on the other hand, he is wildly coveted, and the Sixers, an actual legit threat to make it out of the east this year, can throw max money at him. From a players perspective, when you can get the same money but be on a WAY better team with a chance at a ring, it's not as simple as "the Raps matched, guess I'll stay".
sure, but with a reduced role on offence? under a coach that previously kept you as 4th/5th option? yeah i don't see it, but we'll see.
all things being equal you might have a point, but players want the touches on offence because it equates higher future earning potential. it's pretty rare for 26 year old players to ring chase.
For sure, I don't think you're way off base or anything, what you are saying makes sense, I just think that his numbers on that team wouldn't be what people would want to pay him for.
If he's putting up DPOY level defence on a team that is a legit contender, and still shooting 38-40% from 3, trust, he's getting paid a max no matter what.






















