NotAKnicksFan wrote:Nets gonna win so now what
We’ll win the group, that’s it.
Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob
NotAKnicksFan wrote:Nets gonna win so now what

Shak_Celts wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:I'd ask you the same thing because he had 1 poor 2-3 minute stretch like that takes away from his entire game where he was a big part of winning by this amount in the first place. yall wait for any reason to jump on him when the real problem is IST rules.
Comment was about the last few plays.
It's a **** GT. JB has my VC vote.
a GAME thread, so you're saying I can talk about the whole game? only the part "where jb cost the young guys 500k?"

zoyathedestroya wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Comment was about the last few plays.
we know and still the problem is the rules not that jb had a poor stretch, that or are we taking a look at every poor stretch in this game?
The rules are the rules. The goal is still to get to 23, right? His poor stretch would've prevented that to happen.
I also comment on JT turnovers or poor defense from Jrue entire game. Y'all just too sensitive when it comes to precious JB.

Shak_Celts wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:I'd ask you the same thing because he had 1 poor 2-3 minute stretch like that takes away from his entire game where he was a big part of winning by this amount in the first place. yall wait for any reason to jump on him when the real problem is IST rules.
Comment was about the last few plays.
we know and still the problem is the rules not that jb had a poor stretch, that or are we taking a look at every poor stretch in this game?
Shak_Celts wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:we know and still the problem is the rules not that jb had a poor stretch, that or are we taking a look at every poor stretch in this game?
The rules are the rules. The goal is still to get to 23, right? His poor stretch would've prevented that to happen.
I also comment on JT turnovers or poor defense from Jrue entire game. Y'all just too sensitive when it comes to precious JB.
that or other poor stretches cost them too. because you can mention jt's turnovers but when did that stretch with jb out of the game not cost them 500k? no, we aren't too sensitive, yall are sensitive because JB got paid.



zoyathedestroya wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:The rules are the rules. The goal is still to get to 23, right? His poor stretch would've prevented that to happen.
I also comment on JT turnovers or poor defense from Jrue entire game. Y'all just too sensitive when it comes to precious JB.
that or other poor stretches cost them too. because you can mention jt's turnovers but when did that stretch with jb out of the game not cost them 500k? no, we aren't too sensitive, yall are sensitive because JB got paid.
JT's turnovers came much earlier when we weren't even sure yet we'd get the 23. So not many cared then. I sure didn't. JB's poor play was near the end of the game.
