Again this is so simple but way too complicated for you since you are a child. Like I've said b4 I've agreed with you teams will spend money past the 2nd apron but those teams are contenders. You keep banging the drum that all this money is being spent and the CBA isn't scary, but few are going into the aprons. Now you are pulling back on what you've said by stating cheaper teams won't spend. Good job of moving the goalposts41Dirk41 wrote:ejs78 wrote:How am I to bring up evidence to my thesis when the penalties haven't kicked in yet and the first year of this was the softest of the new CBA. Good job on naming all those 2nd apron teams like the Spurs.41Dirk41 wrote:
Exactly the same number of teams as there would have been without this "new scary CBA", teams will spend more money independently from that.
Nothing significant will change just like i told you.
I'm waiting too see how teams will blow out roster for money, it's you who talks about change so it's up to you to bring evidence to support your thesis but for now we're just hot air.
The first FA was even more expensive than the previous ones so the clues aren't exactly proving you right... sorry. But i have time, i'm sure you can argument better next year. O maybe not
Little disappointed you only used one emoji in that last post.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app
The teams should start preparing to that "new scary CBA" if they were really scared... But i'm sorry it didn't happen
During last FA we have seen crazy contracts just like past years.
Nothing it's changed and nothing will change, put that in your head, contenders will pay taxes and lottery teams will be cheaper. Just like past years.
If your theory is based on the fact that Spurs, Pistons etc etc will not get past the 2nd apron it's not so smart honestly
But your ego is big and you must feed him so go on... Don't worry.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app