Image ImageImage Image

Bears 2023 thread V

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,778
And1: 9,251
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1241 » by Chi town » Thu Nov 30, 2023 5:31 am

https://youtu.be/W9ImrW4QCMQ?si=5O7ZjBR8fTNe2aXG

At 6’4 I’m seeing Daniels as a freak in his ability to run and toss it. He is decisive, gets through his read quick, calm in the pocket, and anticipates. He does get a lot of time to throw and has great WRs. Kelley is a good offensive coach too. Maybe he has developed him.

I’m not into Maye at all.
CW has all the talent but all the signals are bad vibes.

Mocks have Daniels 5-7 now.
biggestbullsfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,789
And1: 2,298
Joined: Apr 28, 2004
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1242 » by biggestbullsfan » Thu Nov 30, 2023 5:33 am

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Kurt Heimlich
Head Coach
Posts: 6,933
And1: 5,564
Joined: Jun 26, 2001

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1243 » by Kurt Heimlich » Thu Nov 30, 2023 5:40 am

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


Whats up with Diana's voice here? Sounds like she's doing the Theranos Elizabeth Holmes hilariously fake deep voice thing? Audio probably just slowed in the clip for copywright purposes I suppose. Harbaugh is a mad lad but I'd definitely take Jim over Flus especially if we're rebooting the OC/QB which seems like an obvious need to me at least.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,778
And1: 9,251
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1244 » by Chi town » Thu Nov 30, 2023 6:03 am

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


Posted a couple pages back… Gabriel said no one in the nfl will touch Harbaugh. He’s delusional and FO’s think the game has passed him. Harbaugh thought he had MIN job locked up and he wasn’t even in consideration.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,695
And1: 915
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1245 » by Almost Retired » Thu Nov 30, 2023 12:54 pm

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl-head-coaching-candidates-2024/

If not Harbaugh then we should go after Ben Johnson. Or Steve Spagnola if he'd bring in a top OC. Or Eric Bieniemy if he'd bring in a top DC.
User avatar
molepharmer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,800
And1: 1,283
Joined: Feb 27, 2002

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1246 » by molepharmer » Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:31 pm

I'd be surprised if Flus isn't the coach next year. Right now, in my mind, thinking 80%-ish likely he returns.
TGibson (1/28/17); "..."a 4 or 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 for drama"...What's the worst? "...yelling matches with Thibs, everybody is just going crazy and I'm just sitting there...like, 'Don't call my name please..."
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,506
And1: 1,396
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1247 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:31 pm

fleet wrote:Jeff Hughes reports Fields skepticism in the Building.

(3) Is the quarterback’s tenure in Chicago officially over? If the season ended Monday night, that answer would surely be yes; the lack of week-to-week consistency would not prohibit the Bears from using one of their high draft picks on a quarterback prospect. Fields has ability; he is a brilliant runner capable of making dynamic plays off-script. But if you listened to Troy Aikman on Monday night, you heard an analyst incredibly skeptical of Fields’ ability to play the position from the pocket. Folks in the building share that skepticism


https://www.dabearsblog.com/2023/five-questions-with-five-games-remaining


I’m skeptical, I’d say most fans who are rooting for him whether they admit it or not are skeptical. He still has a lot to prove and not much time to do it. I read or heard somewhere though that Troy Aikman is leaning towards the idea the bears should be sticking with Fields and drafting more talent around him.

I say lets gather more info for the remainder of the season then we can just say f it lets just….
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 21,716
And1: 4,011
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1248 » by panthermark » Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:14 pm

Very interesting video.
That sight adjustment part reminds me of why I was so mad at Kmet earlier against Denver, but he is playing better now.
Hey, isn't there a former Bears coach in KC now? :)
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,447
And1: 9,366
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1249 » by Jcool0 » Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:42 pm

Chi town wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


Posted a couple pages back… Gabriel said no one in the nfl will touch Harbaugh. He’s delusional and FO’s think the game has passed him. Harbaugh thought he had MIN job locked up and he wasn’t even in consideration.


FWIW Gabriel is not a credible person. His hot takes are laughable, his "sources" are made up and the game has 100% passed him by. Only thing somewhat amusing is he will freak out on anyone who even remotely questions him.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,447
And1: 9,366
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1250 » by Jcool0 » Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:44 pm

Almost Retired wrote:https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl-head-coaching-candidates-2024/

If not Harbaugh then we should go after Ben Johnson. Or Steve Spagnola if he'd bring in a top OC. Or Eric Bieniemy if he'd bring in a top DC.


Um you do know Spagnola went 11-41 as a head coach. There wouldn't be a more worse hire then him.
HearshotKDS
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,967
And1: 1,102
Joined: Apr 17, 2010
 

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1251 » by HearshotKDS » Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:54 pm

kyrv wrote:
panthermark wrote:I think what might be best for this offense is a mix of short passes, moving pockets and vertical strikes, with the occasional mid range pass thrown in to mix it up. Combine that with the strong run game and OCCASIONAL QB keeper.

Screens, slants, hooks, quick outs, AND deep strikes. Keep moving the pocket. I think some of those screens need to go vertical. Maybe a fake to one side, while the opposite side streaks. Last weeks play calling was better, we just needed a few more slants one or two more vertical routes (like the one Scott could not reel in).

You want to protect Fields and the O-line = Short passing game and moving pockets....plus strong run game.
The short game/run leads to 8 or 9 in the box and tight coverage. That is what the deep passes are for..... to punish that behavior.
The short/long combo game allows for the occasional mid-range game since that is not the strength of this team unless it is wide open (which is why it is occasional, and should always have a check down RB out of the backfield. LB's are close due to the run game/short pass...but it is still a 2 high look. It opens space between LB's and safeties).

Basically, mix up the Detroit game plan with some of the Washington game plan (and add more slants, hooks, and quick outs instead of depending on 3 WR screens or 4 RB screens in a row).


There was a previous regime, can't recall who, but they were in love with the seldom working wide receiver screen. This past game brought back the nightmare.

I also thought throwing downfield was one of Fields' plusses. But as you said, at least find out.

Trestman was the one who loved WR screens. Nagy was in love with the 3-4 hitch routes per pass play.
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,841
And1: 4,078
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1252 » by jnrjr79 » Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:56 pm

molepharmer wrote:I'd be surprised if Flus isn't the coach next year. Right now, in my mind, thinking 80%-ish likely he returns.


If the season ended today, I think he's gone. But if the Bears play well down the stretch, let's say 2-3 wins including a season-ending win over the Packers, then I could see them bringing back Flus and bringing in a new OC.

Flus's track record is obviously terrible over the course of his tenure, but the couple things I will say for him are 1) this team still plays really hard, and 2) Flus really has the defense cooking. Re: #2, it looks so much better in the past few weeks, and Flus is playing a more aggressive style than was used early on in the season.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,432
And1: 6,731
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1253 » by Dresden » Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:15 pm

Chi town wrote:
fleet wrote:Jeff Hughes reports Fields skepticism in the Building.

(3) Is the quarterback’s tenure in Chicago officially over? If the season ended Monday night, that answer would surely be yes; the lack of week-to-week consistency would not prohibit the Bears from using one of their high draft picks on a quarterback prospect. Fields has ability; he is a brilliant runner capable of making dynamic plays off-script. But if you listened to Troy Aikman on Monday night, you heard an analyst incredibly skeptical of Fields’ ability to play the position from the pocket. Folks in the building share that skepticism


https://www.dabearsblog.com/2023/five-questions-with-five-games-remaining


Justin doesn't pull the trigger. Doesn’t anticipate and throw his WRs open AND he turns it over.


What makes me doubt Fields are that he has 6-12 plays every game where he just doesn't look like an NFL QB. He doesn't look like he knows what he's doing. These are when he has time to throw the ball, doesn't, and then the rush comes, and he just runs around, looking for daylight, not really doing anything that looks constructive, rarely makes a throw that has a chance to be completed, and is either sacked, fumbles, or throws an incompletion. We see far too many of these kinds of plays. At least Bagent would make a decision and throw the ball.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,695
And1: 915
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1254 » by Almost Retired » Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:16 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl-head-coaching-candidates-2024/

If not Harbaugh then we should go after Ben Johnson. Or Steve Spagnola if he'd bring in a top OC. Or Eric Bieniemy if he'd bring in a top DC.


Um you do know Spagnola went 11-41 as a head coach. There wouldn't be a more worse hire then him.


It's not always the coach's fault. Even the best Head Coaches can't win if the roster sucks. Spagnola can coach defense. Pair him with a good OC and enough talent and he could coach us to a winning record. The Chiefs went on a youth movement a couple years ago defensively and he got them ready to play really quick. So he knows how to coach and how to develop players. We could do worse. And have.
MissileMike
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,526
And1: 1,321
Joined: Feb 25, 2002

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1255 » by MissileMike » Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:19 pm

Dresden wrote:
Chi town wrote:
fleet wrote:Jeff Hughes reports Fields skepticism in the Building.



https://www.dabearsblog.com/2023/five-questions-with-five-games-remaining


Justin doesn't pull the trigger. Doesn’t anticipate and throw his WRs open AND he turns it over.


What makes me doubt Fields are that he has 6-12 plays every game where he just doesn't look like an NFL QB. He doesn't look like he knows what he's doing. These are when he has time to throw the ball, doesn't, and then the rush comes, and he just runs around, looking for daylight, not really doing anything that looks constructive, rarely makes a throw that has a chance to be completed, and is either sacked, fumbles, or throws an incompletion. We see far too many of these kinds of plays. At least Bagent would make a decision and throw the ball.


There are also some bad misses on easy throws to open receivers. Though, he has cut down on those somewhat.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,695
And1: 915
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1256 » by Almost Retired » Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:33 pm

panthermark wrote:Very interesting video.
That sight adjustment part reminds me of why I was so mad at Kmet earlier against Denver, but he is playing better now.
Hey, isn't there a former Bears coach in KC now? :)



Great video. Thanks for posting. I've watched quite a few Chiefs games this year. And I've seen his WRs drop a lot of easy catches. Looks like they need to invest some draft picks in the offense. This is a deep WR draft. Someone like Troy Franklin or Xavier Legette would probably be available with their FRP. But Mahomes needs a better supporting cast.
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,506
And1: 1,396
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1257 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Thu Nov 30, 2023 5:35 pm

I wonder if Caleb saying his entering of the draft this year is a game time decision based on us being projected to get the top pick.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,245
And1: 37,470
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1258 » by fleet » Thu Nov 30, 2023 6:00 pm

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:I wonder if Caleb saying his entering of the draft this year is a game time decision based on us being projected to get the top pick.

I think its based on a coach and system he agrees with. But you don’t often hear quarterbacks making these kinds of comments/decisions. I will say, that today’s quarterback can make millions of dollars while waiting for a better destination. So that makes these kinds of scenarios more likely than in the past. But chances are that waiting for the next year would be just as questionable as far as a perfect destination. Really, all Williams has to do is work out a draft day trade to a team that he wants. I’m sure that’s an option for Poles too.
HoopsterJones
RealGM
Posts: 16,736
And1: 13,931
Joined: Feb 22, 2014

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1259 » by HoopsterJones » Thu Nov 30, 2023 6:03 pm

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:I wonder if Caleb saying his entering of the draft this year is a game time decision based on us being projected to get the top pick.


He’d be putting himself at risk playing another year of NCAA football. I know with NIL money he’s not hurting for it, but you never know what can happen in a year.

If he’s projected to be drafted top 3, he should commit to the draft.
AKME got to go
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,695
And1: 915
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1260 » by Almost Retired » Thu Nov 30, 2023 6:54 pm

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:I wonder if Caleb saying his entering of the draft this year is a game time decision based on us being projected to get the top pick.


Actually, when you compare us to the rest of the bad teams we are probably the best destination....with a new OC. Arizona has a QB and few weapons. New England is a disaster area and will have a new coaching staff next season. The Commanders don't need a QB. The Giants do, and they suck. If Poles drafted Caleb at #1 and added a top receiver to play opposite Moore and added a Center that could play....then we'd be the best destination he could hope for. Despite our history with QBs.

Return to Chicago Bulls