strummer wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:HighRyzer83 wrote:What's ironic is that they play him at the 3 because he's long and agile he was very effective against butler down the stretch. Wtf couldn't we play him at 3 if he threatened Randle so much. We are still searching for a big SF.
Did Thibs ever try him at the 3? I can't remember that happening. I guess the big question is Obi guarding smaller/quicker 3s. I don't recall Obi guarding Butler. If he did, and I don't doubt those who say he did, then I would question the sample size. All I'm saying is that if Obi is a 3, let's wait and see what his defensive rating looks like after a sufficient number of games at that position. The Pacers also have Mathurin who is a legit 3 and very talented. They must've moved Obi to the 3 because he didn't rebound enough and they want him out on the break.
Obi put the clamps on Butler last night. Carlisle used him as the primary defender on Butler and Obi frustrated him all game.
?
Yeah... ANYONE defending the FO on this is simply hating. Most of us wanted to see Obi @ the 3 but I honestly don't recall it happening. Love the Divo signing but it doesn't take away the fact that we drafted Obi, never really developed him unless you call 12 minutes backup PF development and then traded him for 2 2nds. Only a close minded person could defend the moves involving Obi and the FO. Good to see Obi doing well




























