DingleJerry wrote:TroyD92 wrote:DingleJerry wrote:
ok carry on. he's mocked like he's a bum. Not being quite All NBA good is not the same as actually sucking. But i know many here are black and white on if you're not true star level good then the only other option is sucking. Meanwhile, he' l keep 20+ and 10+ while on winning teams. What's funny is takes on guys like him usually stem from being overpaid (like your derozan of 5ish years ago example). Randle isn't even overpaid. His next contract though, yea he can't be a 45 mil per year guy or you're not winning
Okay. Derozan was a good/borderline very good, but was never good enough to carry a team. Which is exactly what you described minus the contract. Randle is also one of the dumbest players in the league unlike Derozan.
ok so you admit he's good. I never said he's a #1 and carry a team. You're not in the boat then that mocks him like a bum here. And sure he's dumb but yet he keeps being 1-3rd best player on winning teams. That's nothing to mock or act like he sucks like many do, but i know ringzzz
I wouldn't really want him on my team would you? Like some cases I see it, but he's always going to have issues being on great teams because of his playstyle relative to his skillset.
He's also a terrible shooter with a bad shot selection which was my initial post lol.

















