levon wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Lakers make formal complaints all the time, you think they just got acknowledged because of one time they complained?
What line in sand are you talking about? Here are splits looking at FTA per month of Lakers and opponent.
What was the outlier?
https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/LAL/2023/splits/
Did you even look at link you provided? Like seriously?
Lakers v Opponent FTA attempts
Oct - 22.3 v 24 = -1.7
Nov - 27 v 21.5 = +5.5
Dec - 24.3 v 20.9 = +3.4
Jan - 27.3 v 25.5 = +1.8
Feb - 27.9 v 16.5 = +11.4
Mar - 29.3 v 18.7 = +10.6
Apr - 25 v 17.6 = +7.4
Shock me. A complete turnaround post Jan 28th. The fact you posted the link and ask what outlier when it’s right in front of you, just goes to show how Laker fans think. Insane
* edit to add this season
Oct - 25.3 v 19.3 = +6.0
Nov - 25.6 v 18.2 = +7.4
Dec - 26.0 v 19.5 = +6.5
The gravy train continues
LA gave up a lot of FTA in December and January because AD went down halfway through December. That +1.8 is actually an outlier and would be even higher. October was a disaster in which the Lakers were just chucking threes at a high rate, hence the low FTA. From Feb on, AD played almost every game and feasted at the line. Schroder and Reaves are legendary foul merchants and got a lot more minutes after the Westbrook trade. Also notice the opponent 3PA bump in February, and how February and beyond corresponds to the team being reformed at the deadline. Believe it or not, not everything revolved around the Celtics game.
Like the effect you're outlining is actually how the Lakers are a good team. They score primarily at the rim (highest frequency of FG made <5 feet) and guard you conservatively through deterrence or funneling to AD in the drop, often giving up wide open perimeter threes in favor of you driving in. And they also employ a top 3 defender in the world at worst. When AD's not there, they actually don't up their fouls -- they just allow a layup line.
The flip side is they can't shoot for ****, ever, which basically means so many of their wins are uber close, which means there are calls and foul disparities for everyone to latch onto. It's a chicken or egg thing. You're welcome to believe this free throw disparity is a concerted effort to pay LA back for the Celtics game, and there's really no way to convince you out of that.
I wish they could win shooting 50% from 3 like the Celtics, but alas they're going to have to run into defenders and defend without fouling to keep winning close, highly rigged games.
A lot does revolve around the Celtics game. There was so much media attention around it because of the missed call on Tatum and a few other questionable calls in the Celtics favour. No one remembers the big conspiracy around ref Eric Lewis growing up a Celtics fan? He got death threats so ended up retiring.
I knew someone would bring the trade up but let's dive a bit closer post Celtics game but pre trade.
Away vs Nets (no Lebron) - 37 to 19 = +18 FTA
Away vs Knicks - 31 to 32 = -1
Away vs Pacers - 31 to 6 = +25
Away vs Pelicans - 33 to 20 = +13
Home vs OKC - 26 to 20 = +6
Home vs Bucks (no Lebron) - 21 to 18 = +3
So +10.6 FTA post Celtics game but pre trade which is in line with the rest of the month.
Lakers were actually ranked 11th in terms of % of points in the paint last season and 12th in opponents points in the paint.
Do you know the Grizz were number 1 in both categories? Based off your arguments and your theory on why the Lakers free throw disparity is so high, they should also be right? They also had the DPOY last season. Let's have a look at their splits in comparison.
Oct - 26.0 v 24.9 = +1.1
Nov - 24.5 v 21.9 = +2.6
Dec - 25.1 v 25.8 = -0.7
Jan - 26.1 v 22.8 = +3.3
Feb - 22.8 v 21.8 = +1.0
Mar - 21.6 v 25.0 = -3.4
Apr - 18.4 v 21.0 = -2.6