SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Rumors of Klay’s death have been exaggerated.
Agreed, time to send the video tape of the last two games to 29 other teams and see what's cooking.
Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Rumors of Klay’s death have been exaggerated.
Hoopstar23 wrote:Jester_ wrote:Hoopstar23 wrote:
Lavine IMO is the closest player that resembles Prime Klay but he has to come back with role players such as Caruso, Craig, and Drummond... I'm willing to trade Klay, Kuminga, and Moody to get Lavine, Caurso, Craig, and Drummond... regardless we have to get rid of Klay, he is a cancer on and off the court... if the Warriors resign him then the Warriors are not serious about winning with Curry...
Until then i will continue to **** on Klay because he is really hurting our team...
why in god's name would Chicago do that
Chicago is going Nuclear and those role players are obtainable... to get off Lavine contract alone Bulls might add a couple 2nd picks and instead we might ask them for other guys like Craig and Drummond... I would even add GP2 to the deal if they want more for Caruso
jozef wrote:superunknown wrote:klay is not a starter anymore nor a 30 minutes player for a contender (or team that wants to compete), and not because of his volume scoring and offensive output - which has not been that exceptional btw, even tonight 7/19 from the field, meh - but because he's the worst defender in pro basketball.
Could you please find samples of him being worst or at least bad defender?
Onus wrote:Why would anyone want LAVINE? The bulls are winning now that LAVINE isn’t hogging the ball and not playing defense. He’s the definition of empty stats.
On the Lowe Post podcast, ESPN's Zach Lowe said the Warriors "have no desire" to trade Thompson.
"To be clear, the Warriors do not want to trade Klay Thompson. They have no desire to do it," Lowe said. "I would bet heavily against it ever happening."
floppymoose wrote:Too much Vlad. Sixers can't handle it. Solid gold.
KevinMcreynolds wrote:On the Lowe Post podcast, ESPN's Zach Lowe said the Warriors "have no desire" to trade Thompson.
"To be clear, the Warriors do not want to trade Klay Thompson. They have no desire to do it," Lowe said. "I would bet heavily against it ever happening."
Lowe has legit sources with the Warriors too
wco81 wrote:KevinMcreynolds wrote:On the Lowe Post podcast, ESPN's Zach Lowe said the Warriors "have no desire" to trade Thompson.
"To be clear, the Warriors do not want to trade Klay Thompson. They have no desire to do it," Lowe said. "I would bet heavily against it ever happening."
Lowe has legit sources with the Warriors too
They may not see players available on the trade market as being necessarily better.
Do you change the system and use more ISO if they acquired say a DeRozan?
floppymoose wrote:Too much Vlad. Sixers can't handle it. Solid gold.
CDM_Stats wrote:Onus wrote:Why would anyone want LAVINE? The bulls are winning now that LAVINE isn’t hogging the ball and not playing defense. He’s the definition of empty stats.
It would be an expensive upgrade for little reason, and wouldn’t address any of the real problems
Fans think an outside move is necessary to make things happen.. one role change on defense to the starting lineup drops them from +22.5 to -10.4
We’ve been a system team since KD left.. at this point if people don’t see it, they aren’t gonna. But even in the basic public stats, it’s easy to see, so I don’t know anymore. Maybe it’s not easy
whatisacenter wrote:CDM_Stats wrote:Onus wrote:Why would anyone want LAVINE? The bulls are winning now that LAVINE isn’t hogging the ball and not playing defense. He’s the definition of empty stats.
It would be an expensive upgrade for little reason, and wouldn’t address any of the real problems
Fans think an outside move is necessary to make things happen.. one role change on defense to the starting lineup drops them from +22.5 to -10.4
We’ve been a system team since KD left.. at this point if people don’t see it, they aren’t gonna. But even in the basic public stats, it’s easy to see, so I don’t know anymore. Maybe it’s not easy
I think most fans are aware of it but some may feel that the system has run its course and that Curry is the only part that still works effectively in it at a high level. I have heard on national podcasts that players on the trade and buyout markets as well as free agents don't always want to go to the Warriors as they know that their roll would be to be a cog in the system. That has left us with an aging core who's ceiling is a .500ish team as currently constructed.
KevinMcreynolds wrote:On the Lowe Post podcast, ESPN's Zach Lowe said the Warriors "have no desire" to trade Thompson.
"To be clear, the Warriors do not want to trade Klay Thompson. They have no desire to do it," Lowe said. "I would bet heavily against it ever happening."
Lowe has legit sources with the Warriors too
Onus wrote:KevinMcreynolds wrote:On the Lowe Post podcast, ESPN's Zach Lowe said the Warriors "have no desire" to trade Thompson.
"To be clear, the Warriors do not want to trade Klay Thompson. They have no desire to do it," Lowe said. "I would bet heavily against it ever happening."
Lowe has legit sources with the Warriors too
Trading Klay was always a pipe dream for fans. The warriors have been pumping out how the core has stayed together for so long. They take pride in that. No way they would trade one of the core 3. It would only happen if they got a huge offer that we didn’t want to match.
I guess teams now know how much they need to offer Klay to pry him away from us. So good job Klays team?
floppymoose wrote:Too much Vlad. Sixers can't handle it. Solid gold.
superunknown wrote:jozef wrote:superunknown wrote:klay is not a starter anymore nor a 30 minutes player for a contender (or team that wants to compete), and not because of his volume scoring and offensive output - which has not been that exceptional btw, even tonight 7/19 from the field, meh - but because he's the worst defender in pro basketball.
Could you please find samples of him being worst or at least bad defender?
is that a trick question?
wco81 wrote:Derozan is probably as gettable but he’s on an expiring contract while Lavine has the albatross expensive contract. But Demar is 34, though he can still get buckets, a big midrange player, so you’d lose spacing with him, maybe not the best fit with Draymond and Looney.
Impuniti wrote:wco81 wrote:Derozan is probably as gettable but he’s on an expiring contract while Lavine has the albatross expensive contract. But Demar is 34, though he can still get buckets, a big midrange player, so you’d lose spacing with him, maybe not the best fit with Draymond and Looney.
This team is old as dirt with problems on defense, athleticism, 3 point shooting? The team desperately needs guys that can move and have energy. Especially with a 1-dimensional coach like Kerr who can only play one way.
wco81 wrote:Impuniti wrote:wco81 wrote:Derozan is probably as gettable but he’s on an expiring contract while Lavine has the albatross expensive contract. But Demar is 34, though he can still get buckets, a big midrange player, so you’d lose spacing with him, maybe not the best fit with Draymond and Looney.
This team is old as dirt with problems on defense, athleticism, 3 point shooting? The team desperately needs guys that can move and have energy. Especially with a 1-dimensional coach like Kerr who can only play one way.
Sure so let's get SGA!
I'm talking about players rumored to be on the trading block.
So you're going to only be able to trade for players that their teams don't want long term or are having poor seasons.
Utah will probably trade Markkanen than give him an extension after next year.
But other teams can give Ainge way more assets than the Warriors./
Return to Golden State Warriors