Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Moderators: codydaze, KF10, City of Trees
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,380
- And1: 2,802
- Joined: Feb 09, 2017
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
this start to the third might be an early turn off for me.. yeah, we need more help if we can't deal with Boston without Tatum and whoever else
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- City of Trees
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 5,462
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Porzingis is now Huerter's daddy
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- City of Trees
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 5,462
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Think about this, are the Celtics shooting better with JT out there tonight? Probably not. Other guys have stepped up and are on fire. Less opportunity for those guys if JT was out there. And JT isn't the best pull up shooterBoogieTime wrote:this start to the third might be an early turn off for me.. yeah, we need more help if we can't deal with Boston without Tatum and whoever else
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 5,881
- And1: 4,560
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
This one got a way from us real fast.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 5,881
- And1: 4,560
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Jrue, White and Zinger are a combined 11-15 from three...
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,482
- And1: 3,248
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
codydaze wrote:This one got a way from us real fast.
The refs sure took away the momentum in the first half, but they didn't help the Celtics much at the start of the third.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,482
- And1: 3,248
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Ellis needed to grab that ball.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,482
- And1: 3,248
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Interesting they don't call that travel on Monk at the end of the third when scoreboard.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- City of Trees
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 5,462
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
I'm pulling a Boogie. I'm out I got other things on my plate more important than watching this poor performance in the 2nd half
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,726
- And1: 1,242
- Joined: Aug 11, 2021
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
we're really not in their league. I'm done with everyone except Fox, Sabonis and Murray. We're just spinning our wheels with guys like Monk, Huerter and Barnes needing to be major contributors.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 827
- And1: 169
- Joined: Jul 09, 2016
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Missed the game owing to a Christmas function, and perhaps glad I did. This result shows how far the Kings need to progress to be real contenders, and the ususal suspects did not show up again.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,264
- And1: 2,286
- Joined: May 17, 2022
- Contact:
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
This is a good result. Hear me out. It seems like when the Kings come up against EC team they're able to get away with more physicality. The Kings got owned tonight by physical D. I mean, come the F on. Hauser out there pretending to play D and pushing guys so they can't get past him? Gotta blast right past him and you'll get the foul. This is on the coaching staff right now. Gotta hit the mismatch and if you get out with one, so be it, but if you do nothing, this is the result. Refs whistle teams like that as great defensive TEAMS, not individuals. That means bench players, like Hauser etc get the benefit of the doubt. Did Keegan? No. Did anyone on the Kings? No. This wreaked of a game of East Coast ball, reffed the way it is over the other side of the country. Gotta figure it out against before the East Coast trip.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,264
- And1: 2,286
- Joined: May 17, 2022
- Contact:
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
I'm going to say this on its own. I'm not going to be surprised if it comes out that Lyles and Sasha are having issues. Mainly, Lyles is having issues with him, not from the other side at all. Just don't be surprised when it comes out.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- Jstock12
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,523
- And1: 17,294
- Joined: Jun 24, 2012
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
OxAndFox wrote:I'm going to say this on its own. I'm not going to be surprised if it comes out that Lyles and Sasha are having issues. Mainly, Lyles is having issues with him, not from the other side at all. Just don't be surprised when it comes out.