ImageImageImageImageImage

The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

Chandan
RealGM
Posts: 18,350
And1: 22,015
Joined: Nov 23, 2017
 

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#341 » by Chandan » Tue Dec 26, 2023 6:25 pm

2019nbachamps wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:You really can't get too upset about missing on Jacquez. He really wasn't rated as a likely option in our pick range and even Miami picking him felt like an overdraft. You look at the numbers in college, it's hard not to say what he's doing has been very surprising. He put up 54% TS in his junior and senior years and shot 28% and 32% from 3, it's not often a player goes from below average efficiency to a 60% TS in their rookie season.


I’m not upset about missing on him. What upsets me is we haven’t developed anyone other than Scottie in 4 seasons. You mean to tell me there wasn’t one hidden gem out there we couldn’t develop? Miami has developed half a dozen guys the last few seasons. The Lakers signed Austin Reeves. We’ve simply lost our way on the development side.


What it feels like is that scotties developed in spite of the FO, not being aided by them. Between stashing him behind Fred and siakam past 2 years, to surrounding him with no shooters in the front court this year, it's a miracle scottie has came as far as he did.
Scottie hasn't shown much out there that wasn't born out of his innate talent. (except for shooting 38% from 3 but u will give no credit to the team because it's obvious they don't do a good job in that department)
Image
KL78192020
RealGM
Posts: 13,840
And1: 14,789
Joined: Apr 19, 2009

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#342 » by KL78192020 » Tue Dec 26, 2023 6:51 pm

Los_29 wrote:
KL78192020 wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
You don’t develop talent by force feeding them minutes. Gradey isn’t ready. Let him develop properly.

And that’s great that you’ve said that before but historically, it’s not even close to being accurate. Were we winning when we developed Pascal, Fred, Norm, OG, Delon, Poeltl?


lots of other rookies are getting decent minutes, and developing its not an exact science.


Yeah because they are better. We also don’t even know if they are developing because they are two months into their rookie season. Lol.



Well duh, thats the point. If he sucks he sucks. Lots of 19 year old rookies have succeeded and show improvement, if he can't show small signs of improvement in 20 minutes a game, he probably won't amount to much. Not expecting to go out there and be steph curry. Just needs to show some small improved. Rather him play that GTJ or whatever else scrub who won't be on the roster next year.
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 32,555
And1: 47,305
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#343 » by Tor_Raps » Tue Dec 26, 2023 6:59 pm

Have all the GMs left Vegas so Dick is allowed back in the G League? Can't keep hiding him lol.
Madhouse
RealGM
Posts: 12,323
And1: 9,892
Joined: Dec 23, 2014
 

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#344 » by Madhouse » Tue Dec 26, 2023 7:06 pm

Chandan wrote:
2019nbachamps wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:You really can't get too upset about missing on Jacquez. He really wasn't rated as a likely option in our pick range and even Miami picking him felt like an overdraft. You look at the numbers in college, it's hard not to say what he's doing has been very surprising. He put up 54% TS in his junior and senior years and shot 28% and 32% from 3, it's not often a player goes from below average efficiency to a 60% TS in their rookie season.


I’m not upset about missing on him. What upsets me is we haven’t developed anyone other than Scottie in 4 seasons. You mean to tell me there wasn’t one hidden gem out there we couldn’t develop? Miami has developed half a dozen guys the last few seasons. The Lakers signed Austin Reeves. We’ve simply lost our way on the development side.


What it feels like is that scotties developed in spite of the FO, not being aided by them. Between stashing him behind Fred and siakam past 2 years, to surrounding him with no shooters in the front court this year, it's a miracle scottie has came as far as he did.
Scottie hasn't shown much out there that wasn't born out of his innate talent. (except for shooting 38% from 3 but u will give no credit to the team because it's obvious they don't do a good job in that department)


The Raptors hindered Barnes development even, he simply overcame it.
User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 32,006
And1: 46,745
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#345 » by PhilBlackson » Tue Dec 26, 2023 7:06 pm

lobosloboslobos wrote:
PhilBlackson wrote:
lobosloboslobos wrote:How the hell does anyone have any idea what Dick can provide given that our coach seems to have destroyed his confidence? Even when he gave us good minutes early in the year and was showing speedy elite movement both on ball and off our coach could only ever say that 'he needed to slow the game down'. Then Dennis made a point of never passing to him, he missed some shots, got benched and clearly the whole thing just snowballed.

In our last pre-season game he went 4 for 5 from deep.

then Game 1 of his career he played 2 minutes and went 0 for 1
Game 2 he played 5 minutes and went 0 for 2
Game 3 he finally played real minutes (28) and had 16/2/1 on 4-6 from 3, although he did get 5 fouls
Game 4 he payed 20 mins and went 2-7 from the field but had 6 rebounds and 2 steals
Game 5 he played 20 mins and had a rough night going 2-10 against Milwaukee

immediately after that is when Darko put him on a tight leash, just 5 games into his rookie season. in the next 4 games he played 47 minutes and had a total of 9 FGA.

Finally in Game 10 he got back to 24 minutes and played pretty well, going 3-4 (2-3 from deep) with 4 rbds (3 offensive) and 2 ast.

So Darko gave him a little rope in the next game, again against Milwaukee, and again he went 2-10 against a tough veteran defence.

Since that game Dick has played a total of 17 minutes in the past 15 games.

All this talk about how Gradey sucks is really just a way of saying our coach has sucked. Dick showed totally legit flashes of skill and usefulness, especially for a 19 year old, but how the hell do we know what we have when Darko doesn't like what he brings and has no interest in him?


What a lame excuse. He’s been awful even with ample playing time in the G-League. You’re acting like multiple players of ours over the years weren’t essentially forced to go play there to try & earn their way back on to a NBA court (ie/ Pascal, Fred, Norm etc) and they all responded by dominating there. Gradey on the other hand has continued to look underwhelming. That’s not the coach’s fault, that’s his own.

Whether that’s his “confidence” or not adding enough to his game, it’s on himself to step up. The coach can’t hit the jumpers for him. We’ve seen other prospects on different teams struggle to get playing time but go to the G-League and light it up (ie Hardy last year, Walker this year). I’m not a fan of Darko as a coach either but pointing the finger at him is a poor excuse, we’ve seen Gradey brick multiple good looks when he was playing in real games and he’s only continued that trend in extended playing time in the G-League.


lol you'd make a great coach. how old are you i wonder. either not old enough to know how simplistic this take is or old enough to know better but for some reason don't. The first year Pascal played in the G League he was 23 years old. So was Norm. Fred was 22 and did 4 years in college. Gradey is 19. If you think that you develop one of the youngest rookies in the league by throwing him to the wolves and telling him (as you like to do) that he sucks and is on his own to figure stuff out then thank god you don't actually work with any young people. which i hope for their sakes' you don't.


So because I disagree with your opinion & you can't make a logical argument against it you just make a weak attempt to talk sh*t by supposedly questioning my age (despite I'm likely around your age or older) or literally making up things I didn't say ie/ "telling him he sucks and is on his own to figure stuff out" lol get a life, that missed worse than Gradey's jumpshot.

The irony is how simplistic your take is to just blame it on the coach despite the fact you also conveniently skipped 2 rookies who were also just 19/20 years old ie/ Hardy & Walker. I made no mention of a coach belittling the player or telling him to figure it out on his own but yes players do need to take on personal responsibility to get better and you can't simply blame a coach when there are plenty of examples of young players that got limited time in their rookie years & had to work on their game in the G-League to get better. What also adds to the irony of blaming Darko, is that Darko doesn't coach the 905, they're trying to feature him but he's still struggling so what will your next failed excuse be?!
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON* Wemby is HIM
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
Blazing_royale
General Manager
Posts: 9,657
And1: 2,735
Joined: Jul 03, 2006

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#346 » by Blazing_royale » Tue Dec 26, 2023 7:28 pm

Miami rookie dropped 31 points on Xmas day. Our rookie? Unplayable off the bench
Image
Any Pokémon fans out there? Check out my Youtube channel jchucollection
MonkBatter42
RealGM
Posts: 32,496
And1: 22,560
Joined: Nov 16, 2015
   

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#347 » by MonkBatter42 » Tue Dec 26, 2023 7:57 pm

Was there a single person here clamouring for Dick on draft night after it became apparent he had "fallen" a bit? I just don't recall any excitement about him in the picks leading up to our selection and after we selected him. The narrative soon became, "well we do need shooting desperately and he's a shooter", and that seemed to tide over what initially felt like a lacklustre selection. And now, the very thing we drafted this guy for, he can't do, either in the NBA or G-League. Perhaps this should serve as a lesson to actually draft an accomplished all around baller, and not just a profile on paper.
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,824
And1: 26,023
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#348 » by ItsDanger » Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:50 pm

MonkBatter42 wrote:Was there a single person here clamouring for Dick on draft night after it became apparent he had "fallen" a bit? I just don't recall any excitement about him in the picks leading up to our selection and after we selected him. The narrative soon became, "well we do need shooting desperately and he's a shooter", and that seemed to tide over what initially felt like a lacklustre selection. And now, the very thing we drafted this guy for, he can't do, either in the NBA or G-League. Perhaps this should serve as a lesson to actually draft an accomplished all around baller, and not just a profile on paper.

I don't remember many people here bringing his name up much at all pre draft. I never considered him, assumed Orlando would take him. If high upside talent wasn't there, should have considered a guard. I don't believe they weren't aware of Fred's departure risk.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
User avatar
TorontoBarneys
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,958
And1: 7,102
Joined: Dec 30, 2022
   

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#349 » by TorontoBarneys » Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:01 pm

MonkBatter42 wrote:Was there a single person here clamouring for Dick on draft night after it became apparent he had "fallen" a bit? I just don't recall any excitement about him in the picks leading up to our selection and after we selected him. The narrative soon became, "well we do need shooting desperately and he's a shooter", and that seemed to tide over what initially felt like a lacklustre selection. And now, the very thing we drafted this guy for, he can't do, either in the NBA or G-League. Perhaps this should serve as a lesson to actually draft an accomplished all around baller, and not just a profile on paper.


Draft selections in the teens for the '23 draft weren't very exciting in general. Talent was very front-loaded in the top 8-9 for this draft, which is another reason the Poeltl trade was atrocious. Those 7 spots we traded probably end up as an enormous difference in the long-run.
BillNyeBballGuy
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 581
Joined: Jul 31, 2021

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#350 » by BillNyeBballGuy » Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:15 pm

I didn't love the Dick pick, but I do think he's being too harshly criticized this early on. He's super young and hasn't filled out yet at all. If he's still stuck in the G-league next year then we might have a problem, but for now let him develop with the 905 in peace
hype_2004
RealGM
Posts: 12,582
And1: 4,873
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: T.O

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#351 » by hype_2004 » Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:38 pm

BillNyeBballGuy wrote:I didn't love the Dick pick, but I do think he's being too harshly criticized this early on. He's super young and hasn't filled out yet at all. If he's still stuck in the G-league next year then we might have a problem, but for now let him develop with the 905 in peace


Throw him into the FIRE, what does this team have to lose? Get rid of Siakam, Schroder, Poetl and OG while playing the newly acquired guys and Dick. Whats the goal this year? Play in or development, choose one.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,389
And1: 14,440
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#352 » by dagger » Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:44 pm

Blazing_royale wrote:Miami rookie dropped 31 points on Xmas day. Our rookie? Unplayable off the bench


Miami's rookie who is impressive turns 23 in February, so three and a half years older that Gradey
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
lobosloboslobos
RealGM
Posts: 12,975
And1: 18,575
Joined: Jan 08, 2009
Location: space is the place
 

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#353 » by lobosloboslobos » Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:29 pm

PhilBlackson wrote:
lobosloboslobos wrote:
PhilBlackson wrote:
What a lame excuse. He’s been awful even with ample playing time in the G-League. You’re acting like multiple players of ours over the years weren’t essentially forced to go play there to try & earn their way back on to a NBA court (ie/ Pascal, Fred, Norm etc) and they all responded by dominating there. Gradey on the other hand has continued to look underwhelming. That’s not the coach’s fault, that’s his own.

Whether that’s his “confidence” or not adding enough to his game, it’s on himself to step up. The coach can’t hit the jumpers for him. We’ve seen other prospects on different teams struggle to get playing time but go to the G-League and light it up (ie Hardy last year, Walker this year). I’m not a fan of Darko as a coach either but pointing the finger at him is a poor excuse, we’ve seen Gradey brick multiple good looks when he was playing in real games and he’s only continued that trend in extended playing time in the G-League.


lol you'd make a great coach. how old are you i wonder. either not old enough to know how simplistic this take is or old enough to know better but for some reason don't. The first year Pascal played in the G League he was 23 years old. So was Norm. Fred was 22 and did 4 years in college. Gradey is 19. If you think that you develop one of the youngest rookies in the league by throwing him to the wolves and telling him (as you like to do) that he sucks and is on his own to figure stuff out then thank god you don't actually work with any young people. which i hope for their sakes' you don't.


So because I disagree with your opinion & you can't make a logical argument against it you just make a weak attempt to talk sh*t by supposedly questioning my age (despite I'm likely around your age or older) or literally making up things I didn't say ie/ "telling him he sucks and is on his own to figure stuff out" lol get a life, that missed worse than Gradey's jumpshot.

The irony is how simplistic your take is to just blame it on the coach despite the fact you also conveniently skipped 2 rookies who were also just 19/20 years old ie/ Hardy & Walker. I made no mention of a coach belittling the player or telling him to figure it out on his own but yes players do need to take on personal responsibility to get better and you can't simply blame a coach when there are plenty of examples of young players that got limited time in their rookie years & had to work on their game in the G-League to get better. What also adds to the irony of blaming Darko, is that Darko doesn't coach the 905, they're trying to feature him but he's still struggling so what will your next failed excuse be?!


Hey, I didn't ask for this beef, but to be clear, you started this. You say I can't make a logical argument but all I did was walk through every game Gradey has played and pointed out how there is a noticeable downward trend from where he started, and that that ties in to confidence, and also that Darko has not expressed a lot of confidence in him. You may disagree but I didn't post this to you in any way. I just put some facts out there and drew a reasonable conclusion.

Meanwhile your very first line of your response to my post is "What a lame excuse." And you say that I'm talking sh*t? lol Then you make a point about Pascal and other guys having succeeded in the G League, which I directly responded to with some relevant facts that you conveniently ignored. And you say I'm incapable of a logical argument? lol. Then you repeatedly say it's not the coach's responsibility to help Gradey succeed ("He can't hit his jumpers for him", "That's not the coach's fault, it's his own.", "It's on himself to step up", etc.) but follow up with a post saying "I made no mention of a coach belittling the player or telling him to figure it out on his own". lol as if. you can't even remember what you posted. And sure there are some other guys doing well as rookies, and plenty of other guys who have taken more time to figure stuff out and still become terrific players. But for whatever reason you can't stop trashing a 19 year who hasn't even taken 100 shots in the NBA but also can't stop to ask yourself why he is having a hard time. it's the typical knee-jerk negativity i've come to expect from your posts.

as for you being older me than me, i seriously doubt it, but if you are, well, that sucks for you. i've spent a lot of years helping young people figure out how to tap into their potential. if it was as simple as you seem to think it is (just do it!) then a lot of people in every walk of life would be a lot more successful than they are. and a lot less angry.
Image
tecumseh18
RealGM
Posts: 19,148
And1: 11,376
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Location: Big green house
 

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#354 » by tecumseh18 » Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:57 pm

dagger wrote:
Blazing_royale wrote:Miami rookie dropped 31 points on Xmas day. Our rookie? Unplayable off the bench


Miami's rookie who is impressive turns 23 in February, so three and a half years older that Gradey


Yeah, older rookies - e.g. Chris Duarte - often look really impressive from the get go. But then the growth curve stops dead in its tracks.

The odd thing is that Masai made a practice of drafting older college players (after the Bruno disaster). But last June, when the team was ostensibly in win-now mode, he didn't.

Oh well, WTF ya gonna do?
AbC?
Head Coach
Posts: 6,648
And1: 10,691
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: Toronto
 

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#355 » by AbC? » Wed Dec 27, 2023 12:06 am

Early success is the best predictor of future success. Good players figure out how to stay on the court and bad players don’t. The fact that he sucks at the G league level is very bad for his odds of becoming a good NBA player.

In any case we gave Flynn 4 years and he’s been mostly terrible so I’m sure Dick will get plenty of runway to figure it out. I don’t think throwing NBA minutes will do him any good because it’s like putting a scrawny high school kid against grown men. Setting him up to fail.
Image
User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 32,006
And1: 46,745
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#356 » by PhilBlackson » Wed Dec 27, 2023 12:42 am

lobosloboslobos wrote:
PhilBlackson wrote:
lobosloboslobos wrote:
lol you'd make a great coach. how old are you i wonder. either not old enough to know how simplistic this take is or old enough to know better but for some reason don't. The first year Pascal played in the G League he was 23 years old. So was Norm. Fred was 22 and did 4 years in college. Gradey is 19. If you think that you develop one of the youngest rookies in the league by throwing him to the wolves and telling him (as you like to do) that he sucks and is on his own to figure stuff out then thank god you don't actually work with any young people. which i hope for their sakes' you don't.


Spoiler:
So because I disagree with your opinion & you can't make a logical argument against it you just make a weak attempt to talk sh*t by supposedly questioning my age (despite I'm likely around your age or older) or literally making up things I didn't say ie/ "telling him he sucks and is on his own to figure stuff out" lol get a life, that missed worse than Gradey's jumpshot.

The irony is how simplistic your take is to just blame it on the coach despite the fact you also conveniently skipped 2 rookies who were also just 19/20 years old ie/ Hardy & Walker. I made no mention of a coach belittling the player or telling him to figure it out on his own but yes players do need to take on personal responsibility to get better and you can't simply blame a coach when there are plenty of examples of young players that got limited time in their rookie years & had to work on their game in the G-League to get better. What also adds to the irony of blaming Darko, is that Darko doesn't coach the 905, they're trying to feature him but he's still struggling so what will your next failed excuse be?!


Hey, I didn't ask for this beef, but to be clear, you started this. You say I can't make a logical argument but all I did was walk through every game Gradey has played and pointed out how there is a noticeable downward trend from where he started, and that that ties in to confidence, and also that Darko has not expressed a lot of confidence in him. You may disagree but I didn't post this to you in any way. I just put some facts out there and drew a reasonable conclusion.

Meanwhile your very first line of your response to my post is "What a lame excuse." And you say that I'm talking sh*t? lol Then you make a point about Pascal and other guys having succeeded in the G League, which I directly responded to with some relevant facts that you conveniently ignored. And you say I'm incapable of a logical argument? lol. Then you repeatedly say it's not the coach's responsibility to help Gradey succeed ("He can't hit his jumpers for him", "That's not the coach's fault, it's his own.", "It's on himself to step up", etc.) but follow up with a post saying "I made no mention of a coach belittling the player or telling him to figure it out on his own". lol as if. you can't even remember what you posted. And sure there are some other guys doing well as rookies, and plenty of other guys who have taken more time to figure stuff out and still become terrific players. But for whatever reason you can't stop trashing a 19 year who hasn't even taken 100 shots in the NBA but also can't stop to ask yourself why he is having a hard time. it's the typical knee-jerk negativity i've come to expect from your posts.

as for you being older me than me, i seriously doubt it, but if you are, well, that sucks for you. i've spent a lot of years helping young people figure out how to tap into their potential. if it was as simple as you seem to think it is (just do it!) then a lot of people in every walk of life would be a lot more successful than they are. and a lot less angry.


Lol save me this "I didn't ask for this beef" nonsense...you IMMEDIATELY start your entire post condescendingly saying "you'd make a great coach lol" and any mildly intelligent poster knows what you're implying when you "question" a poster's age especially when you say "not old enough to know how simplistic this take is". That you're saying "without saying" that they don't know what they're talking about due to them not developing enough cognitively and hence why you also said at the end "old enough to know better" to again imply that your intelligence is supposedly "superior" so please cut out the sh*t/"victim" role, you quite clearly started the insulting behaviour. Own it and stop trying to exalt yourself as being on some higher ground when you only are in your own head, not reality.

Now as to "just laying out the facts", you didn't do that either - you cherrypicked only what you wanted to include. Again you completely skimmed over that there were other rookies his age with the same experiences that still managed to flourish in the G-League and more importantly that Gradey at this point is being coached by Eric Khoury right now (and has been for weeks now) NOT Darko but yet you want to pin all of Dick's struggles on Darko's coaching of him which is illogical considering Khoury is the one doing so now but how about you finally address that point?! Oh I know why, it doesn't fit your argument.

Also I'll do best to not insult but you are either some THE worst comprehension of the English language (which I'm not saying is the case) OR what's more likely TRYING (and failing) to manipulate or blur lines by implications YOU are making, not that I am saying. What's hilarious is even what you quoted of me, there isn't a single example that fits the criteria of a coach belittling the player...

"He can't hit jumpers for him" - that's just a fact, that's not what I'm saying the coach should say to him
"That's not the coach's fault, that's his own" - again that's not the coach belittling, that's asking him to take on personal responsibility
"It's on himself to step up" - again personal responsibility, none of that was insulting or belittling

Nowhere in all those quotes is there ANYWHERE where the coach is being insulting or belittling, it is however again as I stated before asking Gradey to take on personal responsibility to step up as a player which is why cited multiple players who have (and whom you conveniently continue to skim over because you can't address the clear flaw in your "logic"). Also I'm not "trashing" Gradey at all lol you're just as usual overly sensitive to any criticism of our players but what else is new?! lol You can look through this thread where I've said on multiple occasions that I'm really hoping that he can turn it around and have compared him to clearly a solid NBA player in Kevin Huerter. But just because again I don't share your opinion/excuse for Gradey underwhelming that it's "hating" or "trashing" him. Trashing would be if I said he sucks, he's garbage, he's a bust etc which I have not said but again you handle him being critiqued because you're overly sensitive and want to point the finger and make weak excuses for his poor play.

You can doubt us being close in age all you want I really could care less. But apparently you feel the need to make this a pissing contest for age because again you seem to think it implies that you somehow have greater wisdom when it's just flat out foolish for you to make any assumptions. But given that you want to again boast of how wise you are with age and your "guidance" has helped people that you'd also understand that a ton of success has to do with PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY (along with self discipline). Go watch nearly any serious entrepreneurial material and those are paramount to people's success as they are arguably some of THE biggest factors/key indicators of it. But here you want Gradey to place the blame on a single person to excuse his poor performance despite the fact he's around a plethora of different people within the organization AND being coached by an entirely different person and STILL struggling but hey you can continue skip over that part and try to validate your stance based on self perceived superiority based on seniority lol but please save it & stick to what is ACTUALLY being said and not what you try (and fail) to twist it into.
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON* Wemby is HIM
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
User avatar
lobosloboslobos
RealGM
Posts: 12,975
And1: 18,575
Joined: Jan 08, 2009
Location: space is the place
 

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#357 » by lobosloboslobos » Wed Dec 27, 2023 1:53 am

PhilBlackson wrote:.



Hey Phil, you are 100% right about personal responsibility and self-discipline. Totally with ya on that, though personally I'm not so big on the be-a-billionaire gurus of the world. But yeah, absolutely. I never said it wasn't important, never said anything about it, or placed all the responsibility on the coach. Gradey is obviously more than anyone else personally responsible for his performance. To me that goes without saying. But maybe you'll agree that for any young person attempting to do something very difficult in a complex and competitive environment, getting the right support is extremely valuable, especially to build confidence. I asked whether he is getting it, and offered some factual reasons to question if he is.

I get that we disagree, but you went 100% on the offensive to show that my analysis and facts were 'a lame excuse' by explicitly putting 100% of the responsibility on the kid, and never acknowledging that the coaching/confidence question was valid, let alone commenting on the facts i presented in my lengthy post or the merit of my conclusion.

You keep referring to all the other rookies who are doing well, and to guys who have done well in the g league. But everybody's journey is different. pascal, fred, gary etc. all had very different trajectories, and so will gradey for better or worse.

anyway, whatever. for me the bottom line is that if I hire – or in this case draft – a 19 year old who I think is talented, and they have a positive hardworking attitude but they are blatantly failing then I am going to question my own activities and approach every bit as hard as I question theirs, probably moreso, and i would expect that to be the case for an NBA team who has so much invested in a draft pick. aka coaches and management are also nearly as responsible as players for how well they perform. isn't that precisely what so many people have been saying endlessly vis a vis our roster construction not optimizing the situation for scottie?

maybe you really are cheering for gradey, and maybe he really would feel that support if he read your posts. i'm not so sure though. but it's a free world. you'll keep saying what you want and so will i.

raps in 4
Image
User avatar
The Duke
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,812
And1: 3,460
Joined: Jul 18, 2003
Location: Da Beaches

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#358 » by The Duke » Wed Dec 27, 2023 1:59 am

When your this bad and your a mid first round pick, my money would be him traded away next season or so, as a throw in, so the mistake is off the roster, and fans can’t look at the bust anymore
User avatar
Boogie!
RealGM
Posts: 68,701
And1: 57,790
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Ba da da da daaaaaa. If you build it, they will come!
Contact:
   

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#359 » by Boogie! » Wed Dec 27, 2023 2:17 am

BillNyeBballGuy wrote:I didn't love the Dick pick, but I do think he's being too harshly criticized this early on. He's super young and hasn't filled out yet at all. If he's still stuck in the G-league next year then we might have a problem, but for now let him develop with the 905 in peace


He's not being harshly crificzed at all... this is not some raw high potential player. This is a guy drafted based on one skill, who's NBA floor was basically supposed to be a guy that even if everything else sucks should at least be able to make open 3s and has ot been able to do that at an NBA or gleague level. It's all fair. Like I said it's not like we're mad he socks defensively, the game is too fast for him, he has no handle, limited athleticism and no go to scoring moves, it's the fact he's all that AND he can't even shoot. He's being criticized fairly.
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.
User avatar
hyper316
RealGM
Posts: 14,804
And1: 10,113
Joined: Dec 23, 2006
   

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 2 

Post#360 » by hyper316 » Wed Dec 27, 2023 2:22 am

Boogie! wrote:
BillNyeBballGuy wrote:I didn't love the Dick pick, but I do think he's being too harshly criticized this early on. He's super young and hasn't filled out yet at all. If he's still stuck in the G-league next year then we might have a problem, but for now let him develop with the 905 in peace


He's not being harshly crificzed at all... this is not some raw high potential player. This is a guy drafted based on one skill, who's NBA floor was basically supposed to be a guy that even if everything else sucks should at least be able to make open 3s and has ot been able to do that at an NBA or gleague level. It's all fair. Like I said it's not like we're mad he socks defensively, the game is too fast for him, he has no handle, limited athleticism and no go to scoring moves, it's the fact he's all that AND he can't even shoot. He's being criticized fairly.


Was told by Bobby that Gradey isn't just a shooter though. Our GM is either a liar or a terrible talent evaluator

Return to Toronto Raptors