Dak Prescott thread

Moderator: bwgood77

bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 20,772
And1: 4,481
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#161 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Dec 28, 2023 1:32 am

Mariner wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mariner wrote:Nothing wrong with wanting to get rid of him and starting fresh.
But it’s wrong to not cheer for him this year.

That is the difference between the old guard Cowboy fans and the new generation cowboy fans. Its Super bowl or bust for us. You and Micah are just happy making the playoffs, getting an early boot and getting a participation trophy or something. Gets old after 28 years with no improvement and not being able to jump over the last hurdle into elite territory. :giveup:

You’re missing the point. I have no issue with you wanting to get rid of Dak. Read that again.
But seeing as he’s here this year we should be cheering for him. Cheering against him now is just wrong.

I made my feelings more than well known before the season even started. There is nothing you can say or anyone can do to change my mind. You are wasting your time convincing me otherwise. I think I hear your mother calling. Its bed time sweetie.
Mariner
Rookie
Posts: 1,110
And1: 225
Joined: Jul 21, 2023

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#162 » by Mariner » Thu Dec 28, 2023 1:39 am

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mariner wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:That is the difference between the old guard Cowboy fans and the new generation cowboy fans. Its Super bowl or bust for us. You and Micah are just happy making the playoffs, getting an early boot and getting a participation trophy or something. Gets old after 28 years with no improvement and not being able to jump over the last hurdle into elite territory. :giveup:

You’re missing the point. I have no issue with you wanting to get rid of Dak. Read that again.
But seeing as he’s here this year we should be cheering for him. Cheering against him now is just wrong.

I made my feelings more than well known before the season even started. There is nothing you can say or anyone can do to change my mind. You are wasting your time convincing me otherwise. I think I hear your mother calling. Its bed time sweetie.

It’s weird that you’re not getting it.
I’m not disagreeing with you about Dak.
Comprehension would be appreciated.
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 20,772
And1: 4,481
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#163 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Dec 28, 2023 1:47 am

Mariner wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mariner wrote:You’re missing the point. I have no issue with you wanting to get rid of Dak. Read that again.
But seeing as he’s here this year we should be cheering for him. Cheering against him now is just wrong.

I made my feelings more than well known before the season even started. There is nothing you can say or anyone can do to change my mind. You are wasting your time convincing me otherwise. I think I hear your mother calling. Its bed time sweetie.

It’s weird that you’re not getting it.
I’m not disagreeing with you about Dak.
Comprehension would be appreciated.

When you get bored there is 3 years of my thoughts on Dak in the cowboy forum. If you go back and read any of my posts you would be in here now playing these little girl games. I've loathed and hated Dak for 3 years and running and wanted to show him the door a long time ago. Go look it up.
I guess yo have nothing else to bring to the table cowboy wise. Making the team better and best way to proceed moving forward. I'm interested in your thoughts in that regard. Trying to change my mind on Dak is a total waste of time unless you are trying hard for me to put you on ignore moving forward and putting you on my hate list. Whats weird is you want to keep making the same mistake and expecting different results.
Mariner
Rookie
Posts: 1,110
And1: 225
Joined: Jul 21, 2023

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#164 » by Mariner » Thu Dec 28, 2023 1:54 am

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mariner wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:I made my feelings more than well known before the season even started. There is nothing you can say or anyone can do to change my mind. You are wasting your time convincing me otherwise. I think I hear your mother calling. Its bed time sweetie.

It’s weird that you’re not getting it.
I’m not disagreeing with you about Dak.
Comprehension would be appreciated.

When you get bored there is 3 years of my thoughts on Dak in the cowboy forum. If you go back and read any of my posts you would be in here now playing these little girl games. I've loathed and hated Dak for 3 years and running and wanted to show him the door a long time ago. Go look it up.
I guess yo have nothing else to bring to the table cowboy wise. Making the team better and best way to proceed moving forward. I'm interested in your thoughts in that regard. Trying to change my mind on Dak is a total waste of time unless you are trying hard for me to put you on ignore moving forward and putting you on my hate list. Whats weird is you want to keep making the same mistake and expecting different results.

You have the poorest comprehension I have ever seen.

I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
It would be nice if the cowboys had a different QB next year.
But as cowboys fans we should be cheering for him this year.
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 20,772
And1: 4,481
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#165 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Dec 28, 2023 2:01 am

Mariner wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mariner wrote:It’s weird that you’re not getting it.
I’m not disagreeing with you about Dak.
Comprehension would be appreciated.

When you get bored there is 3 years of my thoughts on Dak in the cowboy forum. If you go back and read any of my posts you would be in here now playing these little girl games. I've loathed and hated Dak for 3 years and running and wanted to show him the door a long time ago. Go look it up.
I guess yo have nothing else to bring to the table cowboy wise. Making the team better and best way to proceed moving forward. I'm interested in your thoughts in that regard. Trying to change my mind on Dak is a total waste of time unless you are trying hard for me to put you on ignore moving forward and putting you on my hate list. Whats weird is you want to keep making the same mistake and expecting different results.

You have the poorest comprehension I have ever seen.

I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
It would be nice if the cowboys had a different QB next year.
But as cowboys fans we should be cheering for him this year.

What are you, my mother. I will cheer for whom I choose. I better stop here. I'm about to go on a rant with thoughts and language that would get me suspended for a week.
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 20,772
And1: 4,481
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#166 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Dec 28, 2023 2:03 am

Mariner wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mariner wrote:It’s weird that you’re not getting it.
I’m not disagreeing with you about Dak.
Comprehension would be appreciated.

When you get bored there is 3 years of my thoughts on Dak in the cowboy forum. If you go back and read any of my posts you would be in here now playing these little girl games. I've loathed and hated Dak for 3 years and running and wanted to show him the door a long time ago. Go look it up.
I guess yo have nothing else to bring to the table cowboy wise. Making the team better and best way to proceed moving forward. I'm interested in your thoughts in that regard. Trying to change my mind on Dak is a total waste of time unless you are trying hard for me to put you on ignore moving forward and putting you on my hate list. Whats weird is you want to keep making the same mistake and expecting different results.

You have the poorest comprehension I have ever seen.

I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
It would be nice if the cowboys had a different QB next year.
But as cowboys fans we should be cheering for him this year.

So what the hell are your thoughts moving forward with all things Cowboys? Don't leave anything out. How do we reach the Super bowl?
User avatar
Micah Prescott
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,606
And1: 1,755
Joined: Aug 25, 2021
     

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#167 » by Micah Prescott » Thu Dec 28, 2023 2:06 am

Lol, the irony is that BJJ is always accusing "new generation Cowboy fans" of not wanting to win.

While he is literally rooting for Dallas to lose

Can't make this s--t up
Mariner
Rookie
Posts: 1,110
And1: 225
Joined: Jul 21, 2023

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#168 » by Mariner » Thu Dec 28, 2023 2:23 am

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mariner wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:When you get bored there is 3 years of my thoughts on Dak in the cowboy forum. If you go back and read any of my posts you would be in here now playing these little girl games. I've loathed and hated Dak for 3 years and running and wanted to show him the door a long time ago. Go look it up.
I guess yo have nothing else to bring to the table cowboy wise. Making the team better and best way to proceed moving forward. I'm interested in your thoughts in that regard. Trying to change my mind on Dak is a total waste of time unless you are trying hard for me to put you on ignore moving forward and putting you on my hate list. Whats weird is you want to keep making the same mistake and expecting different results.

You have the poorest comprehension I have ever seen.

I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
It would be nice if the cowboys had a different QB next year.
But as cowboys fans we should be cheering for him this year.

So what the hell are your thoughts moving forward with all things Cowboys? Don't leave anything out. How do we reach the Super bowl?

Moving forward I agree with what you have been saying.
I’m a bigger cowboy fan than my annoyance with Dak.
I will always cheer for my team to win a playoff game.
In the off-season I will be cheering for change.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 17,590
And1: 5,185
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#169 » by Mr B » Thu Dec 28, 2023 5:38 am

Micah Prescott wrote:Okay well explain your views to NFL front offices El Turco, and then tell them that you hope they don't do their own finances that way and show them your YouTube vids.

I'm not the one who does it, I'm just telling you how it's going to be. Dak is going to be resigned and the contract will be backloaded. EXACTLY like his current contract.

Assuming we lose 2nd round or earlier, I think McCarthy will be gone and a new system will be brought in.

You honestly might be right in the end. Dak will more than likely get the extension. There is an outside chance though that the Cowboys find a way to move on.

So if you’re right and he does get resigned (along with Lamb and Parsons) what would you do next? What would you do to make the team better? What positions are you targeting in the draft? Just curious.
User avatar
El Turco
GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
Posts: 53,957
And1: 21,428
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Location: Frisco
     

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#170 » by El Turco » Thu Dec 28, 2023 1:48 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mariner wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:When you get bored there is 3 years of my thoughts on Dak in the cowboy forum. If you go back and read any of my posts you would be in here now playing these little girl games. I've loathed and hated Dak for 3 years and running and wanted to show him the door a long time ago. Go look it up.
I guess yo have nothing else to bring to the table cowboy wise. Making the team better and best way to proceed moving forward. I'm interested in your thoughts in that regard. Trying to change my mind on Dak is a total waste of time unless you are trying hard for me to put you on ignore moving forward and putting you on my hate list. Whats weird is you want to keep making the same mistake and expecting different results.

You have the poorest comprehension I have ever seen.

I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
It would be nice if the cowboys had a different QB next year.
But as cowboys fans we should be cheering for him this year.

What are you, my mother. I will cheer for whom I choose.


:lol: Merry Xmas to Mama Bjj
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!


Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
User avatar
QB_Eagles
Veteran
Posts: 2,514
And1: 824
Joined: Jul 24, 2023
     

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#171 » by QB_Eagles » Thu Dec 28, 2023 2:20 pm

El Turco wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mariner wrote:You have the poorest comprehension I have ever seen.

I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT DAK
It would be nice if the cowboys had a different QB next year.
But as cowboys fans we should be cheering for him this year.

What are you, my mother. I will cheer for whom I choose.


:lol: Merry Xmas to Mama Bjj

Mother, who do we cheer for this season? The Chiefs?

Image
User avatar
Micah Prescott
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,606
And1: 1,755
Joined: Aug 25, 2021
     

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#172 » by Micah Prescott » Thu Dec 28, 2023 3:36 pm

Mr B wrote:
Micah Prescott wrote:Okay well explain your views to NFL front offices El Turco, and then tell them that you hope they don't do their own finances that way and show them your YouTube vids.

I'm not the one who does it, I'm just telling you how it's going to be. Dak is going to be resigned and the contract will be backloaded. EXACTLY like his current contract.

Assuming we lose 2nd round or earlier, I think McCarthy will be gone and a new system will be brought in.

You honestly might be right in the end. Dak will more than likely get the extension. There is an outside chance though that the Cowboys find a way to move on.

So if you’re right and he does get resigned (along with Lamb and Parsons) what would you do next? What would you do to make the team better? What positions are you targeting in the draft? Just curious.

We need a better defense. Im sorry but our offense and QB put up points. We have the #2 scorong offense in the NFL. Our QB has thrown more TDs than any other QB. Now we need a defense that can hold teams low. But Id probably go BPA, the same strategy most teams do. If there is an elite RB at pur spot go with it.

It sure AF beats drafting a QB year after year until we finally find one that throws even MORE TDs than this.

I mean the Ravens just gave Lamar Jackson the biggest contract ever. How does that effect what are they targeting?
User avatar
Micah Prescott
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,606
And1: 1,755
Joined: Aug 25, 2021
     

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#173 » by Micah Prescott » Thu Dec 28, 2023 3:47 pm

Actually had we just had Hankins that night have been enough to hang onto that Dolphins win.

We missed on Mazi...unfortunately
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 20,772
And1: 4,481
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#174 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Dec 28, 2023 4:13 pm

Micah Prescott wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Micah Prescott wrote:Okay well explain your views to NFL front offices El Turco, and then tell them that you hope they don't do their own finances that way and show them your YouTube vids.

I'm not the one who does it, I'm just telling you how it's going to be. Dak is going to be resigned and the contract will be backloaded. EXACTLY like his current contract.

Assuming we lose 2nd round or earlier, I think McCarthy will be gone and a new system will be brought in.

You honestly might be right in the end. Dak will more than likely get the extension. There is an outside chance though that the Cowboys find a way to move on.

So if you’re right and he does get resigned (along with Lamb and Parsons) what would you do next? What would you do to make the team better? What positions are you targeting in the draft? Just curious.

We need a better defense. Im sorry but our offense and QB put up points. We have the #2 scorong offense in the NFL.Our QB has thrown more TDs than any other QB. Now we need a defense that can hold teams low. But Id probably go BPA, the same strategy most teams do. If there is an elite RB at pur spot go with it.

It sure AF beats drafting a QB year after year until we finally find one that throws even MORE TDs than this.

I mean the Ravens just gave Lamar Jackson the biggest contract ever. How does that effect what are they targeting?

Sure. Between all the tomato cans teams Dak as able to pad his stats. Been doing it for years. And lets not forget how the defense and special teams carried the team the first 5 weeks, making things extremely easy for your boy. Gave him tons of leads and numerous short fields and most of the time all he and the offense could do in the beginning was put up field goals. Dak's stats would not be what they are now hadn't the defense played lights out till they became a MASH unit losing 4 players for the year.
You are right about one thing. We need a couple more pieces on defense and a lot more depth. I've been bitching about for more years than I care to remember. We have to have a top 3 defense because we all know, except you, that Dak is no way good enough to carry an offense and get it done against the best of the best.
Nevertheless, you will defend Dak at all costs when it is apparent to everyone else that Dak is not the guy and getting us to the once promised land we used visit quite frequently. Its so obvious to me that will defend dumb Dak even if the Cowboys went 0-17 next year with your boy throwing 22 int's. As long as Dak is the Cowboys QB, the Cowboys will never get by the divisional round. Book it. :wizard:
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 31,826
And1: 15,984
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: The Last of Us Part II
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#175 » by Cactus Jack » Thu Dec 28, 2023 4:16 pm

Micah Prescott wrote:We missed on Mazi...unfortunately

Mazi was doomed from the start. :wink:
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
User avatar
Micah Prescott
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,606
And1: 1,755
Joined: Aug 25, 2021
     

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#176 » by Micah Prescott » Thu Dec 28, 2023 4:34 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=eUlGXH2JqX86DwNwMtkHfg&s=19



The difference between Dak and Lamar? The Ravens defense only allows 16.3 PPG which is #1 in the NFL.

And if you watched the Ravens beat the 49ers and you came out thinking "Lamar did it!". Then you suffer BJJ syndrome, someone who is incapable of seeing anything other than the QB
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 20,772
And1: 4,481
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#177 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Dec 28, 2023 4:56 pm

Micah Prescott wrote:
Read on Twitter
?t=eUlGXH2JqX86DwNwMtkHfg&s=19



The difference between Dak and Lamar? The Ravens defense only allows 16.3 PPG which is #1 in the NFL.

And if you watched the Ravens beat the 49ers and you came out thinking "Lamar did it!". Then you suffer BJJ syndrome, someone who is incapable of seeing anything other than the QB

Cowboys defense were giving up less points per game till we became a MASH unit and lost 4 starters. I know the real reason why you don't want to go back and review Dak's performance and leadership of the offense the first 5 weeks when defense was totally dominate except the the Arizona game. First 10 games or so, wins vs. Giants, Jets, Patriots, Chargers, Giants again, Panthers and then Washington. Wow !!! Whee. Losses to Niners, Egals and Arizona. You call that a championship resume?
User avatar
Micah Prescott
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,606
And1: 1,755
Joined: Aug 25, 2021
     

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#178 » by Micah Prescott » Thu Dec 28, 2023 5:06 pm

It's actually our defense that got to benefit from facing awful QBs. Not Dak.

Take the Jets for example.... its the defense that got the luxury of facing Zack Wilson. Meanwhile Dak still had to battle a very good defense. And you think that Dak leads in TDs because of it.

The discrepancy between the Ravens defense and the Cowboys defense is MUCH MUCH MUCH greater than the discrepancy between the two offenses.
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 20,772
And1: 4,481
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#179 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Dec 28, 2023 5:16 pm

My bad. I forgot. Dallas defense sucks and its all their fault. Dak is great even though recently, like last year, he had more int's than games played. Defense really has benefited from all his great play. Dak never puts the defense in a bad place. Cowboy defense also was the difference on losing to the niners last year. They suck and blew the game all on their own. I'm so wrong. Dak has never had a good defense, O-line, any RB's or receivers in 8 years. We need to do a better job.
User avatar
El Turco
GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
Posts: 53,957
And1: 21,428
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Location: Frisco
     

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#180 » by El Turco » Thu Dec 28, 2023 5:21 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Micah Prescott wrote:
Mr B wrote:You honestly might be right in the end. Dak will more than likely get the extension. There is an outside chance though that the Cowboys find a way to move on.

So if you’re right and he does get resigned (along with Lamb and Parsons) what would you do next? What would you do to make the team better? What positions are you targeting in the draft? Just curious.

We need a better defense. Im sorry but our offense and QB put up points. We have the #2 scorong offense in the NFL.Our QB has thrown more TDs than any other QB. Now we need a defense that can hold teams low. But Id probably go BPA, the same strategy most teams do. If there is an elite RB at pur spot go with it.

It sure AF beats drafting a QB year after year until we finally find one that throws even MORE TDs than this.

I mean the Ravens just gave Lamar Jackson the biggest contract ever. How does that effect what are they targeting?

Sure. Between all the tomato cans teams Dak as able to pad his stats. Been doing it for years. And lets not forget how the defense and special teams carried the team the first 5 weeks, making things extremely easy for your boy. Gave him tons of leads and numerous short fields and most of the time all he and the offense could do in the beginning was put up field goals. Dak's stats would not be what they are now hadn't the defense played lights out till they became a MASH unit losing 4 players for the year.


Yeah it is utterly dishonest to use scoring offense for Dallas considering they got 7 defensive and special teams touchdowns in addition to short fields.

Dallas' estimated offensive points per game is 5th which is still not bad. Until you see that Dallas offense 17th on the road and 20th against teams with winning record. Even in points per play Dallas is essentially tied with Seattle for 13th in away games.

Dallas will have to play away probably for the entirety of the playoffs. For once stats back your analysis :D
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!


Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.

Return to The General NFL Board