Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, dakomish23, mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully
KnicksGod wrote:Im Coming Home wrote:I feel bad for Ant, must suck to deal with KAT thinking it's still his team and taking dumb runners in crunch time
Didn’t need to keep shooting like that
Edwards is how they win
dakomish23 wrote:cgmw wrote:Randle with no RJ is a problem
He’s been killing it long before today. But we’ll see if it takes another leap.
Reign23 wrote:Brunson was 5-23? jesus
god shammgod wrote:good win. much more enjoyable watch than usual. i'm not gonna say why out of respect for people who like bad basketball players. happy new year to all my friends.
3toheadmelo wrote:Reign23 wrote:DaGawd wrote:rj tribute
couldn't resist huh?
tbf you threw the alley to him
KnicksGod wrote:god shammgod wrote:good win. much more enjoyable watch than usual. i'm not gonna say why out of respect for people who like bad basketball players. happy new year to all my friends.
Mitch has been out a while so you’re late
3toheadmelo wrote:Reign23 wrote:DaGawd wrote:rj tribute
couldn't resist huh?
tbf you threw the alley to him
Im Coming Home wrote:mrdressup wrote:Im Coming Home wrote:OG needs to attack more.
I don't think you want to see that. Bad handles. Almost a guaranteed offensive foul if he does. The guy has very little floor game.
Well we need him to try, Brunson and Randle can't do everything. That's where we'll miss RJ as bad as he was at times he was our 3rd option and could actually go to him and he would attack and score at times.
sol537 wrote:40 mins for Brunson, Randle, and Hartenstein.... oof
DaGawd wrote:Reign23 wrote:Brunson was 5-23? jesus
rj tribute
Snacks wrote:dakomish23 wrote:cgmw wrote:Randle with no RJ is a problem
He’s been killing it long before today. But we’ll see if it takes another leap.
What about no big Mitch? ...more space to play for him
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Im Coming Home wrote:Scase wrote:Yall likin OG?
Yes, but offensively in some ways he hurts us because now we don't have a 3rd player who can attack and create. So now most of the offense has been Randle or Brunson going one on one it felt like. Hopefully OG was being this passive since it was his first game and he has some more selfishness in the future.
Snacks wrote:dakomish23 wrote:cgmw wrote:Randle with no RJ is a problem
He’s been killing it long before today. But we’ll see if it takes another leap.
What about no big Mitch? ...more space to play for him
Reign23 wrote:god shammgod wrote:good win. much more enjoyable watch than usual. i'm not gonna say why out of respect for people who like bad basketball players. happy new year to all my friends.
because Mitch is out and we have a center who can... play basketball ?
Iron Mantis wrote:sol537 wrote:40 mins for Brunson, Randle, and Hartenstein.... oof
Get used to this.
Randle and Brunson will consistently have to play big minutes unless the Knicks are blowing teams out.
Scase wrote:Im Coming Home wrote:Scase wrote:Yall likin OG?
Yes, but offensively in some ways he hurts us because now we don't have a 3rd player who can attack and create. So now most of the offense has been Randle or Brunson going one on one it felt like. Hopefully OG was being this passive since it was his first game and he has some more selfishness in the future.
Trust me, you dont want selfish OG lol. He is at his best when he is a corner 3 sniper, when he puts the ball on the floor, bad things usually follow.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
