eyeatoma wrote:Bad game for SGA against the hapless Hawks...
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Bad game? He went 33/13/8.
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
eyeatoma wrote:Bad game for SGA against the hapless Hawks...
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
DrModesty wrote:eyeatoma wrote:Bad game for SGA against the hapless Hawks...
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Bad game? He went 33/13/8.
eyeatoma wrote:DrModesty wrote:eyeatoma wrote:Bad game for SGA against the hapless Hawks...
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Bad game? He went 33/13/8.
That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.
You can have good stats and still play poorly.
DrModesty wrote:eyeatoma wrote:DrModesty wrote:
Bad game? He went 33/13/8.
That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.
You can have good stats and still play poorly.
But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.
The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.
You can miss shots and still play well.
eyeatoma wrote:DrModesty wrote:eyeatoma wrote:
That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.
You can have good stats and still play poorly.
But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.
The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.
You can miss shots and still play well.
It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.
You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.
He'll be fine.
DrModesty wrote:eyeatoma wrote:DrModesty wrote:
But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.
The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.
You can miss shots and still play well.
It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.
You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.
He'll be fine.
They literally had an open 3 to take it to overtime. But if you aren't capable of accepting a .458 FG% can be a part of a good game, I just don't think I can give your opinions much credence.
eyeatoma wrote:DrModesty wrote:eyeatoma wrote:
That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.
You can have good stats and still play poorly.
But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.
The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.
You can miss shots and still play well.
It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.
You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.
He'll be fine.

LoneyROY wrote:eyeatoma wrote:DrModesty wrote:
But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.
The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.
You can miss shots and still play well.
It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.
You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.
He'll be fine.
eyeatoma wrote:LoneyROY wrote:eyeatoma wrote:
It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.
You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.
He'll be fine.
Showing a gif of the ultimate chucker, who basically was only ever able to shoot about .450
Kobe was so overrated it's not funny.
eyeatoma wrote:LoneyROY wrote:eyeatoma wrote:
It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.
You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.
He'll be fine.
Showing a gif of the ultimate chucker, who basically was only ever able to shoot about .450
Kobe was so overrated it's not funny.
LoneyROY wrote:eyeatoma wrote:LoneyROY wrote:
Showing a gif of the ultimate chucker, who basically was only ever able to shoot about .450
Kobe was so overrated it's not funny.
If you think it's impossible to have a good game while shooting 45.8 percent, you need to seriously re-evaluate your entire understanding of the game of basketball.
eyeatoma wrote:DrModesty wrote:eyeatoma wrote:
That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.
You can have good stats and still play poorly.
But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.
The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.
You can miss shots and still play well.
It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.
You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.
He'll be fine.
eyeatoma wrote:You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game (unless isn't Embiid).

mcmurphy wrote:eyeatoma wrote:You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game (unless isn't Embiid).
fix it.
25 of 53 playoff career games under 0.460
dygaction wrote:eyeatoma wrote:LoneyROY wrote:
Showing a gif of the ultimate chucker, who basically was only ever able to shoot about .450
Kobe was so overrated it's not funny.
Cannot believe this is from a fan of Embiid, a career .461% CENTER conference final virgin, laughing at a .458 game and a 5-times champion legend.
eyeatoma wrote:mcmurphy wrote:eyeatoma wrote:You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game (unless isn't Embiid).
fix it.
25 of 53 playoff career games under 0.460
Yup, and how many of those game under 460, where when he was injured, and had Ben Simmons/James Harden as his partner?
And don't literally put words into my mouth. I've always said defensively Embiid has been elite in the playoffs but offensively he takes a big step back...
Hmm I wonder why, what could he be having nearly every post season that slows him down?
nikster wrote:eyeatoma wrote:mcmurphy wrote:
fix it.
25 of 53 playoff career games under 0.460
Yup, and how many of those game under 460, where when he was injured, and had Ben Simmons/James Harden as his partner?
And don't literally put words into my mouth. I've always said defensively Embiid has been elite in the playoffs but offensively he takes a big step back...
Hmm I wonder why, what could he be having nearly every post season that slows him down?
The excuses for Embiid are so funny lol