NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued)

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

Who is leading the race for MVP? (players listed in alphabetical order)

Giannis Antetokounmpo
50
17%
Luka Doncic
45
15%
Kevin Durant
1
0%
Anthony Edwards
3
1%
Joel Embiid
61
21%
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
41
14%
Tyrese Haliburton
8
3%
Nikola Jokic
64
22%
Jayson Tatum
7
2%
Other (Kawhi, Curry, Booker, Fox, Gobert, LeBron, AD, Etc.)
11
4%
 
Total votes: 291

DrModesty
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 1,059
Joined: Jan 09, 2020

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1581 » by DrModesty » Thu Jan 4, 2024 4:39 am

eyeatoma wrote:Bad game for SGA against the hapless Hawks...

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


Bad game? He went 33/13/8.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,952
And1: 13,205
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1582 » by eyeatoma » Thu Jan 4, 2024 4:47 am

DrModesty wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:Bad game for SGA against the hapless Hawks...

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


Bad game? He went 33/13/8.



That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.

You can have good stats and still play poorly.
DrModesty
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 1,059
Joined: Jan 09, 2020

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1583 » by DrModesty » Thu Jan 4, 2024 5:02 am

eyeatoma wrote:
DrModesty wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:Bad game for SGA against the hapless Hawks...

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


Bad game? He went 33/13/8.



That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.

You can have good stats and still play poorly.


But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.

The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.

You can miss shots and still play well.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,952
And1: 13,205
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1584 » by eyeatoma » Thu Jan 4, 2024 5:05 am

DrModesty wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
DrModesty wrote:
Bad game? He went 33/13/8.



That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.

You can have good stats and still play poorly.


But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.

The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.

You can miss shots and still play well.


It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.

You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.

He'll be fine.
DrModesty
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 1,059
Joined: Jan 09, 2020

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1585 » by DrModesty » Thu Jan 4, 2024 5:19 am

eyeatoma wrote:
DrModesty wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:

That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.

You can have good stats and still play poorly.


But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.

The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.

You can miss shots and still play well.


It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.

You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.

He'll be fine.


They literally had an open 3 to take it to overtime. But if you aren't capable of accepting a .458 FG% can be a part of a good game, I just don't think I can give your opinions much credence.
AleksandarN
General Manager
Posts: 9,376
And1: 12,902
Joined: Aug 08, 2002

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1586 » by AleksandarN » Thu Jan 4, 2024 7:01 am

DrModesty wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
DrModesty wrote:
But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.

The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.

You can miss shots and still play well.


It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.

You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.

He'll be fine.


They literally had an open 3 to take it to overtime. But if you aren't capable of accepting a .458 FG% can be a part of a good game, I just don't think I can give your opinions much credence.

I bet he didn't even watch the game.
User avatar
LoneyROY
Veteran
Posts: 2,755
And1: 3,134
Joined: Apr 07, 2012
Location: NYC
   

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1587 » by LoneyROY » Thu Jan 4, 2024 7:25 am

eyeatoma wrote:
DrModesty wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:

That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.

You can have good stats and still play poorly.


But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.

The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.

You can miss shots and still play well.


It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.

You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.

He'll be fine.


Image
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,952
And1: 13,205
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1588 » by eyeatoma » Thu Jan 4, 2024 7:48 am

LoneyROY wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
DrModesty wrote:
But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.

The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.

You can miss shots and still play well.


It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.

You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.

He'll be fine.


Image



Showing a gif of the ultimate chucker, who basically was only ever able to shoot about .450

Kobe was so overrated it's not funny.
User avatar
LoneyROY
Veteran
Posts: 2,755
And1: 3,134
Joined: Apr 07, 2012
Location: NYC
   

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1589 » by LoneyROY » Thu Jan 4, 2024 8:01 am

eyeatoma wrote:
LoneyROY wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.

You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.

He'll be fine.


Image



Showing a gif of the ultimate chucker, who basically was only ever able to shoot about .450

Kobe was so overrated it's not funny.


If you think it's impossible to have a good game while shooting 45.8 percent, you need to seriously re-evaluate your entire understanding of the game of basketball.
dygaction
General Manager
Posts: 7,638
And1: 4,926
Joined: Sep 20, 2015
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1590 » by dygaction » Thu Jan 4, 2024 8:04 am

eyeatoma wrote:
LoneyROY wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.

You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.

He'll be fine.


Image



Showing a gif of the ultimate chucker, who basically was only ever able to shoot about .450

Kobe was so overrated it's not funny.


Cannot believe this is from a fan of Embiid, a career .461% CENTER conference final virgin, laughing at a .458 game and a 5-times champion legend.
SpreeS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,791
And1: 4,150
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1591 » by SpreeS » Thu Jan 4, 2024 8:12 am

It’s possible that Shai will get MVP this year. Now he is strong case for 2nd place and Embiid has missed already 7 games to Shai one.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,952
And1: 13,205
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1592 » by eyeatoma » Thu Jan 4, 2024 8:26 am

LoneyROY wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
LoneyROY wrote:
Image



Showing a gif of the ultimate chucker, who basically was only ever able to shoot about .450

Kobe was so overrated it's not funny.


If you think it's impossible to have a good game while shooting 45.8 percent, you need to seriously re-evaluate your entire understanding of the game of basketball.



I think in this case Shai was having a terrible game until the 4th quarter, so 45.8 could have been a lot worse, which is my point. As I said, it's largely an anomally for Shai. It's why he's an MVP candidate right now, because he's scoring so effeciently, and taking excellent shots.

It's also one of the reasons why Kobe only ever one 1 MVP (feel like it was more of a lifetime achievement award). He was given the license to shoot more than anyone not named Allen Iverson. A lot of that offense was bad offense too. He was never able to lead the Lakers to a chip until he get Pau (well the NBA gifted him Pau), and Bynum. What Kobe was, was an incredible shot maker, but he also had a lot of bad games, where he shot his team out of the game.
losmi
Junior
Posts: 407
And1: 591
Joined: Jan 26, 2022

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1593 » by losmi » Thu Jan 4, 2024 12:11 pm

eyeatoma wrote:
DrModesty wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:

That was before the game ended, finished with that much, but look at his efficiency. Only 458, for someone who usually is in the high 50s for fg%.

You can have good stats and still play poorly.


But it wasn't that he was playing poorly. He was taking his normal shots, but early they just didn't drop. He was unequivocally good tonight. 13 Rebounds and the second leading rebounder on the team got 4. 8 assists to only 2 turnovers. Made a flurry of buckets in the clutch to give them a chance to take the game to OT.

The reason they lost is OKC as a whole didn't play good defense... on a back to back, away, with travel issues, after an emotionally charged win against the Celtics.

You can miss shots and still play well.


It's okay man, even amazing players have bad games, MVP candidates even.

You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game. Those weren't really clutch shots, the game was out of hand at that point, and he tried to make a late run, too little too late. If he had a good game, he would have hit those shots earlier.

He'll be fine.



Interestingly, Embiid, in his fraudulent MVP season, had 13 games with a shooting below .458. So that's at least 13 bad games.

For comparison, Jokic only 3.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,547
And1: 9,970
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1594 » by The-Power » Thu Jan 4, 2024 12:24 pm

SGA – Jokic – Embiid – Haliburton – Giannis

That would be my ballot thus far, in order.
User avatar
mcmurphy
Starter
Posts: 2,294
And1: 2,175
Joined: Mar 06, 2009
Location: Milan-Italy
   

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1595 » by mcmurphy » Thu Jan 4, 2024 1:47 pm

eyeatoma wrote:You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game (unless isn't Embiid).


fix it.

25 of 53 playoff career games under 0.460

Image
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,952
And1: 13,205
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1596 » by eyeatoma » Thu Jan 4, 2024 1:58 pm

mcmurphy wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game (unless isn't Embiid).


fix it.

25 of 53 playoff career games under 0.460

Image


Yup, and how many of those game under 460, where when he was injured, and had Ben Simmons/James Harden as his partner?

And don't literally put words into my mouth. I've always said defensively Embiid has been elite in the playoffs but offensively he takes a big step back...

Hmm I wonder why, what could he be having nearly every post season that slows him down?
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,952
And1: 13,205
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1597 » by eyeatoma » Thu Jan 4, 2024 2:02 pm

dygaction wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
LoneyROY wrote:
Image



Showing a gif of the ultimate chucker, who basically was only ever able to shoot about .450

Kobe was so overrated it's not funny.


Cannot believe this is from a fan of Embiid, a career .461% CENTER conference final virgin, laughing at a .458 game and a 5-times champion legend.


He's busy committing robberies man...
GrandTheftRondo
RealGM
Posts: 10,251
And1: 10,796
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1598 » by GrandTheftRondo » Thu Jan 4, 2024 2:18 pm

Good lord surely it gets tiring post the same repetitive crap over and over again
nikster
RealGM
Posts: 14,535
And1: 13,018
Joined: Sep 08, 2013

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1599 » by nikster » Thu Jan 4, 2024 2:18 pm

eyeatoma wrote:
mcmurphy wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:You're never going to convince me that shooting .458 is a good game (unless isn't Embiid).


fix it.

25 of 53 playoff career games under 0.460

Image


Yup, and how many of those game under 460, where when he was injured, and had Ben Simmons/James Harden as his partner?

And don't literally put words into my mouth. I've always said defensively Embiid has been elite in the playoffs but offensively he takes a big step back...

Hmm I wonder why, what could he be having nearly every post season that slows him down?

The excuses for Embiid are so funny lol
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,952
And1: 13,205
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1600 » by eyeatoma » Thu Jan 4, 2024 2:24 pm

nikster wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
mcmurphy wrote:
fix it.

25 of 53 playoff career games under 0.460

Image


Yup, and how many of those game under 460, where when he was injured, and had Ben Simmons/James Harden as his partner?

And don't literally put words into my mouth. I've always said defensively Embiid has been elite in the playoffs but offensively he takes a big step back...

Hmm I wonder why, what could he be having nearly every post season that slows him down?

The excuses for Embiid are so funny lol


I've never said anything different, it's always been the injuries.

Return to The General Board