Where would 1998 Jordan rank today?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Where would 1998 Jordan rank today?

Best player
18
22%
Top 3
15
18%
Top 5
28
34%
Top 10
18
22%
Outside Top 10
4
5%
 
Total votes: 83

Matt15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,543
And1: 550
Joined: Aug 27, 2008

Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#1 » by Matt15 » Thu Jan 4, 2024 10:25 pm

Where would 1998 Jordan rank in todays league?

;si=xzGVWrYlA4gaHFe7
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,274
And1: 30,264
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#2 » by HomoSapien » Thu Jan 4, 2024 10:43 pm

In the regular season, he'd probably be somewhere in the top 5. I have him above Durrant, Steph, LeBron but in 98 I don't think there was anyone playing at Jokic, Embiid, or Luka's level. Shai and Giannis are also having incredible seasons.

In the playoffs though, I think he's the most dangerous player that has ever existed.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
jdzimme3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 858
And1: 338
Joined: Oct 29, 2003

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#3 » by jdzimme3 » Thu Jan 4, 2024 11:28 pm

HomoSapien wrote:In the regular season, he'd probably be somewhere in the top 5. I have him above Durrant, Steph, LeBron but in 98 I don't think there was anyone playing at Jokic, Embiid, or Luka's level. Shai and Giannis are also having incredible seasons.

In the playoffs though, I think he's the most dangerous player that has ever existed.


This
SportsGuru08
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 1,464
Joined: Dec 23, 2023
Location: Clearwater, FL
       

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#4 » by SportsGuru08 » Fri Jan 5, 2024 12:52 am

HomoSapien wrote:In the regular season, he'd probably be somewhere in the top 5. I have him above Durrant, Steph, LeBron but in 98 I don't think there was anyone playing at Jokic, Embiid, or Luka's level. Shai and Giannis are also having incredible seasons.

In the playoffs though, I think he's the most dangerous player that has ever existed.


Good take. Regular season is tough to say where he'd rank, but in the playoffs I'd trust him a great deal more than any of today's stars.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,985
And1: 5,533
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#5 » by One_and_Done » Fri Jan 5, 2024 1:09 am

I voted top 3, but my gut was telling me that's too high. Kind of regretting it tbh.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
User avatar
Heej
General Manager
Posts: 8,469
And1: 9,170
Joined: Jan 14, 2011

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#6 » by Heej » Fri Jan 5, 2024 3:55 am

Top 10. 98 was kind of a drop off for Jordan all around. His burst was zapped with him relying on midranges a lot more (while shooting well on them) and his dunks were essentially rim grazers. 98 MJ is a tier 2 or 3 athlete in the league right now and probably wouldn't be the best pure athlete on most teams rn
LeBron's NBA Cup MVP is more valuable than either of KD's Finals MVPs. This is the word of the Lord
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,932
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#7 » by OhayoKD » Fri Jan 5, 2024 10:42 am

HomoSapien wrote:In the regular season, he'd probably be somewhere in the top 5. I have him above Durrant, Steph, LeBron but in 98 I don't think there was anyone playing at Jokic, Embiid, or Luka's level. Shai and Giannis are also having incredible seasons.

In the playoffs though, I think he's the most dangerous player that has ever existed.

Interesting claim given that Jordan rises less in the postseason than a fair few players, most notably Lebron and Hakeem
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,082
And1: 2,826
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#8 » by lessthanjake » Fri Jan 5, 2024 4:05 pm

He’d be top 3-5 IMO. By 1998, I don’t think he could be the best today, since we have Jokic, who I think is currently up there with anyone’s peak ever (including Jordan’s) and Jordan was not at his peak in 1998. Beyond Jokic, I think there’s no one that is very clearly above 1998 Jordan. But there’s enough guys that I think *could* be better that I would guess top 3-5 rather than saying #2. One thing I’ll note is that there’s players in the league now that are perhaps playing better than 1998 Jordan generally did, but who I’m not sure I’d put over 1998 Jordan because of questions about holding up in the playoffs (Embiid, for instance). In general, my inclination is that 1998 Jordan would be at about the level of Luka. Not that they’d be the same player, of course, but that’s the general level I see him at that year (though I think I’m not as high on Luka as some others are, so keep that in mind).
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,406
And1: 5,002
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#9 » by Dutchball97 » Fri Jan 5, 2024 6:19 pm

I'd take him 5th in the regular season behind Embiid, SGA, Jokic and Giannis. Luka is arguable but his inability to produce a +- impact you expect from a star (and see with the other guys I mentioned) is becoming a persistent enough issue I'm not willing to give him the benefit of the doubt over Jordan, who had at least a weak MVP level season himself.

In the post-season SGA and Embiid haven't proven themselves enough to justify over even an older and not quite at his best Jordan imo. GIannis and Jokic have but those two and 98 Jordan would be an interesting discussion so I'm going top 3 for now.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,974
And1: 31,577
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#10 » by tsherkin » Fri Jan 5, 2024 6:55 pm

Hmm.

Old Bull Jordan, less burst than he had even in 96.

He wouldn't play 38.8 mpg today, though. Chicago was slow af (89.0 pace in 98), so he might enjoy a little boost with the extra transition offense from a league that's like 10 full possessions per game faster than that on average. Especially with reduced minutes to help manage his stamina. Trash year for him in terms of scoring efficiency, he was a 102 TS+ guy on 53.3% TS (+0.9% rTS). About a third of his FGAs were long 2s (32.8%) at 46.2% FG. Excellent shooting, but a horrible strategy in today's game.

That puts him about 4.7% below league average efficiency today. Even with a boost from transition (and thus more high-percentage looks at the rim), it's hard to envision that particular version of Jordan thriving as a high-volume scorer in this environment. Still, on a team with spacing, helping him get a few more drives to the rack per game, you can imagine him as a guy in that +2% rTS range, and he was exceptional at protecting the ball, so his overall utility on offense would be interesting. 1997 was his last really great year. 98 was not a banner year for him, though in his defense, he turned it up in the playoffs. Less so with efficiency (he was at similar efficiency from January forward in the RS), but he also had only 45 turnovers in that entire playoff run (again), which is wild . 6.7% TOV. Just parse that for a second. Yeah, most of his possessions ended with a middie, but even still, it's wild.

He'd be up there. Top 10 in the RS, maybe? Hard to do the theoretical translation into today's game and get a strong picture of exactly how he'd look, but he wasn't staggering the league even in his own day, and without a 3 or elite FT shooting (that was also the worst FT-shooting season of his entire career), there's something of a cap on how efficient he could be.

There are younger, more athletic guys who are better scorers and playmakers in the league right now than Old MJ with a busted finger on his last ride with the red and black. That shouldn't be that surprising. It's hard to imagine him being better than Jokic, Giannis, Luka, Shai, Hali. He's in there somewhere maybe with Steph, KD, Trae and Lebron. Jordan has this titanic narrative weight to him, but his RS performance wasn't that hot. He'd need to have an epic postseason to really turn that around. He certainly had a great one in 98 in flashes, but like, 98 was a brutally-repressed offensive environment, so mediocre volume scoring with decent playmaking and very strong ball protection was a viable approach. It isn't right now.

Younger MJ, different story, but Jordan wasn't that stunning in 98. Winning glosses over a lot. I can see where a lot of pro-MJ arguments come from, of course. And certainly tracing back to the 98 postseason, you see some flashes. But it's quite a bit more difficult to survive your star going 11/28, 9/22 and 9/25 as he did in the Pacers series, that last being in game 7... and he was 3/12 in the 2nd half. And then yeah, 51.6% TS (1.3% BELOW playoff league average) in the Finals? That's the guy we're talking about here. We remember the game-winner over Russell, and the steal before it and such. But we tend to forget how mundane and mortal he looked in that series overall. Chicago had him lofting over 27 FGA/g and it was brutal; they're lucky Utah folded like a cheap suit on O in that series. Well, lucky and very good on D, but still.

Food for thought.
magicman1978
Analyst
Posts: 3,158
And1: 2,123
Joined: Dec 27, 2005
     

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#11 » by magicman1978 » Fri Jan 5, 2024 7:39 pm

Top 10. 97 was the last year he could have been top 5. The finger issue tsherkin mentioned is a key reason why. It caused him to struggle with his outside shot and definitely would have meant he'd struggle with shooting 3s. He was no longer athletic enough to make up for it.
User avatar
OldSchoolNoBull
General Manager
Posts: 9,078
And1: 4,468
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Ohio
 

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#12 » by OldSchoolNoBull » Fri Jan 5, 2024 8:57 pm

tsherkin wrote:Hmm.

Old Bull Jordan, less burst than he had even in 96.

He wouldn't play 38.8 mpg today, though. Chicago was slow af (89.0 pace in 98), so he might enjoy a little boost with the extra transition offense from a league that's like 10 full possessions per game faster than that on average. Especially with reduced minutes to help manage his stamina. Trash year for him in terms of scoring efficiency, he was a 102 TS+ guy on 53.3% TS (+0.9% rTS). About a third of his FGAs were long 2s (32.8%) at 46.2% FG. Excellent shooting, but a horrible strategy in today's game.

That puts him about 4.7% below league average efficiency today. Even with a boost from transition (and thus more high-percentage looks at the rim), it's hard to envision that particular version of Jordan thriving as a high-volume scorer in this environment. Still, on a team with spacing, helping him get a few more drives to the rack per game, you can imagine him as a guy in that +2% rTS range, and he was exceptional at protecting the ball, so his overall utility on offense would be interesting. 1997 was his last really great year. 98 was not a banner year for him, though in his defense, he turned it up in the playoffs. Less so with efficiency (he was at similar efficiency from January forward in the RS), but he also had only 45 turnovers in that entire playoff run (again), which is wild . 6.7% TOV. Just parse that for a second. Yeah, most of his possessions ended with a middie, but even still, it's wild.

He'd be up there. Top 10 in the RS, maybe? Hard to do the theoretical translation into today's game and get a strong picture of exactly how he'd look, but he wasn't staggering the league even in his own day, and without a 3 or elite FT shooting (that was also the worst FT-shooting season of his entire career), there's something of a cap on how efficient he could be.

There are younger, more athletic guys who are better scorers and playmakers in the league right now than Old MJ with a busted finger on his last ride with the red and black. That shouldn't be that surprising. It's hard to imagine him being better than Jokic, Giannis, Luka, Shai, Hali. He's in there somewhere maybe with Steph, KD, Trae and Lebron. Jordan has this titanic narrative weight to him, but his RS performance wasn't that hot. He'd need to have an epic postseason to really turn that around. He certainly had a great one in 98 in flashes, but like, 98 was a brutally-repressed offensive environment, so mediocre volume scoring with decent playmaking and very strong ball protection was a viable approach. It isn't right now.

Younger MJ, different story, but Jordan wasn't that stunning in 98. Winning glosses over a lot. I can see where a lot of pro-MJ arguments come from, of course. And certainly tracing back to the 98 postseason, you see some flashes. But it's quite a bit more difficult to survive your star going 11/28, 9/22 and 9/25 as he did in the Pacers series, that last being in game 7... and he was 3/12 in the 2nd half. And then yeah, 51.6% TS (1.3% BELOW playoff league average) in the Finals? That's the guy we're talking about here. We remember the game-winner over Russell, and the steal before it and such. But we tend to forget how mundane and mortal he looked in that series overall. Chicago had him lofting over 27 FGA/g and it was brutal; they're lucky Utah folded like a cheap suit on O in that series. Well, lucky and very good on D, but still.

Food for thought.


I hear what you're saying, but I would caution against minimizing 98 Jordan's impact too much. You've focused on his efficiency which, while still above league average(barely), was certainly below previous years. But these are some of his other numbers for 97-98:

Regular Season: .238 WS/48, 6.9 BPM, +6.7 on/off
Playoffs: .265 WS/48(next highest Bull in playoffs was Kukoc at .182), 9.0 BPM(next highest Bull in playoffs was Scottie at 5.6), +13.1 on/off(next highest Bull in playoffs was Rodman at +5.5)
6.15 RS+PO RAPM(via JE), 4.43 O-RAPM, 1.72 D-RAPM(next highest RAPM on the team was Kukoc at 4.99)

This illustrates, imo, elite impact despite the drop in efficiency, especially in the playoffs.

If there's narrative weight around Jordan for the 98 playoffs, the narrative is that the team was running on fumes: Pippen had missed half the season recovering from foot surgery and by the playoffs was dealing with back problems that turned out to be herniated discs and had wanted out all season; Rodman had begun mentally checking out, having ran away to Vegas for a time during the season; all of the major players on the team were aging; everyone knew Phil was done in Chicago; etc. That playoff run has always been characterized as a big carry job on MJ's part, and the numbers posted above seem to jive with that. That being said, I suppose people have exaggerated this a bit, seeing as Pippen(before the back injury) and Kukoc played well enough.

There's also this fact that I saw in a reddit thread about the 98 playoffs:

"MJ scored 32.4 out of their 92 points per game during their 28 postseason games. That's the highest percentage/share for any individual player of any title team's total offense in league history. Higher than Shaq's 2000, Hakeem's 94+95, and LeBron's 2012."

He was past his prime, but he was still a hugely impactful player imo.

It's hard to say where he'd rank in the current league - too many variables.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,974
And1: 31,577
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#13 » by tsherkin » Fri Jan 5, 2024 9:04 pm

OldSchoolNoBull wrote:I hear what you're saying, but I would caution against minimizing 98 Jordan's impact too much. You've focused on his efficiency which, while still above league average(barely), was certainly below previous years. But these are some of his other numbers for 97-98:

Regular Season: .238 WS/48, 6.9 BPM, +6.7 on/off
Playoffs: .265 WS/48(next highest Bull in playoffs was Kukoc at .182), 9.0 BPM(next highest Bull in playoffs was Scottie at 5.6), +13.1 on/off(next highest Bull in playoffs was Rodman at +5.5)
6.15 RS+PO RAPM(via JE), 4.43 O-RAPM, 1.72 D-RAPM(next highest RAPM on the team was Kukoc at 4.99)

This illustrates, imo, elite impact despite the drop in efficiency, especially in the playoffs.


It's worth remembering that the Bulls made their bones on offense that year not with shotmaking, but with ball protection (of which Jordan was a significant part) and offensive rebounding. They were 15th in 2FG% and 23rd in 3P%, and 21st in FT/FGA. Some of that last was due to some crappy FT shooters, of course. There were injuries to consider, and Rodman's lack of scoring ability, etc.

If there's narrative weight around Jordan for the 98 playoffs,


I meant around him in general. People don't like to consider the idea that he might not be the best in the league always, for every season he ever played, in all eras.

He was past his prime, but he was still a hugely impactful player imo.


Oh, they leaned on him really hard. Chicago was designed to let him be the high-volume individual scorer. My point was more that this is not a sensible strategy in today's game, particularly without SIGNIFICANT shift in efficiency.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,274
And1: 30,264
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#14 » by HomoSapien » Fri Jan 5, 2024 9:24 pm

OhayoKD wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:In the regular season, he'd probably be somewhere in the top 5. I have him above Durrant, Steph, LeBron but in 98 I don't think there was anyone playing at Jokic, Embiid, or Luka's level. Shai and Giannis are also having incredible seasons.

In the playoffs though, I think he's the most dangerous player that has ever existed.

Interesting claim given that Jordan rises less in the postseason than a fair few players, most notably Lebron and Hakeem


Yeah, nope. Not taking that bait.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,130
And1: 5,974
Joined: Jul 24, 2022

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#15 » by AEnigma » Fri Jan 5, 2024 9:28 pm

Not really bait, there is nothing that makes Jordan (especially old Jordan) uniquely “dangerous” outside of his sheer shot volume — which in the modern league is no longer the outlier it used to be with more teams than ever trying to funnel shots to their stars.
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,161
And1: 6,895
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#16 » by DirtyDez » Sat Jan 6, 2024 4:41 am

I’d take 88-92’ MJ over Jokic.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,827
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#17 » by HeartBreakKid » Sat Jan 6, 2024 8:56 am

jordan past his prime isn't more dangerous than jokic lol. makes no sense, jokic already did what 98 Jordan did last year in terms of leading and scoring (and then some), not to mention one of the goat passers..
Djoker
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 1,879
Joined: Sep 12, 2015
 

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#18 » by Djoker » Sat Jan 6, 2024 7:28 pm

Top 3 in the league with Jokic/Giannis but I wouldn't take anyone over him in the playoffs.

The 1998 NBA had a league average TS% pf 52.4 and a pace of 90.3.
The 2023 NBA had a league average TS% of 58.1 and a pace of 99.1.

1998 Jordan averaged 32.4/5.1/3.5 on 54.5 %TS (+2.1 rTS) with 2.1 turnovers per game in the playoffs. Today with the same rTS the scoring numbers jump up to 35.8 ppg on 60.2 %TS (+2.1 rTS). With the higher pace the other stats including FGA would probably go up too so overall a 36/6/4 average is very probable. And he was still an elite defender for a guard.
VanWest82
RealGM
Posts: 19,515
And1: 18,053
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#19 » by VanWest82 » Sat Jan 6, 2024 7:32 pm

Shai is a good example of how 98 MJ would look today imo, though I always find these old guy from a previous era in a new era thought experiments really tough. Part of the old guy advantage is you know the league so well.
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,880
And1: 11,377
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Where would 1998 Jordan rank today? 

Post#20 » by Cavsfansince84 » Sat Jan 6, 2024 7:39 pm

Still top 5ish. It's hard to project him from being in a way slower league, on a team near the bottom pace wise on top of it and getting to play in the triangle on teams that were winning with defense to today. I also think that even though he was still a great playoff performer he was starting to wear down as the playoffs came around in 96-98.

Return to Player Comparisons