Doctor MJ wrote:WhatTheBuck wrote:bigboi wrote:
That’s the same stat family that claimed that Grizzlies would be fine without Morant. Some of you clearly don’t know how sports work at all. You have an absolutely pitiful defensive team who would be lead by an injury prone inconsistent all star player and you don’t think that isn’t a recipe for disaster? It’s literally common sense. The team would resemble Beal Wizards. Just flat out not good
Plus minus - the ultimate correlation over causation stat of all time.
 
Inferring causation from correlation is pretty much what human beings do when they draw conclusions.
 
Yeah, and its pretty much the reason why some of the conclusions we draw are dumb ones.
For example, does plus minus take into account what a team needs to expend to stop a player? Does it take into account that he makes it easier for a bench unit to take over because he has exhausted the best players of the opposition that have to sit when he sits because their sole focus is to try and contain him? 
Does it take into account whether a player is playing with the best players on his team or whether he is allowing other players to take a break whilst he plays with the bench?
Does it take into account how good/bad the rest of the squad is?