Jaydubb wrote:SurfAndTurf wrote:Jaydubb wrote:I’ve watched more Japanese baseball in the last month than I have in probably my whole life.lol I guess that’s probably because the dodgers are signing everybody and the eagles have sucked ass in that exact same time frame.lol I’m so hyped for the dodgers tho, it’s gonna be fun. Closest stadium to me is Atlanta so imma try to see if I can get tickets when they play there in September.
Thanks man . Yeah I’m guessing face value is over 200 a piece and I’m praying that’s all she charges me . lol she’s cool she actually took my son once or twice and didn’t take money . Looked like around the 10th row
I dropped the ball there . Prices sky rocketed after those 2 signings . My friend has season tickets behind home plate I’m hoping she will sell me 2 for a game . I’m a grandfather now I want to take my son for his first Father’s Day . He’s a Yankee fan lol
I’m jealous.lol that’ll be a fun game. Behind home plate? Man those tickets have gotta be worth a fortune. Congrats on the grandkid!
Dak Prescott thread
Moderator: bwgood77
Re: Dak Prescott thread
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 117
- And1: 23
- Joined: Nov 05, 2023
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,995
- And1: 4,822
- Joined: Oct 18, 2014
- Location: Maine
-
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
El Turco wrote:SurfAndTurf wrote:El Turco wrote:If they draft a young guy who is even serviceable they can pay most their impact guys and even get an impact running back, and viola you are not that far from Niners.
Maybe you can even develop the guy into a franchise quarterback who knows, better than going with what you know isnt working for another 8 years.
Dallas can’t block or run right now . And the defense is not who we thought they were . It’s pretty much all on Dak . Good luck putting a young unproven guy behind that . The SF situation is an about as common as Haley’s comet . They had a top 3 roster in football already worked into the salary cap without the mega QB deal and also without high draft pics to go get 1 . In walks Purdy he completely changed the landscape . I love him btw . His poise is impressive. Gotta be the best story in the NFL right now .
Dallas still has a top 5 defense, good receivers and drafts well. I posted while back, there are plenty of teams that found their quarterback later than mid first round or moved up from late first round, it is not rare at all. I love that it is on Dak and hope Dallas keeps him forever but they definitely dont have to at all.
Glad to see at least one Dallas fan has a good taste in quarterbacks


Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
- El Turco
- GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
- Posts: 54,506
- And1: 21,820
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
- Location: Frisco
-
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
bluejerseyjinx wrote:El Turco wrote:SurfAndTurf wrote:
Dallas can’t block or run right now . And the defense is not who we thought they were . It’s pretty much all on Dak . Good luck putting a young unproven guy behind that . The SF situation is an about as common as Haley’s comet . They had a top 3 roster in football already worked into the salary cap without the mega QB deal and also without high draft pics to go get 1 . In walks Purdy he completely changed the landscape . I love him btw . His poise is impressive. Gotta be the best story in the NFL right now .
Dallas still has a top 5 defense, good receivers and drafts well. I posted while back, there are plenty of teams that found their quarterback later than mid first round or moved up from late first round, it is not rare at all. I love that it is on Dak and hope Dallas keeps him forever but they definitely dont have to at all.
Glad to see at least one Dallas fan has a good taste in quarterbacks
![]()
You should pray for early exit

TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!
Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 117
- And1: 23
- Joined: Nov 05, 2023
-
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
El Turco wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:El Turco wrote:
Dallas still has a top 5 defense, good receivers and drafts well. I posted while back, there are plenty of teams that found their quarterback later than mid first round or moved up from late first round, it is not rare at all. I love that it is on Dak and hope Dallas keeps him forever but they definitely dont have to at all.
Glad to see at least one Dallas fan has a good taste in quarterbacks
![]()
You should pray for early exit
Dallas found DAK in the 4th round but they already had a big qb contract with Romo on the books . Like I said the SF situation is as unique as it is lucky . Because if you think anyone in SF thought they were drafting anything but a backup you’re wrong .
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
- El Turco
- GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
- Posts: 54,506
- And1: 21,820
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
- Location: Frisco
-
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
SurfAndTurf wrote:El Turco wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:![]()
You should pray for early exit
Dallas found DAK in the 4th round but they already had a big qb contract with Romo on the books . Like I said the SF situation is as unique as it is lucky . Because if you think anyone in SF thought they were drafting anything but a backup you’re wrong .
Been thru this before, you are wrong... Eagles went to Super Bowl last year with only Hurts' second round salary on the books, Chiefs had a good team and moved up from 27th to grab Mahomes then won a super bowl with him on rookie salary etc etc even Niners wasted 3 first round picks to find their guy, Purdy is essentially what Lance suppose to be.
Good teams make bold attempts to find their guy, they dont keep on going with 8 year failure.
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!
Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
Re: Dak Prescott thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 407
- And1: 114
- Joined: Dec 18, 2022
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
Exactly, you can call Purdy lucky but you cant say Niners havent been trying to find an upgrade to Jimmy G.
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 117
- And1: 23
- Joined: Nov 05, 2023
-
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
El Turco wrote:SurfAndTurf wrote:El Turco wrote:
You should pray for early exit
Dallas found DAK in the 4th round but they already had a big qb contract with Romo on the books . Like I said the SF situation is as unique as it is lucky . Because if you think anyone in SF thought they were drafting anything but a backup you’re wrong .
Been thru this before, you are wrong... Eagles went to Super Bowl last year with only Hurts' second round salary on the books, Chiefs had a good team and moved up from 27th to grab Mahomes then won a super bowl with him on rookie salary etc etc even Niners wasted 3 first round picks to find their guy, Purdy is essentially what Lance suppose to be.
Good teams make bold attempts to find their guy, they dont keep on going with 8 year failure.
lol how many starting quarterbacks own a SB ring ? Get rid of all of them and start over . What if Purdy plays this good but doesn’t win a ring before his rookie deal is up ? Your saying let him walk ? Because if they extend or re sign him it’s the exact thing Dallas did with Dak without winning a ring . No ?
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
- El Turco
- GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
- Posts: 54,506
- And1: 21,820
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
- Location: Frisco
-
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
SurfAndTurf wrote:El Turco wrote:SurfAndTurf wrote:
Dallas found DAK in the 4th round but they already had a big qb contract with Romo on the books . Like I said the SF situation is as unique as it is lucky . Because if you think anyone in SF thought they were drafting anything but a backup you’re wrong .
Been thru this before, you are wrong... Eagles went to Super Bowl last year with only Hurts' second round salary on the books, Chiefs had a good team and moved up from 27th to grab Mahomes then won a super bowl with him on rookie salary etc etc even Niners wasted 3 first round picks to find their guy, Purdy is essentially what Lance suppose to be.
Good teams make bold attempts to find their guy, they dont keep on going with 8 year failure.
lol how many starting quarterbacks own a SB ring ? Get rid of all of them and start over . What if Purdy plays this good but doesn’t win a ring before his rookie deal is up ? Your saying let him walk ? Because if they extend or re sign him it’s the exact thing Dallas did with Dak without winning a ring . No ?
Yes, if Purdy doesnt improve from his current play, keeps losing in divisional and nfc title games year after year, get rid of him when it is time to pay. I always say I am loyal to the team, not to the quarterback. If he has a super bowl quality team, he should deliver one of these years.
In current salary cap structure only quarterbacks that should get those high end contracts are the quarterbacks that can make up the deficiencies that arise from the salary cap squeeze. There are very few of those quarterbacks, we'll see if Purdy one of them, I know Dak is not.
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!
Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 117
- And1: 23
- Joined: Nov 05, 2023
-
Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m
El Turco wrote:SurfAndTurf wrote:El Turco wrote:
DAK has been a top 3 QB this year with a paper thin offensive line and no running game . Any move you make at the QB position will mean more losses . You say they have a top defense but where were they in the fourth quarter of both the Miami and Philly game where DAK had 4 qtr go ahead touchdown drives in both games . I don’t like blaming the qb without context
Been thru this before, you are wrong... Eagles went to Super Bowl last year with only Hurts' second round salary on the books, Chiefs had a good team and moved up from 27th to grab Mahomes then won a super bowl with him on rookie salary etc etc even Niners wasted 3 first round picks to find their guy, Purdy is essentially what Lance suppose to be.
Good teams make bold attempts to find their guy, they dont keep on going with 8 year failure.
lol how many starting quarterbacks own a SB ring ? Get rid of all of them and start over . What if Purdy plays this good but doesn’t win a ring before his rookie deal is up ? Your saying let him walk ? Because if they extend or re sign him it’s the exact thing Dallas did with Dak without winning a ring . No ?
Yes, if Purdy doesnt improve from his current play, keeps losing in divisional and nfc title games year after year, get rid of him when it is time to pay. I always say I am loyal to the team, not to the quarterback. If he has a super bowl quality team, he should deliver one of these years.
In current salary cap structure only quarterbacks that should get those high end contracts are the quarterbacks that can make up the deficiencies that arise from the salary cap squeeze. There are very few of those quarterbacks, we'll see if Purdy one of them, I know Dak is not.
Re: Dak Prescott thread
- El Turco
- GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
- Posts: 54,506
- And1: 21,820
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
- Location: Frisco
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
Dont think you posted that correctly, at least I cant read it.
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!
Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
Re: Dak Prescott thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 407
- And1: 114
- Joined: Dec 18, 2022
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
El Turco wrote:Dont think you posted that correctly, at least I cant read it.
Me neither but I can guess he tried to come up with more excuses about why Dak fails in playoffs
Re: Dak Prescott thread
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 117
- And1: 23
- Joined: Nov 05, 2023
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
wembambamya wrote:El Turco wrote:Dont think you posted that correctly, at least I cant read it.
Me neither but I can guess he tried to come up with more excuses about why Dak fails in playoffs
He had 5 touchdowns in a playoff game last year . There’s no excuses for anybody but if you think losing to a 7 point favorite which is what happened the following week is a massive fail your wrong . Sometimes it’s as simple as you played a better team that played and coached better . The entire team was beat . If you’re going to blame just 1 person for that it’s Jerry Jones . You think if SF and Dallas switched quaterbacks before last years playoff game the outcome would be different? Lol
Re: Dak Prescott thread
- El Turco
- GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
- Posts: 54,506
- And1: 21,820
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
- Location: Frisco
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
SurfAndTurf wrote:wembambamya wrote:El Turco wrote:Dont think you posted that correctly, at least I cant read it.
Me neither but I can guess he tried to come up with more excuses about why Dak fails in playoffs
He had 5 touchdowns in a playoff game last year . There’s no excuses for anybody but if you think losing to a 7 point favorite which is what happened the following week is a massive fail your wrong . Sometimes it’s as simple as you played a better team that played and coached better . The entire team was beat . If you’re going to blame just 1 person for that it’s Jerry Jones . You think if SF and Dallas switched quaterbacks before last years playoff game the outcome would be different? Lol
Yes, it would have been different. It was a touchdown game where Dallas defenses did well to keep Niners to 19 points, without Dak's interceptions Cowboys likely would have won that game. Not many defenses held Niners to less than 20 since Purdy took over yet Dak couldnt take advantage.
Regardless we are talking about 8 years of failure, you are talking about one game

TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!
Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
Re: Dak Prescott thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,995
- And1: 4,822
- Joined: Oct 18, 2014
- Location: Maine
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
El Turco wrote:SurfAndTurf wrote:wembambamya wrote:
Me neither but I can guess he tried to come up with more excuses about why Dak fails in playoffs
He had 5 touchdowns in a playoff game last year . There’s no excuses for anybody but if you think losing to a 7 point favorite which is what happened the following week is a massive fail your wrong . Sometimes it’s as simple as you played a better team that played and coached better . The entire team was beat . If you’re going to blame just 1 person for that it’s Jerry Jones . You think if SF and Dallas switched quaterbacks before last years playoff game the outcome would be different? Lol
Yes, it would have been different. It was a touchdown game where Dallas defenses did well to keep Niners to 19 points, without Dak's interceptions Cowboys likely would have won that game. Not many defenses held Niners to less than 20 since Purdy took over yet Dak couldnt take advantage.
Regardless we are talking about 8 years of failure, you are talking about one game

Re: Dak Prescott thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 407
- And1: 114
- Joined: Dec 18, 2022
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
bluejerseyjinx wrote:El Turco wrote:SurfAndTurf wrote:
He had 5 touchdowns in a playoff game last year . There’s no excuses for anybody but if you think losing to a 7 point favorite which is what happened the following week is a massive fail your wrong . Sometimes it’s as simple as you played a better team that played and coached better . The entire team was beat . If you’re going to blame just 1 person for that it’s Jerry Jones . You think if SF and Dallas switched quaterbacks before last years playoff game the outcome would be different? Lol
Yes, it would have been different. It was a touchdown game where Dallas defenses did well to keep Niners to 19 points, without Dak's interceptions Cowboys likely would have won that game. Not many defenses held Niners to less than 20 since Purdy took over yet Dak couldnt take advantage.
Regardless we are talking about 8 years of failure, you are talking about one game
Nothing to add here.
Maybe one thing, Jerry Jones holds on to quarterbacks and coaches too long but he does a decent job building teams imo, even if he is not the one drafting he puts the right people right positions to draft.
Re: Dak Prescott thread
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 117
- And1: 23
- Joined: Nov 05, 2023
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
wembambamya wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:El Turco wrote:
Yes, it would have been different. It was a touchdown game where Dallas defenses did well to keep Niners to 19 points, without Dak's interceptions Cowboys likely would have won that game. Not many defenses held Niners to less than 20 since Purdy took over yet Dak couldnt take advantage.
Regardless we are talking about 8 years of failure, you are talking about one game
Nothing to add here.
Maybe one thing, Jerry Jones holds on to quarterbacks and coaches too long but he does a decent job building teams imo, even if he is not the one drafting he puts the right people right positions to draft.
It’s 8 years without context you act like they made the playoffs all 8 years . This year however if they don’t win today and get to the NFCCG it’s a clear failure and choke . I just havnt seen it like that a whole lot of Daks career .
Re: Dak Prescott thread
- QB_Eagles
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,876
- And1: 981
- Joined: Jul 24, 2023
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
SurfAndTurf wrote:I dropped the ball there . Prices sky rocketed after those 2 signings . My friend has season tickets behind home plate I’m hoping she will sell me 2 for a game . I’m a grandfather now I want to take my son for his first Father’s Day . He’s a Yankee fan lol
Congrats, grandpa Surf!
Re: Dak Prescott thread
- Micah Prescott
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,822
- And1: 1,820
- Joined: Aug 25, 2021
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
SurfAndTurf wrote:wembambamya wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Nothing to add here.
Maybe one thing, Jerry Jones holds on to quarterbacks and coaches too long but he does a decent job building teams imo, even if he is not the one drafting he puts the right people right positions to draft.
It’s 8 years without context you act like they made the playoffs all 8 years . This year however if they don’t win today and get to the NFCCG it’s a clear failure and choke . I just havnt seen it like that a whole lot of Daks career .
Exactly, when Dallas lost to SF last season they were the underdogs. They were expected to lose.
Also they never had the lead that game.
It is only a "choke" to people who do not know what that word means.
Re: Dak Prescott thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 407
- And1: 114
- Joined: Dec 18, 2022
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
They probably never had a lead because of Dak's turnovers. Dallas defense did very well to keep Niners in check, you can be a three touchdown underdogs but if you are a super bowl winning quarterback and cant take advantage of a great defensive effort your team gives you, it is a failure. I dont think anyone called it a choke anyway, that's just insecurity oozing ahaha
Anyway what are your excuses for other 7 years ahhaha
Anyway what are your excuses for other 7 years ahhaha
Re: Dak Prescott thread
- Micah Prescott
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,822
- And1: 1,820
- Joined: Aug 25, 2021
-
Re: Dak Prescott thread
wembambamya wrote:They probably never had a lead because of Dak's turnovers. Dallas defense did very well to keep Niners in check, you can be a three touchdown underdogs but if you are a super bowl winning quarterback and cant take advantage of a great defensive effort your team gives you, it is a failure. I dont think anyone called it a choke anyway, that's just insecurity oozing ahaha
Anyway what are your excuses for other 7 years ahhaha
Lol nope, the 49ers scored on the opening drive and the 49ers didnt capitalize on either of Daks ints.
You're just talking out of your ass. And trying to force a narrative.
Return to The General NFL Board