ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,971
And1: 3,646
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1121 » by BlacJacMac » Tue Jan 9, 2024 2:30 am

winforlose wrote:
Neeva wrote:This three teamer works IMO
Markkanen, Murray and Dunn to Wolves
Towns and Anderson to Hawks
Jalen Johnson,Minott, filler and picks to jazz.


Hawks came out and said Johnson is off limits.


There is no such thing.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,589
And1: 2,949
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1122 » by Neeva » Tue Jan 9, 2024 2:45 am

winforlose wrote:
Neeva wrote:This three teamer works IMO
Markkanen, Murray and Dunn to Wolves
Towns and Anderson to Hawks
Jalen Johnson,Minott, filler and picks to jazz.


Hawks came out and said Johnson is off limits.


I think they are posturing, he’s not close to an off limits young and for sure future star player but he is probably their only way to get a legit second star to pair with Trae, their other assets are pretty underwhelming.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,839
And1: 5,309
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1123 » by minimus » Tue Jan 9, 2024 7:20 pm

Image

I wish we could just swap Anderson and Milton for Huerter
twolves31
Junior
Posts: 381
And1: 256
Joined: Jan 13, 2018
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1124 » by twolves31 » Tue Jan 9, 2024 7:42 pm

minimus wrote:Image

I wish we could just swap Anderson and Milton for Huerter


I'm sure this isn't the first time good old sleepy standrew has made this list.
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,846
And1: 899
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1125 » by Guest84 » Tue Jan 9, 2024 8:20 pm

Not sure if this is the right thread for this but looking around at the league, this year may be the best chance for the wolves to cash in on a championship run. So finding players that can help with that by the deadline is more important as the season goes in my opinion. We'll see how things shake out but it seems like they have a great opportunity to do it this year.
twolves31
Junior
Posts: 381
And1: 256
Joined: Jan 13, 2018
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1126 » by twolves31 » Tue Jan 9, 2024 8:50 pm

As next month's trade deadline approaches, Timberwolves backup guard Shake Milton has been brought up as possible trade chip.

"I think the Wolves end up trading Shake Milton," said KSTP's Darren Wolfson on a recent appearance on SKOR North's Mackey & Judd show. "I also sense that is something he would happily welcome."

Milton, 27, signed with Minnesota in the offseason but hasn't settled into the team's rotation. Through 29 games Milton's numbers are down from his five years in Philadelphia.

Milton regularly broke double-digit minutes in the team's first 22 games but now has failed to appear in six of the Wolves' last 13 games entering play Tuesday. He's only played double-digit minutes twice in that span.

"I think they end up doing something," Wolfson continued. "They realize they need a little bit more bench power, they could use some shooting help. You can make the case for a backup point guard."

Minnesota has slumped of late, going 5-5 in the last 10 games while seeing a number of key defensive statistics drop. In fact, since Dec. 20 they have the 9th-ranked defensive rating (114.9) and the 21st-ranked offensive rating (114.4).

Not exactly surprising.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,848
And1: 23,139
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1127 » by Klomp » Tue Jan 9, 2024 10:20 pm

twolves31 wrote:Minnesota has slumped of late, going 5-5 in the last 10 games while seeing a number of key defensive statistics drop. In fact, since Dec. 20 they have the 9th-ranked defensive rating (114.9) and the 21st-ranked offensive rating (114.4).

Not exactly surprising.

I am not trying to put it all on him, but we are 1-4 in games with McLaughlin back in the rotation (not counting the two DNP in the middle. Is there something there?

I think we put him in to revive the offense, but the defense has suffered in this stretch. Are they related?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,848
And1: 23,139
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1128 » by Klomp » Tue Jan 9, 2024 11:04 pm

I know everyone wants a true point guard to start every offensive set and all of our offensive issues will be cured. But something in the back of my mind says Connelly is going to once again zag where everyone else would zig.

I think we're going to dive deeper into our defensive identity, possibly getting someone like Marcus Smart.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,859
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1129 » by Colbinii » Tue Jan 9, 2024 11:58 pm

Klomp wrote:I know everyone wants a true point guard to start every offensive set and all of our offensive issues will be cured. But something in the back of my mind says Connelly is going to once again zag where everyone else would zig.

I think we're going to dive deeper into our defensive identity, possibly getting someone like Marcus Smart.


We basically get there salary wise with SlowMo, Milton, TBJ and Moore Jr.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,575
And1: 31,048
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1130 » by Domejandro » Wed Jan 10, 2024 5:15 am

Posted the following on the T&T Board. I don't know if it is enough to net Alex Caruso, but barring adding another second, it is the most that Minnesota could really offer.

Being honest, I don't think that Chicago are going to be sellers (much to the chagrin of their fanbase), but here is an attempt at an Alex Caruso trade. There is another alternative where Chicago gets Wendell Moore Jr. (solving problems for Minnesota), but I figured that it is worth keeping the bones of the trade simple. Maybe Utah kicks in a second, but here is the rough trade.

IMPORTANT: Minnesota would be trading their 2026, 2027 (Swap), 2028, and 2030 First Round Draft Picks to the Utah Jazz in exchange for their 2025, 2026 (Swap), 2027, and 2029 (1-5 Protected) First Round Draft Picks. This would free up the 2024 First Round Draft Pick to be traded to the Chicago Bulls.

______________________________
CHI: Shake Milton, Troy Brown Jr., MIN 2024 FRP, and 2024 MEM/WAS SRP
OUT: Alex Caruso

Why for Chicago? Get a late first and a high second for Alex Caruso. Shake Milton and Troy Brown Jr.'s contracts are unguaranteed, next season.
______________________________

MIN: Alex Caruso
OUT: Shake Milton, Troy Brown Jr., MIN 2024 FRP, and 2024 MEM/WAS SRP

Why for Minneota? Go all-in on their defensive identity. The team would need to unload someone like Wendell Moore Jr. elsewhere and sign two low-cost players to stay under $1.5MM of the Luxury-Tax, but not worth complicating the thread further with that.

Mike Conley / Nickeil Alexander Walker / Jordan McLaughlin
Anthony Edwards / Alex Caruso / Daishen Nix (2WP)
Jaden McDaniels / Josh Minott
Karl-Anthony Towns / Kyle Anderson / Leonard Miller
Rudy Gobert / Naz Reid / Luka Garza (2WP)
______________________________

UTAH: 2026/2027(Swap)/2028/2030 Minnesota First Round Draft Picks
OUT: 2025/2026(Swap)/2027/2029(1-4 Protected) Minnesota First Round Draft Picks

Why for Utah? Push back Minnesota's obligations by a year in exchange for unprotecting the final pick.
______________________________
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,704
And1: 19,805
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1131 » by shrink » Wed Jan 10, 2024 5:22 am

MIN is about to have one of the worst 1st round picks this year. Utah should pay US to back up our picks.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,569
And1: 6,056
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1132 » by winforlose » Wed Jan 10, 2024 5:30 am

shrink wrote:MIN is about to have one of the worst 1st round picks this year. Utah should pay US to back up our picks.


Back up our pick?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,704
And1: 19,805
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1133 » by shrink » Wed Jan 10, 2024 5:36 am

winforlose wrote:
shrink wrote:MIN is about to have one of the worst 1st round picks this year. Utah should pay US to back up our picks.

Back up our pick?

I don’t know. The quality of each draft, plus how long a GM wants to wait, probably influence the price.

[EDIT out my confusion]
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,569
And1: 6,056
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1134 » by winforlose » Wed Jan 10, 2024 5:40 am

shrink wrote:
winforlose wrote:
shrink wrote:MIN is about to have one of the worst 1st round picks this year. Utah should pay US to back up our picks.

Back up our pick?

I don’t know. The quality of each draft, plus how long a GM wants to wait, probably influence the price.

Still, without changing the original deal, I think MIN is very happy to extinguish part of their obligation with their late 2024 1st.


I don’t follow. Pay us to what exactly? We don’t owe anything on our 24 pick.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,704
And1: 19,805
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1135 » by shrink » Wed Jan 10, 2024 5:45 am

winforlose wrote:
shrink wrote:
winforlose wrote:Back up our pick?

I don’t know. The quality of each draft, plus how long a GM wants to wait, probably influence the price.

Still, without changing the original deal, I think MIN is very happy to extinguish part of their obligation with their late 2024 1st.


I don’t follow. Pay us to what exactly? We don’t owe anything on our 24 pick.

You’re right. I read the trade and got confused. Thanks, I’ll edit.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,569
And1: 6,056
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1136 » by winforlose » Wed Jan 10, 2024 7:55 am

Just went back and reread the above. Caruso would be a big get, but NAW is not a PG and cannot play PG. I thought Caruso could but just checked and his AST/TO is only 2.5/1.4. Is Caruso capable of being an on ball PG?
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,575
And1: 31,048
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1137 » by Domejandro » Wed Jan 10, 2024 11:58 am

winforlose wrote:Just went back and reread the above. Caruso would be a big get, but NAW is not a PG and cannot play PG. I thought Caruso could but just checked and his AST/TO is only 2.5/1.4. Is Caruso capable of being an on ball PG?

Alex Caruso is a mostly wing, not a Point-Guard. That said, he is also the best non-big defensive player in the entire NBA who can guard 1-4 against most lineups. Dude is legitimately a defensive savant.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,839
And1: 5,309
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1138 » by minimus » Wed Jan 10, 2024 1:31 pm

Domejandro wrote:
winforlose wrote:Just went back and reread the above. Caruso would be a big get, but NAW is not a PG and cannot play PG. I thought Caruso could but just checked and his AST/TO is only 2.5/1.4. Is Caruso capable of being an on ball PG?

Alex Caruso is a mostly wing, not a Point-Guard. That said, he is also the best non-big defensive player in the entire NBA who can guard 1-4 against most lineups. Dude is legitimately a defensive savant.


CHI had second best defense in 2nd half of last season, and he was the biggest reason why they were good defensively.
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,243
And1: 3,167
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1139 » by TimberKat » Wed Jan 10, 2024 4:03 pm

Assuming we are not doing any big swing in mid season and we are one month away from trading deadline. What is the one somewhat realistic trade that will help the most?

1. Tyrus Jones for KA+ seems to check most boxes

2. Is Caruso a better choice?

3. Others had mentioned: Kennard, BOGDAN
BOGDANOVIC, KEVIN HUERTER, Westbrook?

4. Maybe claim Hayward once he is waived too?
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 14): 2023-24 Edition 

Post#1140 » by moss_is_1 » Wed Jan 10, 2024 4:23 pm

Domejandro wrote:
winforlose wrote:Just went back and reread the above. Caruso would be a big get, but NAW is not a PG and cannot play PG. I thought Caruso could but just checked and his AST/TO is only 2.5/1.4. Is Caruso capable of being an on ball PG?

Alex Caruso is a mostly wing, not a Point-Guard. That said, he is also the best non-big defensive player in the entire NBA who can guard 1-4 against most lineups. Dude is legitimately a defensive savant.

Caruso would be a huge get, I think something that could be explored would be dealing NAW for him if it came down to it. Caruso is basically just a better version, but Chicago might like getting him back and he's still young enough to continue to develop. Though having 3 high level wing defenders for the postseason would be a fantastic luxury.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves