ImageImageImage

Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts

Cast your votes for the ASS OF SHAME!

All the Celtics
16
18%
A particular Celtic
2
2%
The offense
1
1%
The defense
0
No votes
The offense and the defense and the rebounding
5
6%
The schedule makers - thanks guys!
25
28%
The comments we're about to get in this thread
14
16%
Other
3
3%
Coach
10
11%
All of the above
13
15%
 
Total votes: 89

User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,496
And1: 33,497
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#141 » by GoCeltics123 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:31 pm

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
He is nowhere near 15th. He is like Darvin Ham bad. Bottom 3 easily.

This is obviously mostly on the players, sure. But why though? It’s a system where if the 3’s don’t fall they have NOTHING else to land on, they don’t play defense if their 3pt shot doesn’t fall and hey..they don’t like teams that push back. It’s why they struggle with teams like Miami and all these teams like the Magic and Minny who come at them like they don’t give a ****.

People get mad when we complain about L’s in January..but it’s not about the L’s. A loss today would be normal. It’s because the L’s always highlight the reasons why we fall short every single damn year.

They would not be 29-9 if he was that bad and the players would've given up on him like they did Ham. Like, this is a joke dude.

Their counter for missing 3s all year was KP in the post and it's worked many times, they've won at least like 5-7 games this year where they've been outshot from 3. You are speaking about a last year thing, not this year.

Like I understand disliking Joe's style but putting him next to Darvin Ham is a complete insult to him, Ham is under .500 with a team that made the WCF last year and his players are openly quitting on him.

Also struggle with the Magic? The same team they blew out twice in Boston, once completely shorthanded? And the Wolves, who have the best defense in the league? Hell they were calling for Chris Finch to be fired last year now look at them.

Joe is not an elite coach but people that say he's a bottom 3 coach are hilarious dude, like if he's bottom 3, then guys like Ham, Vogel, Adrian Griffin, Quin Snyder, Jason Kidd, etc. should be coaching HS ball with the seasons they're having. Joe is average, not elite and people on here that don't watch the rest of the league say he's bottom 3 lmao


Players gave up on Brad Stevens and he was a brilliant **** coach. That makes no sense.

Orlando wiped the floor with them last year and beat their asses in the IST again before we got two on them. It’s a team we tend to struggle with, I never said we can’t beat them.

How many of those 5-7 games were against teams worth a damn?

I’m not a believer in the way this team plays and that they can win it with Mazzula. They still run too much iso, they still rely too much on talent, their drop coverage defense is still meh, the new zone thing they ran hasn’t been too effective. People want to talk about the back to back but when we beat Milwaukee last game they mopped us in the 4th and if we had to play another 45 seconds we probably would have lost that also.

We can bring up all the stats in the world to back up everything that has been done, but when the real games come around will those stats last? Because I had similar arguments last year and the stats got brought up, the ‘it’s only January’ excuses got brought up, the ‘they are the best in the NBA, Joe won coach of the month, they are top 2 in defense..bla bla bla. but we all saw what happened in the end and how they died a similar death once again. I want to be wrong, I really do, but I see them dying that death again. But yall do you.

Because honestly, Brad himself was checked out and the locker room was immature. The team brought in Ime to yell at them and call them losers for that reason, but he couldn't keep his dick in his pants and the team had to fire him.

Last year's team was coming off losing by 33 to Shai-less OKC at this point of the season, and were 3 wins worse. And again, THAT TEAM DID NOT HAVE KRISTAPS PORZINGIS. The Celtics have a counter to switching defense that they didn't have last year, period. The thing that doomed them against Miami was Miami switched everything and we had no counter to it since they didn't have an inside threat, this year they do. KP's been killing switches all season.

"When real games come around" is impossible to judge for this game because the circumstances for this game were brutal. The Celtics have had some bad endings to games this year, but if you look really, almost all of them have come without KP (@GS, @ORL he got hurt, @IND). KP's health (whole team's really but especially his) kinda determines the difference between this team winning a title and not imo.

I don't think Joe is a great coach by any means, he's average and definitely has flaws. But Mike Malone wasn't, Mike Budenholzer wasn't, hell Doc Rivers wasn't. The drop coverage is fine, because KP is limited and can't switch, and his job is rim protection. The zone worked great against Indy like a week ago, just not the Bucks.
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,755
And1: 24,669
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#142 » by playa-hater » Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:33 pm

I have said As also another poster, Ninety nine percent of people here won't change their mind..

Going back and forth is quite tiresome..

I just want to put my final thoughts and move on.

Boston Has a very nice talent advantage in most games in the regular season. But in the playoffs when The teams are down to the final four or eight left. the talent gap will close tremendously. And in a seven game series real coaching, And real strategies become prevalent. With that said I truly do not feel confident with this coach I see far too many red flags..

Seven months from now, we will all be able to look back and see what transpired...

If we Fail I absolutely do not believe it will be because of lack of talent or chemistry that we have that with this group.
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
User avatar
bisme37
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 25,151
And1: 73,230
Joined: May 24, 2014
 

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#143 » by bisme37 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 5:16 pm

I'm over the blowout last night but I'm salty that 2 of our 9 losses came this week and we got hosed by the refs in one and hosed by the schedule in the other.
User avatar
bisme37
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 25,151
And1: 73,230
Joined: May 24, 2014
 

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#144 » by bisme37 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 5:18 pm

Per Dick Lipe:

The average winning margin for the last two Celtic games played in Milwaukee is 37 points! Last March 30, Boston pummeled the Bucks by 41, 140-99, and Milwaukee's final margin was 33 tonight.
User avatar
hickfromfrenchlick
General Manager
Posts: 7,938
And1: 9,367
Joined: Mar 22, 2006
Location: BROOKLYN
     

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#145 » by hickfromfrenchlick » Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:22 pm

Romeiro Celtic wrote:I have a serious question to ask everyone on here except I few I won't even bother to reply back.

Do you really think Mazzulla is going to take us to win the NBA title?

In all seriousness. Let's discuss about it.


The Athletic just published an article about the Celtics' great defensive schemes. Like the team's success, our defense rests in large part on the talent of the players, but the schemes are special. Other teams don't do what we do.

The problem I have with the Joe-haters is that unless and until he wins a title, and probably not even then, they'll claim he sucks. He literally can't prove you wrong. Even if he won 5 titles, you'd say it was the players.

I'm not saying he's brilliant. I'm not saying he's a top-10 coach. I have no idea how good he is. And neither do any of you. I just know what the standings look like.

To answer your question, sure, we can win a title with him. Doc Rivers won our last one.
Image
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,423
And1: 23,553
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#146 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:26 pm

GoCeltics123 wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:They would not be 29-9 if he was that bad and the players would've given up on him like they did Ham. Like, this is a joke dude.

Their counter for missing 3s all year was KP in the post and it's worked many times, they've won at least like 5-7 games this year where they've been outshot from 3. You are speaking about a last year thing, not this year.

Like I understand disliking Joe's style but putting him next to Darvin Ham is a complete insult to him, Ham is under .500 with a team that made the WCF last year and his players are openly quitting on him.

Also struggle with the Magic? The same team they blew out twice in Boston, once completely shorthanded? And the Wolves, who have the best defense in the league? Hell they were calling for Chris Finch to be fired last year now look at them.

Joe is not an elite coach but people that say he's a bottom 3 coach are hilarious dude, like if he's bottom 3, then guys like Ham, Vogel, Adrian Griffin, Quin Snyder, Jason Kidd, etc. should be coaching HS ball with the seasons they're having. Joe is average, not elite and people on here that don't watch the rest of the league say he's bottom 3 lmao


Players gave up on Brad Stevens and he was a brilliant **** coach. That makes no sense.

Orlando wiped the floor with them last year and beat their asses in the IST again before we got two on them. It’s a team we tend to struggle with, I never said we can’t beat them.

How many of those 5-7 games were against teams worth a damn?

I’m not a believer in the way this team plays and that they can win it with Mazzula. They still run too much iso, they still rely too much on talent, their drop coverage defense is still meh, the new zone thing they ran hasn’t been too effective. People want to talk about the back to back but when we beat Milwaukee last game they mopped us in the 4th and if we had to play another 45 seconds we probably would have lost that also.

We can bring up all the stats in the world to back up everything that has been done, but when the real games come around will those stats last? Because I had similar arguments last year and the stats got brought up, the ‘it’s only January’ excuses got brought up, the ‘they are the best in the NBA, Joe won coach of the month, they are top 2 in defense..bla bla bla. but we all saw what happened in the end and how they died a similar death once again. I want to be wrong, I really do, but I see them dying that death again. But yall do you.

Because honestly, Brad himself was checked out and the locker room was immature. The team brought in Ime to yell at them and call them losers for that reason, but he couldn't keep his dick in his pants and the team had to fire him.

Last year's team was coming off losing by 33 to Shai-less OKC at this point of the season, and were 3 wins worse. And again, THAT TEAM DID NOT HAVE KRISTAPS PORZINGIS. The Celtics have a counter to switching defense that they didn't have last year, period. The thing that doomed them against Miami was Miami switched everything and we had no counter to it since they didn't have an inside threat, this year they do. KP's been killing switches all season.

"When real games come around" is impossible to judge for this game because the circumstances for this game were brutal. The Celtics have had some bad endings to games this year, but if you look really, almost all of them have come without KP (@GS, @ORL he got hurt, @IND). KP's health (whole team's really but especially his) kinda determines the difference between this team winning a title and not imo.

I don't think Joe is a great coach by any means, he's average and definitely has flaws. But Mike Malone wasn't, Mike Budenholzer wasn't, hell Doc Rivers wasn't. The drop coverage is fine, because KP is limited and can't switch, and his job is rim protection. The zone worked great against Indy like a week ago, just not the Bucks.


I agree with some of the things you said. But I will say, a lot of us brought up concerns through out last season, be it the Tatum and Brown duo, the bench, lack of answers for the zone, poor use of the drop, lack of impact from the coach in crucial times and a difficulty of winning games when the three didn’t fall or the talent gap wasn’t huge. The excuses were piled up and dismissed the entire season until the real games came and a lot of the ugly warts started to show up.

Did we get better in a lot of those areas? Sure. KP answers a lot of those questions we failed in. Have they been totally eliminated? I don’t believe they have, I see a lot of them show up in games we lose and time will tell if they will bury us..again. Hopefully not, I don’t want to be right on this. But I’m not going to sit here and act like this team is as good as their record or stats show or not point **** out because it hurts the positivity crowd.

Another unpopular opinion that is slapping us right in the face and will show up when the competition tightens up is the fact that besides the top 6 guys, everybody else will be exposed in the playoffs. Brissett might be the only one playable.
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
User avatar
hickfromfrenchlick
General Manager
Posts: 7,938
And1: 9,367
Joined: Mar 22, 2006
Location: BROOKLYN
     

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#147 » by hickfromfrenchlick » Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:34 pm

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Players gave up on Brad Stevens and he was a brilliant **** coach. That makes no sense.

Orlando wiped the floor with them last year and beat their asses in the IST again before we got two on them. It’s a team we tend to struggle with, I never said we can’t beat them.

How many of those 5-7 games were against teams worth a damn?

I’m not a believer in the way this team plays and that they can win it with Mazzula. They still run too much iso, they still rely too much on talent, their drop coverage defense is still meh, the new zone thing they ran hasn’t been too effective. People want to talk about the back to back but when we beat Milwaukee last game they mopped us in the 4th and if we had to play another 45 seconds we probably would have lost that also.

We can bring up all the stats in the world to back up everything that has been done, but when the real games come around will those stats last? Because I had similar arguments last year and the stats got brought up, the ‘it’s only January’ excuses got brought up, the ‘they are the best in the NBA, Joe won coach of the month, they are top 2 in defense..bla bla bla. but we all saw what happened in the end and how they died a similar death once again. I want to be wrong, I really do, but I see them dying that death again. But yall do you.

Because honestly, Brad himself was checked out and the locker room was immature. The team brought in Ime to yell at them and call them losers for that reason, but he couldn't keep his dick in his pants and the team had to fire him.

Last year's team was coming off losing by 33 to Shai-less OKC at this point of the season, and were 3 wins worse. And again, THAT TEAM DID NOT HAVE KRISTAPS PORZINGIS. The Celtics have a counter to switching defense that they didn't have last year, period. The thing that doomed them against Miami was Miami switched everything and we had no counter to it since they didn't have an inside threat, this year they do. KP's been killing switches all season.

"When real games come around" is impossible to judge for this game because the circumstances for this game were brutal. The Celtics have had some bad endings to games this year, but if you look really, almost all of them have come without KP (@GS, @ORL he got hurt, @IND). KP's health (whole team's really but especially his) kinda determines the difference between this team winning a title and not imo.

I don't think Joe is a great coach by any means, he's average and definitely has flaws. But Mike Malone wasn't, Mike Budenholzer wasn't, hell Doc Rivers wasn't. The drop coverage is fine, because KP is limited and can't switch, and his job is rim protection. The zone worked great against Indy like a week ago, just not the Bucks.


I agree with some of the things you said. But I will say, a lot of us brought up concerns through out last season, be it the Tatum and Brown duo, the bench, lack of answers for the zone, poor use of the drop, lack of impact from the coach in crucial times and a difficulty of winning games when the three didn’t fall or the talent gap wasn’t huge. The excuses were piled up and dismissed the entire season until the real games came and a lot of the ugly warts started to show up.

Did we get better in a lot of those areas? Sure. KP answers a lot of those questions we failed in. Have they been totally eliminated? I don’t believe they have, I see a lot of them show up in games we lose and time will tell if they will bury us..again. Hopefully not, I don’t want to be right on this. But I’m not going to sit here and act like this team is as good as their record or stats show or not point **** out because it hurts the positivity crowd.

Another unpopular opinion that is slapping us right in the face and will show up when the competition tightens up is the fact that besides the top 6 guys, everybody else will be exposed in the playoffs. Brissett might be the only one playable.


Per the Athletic:

The Celtics have used the zone sparingly this season – just 52 possessions over 36 games, according to Synergy Sports Technology. But they’ve allowed just 49 total points on those zone plays, an absurdly good rate that should entice Boston to use it more often.


Why do you say it hasn't been effective?
Image
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,866
And1: 70,968
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#148 » by Celts17Pride » Fri Jan 12, 2024 8:18 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,363
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#149 » by ConstableGeneva » Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:44 am

What did the L2M report say?
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 19,969
And1: 17,391
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#150 » by Fierce1 » Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:58 am

hickfromfrenchlick wrote:
Romeiro Celtic wrote:I have a serious question to ask everyone on here except I few I won't even bother to reply back.

Do you really think Mazzulla is going to take us to win the NBA title?

In all seriousness. Let's discuss about it.


The Athletic just published an article about the Celtics' great defensive schemes. Like the team's success, our defense rests in large part on the talent of the players, but the schemes are special. Other teams don't do what we do.

The problem I have with the Joe-haters is that unless and until he wins a title, and probably not even then, they'll claim he sucks. He literally can't prove you wrong. Even if he won 5 titles, you'd say it was the players.

I'm not saying he's brilliant. I'm not saying he's a top-10 coach. I have no idea how good he is. And neither do any of you. I just know what the standings look like.

To answer your question, sure, we can win a title with him. Doc Rivers won our last one.

Yeah, you're spot on.

If Joe is good enough for the Cs to win a title then that should be good enough.

Apparently the Joe-haters want the Celtics to win with the coach they want.

Wouldn't surprise me if they prefer the Celtics not winning a championship as long as the coach the Celtics have is the coach they want coaching the Celtics.
User avatar
Romeiro Celtic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,597
And1: 7,183
Joined: Jan 04, 2017
Location: Brazil
   

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#151 » by Romeiro Celtic » Sat Jan 13, 2024 2:50 am

Fierce1 wrote:
hickfromfrenchlick wrote:
Romeiro Celtic wrote:I have a serious question to ask everyone on here except I few I won't even bother to reply back.

Do you really think Mazzulla is going to take us to win the NBA title?

In all seriousness. Let's discuss about it.


The Athletic just published an article about the Celtics' great defensive schemes. Like the team's success, our defense rests in large part on the talent of the players, but the schemes are special. Other teams don't do what we do.

The problem I have with the Joe-haters is that unless and until he wins a title, and probably not even then, they'll claim he sucks. He literally can't prove you wrong. Even if he won 5 titles, you'd say it was the players.

I'm not saying he's brilliant. I'm not saying he's a top-10 coach. I have no idea how good he is. And neither do any of you. I just know what the standings look like.

To answer your question, sure, we can win a title with him. Doc Rivers won our last one.

Yeah, you're spot on.

If Joe is good enough for the Cs to win a title then that should be good enough.

Apparently the Joe-haters want the Celtics to win with the coach they want.

Wouldn't surprise me if they prefer the Celtics not winning a championship as long as the coach the Celtics have is the coach they want coaching the Celtics.


Maybe idiots think like that. Self-centered idiots. Fans want the team success. You don't have to agree with other people to have a clear mind. I don't have to like Mazzulla or Stevens or Udoka or Rivers or Auerbach to not hope for the team success because of my preferences. I hope Mazzulla succeeds and win us a championship. But do why believe he will? That's a whole different story.

If I had to choose and I was the one making decisions, I wouldn't have chosen him. But hey, who am I, right? Who are all of us in the business of the NBA? We're just people sitting on their chairs chatting with each other on the computer and making assumptions and discussing opinions.
Read on Twitter
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,363
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#152 » by ConstableGeneva » Sat Jan 13, 2024 3:20 am

Rewatched this game, and for anyone who didn't catch it, I'm pleased to report that we weren't outscored in the 3rd quarter badly. Just lost the Q by 4 points. Progress!
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 19,969
And1: 17,391
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#153 » by Fierce1 » Sat Jan 13, 2024 4:26 am

Romeiro Celtic wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:
hickfromfrenchlick wrote:
The Athletic just published an article about the Celtics' great defensive schemes. Like the team's success, our defense rests in large part on the talent of the players, but the schemes are special. Other teams don't do what we do.

The problem I have with the Joe-haters is that unless and until he wins a title, and probably not even then, they'll claim he sucks. He literally can't prove you wrong. Even if he won 5 titles, you'd say it was the players.

I'm not saying he's brilliant. I'm not saying he's a top-10 coach. I have no idea how good he is. And neither do any of you. I just know what the standings look like.

To answer your question, sure, we can win a title with him. Doc Rivers won our last one.

Yeah, you're spot on.

If Joe is good enough for the Cs to win a title then that should be good enough.

Apparently the Joe-haters want the Celtics to win with the coach they want.

Wouldn't surprise me if they prefer the Celtics not winning a championship as long as the coach the Celtics have is the coach they want coaching the Celtics.


Maybe idiots think like that. Self-centered idiots. Fans want the team success. You don't have to agree with other people to have a clear mind. I don't have to like Mazzulla or Stevens or Udoka or Rivers or Auerbach to not hope for the team success because of my preferences. I hope Mazzulla succeeds and win us a championship. But do why believe he will? That's a whole different story.

If I had to choose and I was the one making decisions, I wouldn't have chosen him. But hey, who am I, right? Who are all of us in the business of the NBA? We're just people sitting on their chairs chatting with each other on the computer and making assumptions and discussing opinions.

My post is not directed at you.

You don't believe Joe can lead the Cs to a championship is fine.

It's those who hate Joe and blame Joe for every Celtic loss but says the Cs can win a championship despite Joe that I don't understand.
User avatar
hickfromfrenchlick
General Manager
Posts: 7,938
And1: 9,367
Joined: Mar 22, 2006
Location: BROOKLYN
     

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#154 » by hickfromfrenchlick » Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:57 pm

Fierce1 wrote:
hickfromfrenchlick wrote:
Romeiro Celtic wrote:I have a serious question to ask everyone on here except I few I won't even bother to reply back.

Do you really think Mazzulla is going to take us to win the NBA title?

In all seriousness. Let's discuss about it.


The Athletic just published an article about the Celtics' great defensive schemes. Like the team's success, our defense rests in large part on the talent of the players, but the schemes are special. Other teams don't do what we do.

The problem I have with the Joe-haters is that unless and until he wins a title, and probably not even then, they'll claim he sucks. He literally can't prove you wrong. Even if he won 5 titles, you'd say it was the players.

I'm not saying he's brilliant. I'm not saying he's a top-10 coach. I have no idea how good he is. And neither do any of you. I just know what the standings look like.

To answer your question, sure, we can win a title with him. Doc Rivers won our last one.

Yeah, you're spot on.

If Joe is good enough for the Cs to win a title then that should be good enough.

Apparently the Joe-haters want the Celtics to win with the coach they want.

Wouldn't surprise me if they prefer the Celtics not winning a championship as long as the coach the Celtics have is the coach they want coaching the Celtics.


Unlike some other boards, this one doesn’t seem to have anyone with an axe to grind so big that they want us to lose, in order to prove some point.

In general, people are happy to have been wrong when you win a title. Case in point: my UConn Huskies. Just like Joe, Danny Hurley was accused by many fans of not knowing Xs and Os, being outcoached in close games, and not working the refs properly. Until this spring. He doesn’t have a lot of critics now.
Image
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,755
And1: 24,669
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Celts Get Royally Bucked! Loss vs MIL 1/11 

Post#155 » by playa-hater » Sat Jan 13, 2024 2:44 pm

Romeiro Celtic wrote:
Spoiler:
Mr_Mojo_Risin wrote:
Romeiro Celtic wrote:I have a serious question to ask everyone on here except I few I won't even bother to reply back.

Do you really think Mazzulla is going to take us to win the NBA title?

In all seriousness. Let's discuss about it.

I made a decision years ago to stop even trying to change anyone’s mind about something over the internet. 99.99% of the time it’s a waste of time and effort, most don’t come with an open mind and a willingness to change it. In person people seem more prepared to…however I’ll respond to you with my thoughts and you can take it or leave it, I don’t want to get into an endless back and forth.

At the end of last season I wanted Joe gone. I thought the team played in a one dimensional fashion, that Joe lacked a feel for moments and that he wasn’t creative enough with his lineups.

This year, Joe started the year off well at camp with his focus on defense first and tweaks to offensive plans (the curveball in his terms). The team has had remarkable cohesion given the number of roster changes.

There has been a major difference in how the Celtics have played, 2nd in post ups and efficiency and matchup based variation with defensive schemes, not just drop or switch.

I don’t know how many years have gone by where I’ve grown more and more frustrated with JB, but finally he is playing with far more court awareness than he ever has and he credits Joe for how well he is teaching all the players on how to read the game.

The Bucks keep saying to be patient with them because of how they need to learn together, but the Celtics have had more roster changes.

Even if many here like to credit anyone but Joe for our best in the league record and greatest of all time starts at home, it takes a good head coach to listen to others and make decisions. Contrast that with how Stotts left because Griffin didn’t like him talking to the players.

Many analysts have praised Joe’s creative defensive matchups and schemes, he has also tried a large number of lineups often with good success. Joe is the second best in the league in points from A/TOs last time I checked.

Joe supports his players and also is not afraid to call them out, a sign of a good coach.

Only time will tell whether his feel in the playoffs this year will be better.

I have been turned around 180 degrees on Joe. He’s not perfect but has improved rapidly and is humble enough to say when he gets things wrong which is essential for learning.

Brad knows his **** far more than I ever will and has made many decisions in his short time as PoBO that require balls of steel. If Joe wasn’t the coach in his opinion to take us to a chip he would be gone, there is no way he would remain with the ownership spend on everything else otherwise.

Others can think what they want, but all I ask is for all to keep an open mind, pay attention to all the things he’s doing well and give credit for it along with the criticism where he deserves it.


I can totally agree with you that the team is playing better than last year. But what I feel is that it's not due to coaching, but for individual talents and chemestry built through the years since the Brad days from the leaders of our team.

I agree too that Joe is improving, but I don't think this is the scenario ideal for us, since whenever he's pressured, he comes back to his comfort zone of playing the old three ball chuck and pray to the heavens it'll fall, his rotations have been underwhelming and personel management is kinda frustrating as well. There's no continuity for some bench players who have been playing well. There's no minute management in order to avoid injuries for key players. And yet again, whenever he's pressured, he falls back to the old Joe we all know from the Miami Heat series last year. Yeah, we came back 3-0 to tie it, but game 7 was an absolute disaster, reinforcing that when the pressure is there, he disappears and has no clue on what to do.

Some guys here posted that all you need to win is a mid tier coach and a very good team, hence Doc Rivers with us in 2008 and Bud with the Bucks. But I don't think it's quite the same situation here. Mazzulla is great whenever it's about to destroy some teams in the RS, but when the big time comes, he has no gameplan, he has no option other option than option B which is throwing even your mama from the 3pt line, C or D is just keep praying to God it'll do well.

Yeah, we've got some really experienced fellas behind him like Cassell and Charles Lee, but yet again, does it even matter when he's a boneheaded idiot? It did matter against the Wolves the other night, which I credit those guys for winning it, not Joe. Specially because if it was only for him, we would have lost that game at home and be 17-1.

Tell me that I'm stubborn as you want. But unless he proves that he's got more aces in his sleeve, I won't believe him at all and all I see is the Miami series repeating itself over and over again, specially if we face a very physical team.

But thanks for your answer, man. Good discussion here, hope we can continue from this and maybe you can change my mind. Totally open for it.


What you said up above is exactly how I feel.. Excellent post
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:

Return to Boston Celtics