The Pacers lost to Denver last night.
Haliburton is OUT, Nesmith is GTD.
Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
Moderators: FJS, Inigo Montoya
Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 16,236
- And1: 7,641
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 18,677
- And1: 2,098
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
You never know what to expect.
Jazz should win it without Haliburton, but Pacers are a really good team, so I don't expect an easy win.
Back to back for them too.
I hope we play with the same intensity as habitual.
Jazz should win it without Haliburton, but Pacers are a really good team, so I don't expect an easy win.
Back to back for them too.
I hope we play with the same intensity as habitual.
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,656
- And1: 3,189
- Joined: Jan 07, 2006
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
Super impressed the Jazz have gotten over .500. Never thought it would happen this season. Hope they keep it going.
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
- Wolverine
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,259
- And1: 114
- Joined: Jul 27, 2002
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
Always been an O'Connel fan. Love what he brings
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,174
- And1: 359
- Joined: Jul 24, 2017
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
q1 Sloppy offense from Jazz. +7, but sloppy. And quite a few bone-headed decisions from Seston and George. Let's see...
q2 Offense - more energy and more bone-headed stuff. Defense is consistently OK. Another 7 point plus.
q3 Good stretch at the start. Practically end of the game story. Can go to sleep any time.
q2 Offense - more energy and more bone-headed stuff. Defense is consistently OK. Another 7 point plus.
q3 Good stretch at the start. Practically end of the game story. Can go to sleep any time.
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
-
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,562
- And1: 992
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
Jazz defense, besides the zone, has been very good in this game...... Particularly in the 2nd quarter.....
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 18,677
- And1: 2,098
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
Re: Game 42: Utah Jazz (21-20) vs Indiana Pacers (23-16)
Our offense weren't as brilliant as other games, but man, our offensive rebounds allow us more shots.
great team performance.
I really love to see those guys working hard, without egos.
great team performance.
I really love to see those guys working hard, without egos.