Knicks: Simons Says So
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Knicks: Simons Says So
- MasterIchiro
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,388
- And1: 6,845
- Joined: Jan 18, 2013
- Location: The Dirty Water
-
Knicks: Simons Says So
Knicks get Simons adding a pure scorer relieving Brunson for a playoff run.
Blazers collect picks for the rebuild, open the door to Sharpe starting alongside Scoot.
2024 Mavs 1st
2025 Bucks 1st
J. Sims
Fournier
Arcidiacono
Blazers collect picks for the rebuild, open the door to Sharpe starting alongside Scoot.
2024 Mavs 1st
2025 Bucks 1st
J. Sims
Fournier
Arcidiacono
It has been written...
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,372
- And1: 9,921
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Not in the market for another 2024 FRP IMO.
Brogdan for Fournier + WAS or DET FRP is what I am thinking is much more realistic.
Brogdan for Fournier + WAS or DET FRP is what I am thinking is much more realistic.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,551
- And1: 1,264
- Joined: Jan 10, 2005
- Location: Missing the Coast & Trees
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
BlazersBroncos wrote:Not in the market for another 2024 FRP IMO.
Brogdan for Fournier + WAS or DET FRP is what I am thinking is much more realistic.
Agreed.
No to the initial Simons trade.
Yes to Brogdon <-> Fournier + DET 1st.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,458
- And1: 2,207
- Joined: May 17, 2003
- Location: Oregon
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
It would be interesting the Knicks offered Pistons FRP + Wash FRP + filler for Simons.
Pistons FRP might not convey at time soon but that pick protections drops from top 18 to 13 in 2025,
top 11 in 2026 and top 9 in 2027
Washingtons FRP is top12 protected in 2024, top 10 in 2025 and top 8 in 2026
Simons would be a solid get for the knicks and Portland could end up with just future SRP's but one has
to wonder if they are willing to roll the dice for future rewards?
Pistons FRP might not convey at time soon but that pick protections drops from top 18 to 13 in 2025,
top 11 in 2026 and top 9 in 2027
Washingtons FRP is top12 protected in 2024, top 10 in 2025 and top 8 in 2026
Simons would be a solid get for the knicks and Portland could end up with just future SRP's but one has
to wonder if they are willing to roll the dice for future rewards?
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,372
- And1: 9,921
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Norm2953 wrote:It would be interesting the Knicks offered Pistons FRP + Wash FRP + filler for Simons.
Pistons FRP might not convey at time soon but that pick protections drops from top 18 to 13 in 2025,
top 11 in 2026 and top 9 in 2027
Washingtons FRP is top12 protected in 2024, top 10 in 2025 and top 8 in 2026
Simons would be a solid get for the knicks and Portland could end up with just future SRP's but one has
to wonder if they are willing to roll the dice for future rewards?
I would probably need a NYK FRP with Top-8 protection to move Simons. Dont think the 2 highly protected picks gets it done.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,245
- And1: 13,071
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Those Mavs and Bucks picks don’t have much value, especially to the Blazers. Do the Knicks 2025 protected top5 and 15-30 through 2028 and then becomes unprotected. Blazers are going to want some legit value to move Simmons I would guess
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,372
- And1: 9,921
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
brackdan70 wrote:Those Mavs and Bucks picks don’t have much value, especially to the Blazers. Do the Knicks 2025 protected top5 and 15-30 through 2028 and then becomes unprotected. Blazers are going to want some legit value to move Simmons I would guess
Ya, thats the type of pick PDX would want - but it also encumbers NYK for years. I think they want to keep their own picks for a 3/3 offer if a superstar becomes avaliable. It makes a trade for Simons pretty hard as the picks they own are meh and their own picks should be kept in the war-chest for a bigger needle mover.
Again, Brogdan makes much more sense. Would only cost the WAS or DET FRP and they add a guy Thibs would love while keeping the war-chest intact.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,552
- And1: 98,793
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
brackdan70 wrote:Those Mavs and Bucks picks don’t have much value, especially to the Blazers. Do the Knicks 2025 protected top5 and 15-30 through 2028 and then becomes unprotected. Blazers are going to want some legit value to move Simmons I would guess
Bucks pick should be fairly late assuming healthy Giannis, though their core continues to age and the RS matters less and less. But the Mavs could easily turn over a lottery pick. Nobody can look at this Dallas team and think oh that's a top 10 team.
And nobody should be giving up a pick protected like that for Simons.
I think you are both overvaluing Simons and too sure of where picks are going to fall particularly with a maddeningly inconsistent Dallas team that just picked 10th last year.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
- Rockazoids
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,487
- And1: 2,223
- Joined: Jun 05, 2008
- Location: Cincinnati
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Texas Chuck wrote:brackdan70 wrote:Those Mavs and Bucks picks don’t have much value, especially to the Blazers. Do the Knicks 2025 protected top5 and 15-30 through 2028 and then becomes unprotected. Blazers are going to want some legit value to move Simmons I would guess
Bucks pick should be fairly late assuming healthy Giannis, though their core continues to age and the RS matters less and less. But the Mavs could easily turn over a lottery pick. Nobody can look at this Dallas team and think oh that's a top 10 team.
And nobody should be giving up a pick protected like that for Simons.
I think you are both overvaluing Simons and too sure of where picks are going to fall particularly with a maddeningly inconsistent Dallas team that just picked 10th last year.
Wow that's 2 times in a roll I agree with TC, were going to have to stop this. People are going to this something up.

Also NY didn't want to pay IQ $25 M so why would they want to pay Simons that while also turning over 2 1st?
Follow the science not some internet physician & get your shots.
Kerrsed wrote:Just thinking of this deal makes my ass hurt!
turk3d wrote: you're about to make me go old rem on you
GoNYK1288 wrote:You better clench your butt cheeks because the GB is about to have at you.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,552
- And1: 98,793
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Rockazoids wrote:Wow that's 2 times in a roll I agree with TC, were going to have to stop this.
Have no fear. I posted Grimes was only worth 2 2nd round picks in another thread. When you see that post you'll be right back to thinking my take is idiotic and order will be restored.

ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,245
- And1: 13,071
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Texas Chuck wrote:brackdan70 wrote:Those Mavs and Bucks picks don’t have much value, especially to the Blazers. Do the Knicks 2025 protected top5 and 15-30 through 2028 and then becomes unprotected. Blazers are going to want some legit value to move Simmons I would guess
Bucks pick should be fairly late assuming healthy Giannis, though their core continues to age and the RS matters less and less. But the Mavs could easily turn over a lottery pick. Nobody can look at this Dallas team and think oh that's a top 10 team.
And nobody should be giving up a pick protected like that for Simons.
I think you are both overvaluing Simons and too sure of where picks are going to fall particularly with a maddeningly inconsistent Dallas team that just picked 10th last year.
That’s a fair point on the Dallas Pick. At 24 yo Simmons has room to improve. He is an elite shooter and his contract is fair. I think blazers value him pretty highly and wouldn’t move him unless they get a really good return. Maybe tone down the protections in the pick I proposed, but I think they need better than the OP to move him.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
- Rockazoids
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,487
- And1: 2,223
- Joined: Jun 05, 2008
- Location: Cincinnati
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Texas Chuck wrote:Rockazoids wrote:Wow that's 2 times in a roll I agree with TC, were going to have to stop this.
Have no fear. I posted Grimes was only worth 2 2nd round picks in another thread. When you see that post you'll be right back to thinking my take is idiotic and order will be restored.
Yeah that what I'm talking about, let the good times roll. I haven't seen the Grimes post yet but I will be sure to disagree
with it when I see it.
Follow the science not some internet physician & get your shots.
Kerrsed wrote:Just thinking of this deal makes my ass hurt!
turk3d wrote: you're about to make me go old rem on you
GoNYK1288 wrote:You better clench your butt cheeks because the GB is about to have at you.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,086
- And1: 14,457
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Texas Chuck wrote:Rockazoids wrote:Wow that's 2 times in a roll I agree with TC, were going to have to stop this.
Have no fear. I posted Grimes was only worth 2 2nd round picks in another thread. When you see that post you'll be right back to thinking my take is idiotic and order will be restored.
God do I hope that's how other teams value him so our FO is forced to keep him and use one of our protected FRPs instead

Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,950
- And1: 12,077
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Do you really want to put 6'3 no defense Simons next to a small pg like Brunson? Also where are the touches for Simons, between Brunson, OG, Randle he definitely isn't putting up 15+ shots in NY.
I'd double down defensively for NY.
I'd double down defensively for NY.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,086
- And1: 14,457
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
LightTheBeam wrote:Do you really want to put 6'3 no defense Simons next to a small pg like Brunson? Also where are the touches for Simons, between Brunson, OG, Randle he definitely isn't putting up 15+ shots in NY.
I'd double down defensively for NY.
I have my doubts whether Simons is the right guy, but we desperately need a 3rd creator. We're relying on a career year from Donte DiVincenzo for non-Brundle creation right now. OG is a nice complementary guy, but he's not a throw him the ball and ask him to create guy.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,508
- And1: 477
- Joined: Feb 16, 2016
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
I think the offer is off for Simons.
It should be Fournier/Grimes/choice of 24 FRP for Simmons
It should be Fournier/Grimes/choice of 24 FRP for Simmons
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,398
- And1: 104
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
- Location: In the Knicks' Front Office
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
LightTheBeam wrote:Do you really want to put 6'3 no defense Simons next to a small pg like Brunson? Also where are the touches for Simons, between Brunson, OG, Randle he definitely isn't putting up 15+ shots in NY.
I'd double down defensively for NY.
I agree. I want to stay away from Simons whose offensive rating is 8 points lower than his defensive rating. His offense is not worth the horrible defense that he’ll provide.
Ironically, while agreeing with a Kings fan, I would actually really like the Knicks to trade for Harrison Barnes.
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
- MasterIchiro
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,388
- And1: 6,845
- Joined: Jan 18, 2013
- Location: The Dirty Water
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Knicks can hide his defense. This is overblown. If I'm the Blazers I want 2 firsts for him. He's a potential breakout candidate to become a leading scorer for a playoff team. He's exactly what the Knicks are (at least reportedly) looking for.
It has been written...
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
- KnicksManiac
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,173
- And1: 953
- Joined: Dec 05, 2003
- Location: NY
-
Re: Knicks: Simons Says So
Simons wouldn’t be my first choice, but if the cost to acquire him is 2 heavily protected first round picks, that’s worth the risk imho. We need a combo guard who is a microwave scorer and someone who knows how to distribute and handle the ball when Brunson is on the bench. Simons fits the bill. And then I assume we’d flip him in the off-season in a deal for a star.
I’d like to get Reath too.
Brunson/Simons/McBride
Donte/Simons/Grimes
OG/Grimes/Hart
Randle/Hart
Hartenstein/Reath
I’d like to get Reath too.
Brunson/Simons/McBride
Donte/Simons/Grimes
OG/Grimes/Hart
Randle/Hart
Hartenstein/Reath

Return to Trades and Transactions