Sandman88 wrote:If we’re getting 3 picks, there’s no way we getting mathurin, walker, or nesmith
I don't think the last has the same value as the first two.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer
Sandman88 wrote:If we’re getting 3 picks, there’s no way we getting mathurin, walker, or nesmith
bobbyp3588 wrote:PD28 wrote:If they won't include one of their young players, these picks better not be heavily protected.
There had better be a good young player involved.
These picks project to be late 20’s ffs.
redraptor77 wrote:Why not walker instead of Obi Top
yamadory wrote:TimeForChange wrote:
But Masai is washed
CazOnReal wrote:yamadory wrote:TimeForChange wrote:
But Masai is washed
I'm sorry but filler and 3 picks of unknown draft year, not to mention protections is a joke of a return for Siakam. If there's a prospect in there like Smith or Nembhard then this changes - and it goes without saying getting Walker or Mathurin would be a paradigm shift - but right now this is a paltry package for an All-NBA player, irrespective of their intentions or contract.
CazOnReal wrote:yamadory wrote:TimeForChange wrote:
But Masai is washed
I'm sorry but filler and 3 picks of unknown draft year, not to mention protections is a joke of a return for Siakam. If there's a prospect in there like Smith or Nembhard then this changes - and it goes without saying getting Walker or Mathurin would be a paradigm shift - but right now this is a paltry package for an All-NBA player, irrespective of their intentions or contract.
og for brown + 3 frps
pascal for iq + rj + detroit 2nd
tdotrep2 wrote:redraptor77 wrote:Why not walker instead of Obi Top
well... it's almost like the pacers don't want to give up walker
StopitLeo wrote:djsunyc made an interesting point in the latest Pacer rumor thread. Most people would probably be happy if it was:og for brown + 3 frps
pascal for iq + rj + detroit 2nd


bobbyp3588 wrote:
So, yeah, pretty much a done deal.
