dkb964 wrote:HotelVitale wrote:dkb964 wrote:
Yikes. Imagine paying a 34-35 year old Siakam 60M a year. It is not like his game will age well or anything.
34’s not that old these days and the cap should climb up too, at no point should his contract be more than like the 12th biggest in the league.
But yeah the point here is that you take a chance on a bad year or two to add meaningful talent now. For a team that will struggle to attract talent feels like the $ risk is pretty reasonable here.
Siakam is nowhere near as good as he was 3 or 4 years ago. People forget but he was a seen easily as a top 10-15 player then. He is not that guy anymore and I think he will continue to decline. His game is not suited to age well in my opinion. He has never been a good shooter from range and now he basically scores on drives to the paint. How is he going to do that when he loses a step ot two? He has regressed massively on defense. All the talking heads are saying he will slow down Giannis. It is laughable. I wish him the best but not sad to see him go at this point of his career.
Just stop man, he's having the most efficient offensive season of his career since the championship, which include his horrible November. Doing so on a team that was just didn't fit all season and with him playing out of position with a team full of guys that do and operate in the same areas as he does. Even with all that said he his turnaround since December is eye opening:
October/November First 19 games: 19.9pts, 7.1reb, 5.1ast, 0.8stll on 48/21/73 in 34.3mpg
Since December 1st (20 games): 24.3pts, 5.6reb, 4.7ast, 0.9stl on 56/44/78 in 35.1mpg
Also Pascal was never seen as top 10-15 player... ever.