Viper1500 wrote:BadMofoPimp wrote:Murray would be a great fit at PG. What would it take to get him? I wouldn't part with Suggs for Murray. I reckon they are looking for expirings and draft picks.
I'd do Fultz+ORL '24, Den '25 and a couple 2nds
I know that sounds like a bad offer but I don't think there is very high demand for Murray. Murray is a good starter, that's it.
I agree. We're currently slotted for the 15th pick. Add Denver's 1st and a couple of seconds? I'm not sure anyone wants to top that.
Thinking of the teams that could potentially want him, I'm not seeing a significantly better offer when evaluating both sides of the trade.
Lakers? Maybe if they include Austin (doubtful) and Atlanta thinks he's the answer next to Trae (highly doubtful considering the lack of defense with that pairing). Lakers also don't have much draft capital to include.
Pheonix? They have nothing to offer.
Knicks? This is a maybe. They have their picks but I wonder if they question pairing their small star guard with Murray like Atlanta tried. They have draft capital to use and could include Fournier as a matching expiring. Something like Evan, 2024 1st and 2025 Bucks 1st. I have my doubts that they would make this move but it is possible. It's also not a better deal than our theoretical deal. It could, however, lead to a small bidding war.
Warriors? This one may have legs if GSW is willing to trade Kuminga, Moody, and an expiring... and if Atlanta prefers that over our picks. That said, do the warriors really think adding another guard will fix their problems? I'm not sure how they play Steph, Murray, Klay, CP3, and Podziemski while losing size (Kuminga) and not adding any. Still this could be intriguing for both teams.
Pelicans? They would have a hard time matching salaries and have a ton of money already committed to CJ, Zion, and Ingram. Not sure they would be willing to trade players like Murphy, Herb, or Hawkins to make it happen. I think the price tag makes it difficult for them.
Am I missing anyone else?