WuTang_OG wrote:Despite various teams, including the Lakers and Knicks, reaching out to inquire about Brown's availability, the Raptors front office does like the veteran being a leading voice for their now young roster. Whether or not Brown is dealt ahead of the trade deadline comes down to Toronto's willingness to give him up. Various playoff teams have registered interest in him, but the Raptors don't necessarily have to trade Brown if they believe there is a better deal to be had in the offseason. The Raptors maintain rights to his deal and could always flip a contract like this in the offseason when teams have a little bit more financial flexibility.
Toronto is currently operating with the mindset that Brown can still be of value to them for the rest of the season and not just a player they need to find a way to move on from at the trade deadline.
Really hope this rhetoric is to drum up more offers.
We have no use long term for a guy like Bruce Brown. I like everything that he brings and if we were on pace to be a playoff team, I might understand a little more. But as of right now, we'd be making the same mistake we did with Pascal.
The guy has value now, with 1.5 years left on his deal. At the draft or during the summer, he's going to be an expiring deal and you'll probably get less. Not to mention, it seems based on the rumours so far that the Knicks have the best potential package for Brown. If you wait too long and they pivot to Murray (which I would have done a long time ago if I were them) or Clarkson, we may have to settle for an inferior package from another team.
Unless there are plans to use Brown's contract to acquire a guy like Jones, Murphy or Williams (shooting SF, low usage, POA defender) if Knicks are offering even a protected FRP (their own or the Dallas one), plus Grimes and Fournier for Brown, I'm afraid it's a move we absolutely need to make.
Then we can shift our focus to shipping out Trent.