Bogyo wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:Stix wrote:Does everyone think having Beal with his contract is worth not having cap flexability and trade assets?
It’s not. You could get valuable depth and defense with the money he gets.
It’s probably not as simple though but then again…I didn’t like any of the moves they made, expect the Ayton trade.
The original sin was the price of the KD trade. They really painted themselves in the corner with that - I'm not fully sure they weren't reeeeaaaallllyyyy close to it beforehand with that awful CP3 contract (originaloriginal sin?) and fornicAyton situation (worst ever original sin?).
So in a way the Beal trade was a no-brainer win in my book - that also came with a price. Basically we got a queen for a cornered in useless bishop and a pawn. We HAD to trade CP3 otherwise we'd be in hell right now, PLUS we got rid of Shamet. We had no other suitors for CP3, and damn sure noone lined up to get Shamet. If I look at all the available info there and fully realize the situation I'm already in, I make that trade 100 times out of 100. Even in hindsight. It made sense, and it worked out - and the "risk" of no flexibility was true beforhand as well, only in a worse situation with GrandPauls corpse on a 40 mill contract and Shamet taking up valuable oxygen on the bench, while also stealing 10 million dollars in broad daylight.
Now the price and the timing of the KD trade was a debacle, no matter how you slice it. Brooklyn had no leverage, we only would have had to wait for a couple of days to lower the price most likely - or up until the offseason in a worst case scenario. A true fckup of epic proportions.
CP could have been released after this year though. Wouldn't that help making moves to improve depth? I do agree with you about the KD trade.