UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#1 » by bkohler » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:20 pm

UTA OUT: Olynyk / THT / Protections changed to top 3 on 2024 pick
UTA IN: Bertans / 2 SRP
Why: UTA gets lower value than it potentially could for Olynyk but no longer has to worry about where they are finishing to end the season as the pick will end up conveying almost certainly.

OKC OUT: 2 SRP (dealers choice) / Bertans
OKC IN: Olynyk / THT / Protections changed to top 3 on 2024 pick
Why: OKC gets a quality backup big who won't dramatically alter their future plans or cap but give them a little more oomph for the playoff run. Can most likely buyout THT and have this be a neutral salary trade as well as saving them the 5M from Bertans next year.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,924
And1: 7,867
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#2 » by jayjaysee » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:22 pm

Utah lowers their protection just for 2nds?

And that cost involves getting to turn Bertans into Kelly.

I’m pretty confused by the valuations.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,143
And1: 17,648
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#3 » by babyjax13 » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:24 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Utah lowers their protection just for 2nds?

And that cost involves getting to turn Bertans into Kelly.

I’m pretty confused by the valuations.

It's a terrible draft year. I'd much rather have this pick convey than not.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,924
And1: 7,867
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#4 » by jayjaysee » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:33 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Utah lowers their protection just for 2nds?

And that cost involves getting to turn Bertans into Kelly.

I’m pretty confused by the valuations.

It's a terrible draft year. I'd much rather have this pick convey than not.


I think OKC would be happy with that. Getting Cody Williams or Matas or Flip instead of waiting til next year… I don’t think this draft is as bad as some posters here
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,143
And1: 17,648
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#5 » by babyjax13 » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:37 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Utah lowers their protection just for 2nds?

And that cost involves getting to turn Bertans into Kelly.

I’m pretty confused by the valuations.

It's a terrible draft year. I'd much rather have this pick convey than not.


I think OKC would be happy with that. Getting Cody Williams or Matas or Flip instead of waiting til next year… I don’t think this draft is as bad as some posters here

I agree that it's not abysmal, but I think there is some really hard fall off and no true #1 caliber prospect. You've also identified two of the prospects I like (Cody, Matas) and I wouod be disappointed if we missed out on one of them. I am not sure what Utah is owed here.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,495
And1: 98,535
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#6 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:44 pm

yeah the direness of this year's draft is so overblown. There is no Wemby. Doesn't mean there is no talent.

Now I get Utah maybe just wanting to clear off their debt. But they are still due more value in this deal. This just feels like free stuff for OKC as is.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#7 » by bkohler » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:45 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Utah lowers their protection just for 2nds?

And that cost involves getting to turn Bertans into Kelly.

I’m pretty confused by the valuations.



The real value in this trade IS getting to lower the protections. At the moment, I have to assume that OKC would much prefer the pick conveys in 25 or 26, where the draft would be much stronger, the protections lower, and they'll be closer to a cash crunch where a young cost-controlled player would be very helpful.

Olynyk is the sweeter, and that alone is worth more than the chance to lower the protections, hence the 2 2nds.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 3,490
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#8 » by SkyHook » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:46 pm

bkohler wrote:UTA OUT: Olynyk / THT / Protections changed to top 3 on 2024 pick
UTA IN: Bertans / 2 SRP
Why: UTA gets lower value than it potentially could for Olynyk but no longer has to worry about where they are finishing to end the season as the pick will end up conveying almost certainly.

OKC OUT: 2 SRP (dealers choice) / Bertans
OKC IN: Olynyk / THT / Protections changed to top 3 on 2024 pick
Why: OKC gets a quality backup big who won't dramatically alter their future plans or cap but give them a little more oomph for the playoff run. Can most likely buyout THT and have this be a neutral salary trade as well as saving them the 5M from Bertans next year.


This is pretty good. Make it three SRPs —specifically these: 2024 HOU + 2025 PHI + 2026 GSW — and I’m sold.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 3,490
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#9 » by SkyHook » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:48 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:yeah the direness of this year's draft is so overblown. There is no Wemby. Doesn't mean there is no talent.

Now I get Utah maybe just wanting to clear off their debt. But they are still due more value in this deal. This just feels like free stuff for OKC as is.


There are going to be some really good players in every draft, this one included, but the bolded is the core reason. And I’d hold out for three SRPs: 2024 HOU + 2025 PHI + 2026 GSW.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,775
And1: 25,035
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#10 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:49 pm

Sure. I’d even make it top 3 protected and then 2 2nds.

You can keep THT.
bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#11 » by bkohler » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:49 pm

Part of my reasoning here is I don't think Olynyk could get the 24 pick straight up, but that pick seems to be dictating much of how the Jazz are approaching this season. So get some seconds + the pick protections changed but not removed. It limits the high-end value if the Jazz jump in the lottery but makes it a near certainty the pick conveys and, as Chuck mentioned, gets them out of debt.

As a Jazz fan I'd be happy for OKC to throw in any additional value they feel like! But I think we'd get enough value out of it as it (give or take a SRP).

Obviously, if there's a good FRP on the table for Olynyk, you do that, but if you're getting the 6 SRP type deal... well, I'd rather have less of those and our picks unencumbered.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,143
And1: 17,648
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#12 » by babyjax13 » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:52 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:yeah the direness of this year's draft is so overblown. There is no Wemby. Doesn't mean there is no talent.

Now I get Utah maybe just wanting to clear off their debt. But they are still due more value in this deal. This just feels like free stuff for OKC as is.

There will be good players, but the distribution is going to be much more random than normal. There are no great college players with super projectable skillsets, the ignite class is struggling, and the international class is good but with no one that can truly redeem the lack of top end talent and depth. Like, I'd be really happy with one of Sarr/Buzelis/Williams, and maybe ever one of Saluan/Topic/Holland/Saluan, but most drafts are deeper than this, with better (and more differentiable) top end talent. This also allows us more flexibility with trades moving forward. Again, I'm not sure the proper value here, but there is a pretty obvious incentive to have this obligation over with.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 3,490
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#13 » by SkyHook » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:52 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Sure. I’d even make it top 3 protected and then 2 2nds.

You can keep THT.


Sending the expiring THT contract this year (partially) offsets losing $5.25MM in cap space for the Bertans dead money.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#14 » by bkohler » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:53 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Sure. I’d even make it top 3 protected and then 2 2nds.

You can keep THT.



No deal, you've got to take him. Please take him... unless you want a fresh John Collins? Almost like new? Low miles? No... okay.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 3,490
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#15 » by SkyHook » Fri Feb 2, 2024 5:55 pm

bkohler wrote:Part of my reasoning here is I don't think Olynyk could get the 24 pick straight up, but that pick seems to be dictating much of how the Jazz are approaching this season. So get some seconds + the pick protections changed but not removed. It limits the high-end value if the Jazz jump in the lottery but makes it a near certainty the pick conveys and, as Chuck mentioned, gets them out of debt.

As a Jazz fan I'd be happy for OKC to throw in any additional value they feel like! But I think we'd get enough value out of it as it (give or take a SRP).

Obviously, if there's a good FRP on the table for Olynyk, you do that, but if you're getting the 6 SRP type deal... well, I'd rather have less of those and our picks unencumbered.


Bingo. Better to reduce the uncertainty surrounding that pick to a moonshot.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
sip
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,250
And1: 1,327
Joined: Apr 14, 2009

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#16 » by sip » Fri Feb 2, 2024 7:12 pm

Wow this is a beyond stupid trade idea for the jazz. If we finish in the top 10 then we 100% want to keep our pick because we have a lack of talent and while this draft may lack stars players it is filled with high level role player prospects. Such a stupid idea.
bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#17 » by bkohler » Fri Feb 2, 2024 8:09 pm

sip wrote:Wow this is a beyond stupid trade idea for the jazz. If we finish in the top 10 then we 100% want to keep our pick because we have a lack of talent and while this draft may lack stars players it is filled with high level role player prospects. Such a stupid idea.



Keeping the 25 and 26 picks are much more important than keeping the 24 pick. Were already doing all we can to make sure it’s conveyed in what would likely be the 12-15 spot… what makes it so bad to try and convey it if we fall to say 8-10?
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,388
And1: 7,523
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#18 » by Dadouv47 » Fri Feb 2, 2024 8:19 pm

This is wayyyy to good for OKC. I know this draft sucks but it's unlikely you won't find a couple of future all stars in the top 10. Gettind rid of Olynyk on top of that (who has a pretty decent value IMO) is crazy.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,388
And1: 7,523
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#19 » by Dadouv47 » Fri Feb 2, 2024 8:21 pm

Should at least move the protection to top 6 so u can tank as much as you want since u won't reach the worst 6-7 teams in the league anyway and ask for the worst of LAC/OKC 2024 FRP.

...and that's still bad for Utah I think.
bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: UTA/OKC - Olynyk/THT - Bertans 

Post#20 » by bkohler » Fri Feb 2, 2024 8:31 pm

I find this hilarious that the majority of the Jazz fans are like - 'Yeah, okay.. not awesome, but not horrible'

And OKC fans seem to think they're not paying enough.

Might be the weirdest trade I've ever made.

Return to Trades and Transactions